Cory's Corner: Season Isn't Over
The Packers' offense has to pick up the slack now with the defense's best player out for the season.

DENVER — That’s not all folks.
I’ve heard so many people say that the Packers’ season is now done after Micah Parsons went down with an ACL tear in a 34-26 Broncos win at Empower Field at Mile High Sunday.
I disagree.
Obviously the Packers are not the same team without Parsons, who turned into a one-man wrecking crew by tilting offensive line coverage his way. But the Packers can find other ways to create pressure. The Packers could send linebacker Edgerrin Cooper on a blitz or perhaps Lukas Van Ness will come out of hibernation and become the first round talent that Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst expected him to be.
But this is going to sound weird and crazy but with Parsons going down, the offense is now under the microscope even more. The Packers were in this game until the end and that was with four Brandon McManus field goals. Unless the Packers want to drum up memories of the 2014 NFC title game, you cannot settle for field goals against a very good team on the road.
“The game the whole day felt weird, even when we were up, the game felt weird,” said Josh Jacobs, who had 73 yards rushing and a touchdown on 12 carries. “We got in the red zone a few times, didn’t score. We had a lot more penalties than we did the last several weeks. We look at this film and we know if we clean up a few things here or there it could be a totally different game. It still came down to the wire. They’re a really good team. It’s a really good team they have and we’ll see them again.”
He’s right. Denver is a really good team. The Broncos are currently the No. 1 seed in the AFC thanks to one of the best defenses in football. But here’s the thing, the Packers racked up 362 total yards and 115 rushing yards against a team that was averaging only 89 rushing yards per game.
Like I said heading into this game, the result really didn’t matter. Since the Packers won the first meeting with the Bears, Green Bay’s most important game of the season is now at Chicago. The game at Denver would’ve been nice, but it wasn’t necessary.
Now with Parsons, Devonte Wyatt and Tucker Kraft all out, many are punting on the rest of the season. And that is simply not true. Let’s not forget that being able to run the football is paramount in the playoffs. If the Packers can do that well, they have a chance.
Which is why, if the Packers can get Jacobs healthy, they will be in a great spot. His knee hasn’t been right since he banged it in New York and now the Packers are going to need him on a short week on Saturday night at Chicago.
I would compare Sunday’s loss to Denver like Chicago’s loss to Green Bay a couple weeks ago. Nobody really knew who the Bears were because they were beating up on marginal teams. Losing a close game to one of the best teams in the league is a feather in your cap because it showed that when your best defensive player and your best blocker are out and you’re getting barely anything from the tight end position — and you nearly win a shocker on the road.
This team has had plenty to hang their head about this year. The receiving corps was gutted with injuries, the offensive line hasn’t been consistent and even with Parsons prowling around in the opposing team’s backfield, another guy hasn’t really stepped up.
But what I really like is, despite all that, they have gotten off the mat. They keep responding.
Now, this version of the Packers is going to look much different mainly because if you blitz too much, a secondary which hasn’t been very good to begin with, could turn into chopped liver in an instant.
That’s a risk I’m willing to live with.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn
__________________________




Comments (110)
KenEllis
December 16, 2025 at 07:22 am
If the goal for 2025 was to compete for a Super Bowl, the season is indeed over.
If the goal was to make the playoffs and possibly win a game before bowing out, then sure the season is not over.
Spin it any way you want, but Packer fans as a group are not all blind homers and they see what the pass rush looks like without Micah (looking at you Gary & LVN) and what the CBs look like even when he is terrorizing the QB.
There is a reason MLF looked like he wanted to cry on Sunday, he knows .
LambeauPlain
December 16, 2025 at 07:47 am
The season is not over for the Browns either. (Well, yes it is, after 3 more games)
The best pass rusher in the NFC cannot be replaced by scheme, but scheme is what Hafley must dial up. The Next 3 games and the playoffs (should they get a ticket) are going to determine the demand for Hafley as a HC candidate. He knows that too. Interesting times for Jeff.
The greater concern is the OL. When PFF makes Kinnard the top rated OL in Denver...yikes. The OL is a leaky dike and every week it seems different holes spring leaks. The season long problem remains a very dangerous problem for making the playoffs and playing deep. Love and his arsenal of skill players can still score points but when the game is on the line, the OL gets beat too often.
murf7777
December 16, 2025 at 08:09 am
“The best pass rusher in the NFC cannot be replaced by scheme“. So tell me how do the Seahawks, Rams & NE do it without the best pass rusher? They scheme and get the most out of their players.
The best pass rusher doesn’t guarantee you anything. All you have to do is look at the teams who have them. LV, Cinci & Cleveland.
We forget 2010 too quickly! No we didn’t lose a player of Parsons, but we lost a lot of quality players. It’s time to scheme up some other players to get a line to the QB. It might work, it might not and I can’t wait for Saturday night to find out.
LambeauPlain
December 16, 2025 at 09:31 am
All I am stating is the obvious...Parson cannot be replaced by scheme or Hafley would have routinely used scheme with him in it and made the D even more potent.
If you are advocating the Packers Defense is as good without Parsons as with him...frankly that is rose colored glasses analysis.
The Packers have been one of the lowest blitzing teams in the NFL this season...for a good reason. With Parsons, Hafley could FINALLY create pressure with the front 4 and defend the pass with the other 7...this was his eventual stated goal when he arrived in Green Bay. Even then, they have been susceptible to the pass. Nix had his best passing game of the year after Parsons went down.
Defending the pass with scheme blitzing to get pressure creates even more pressure on the pass D...as was incredibly evident Sunday. The Broncos proceeded to score consecutive TDs on long, clock chewing drives. Packers could not stop them. 3 long TD drives...& game over as the O had just one FG on their last several possessions of the 2nd half.
Going forward, the D needs what they did last season...getting off the field with more turnovers and more three and outs like the first halves of the last two games.
Turnovers are there, just being routinely dropped. Getting three and outs is going to be more difficult without Parsons.
I wish it were not so...but it is. Part of the best defensive plan going forward needs the O to be the long driving, clock chewing, scoring unit...and keep the D off the field... keep them fresh for the 2nd half.
murf7777
December 16, 2025 at 09:45 am
No, I’m not saying we’re a better defense without Parsons. That would be idiotic, I’m saying there are other ways to make it work through schemes. As for your point about how the Packers’ defense performed while blitzing, I’d argue they did fine, especially since they had at least three chances at interceptions. If they had converted two out of the possible five, this debate on this point wouldn't of seen the light of day. We have some very good players; we will find out how good Hafley is over the next few games.
LambeauPlain
December 16, 2025 at 10:06 am
I was mostly responding to your comment "The best pass rusher doesn’t guarantee you anything." implied the Defense did not get their expected guarantees fulfilled with the trade.
I respectfully disagree. The Parsons guarantees were met.
Guam
December 16, 2025 at 09:51 am
"Turnovers are there, just being routinely dropped. Getting three and outs is going to be more difficult without Parsons."
And that is it in a nutshell for this defense LP. Parsons can't be replaced, but his loss can be mitigated through turnovers. Unfortunately the Packer defense is 25th in the league in forcing turnovers this season and the butterfingered secondary is largely responsible for that standing. If they can start picking a few off, the Packers will be okay in the post Parsons season but that may be a big ask.
LambeauPlain
December 16, 2025 at 10:11 am
The forced fumble created by Parsons Sunday was a clinic how to get them. They got T/Os by the bushels last year. This year Hafley double down and coached for turnovers even more and they mostly disappeared.
Football is a crazy game. Turnovers are both luck and ball awareness and swarming it to it. They still swarm and tackle really well. Need some of that luck...or more stickem on the hands.
dobber
December 16, 2025 at 08:15 am
"The OL is a leaky dike and every week it seems different holes spring leaks. The season long problem remains a very dangerous problem for making the playoffs and playing deep."
The bottom line is that when the offense is forced to be one-dimensional, the OL has issues. Allen was a beast inside. Bonitto was in Walker's head all day. This was probably the best defensive front 7 in the league playing in front of an all world CB and a pretty good, physical S. That said: go back and count the number of times Greenlaw or Hufanga threw a shoulder into a pile a step after the whistle or led with their heads going into a tackle. Greenlaw in particular. It worked--they got into the Packers' heads, and the Packers are getting a reputation for being goaded.
People seem to ignore the fact that Denver has likely the best defense in the league right now, and they did what they do well--they keep opponents out of the end zone. On the road you need to score 7s and not 3s. Turn one of those first-half FGs into a TD and that changes the complexion of the game completely.
Coldworld
December 16, 2025 at 09:08 am
Pff did not rate Kinnard well as a pass blocker. They rated him as extremely good in the run game. His pass blocking grade was just barely adequate. Pff also blamed Belton and Banks for almost everything. Based on what I saw, I’d question that apportionment.
greengold
December 16, 2025 at 10:35 am
So RUN THE FREAKING ROCK ON CHI. Incessantly.
CHI ranks #22 in Run D. CHI ranks #23 in rushing yds allowed. CHI ranks #29 in YPC allowed. And, they are down there in the bottom rankings in a host of other Run D stats, while GB is Top 5 in most categories, Top 10 throughout...
Give Love most of the week off, by handing off. There's a lot to like with that strategy. POUND THAT ROCK.
Leatherhead
December 16, 2025 at 09:10 am
The goal, Ken, is to win the division and make the playoffs. That's always the goal. There are simply too many variables (like injuries to key players) to say it's Super Bowl
I would remind you that every single week, teams win games without Micah Parsons. I would remind you that the Packers won games before Micah Parsons came here. And we did it with a DC who isn't nearly the massive genius of Hafley.
KenEllis
December 16, 2025 at 09:56 am
I have no doubt YOUR goal is to simply win the division and make the playoffs Leather.
But that is not my goal and I would hope that the Packers organization shares THE goal of competing for a Lombardi Trophy.
And I would remind you that the last time the Packers went to a Super Bowl 15 years ago they did not win the division.
They may hang banners for winning the NFC North in Minnesota (2022), Detroit (2023 & 2024), and Chicago (2025?), but in Green Bay the goal is, or at least used to be, something 1 of those 3 loser franchises has not done in 40 years and the other 2 have never done — winning a Super Bowl.
NFLfan
December 16, 2025 at 11:08 am
Ken-your comments are insightful--the responding posters have been sent to baby-sit you as you are threatening the status quo. It's always the same 2-4.
dobber
December 16, 2025 at 01:38 pm
Bigfoot called from its winter home with Nessie at the bottom of Loch Ness. It wants its computer back.
TKWorldWide
December 16, 2025 at 06:59 pm
LOL
Packerpasty
December 16, 2025 at 11:15 am
I have enough NFL north div. hats now….makes for a good year but I’m tired of watching other teams with better coaching play on after the first round..
Leatherhead
December 16, 2025 at 01:08 pm
Ken, I want to make sure I understand this. We have a $500M/year business that will fall short of their goal almost every year. You think that's a sound plan?
Coaching HS football, I never showed up for work thinking the goal was to win the state title; I wanted to win the District, because then you got invited to t he playoffs.
Same thing here. Win your division. It gets you into the playoffs and you get the first game at home.
Once you're in the playoffs.....as you pointed out, even a Wild Card team can put it together for a couple of games.
If your goal....your ONLY goal...is to get to the Super Bowl, then you have to make the playoffs, get to the Championship game, and then win. MY goal, and I think the organization's, is to win the division. After that, it depends on your health, your opponent's health, bounces of the ball, officiating, and a dozen other odd variables that you have no control over. If you survive the first week, you're one of the four best teams in the Conference. That's a good season.
dobber
December 16, 2025 at 01:36 pm
You can only win the game in front of you this week with the players you have against the players they have.
You can't win 20 or 4 or even 2 at a time.
This is what evades a lot of people.
Leatherhead
December 16, 2025 at 01:41 pm
True. I heard today that if the Packers and Bears tie, and the Lions lose, they'd both clinch playoff spots??
dobber
December 16, 2025 at 01:48 pm
The Packers need to win 2 of 3 to clinch a playoff bid on their own. Every Detroit loss reduces that number by 1. If one of those wins is over the Bears, they win the division.
LambeauPlain
December 16, 2025 at 02:21 pm
Thank you, sir!
KenEllis
December 16, 2025 at 03:41 pm
Leather I want to make sure I have this right, you are comparing the expectations of a high school football program in which the players are unpaid and it’s head coach is likely also a Chemistry or phy ed teacher to the expectations of the PROFESSIONAL football team known as the Green Bay Packers? Really?
If so, I think we’ve unearthed the source of our disconnect. You keep proudly wearing those sweatshirts celebrating your team’s conference championships and I’ll keep hoping the Packers, as one of the 16 teams competing in the NFC, someday return to the Super Bowl rather than celebrating the fact the Packers just might be one of the 7 NFC teams that get to participate in the post-season.
Leatherhead
December 16, 2025 at 05:42 pm
Look at it this way. If the Packers make the playoffs, I'll be happy. But you won't be happy unless we win it all.
Generally speaking, I think you try to win your division....that's your goal at the beginning of the season. Once you've been invited to the party, anything can happen.
You can't win the Super Bowl without making the playoffs. It's the first step. And I think reaching the Championship game is a big deal and I'll keep wearing those sweatshirts. Maybe I'll start an Only Fans page so people can see.
You can have any expectation you want, and so can I, but I'm pretty sure the Packers organization prioritizes being a consistent challenger, because you can't win the Super Bowl unless you make the playoffs.
KenEllis
December 16, 2025 at 06:43 pm
Nah, I'll look at it my way, which is if the Packers once again scrape their way into the playoffs as a 7th seed only to meekly bow out before reaching the Super Bowl, I'll be disappointed.
I fully understand that you, personally, are perfectly happy with Green Bay losing in the playoffs well short of the Super Bowl. That is certainly your prerogative.
What I do not countenance is those who insist on lecturing other fans who want the Packers to actually compete for Lombardi Trophies that they need, as you do, to celebrate the Packers simply for making the playoffs.
As for you being "pretty sure the Packers organization prioriitizes being a consistent challenger" over winning Super Bowls, while that organziational approach would no doubt warm your heart, I consider your contention to be a sad and unpersuasive attempt to rationalize the team's 15-year absence from the Super Bowl.
Go Pack Go.
LambeauPlain
December 16, 2025 at 02:19 pm
"Titletown" is more than a brand. It is both history, results, and expectations. And the only NFL franchise whose owners' Balance Sheet is devoted entirely to the Team.
The Lombardi needs to be the #1 Team Goal every season.
Just beat the bares.
tommynak
December 16, 2025 at 03:53 pm
Glad your not in my fox hole with me, don't need your wet diapers
tommynak
December 16, 2025 at 04:00 pm
Glad your not in my fox hole, don't need your wet diapers.
murf7777
December 16, 2025 at 07:40 am
My central point is that the "next man up" philosophy is a valid mantra, rooted in the fact that anyone skilled enough to make an NFL roster is a very good player. I was making this argument in this forum yesterday and getting continuously downvoted, which I expected, as I wanted to offer a different perspective from the masses.
My primary example was using Kinnard:
Some fans were slamming his game as bad.
PFF subsequently rated him as the team's third-best offensive player.
Another player I’ve highlighted is Musgrave, I’ve been impressed with him so far.
This highlights the crucial disconnect: some fans react emotionally to what seems like visible mistakes, while objective analysis, like PFF's play-by-play grading, captures overall consistency. History proves the mantra works; often, the "next man up" performs so well that the injured starter never gets their job back.
Who might be the next man up?….LVN, one of the 700lbs of beef we brought in two weeks ago, Musgrave, Kinnard, Gary, Hobbs, etc…it could be any or all of them. Let’s Go, beat da bears!
dobber
December 16, 2025 at 08:07 am
"I was making this argument in this forum yesterday and getting continuously downvoted, which I expected, as I wanted to offer a different perspective from the masses."
The last game was a loss. That means the "only happy when it rains" crowd dominates the posts until about Friday.
Coldworld
December 16, 2025 at 09:09 am
Next man up works to an extent. However, the next man up has to be similar or we have to find a way to unlock a talent hitherto obscured. In the case of Tom, I don’t see an obvious candidate. Watson’s closest comparative as a size speed option is probably the never tried Neyor on the PS or the very banged up Williams. The one thing we do know is it’s onr of the holdovers.
We have no Parsons equivalent, we do have Cox and he might help based on last year. Oliver could too as a designated rusher if we are willing to gamble on inexperienced talent. If we just try to muddle through with the next man on the depth chart and without adapting scheme and calls, I don’t see the gap being bridged well enough to matter.
To get through this we will have to trust talent over experience and forgot the merely dependable. We will need to blitz more, we need to find a 6th OL if it’s not Kinnard. We need to be imaginative and brave and to adopt a risk accepting approach to personnel and tactics: a nothing to lose approach. That’s what McCarthy did and it proved infectious.
jannesbjornson
December 16, 2025 at 10:02 am
McCarthy had Woodson and Tramon Williams at the corners. Clay in his prime, Raji inside and Walden came on down the stretch run. I don't see this type of player still standing for the Pack. And I must mention the guy he didn't resign, Cullen Jenkins.
murf7777
December 16, 2025 at 10:33 am
You're right on, they don't have a Woodson and Clay anymore, but they do still have some really good talent across the board. Enough to get to the SB? That's a tall task even with Parsons so probably not, the odds are heavily against that. That said, I won't lose hope and the next man up mantra.
LambeauPlain
December 16, 2025 at 04:15 pm
The Defense does have good talent on Defense. The front 4 is a problem. The LB core is stellar. The DBs are above average (X, Williams, Bullard tip them above average).
Decent depth remains. Cox, Jr. Hopper, Oladapo, Haden. Every NFL defense has lost starters, or have guys playing dinged up. Hafley has to go to work.
LaFleur needs to coach a team wide complementary plan. He needs to work on that. They have talent.
Boneman
December 16, 2025 at 07:42 am
There is no way our Super Bowl opportunity is gone! Nobody in the NFL today is hands down dominant and in the NFC nobody scares me. The Rams? No way and now Devonte is out. The Seahawks? No way they still have Sam. The Eagles? Maybe but we almost beat them once and can win if things are cleaner. Even if we become underdogs now because of injuries (remember, we were favorites this week, on the road!). If we can just play a bit cleaner of a game we can beat anybody. It's on the Packers themselves and I suspect this team likes the undog position better than the favorite. The key will be Watson. If he can get back and play, we can win.
LambeauPlain
December 16, 2025 at 09:50 am
Packers have a talented roster. Can they get hot and go on a run? Sure!
Crazy year with the NFL parity party in full swing. I am expecting the playoffs to be riddled with upsets. Then anything can happen.
I remain optimistic for the Packers. Was more so Sunday before the Broncos. Losing a talented leader like Parsons dented my optimism. Like the Packers, I am not giving up on them. Far from it.
Leatherhead
December 16, 2025 at 05:43 pm
Can the Packers get hot? Yes!!! Beat the Bears and we'll be in first place with two games to go.
T7Steve
December 16, 2025 at 07:52 am
I'm with you, Cory.
I'll keep grasping at straws and cheering my team till the end. Sometimes the best thing you can hope is to come out of a game healthy and that's something to cheer for going forward.
Always know we can beat the Bears regardless of the people we put on the field. Still can sweep the division, and that will help them limping into the playoffs.
dobber
December 16, 2025 at 08:01 am
If the Packers sweep out the season--which very well could happen--they won't be limping into the playoffs. It's also possible the Packers finish with a whimper and bow out.
The Lions are lurking in the background waiting to see if either the Packers or Bears struggle to finish. They've got two games they should win, and then can be the Packers' best friends against the Bears in the final week.
murf7777
December 16, 2025 at 08:14 am
Hey Dobber, I think it is more likely the Bears falter than GB. Not that the bears haven’t shown they are a good team, I just think their schedule is horrid and their QB isn’t up to snuff. They have GB, at SF and back home for the Lions. Of course, anything can happen, that’s why they play the game!
dobber
December 16, 2025 at 08:21 am
The Bears also get the benefit of 2 of 3 (and 3 of their last 4) at home. The Packers and Lions played 3 of their last 4 on the road. But I agree: if they win the division, they've ended up earning it.
Coldworld
December 16, 2025 at 09:30 am
Whoever does not win on Sunday is limping. It’s as simple and stark as that. Will LaFleur and Hafley step up to this challenge or implode?
This is when coaches earn their paychecks. This is when coaches show their mettle.
dobber
December 16, 2025 at 07:54 am
The goal is to be 1-0 every week. If you're pretty good at that, you've got a shot at winning the whole thing. You're limited every week to doing that with the players and coaches in your locker room. We'll have to see how this team responds to these personnel losses, but if they try to just plug-and-play the next guy, I don't think it goes very well. They need to play a little more on the edge, be aggressive, and force the issue on both sides of the ball.
Again, this defense is now mostly the 2024 defense minus a couple DL. This is where Hafley shows if he's the leader and strategist people seem to think he is...because if he wants to just rush 4 and play coverage, they're going to have to score 30+ every week to make that go. If LaF goes into a cocoon and decides to lean even further into the run game, I don't think that's a winning strategy.
T7Steve
December 16, 2025 at 08:22 am
"If LaF goes into a cocoon and decides to lean even further into the run game, I don't think that's a winning strategy."
The run game would be perfect IF they had the O-line to do it with. Would love to see the RBs churn out some long-sustained TD scoring drives this weekend and for the rest of the season for that matter.
I'm afraid you're right though. They don't have the horses to pull it off. In fact, have struggled to even match their output from last season running the ball.
dobber
December 16, 2025 at 08:51 am
The run game is still a big part of what the Packers do--you just can't take the ball out of 8's hands completely, and all 3 of the Packers' remaining opponents defenses have been susceptible to the run. But they can't become even more run focused down the stretch unless game flow dictates it.
Attack the middle zones. Throw the crossers underneath. Take your shots when they're there. Watson may be no more than a decoy if he plays this week, but if he's on the field opposing DCs will need to respect his deep game.
T7Steve
December 16, 2025 at 10:21 am
I consider the running game or should I say an extension of the running game is passing to the backs. They just really started doing that last week to any extent and it really helps the line and Love. Those short swing passes to the flats and just across the LOS just put someone like Jacobs running out in the open. I think those helped to extend Aaron Jones' career.
jannesbjornson
December 16, 2025 at 10:34 am
Toss to the RBs out of the backfield at a higher frequency. He and Brooks have solid hands. Let them go 1:1 with the LBs. LaFleur has to open up the playbook. Better effort up front from the O line starts now; if not, Love may be the next guy rolled into the infirmary.
Leatherhead
December 16, 2025 at 09:11 am
This defense is the 2024 defense with some different Dlinemen.
Coldworld
December 16, 2025 at 09:25 am
Regardless of last week, Hafley’s use or non use of big men against the Bears remains a pivotal question. We are getting no penetration but can we pivot to at least bring stout? Will we adapt or just back our own vision and ignore the lesson? Hafley is also going to have to dramatically change his approach to chasing down Williams outside the pocket and covering out left sideline.
Leatherhead
December 16, 2025 at 05:45 pm
All things considered, would you rather have the Bears run or pass?
Swisch
December 16, 2025 at 09:44 am
It's an opportunity for the Packers to reassess their approach and perhaps find something that works beyond expectations -- especially if the players buy in and bring their best effort.
On offense and defense, I like mixing it up.
Don't emphasize the run all of the time, and don't emphasize the pass all of the time. Take some shots downfield; but also have a variety of short passes available, especially when the pass rush is fierce. Maybe roll out our QB at times with the option to pass, run, or throw out of bounds.
Don't blitz all of the time, and don't rush four all of the time (and never, or at least almost never, rush three). Perhaps play both zone coverage and man-to-man.
Predictability kills. We don't have to be complicated, but creative. Let's try to outsmart the opposition as much as we try to outhit and outrun them.
Let's motivate and utilize all of the players still available to contribute to the cause.
Let's see just how far we can go.
TXCHEESE
December 16, 2025 at 08:15 am
Everything is still in front of the the team. I know that with 3 games left in 2010, no one was touting GB as Super Bowl material, but that team ramped it up, and kicked some serious butt, at the end of the season.
Every game is winnable. You just have to be the better team on game day. No previous performance matters.
BuckyBadger
December 16, 2025 at 08:29 am
I was at the Lions game that year when Rodgers went down and they had to go to NE the next week to play the Pats. It felt pretty hopeless leaving Ford Field that day. The team can still rally.
LambeauPlain
December 16, 2025 at 10:00 am
In 2010 the Packers were not considered a Playoff lock and had to win their last 2 games to get a last seeded ticket.
Then they won another 4 straight as Rodgers got hot and the Defense played really well.
Whatever has happened in the past can happen again.
BuckyBadger
December 16, 2025 at 08:35 am
Back in August LVN was the going to be the x-factor. If he along with Gary could have a good year the pass rush might have been fixed. We are basically back to that now. LVN was having a great camp and he started the year out looking pretty good as well. The guys left will have to pick up the slack and the group is capable of that.
dobber
December 16, 2025 at 08:57 am
Without Wyatt in the middle pushing the pocket, the Packers will have to be more aggressive in how they attack QBs--they send McDuffie a couple times on Sunday, and there were plays where Cooper and Walker were getting int he backfield. LVN was active on Sunday and looked like he was moving pretty well. I think they'll activate Cox this week and he'll get some rotational snaps on passing downs.
How that all cobbles together is the real question. I think they'll go after Williams on Saturday.
murf7777
December 16, 2025 at 09:51 am
Cox and LVN could be the X-factors, with Cox showing impressive rushing skills. We need LVN to have a Jordy Nelson type where he came into his own the latter part of year 3! They have the pieces in place; they just need to figure out how to put them together effectively.
NFLfan
December 16, 2025 at 10:51 am
Williams can out-run Gary and LVN.
KenEllis
December 16, 2025 at 10:31 am
Yeah Gutey took a good look at the LVN X-factor and shipped two first round picks and Kenny Clark to Dallas for Parsons.
LVN has 1.5 sacks this season in the 7 games he’s played and just 8.5 sacks total over his first 41 games in the NFL.
No amount of puffery can make up for the fact LVN is just another guy.
NFLfan
December 16, 2025 at 10:49 am
Yeah, but he's Gutey's guy....makes him look bad--boo hoo.
LeotisHarris
December 16, 2025 at 08:42 am
There's anecdotal evidence available on incidence of people turning into chopped liver in an instant. It's frightening. No one really talks about it, much like the drummers in Spinal Tap. Count your blessings, I guess.
NFLfan
December 16, 2025 at 10:47 am
Why don't you apply your considerable wit and intelligence to something more important such as investigating 'the core of the Packer's recurrent issues'--hint-(not MLF)
LeotisHarris
December 16, 2025 at 05:05 pm
Such an odd post from a gentle soul who pleads with others to simply scroll by her missives if they disagree with her.
Carry on, fangirl, and be well.
Swisch
December 16, 2025 at 09:30 am
I'm not giving up on the hope of winning the Super Bowl this season.
For players, coaches, and fans, there's only 17 regular season games out of the entire year, and then we hope for a few playoff games.
As those of us who are old-timers know all too well, the seasons pass by quickly -- and suddenly we're too old to play the games we once enjoyed.
In other words, may all of the Packers who are left standing go all in on maxing out this season, and let's see if we can add another trophy to Titletown.
It's a tough challenge, but we still have a lot of talent on this team ready to take the field and enter the fray. At the very least, let's go down fighting. At most, let's get the rings.
With so few opportunities in this fleeting existence of ours, may our Packers seize the day and play it through until the last second of the final game. Enjoy the game of football to the fullest.
It might sound "cheesy" -- but isn't this the key to life for us all?
Even those of us who tend toward the melancholy can try to eke out as much as we can from each day, even if it's in little efforts, humble and hidden.
With the coming of Christmas, all that we do has meaning, all that we strive for matters, nothing that we do goes for naught.
P.S. Kudos to Cory for rallying the troops to give battle at their highest level. The resting can begin on February 9th.
Alberta_Packer
December 16, 2025 at 12:58 pm
And a "sca boola boola" - to add.
Melchy
December 16, 2025 at 09:31 am
Anything can happen but losing Kraft (one of the best TE) Wyatt (just started making noise) & Parson's(one of the best is gonna be really hard.Watson is dangerous but hurt again.Those are BIG HOLES.Plus 34 pts to a so so offense in Denver?????
Swisch
December 16, 2025 at 09:45 am
Let's find out if we have some other players willing and able to step up.
mjbrogno
December 16, 2025 at 09:52 am
The season is far from over. I still have faith in the players, hopefully, they will rally together and play lights out, , Go Pack Go!!!
greengold
December 16, 2025 at 10:22 am
Did we quit when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor??? HELL NO!!!!!!!
Swisch
December 16, 2025 at 11:06 am
When things looked bleak during the Battle of the Bulge, some 81 years ago this month (I think), and Germans pressured us to surrender the town of Bastogne, an American general responded with concise clarity: "Nuts!"
It is said that General Patton commented that an American force with a general that eloquent deserved to be rescued by the heroic march of his army in relief.
As I understand it, it was only Patton who anticipated that the seemingly demoralized Germans, on the run and apparently poised for defeat, could counterattack. Only Patton was ready with a plan when the Germans did the unexpected and turned the table, sending the American and British soldiers into disarray and retreat.
The Packers appeared to be dejected last Sunday when Watson and Parsons and others went down to injury in a hostile environment, but now it's time to rally the team to put up its best fight.
greengold
December 16, 2025 at 11:19 am
Swisch, I'll never forget that 2010 season. My wife (a rockstar football fan) and I looked at each other after loosing to Detroilet, 3-7 on December 12th, and said in unison, "it's over! We're done." Packers lost the following week to NE.
Yet, they snuck in as a wildcard and won another Lombardi Trophy. The ball, it is oblong. No one knows how it's gonna bounce. I'm not giving up on these guys.
T7Steve
December 16, 2025 at 02:25 pm
When did the Germans attack Pearl Harbor? LOL. I know what you meant that's all that matters.
greengold
December 18, 2025 at 10:40 am
It was a John Belushi quote from Animal House...! Steve. Too funny!
Swisch
December 16, 2025 at 02:37 pm
The rallying cry for this point in the season of 2025 could be, "Remember 2010!"
jannesbjornson
December 16, 2025 at 01:31 pm
The Battle of Elsenborn Ridge was the decisive turning point of the Bulge actions and sent the Wehrmacht in retreat, for good.
Starrbrite
December 16, 2025 at 06:43 pm
Swisch—excellent recall. My uncle fought at the Battle of the Bulge. He was from Northgate, ND.
Swisch
December 16, 2025 at 06:52 pm
To have a close relative who fought in such an historic battle would be a great source of family pride, the good kind of pride.
When people question the greatness of America, the heroism of such ordinary Americans is a great answer.
I hope your uncle, being from North Dakota, had at least somewhat of an easier time of it with the cold than many of the other soldiers. Fighting in the wintry December of 1944 in Europe must have been brutal.
Alberta_Packer
December 16, 2025 at 01:18 pm
Also - "My advice to you is to start drinking heavily,"
dobber
December 16, 2025 at 01:46 pm
"REMAIN CALM!!! ALL IS WELL!!!"
Starrbrite
December 16, 2025 at 06:46 pm
Lol—I don’t drink, but I may start. The Bronco loss may have triggered an opioid addiction.
greengold
December 18, 2025 at 10:42 am
See, Alberta! You get me...! OMG, that's funny.
Starrbrite
December 16, 2025 at 06:40 pm
Right GG
NFLfan
December 16, 2025 at 10:31 am
The Packers will not make the SB-there are too many pre-Parsons holes in important position groups but they have a good chance in the Division and I want to see them fight.
Parsons was likely signed to camouflage the weak d-backs/dline
The problem is much deeper and will keep the Packers in an 'just good enough' range moving forward.
The O-Line construction was made much worse this season with poor, expensive choices (Banks, Belton, Kinnard) and the transition of likely disgruntled Jenkins to Center and a possible bust in Morgan)
Jordan and Jacobs have to perform with little protection/blocking every game and they are amazingly gracious about it. There are no real solutions due to lack of Cap space and no first round picks. There are so many other needs as well and those players (CB, DL, OL) are expensive.
The DL was anchored by two first round picks who have never lived up to their Draft positions/contract. The GM stubbornly refused to admit his mistake and decided it was the fault of coaching (coach was likely not good but left in place too long)-so, after a new coach was installed, Gary and LVN remain underwhelming. Slaton was let go, so was Clark and their replacements are not performing. Wyatt, is great when he is present but will have been injured more than 50% of this season.
What exhausts me as a fan is the deceitfulness and lack of accountability from the Front Office/"President". There is no real interest in holding Gutekunst accountable for Gary, LVN, Belton, Banks, Morgan, Kinnard, Hobbs. He is the primary reason the DL and OL and CB-room do not function. But I will guarantee you he will be inaugurated GM with full power by Policy after this season because there are more important concerns to these men than the team. Their concerns are keeping their power, their jobs, Titletown. Policy is a protege of Murphy. (who is likely still alive and well in Titletown). 'just make certain GB wins enough games to keep fans in seats and forever hopeful"
Prove me wrong.
If (When) Gutekunst is re-instated, expect more of the same-he loves to 'build rosters'-
The Packers will not change for the better until a person who puts the team first and is more capable is installed and that won't happen till 2030 at the earliest.
Last, but not least, expect the usual hired guns to attack this post and deny, attack, deflect, etc. 'C****d", 'L***n" and 'L***d"
stockholder
December 16, 2025 at 10:44 am
The season isn't over.
But the thoughts of a super-Bowl are.
This clearly is Star - Power vs Depth.
And since Hafley doesn't have enough
stars on his defense.
It's up to MLf to win the division
with whats left of a offense.
And with that.
What really stands out is
the why?
We begged for years to get Clark help.
And we watched defense after defense
fail with Arron Rodgers as the QB.
Regardless the division is the strongest
it's been since 2011.
And we now have to put it on Love's shoulders.
Cory- The RELAX is is Gone.
And are opponents know it.
Losing to the Bears will start the blame game.
Next man up, vs star power.
Is why Gute will never be a super-bowl winner.
And that was never so obvious with
the loss of Parsons.
Snap the ball
December 16, 2025 at 11:56 am
Some how we keep winning year after year.
The offense is going to really get going . Wicks Golden Watson Doubs Jacob’s Wilson Reed
Wicks Golden Reed can take over if Watson playing double and triple him
I’m going with. XALER
Backwards
Wicks and Golden and Reed all kinds of fire power.
Heck make a call to A Rod he might have a few plays you can run on the bears
Swisch
December 16, 2025 at 02:45 pm
The stellar game that Wicks had very recently is a reminder of how guys can step up.
Let's hope that many of our Packers rise to the occasion.
jannesbjornson
December 16, 2025 at 12:44 pm
He drafted one ALL-PRO, Jaire, in eight years. I do not equate Probowl voting to the ALL-PRO rosters.
dobber
December 16, 2025 at 02:51 pm
"Next man up, vs star power.
Is why Gute will never be a super-bowl winner.
And that was never so obvious with
the loss of Parsons."
Why don't we let them play a couple games before you start shoveling dirt on them.
TarynsEyes
December 16, 2025 at 10:56 am
The season isn't over, neither is the hope, but the probability of this team reaching the SB is because even the wins for this team hasn't and won't scream that they are. They'll end up with a winning record, but SB quality play being seen this season is, and has been, more in the eyes of the blind.
Some of the top contenders have lost games that could allow a Packer fan to believe they're as good, they are not, and the difference is how the other teams play after a loss, and how the Packers continue to be a half-to-half team after a loss or win. They lack sustainability in every game, and no killer instinct to put games to bed, either by lack of talent, or coaching.
This season will end as usual, with over-hyped gusto for where they got to, while ignoring the issues that lead them no further each year.
I hope they can pull it off, but I haven't seen enough to alter my outlook of their ending.
GO PACK GO, regardless of where they get to.
Packerpasty
December 16, 2025 at 11:11 am
Lack of talent or coaching…..I’m going with coaching as I have for past few years….
Leatherhead
December 16, 2025 at 01:16 pm
And yet, LaFleur is one of the winningest coaches in NFL history. We replace HOF QBs, HOF WRs, Pro Bowl RBs....and consistently remain among the better scoring teams in the league.
Can you explain that? To me, the simplest explanation would be that MLF is a good HC, and a good offensive mind. He has the third highest win % among active coaches, behind Sirianni and Harbaugh. At his current pace, two more seasons will put him in the Top 25 or so all-time in games over .500, and just about everybody ahead of him is in the HOF.
jannesbjornson
December 16, 2025 at 01:36 pm
Sirianni got his crew into two SBs and won one of them. John Harbaugh bagged his SB and kept him in a job.
TarynsEyes
December 16, 2025 at 02:36 pm
Please, MLF is a decent to good HC, period. You talk as if he should be in the HOF already because of his W-L record percentage. He hasn't earned crap that warrants that level of revere from anybody. Your standards that dictate success needs an upgrade.
Packerpasty
December 16, 2025 at 06:27 pm
exactly....he is a "good" coach...NFL has many "good" coaches, only a few "really good" coaches...we will see what Policy thinks after this season....im thinking MLF had better run the table...
Swisch
December 16, 2025 at 02:52 pm
I'm with you, Leatherhead, LaFleur has proven himself over the years as a top coach in the NFL. He deserves a lot of credit.
One thing I like is that it seems that LaFleur has at last picked the right defensive coordinator. I like the way the defense plays. It's not perfect, but I like the way it's going.
Let's see what LaFleur and Hafley and the other coaches can come up with from here on out to get the most out of their players.
From the Jungle Room
December 16, 2025 at 11:03 am
I will agree that the season is still alive, however, I also agree that the Parson's injury (along w Wyatt, even Williams) may be stretching this D to its' breakpoint. Interestingly, this article doesn't mention Gary's name at all....and for good reason. Gary's sack/pressure production over the past 6 weeks has taken a nosedive...even with Parsons was taking on 2-3 blockers at a time. I cannot wrap my head around how he has 0 sacks and 3 QB hits over the past 6 games...YIKES! Sure, he's been a solid run defender but we will need way more than that moving forward. And without Parsons, we'll need more from everyone on the D.....a lot more.
IMO, the savior is Hafley and how he can create pressure. He did his "disguised pressure" magic last year without #1 on our roster, and, unfortunately, he will have to recreate it once again. Walker, Coop, Enagbare, Bullard, Nixon, LVN, McKinney, Williams (even Gary!) all have solid/elite playmaking ability... but nobody can do what #1 can do... so it has to come from Hafley's design. This type of scheme comes with risk, like exposing our CBs...but without the Parsons TNT blowing up every down......we don't really have another option....we'll see how this D can roll without Parsons on Saturday night....but it's gonna take Hafley's creative mind and the entire D firing on every cylinder to keep this team competitive....I'm gonna remain hopeful that they can.....
Snap the ball
December 16, 2025 at 11:43 am
Week to week
Week to week
Is the NFL
Let’s see what Cooper and the men can do the rest of the way.
Let’s see what Hafley comes up with.
24-23 Packers win Saturday night
Snap the ball
December 16, 2025 at 11:46 am
One play at a time. One quarter at a time.
Comes down to how bad you want it
We won games without Watson. Then won games without Kraft and will win games without Parsons.
It’s just time to get your juices flowing for play off football.
Lare
December 16, 2025 at 12:03 pm
In order to win, the Packers need to control the LOS. I don’t think they can.
Alberta_Packer
December 16, 2025 at 12:08 pm
I think it's fair to state that the Packers SB chances has now shifted from a viable belief to a tenuous hope. Once again - the race to the SB has proven to be a demolition derby. While the Packers remain in the competition - they have been critically weakened. So not the necessary physical and emotional state to run the gauntlet of top tier teams. It is still possible that they can ultimately prevail. But not probable.
PackerBackerAZ
December 16, 2025 at 12:51 pm
But what I really like is, despite all that, they have gotten off the mat. They keep responding.
Losing Kraft meant the offense needed to adjust to other good receivers. Losing Wyatt meant other players needed to step up and that really hasn't happened. Losing Parsons is a knockout punch and the defense won't get up and respond. The underachieving Gary and Van Ness will not prove to be defensive saviors. I'll be pleasantly surprised if the Packers win another game this season. The Packers are in a horse race with donkeys.
JohnnyLogan
December 16, 2025 at 01:01 pm
Winning teams have a minimum number of household-name stars—or at least players instantly recognizable to NFL fans. The 2010 Packers had Rodgers, Jordy, Clay, Woodson, Collins, Driver, Jenkins. You can do this for every Super Bowl winner. Great teams have great players. This isn’t complicated.
Now do the same exercise with the current Packers. Parsons, Kraft, Tom, Watson, Wyatt… except they’re not on the field. So who’s left? Who are the stars who are supposed to carry this team to a Super Bowl?
Love? Maybe. Fine. Cooper? Yes—he’s a real star and a potential Pro Bowler. McKinney? Absolutely. Jacobs? Yes, a great player, though he’s clearly grinding through injury.
After that? Reed, Doubs, Wicks, Golden—four maybes. Talented, promising, useful. But not one of them is scaring defensive coordinators or getting drafted early in fantasy leagues.
And that’s it. I’m out of names. No corners. No dominant defensive linemen. No offensive linemen who look remotely close to elite.
Sure, someone could break out. Cox, LVN—hope springs eternal. Maybe one of the receivers takes off the way Wicks briefly did. But as of today, this team has three stars: Cooper, Jacobs, and McKinney.
Great coaching could still make it work.
Never mind.
Alberta_Packer
December 16, 2025 at 01:37 pm
I was fine until "great coaching." Then I winced.
MooPack
December 16, 2025 at 01:42 pm
IMO, Hafley has to find a way to bring pressure the rest of the way. Use Cooper and Quay on disguised and/or delayed blitzes up the middle while the DB's look to jump the shortest routes because of the pressure. Can't wait on an opposing QB to make an errant throw. Without Parsons, Cooper is probably the next biggest playmaker. That means not playing CBs more than 5 yds off. Maybe exploited if the opposing QB recognizes it, but I have my doubts the next three teams will with regularity. Also, he needs to bring at least one or two disguised corner blitzes. If he, or by directive from MLF, continues to bring only the front 4, then we will know the fear factor rules this team. Fear, again IMO, wrecks a team's attitude and aggressiveness. It's a big part of what gets teams beat come playoffs. These coaches have got to play outside of their comfort zones and push these players to do the same. This is what builds a winning character.
On offense, MLF needs to focus on moving the chains. Not by unproductive WR Jet Sweeps at inopportune times that even fans can smell out. Not by heaving down field on 3rd and mid to short. Flip the script. Everyone is expecting the Packers to run, run, so don't. Trust Love. Trust the receivers. Run them on crossers and slants. Use their above average quickness and speed. I've yet to see this with regularity. What in the holy heck did you draft Golden for? Use two TE sets that looks like an obvious run and leak Musgrave out. He's improving. Use him. Long developing plays have got to be canned until the OL can prove their protection. Right now, this OL is not up to the task.
Can they do this? Yes, the talent is there. The coaches just have to give them opportunity and trust they deserve.
canadapacker
December 16, 2025 at 02:20 pm
First we have to get to the dance - and that is NOT going to be easy. Chicago - Baltimore and at Minnie . We might need to get at least one win unless Carolina loses one of the next 3 and Detroit loses 2 of the next 3 and then we are automatically in. So it might all come down to the Minnie game in all likelihood - I am not really happy with our offense since we lost Kraft. Our tightends just do not break any tackles at first contact. I think that even if Watson plays - he will not be as effective with him being banged up. And while our defence might hold up somewhat - without pressure our Dbacks will be exposed. My hopes is that we make it to the dance so that we can get our new guys to experience it once again. And if things dont work out well - I believe when we get Kraft and Parsons back that we will have a strong team next season even without a first rounder. Now that all can change if Love plays out of his mind - but I dont think that that will happen because he is in Love with the bomb. We will probably lose Hafley to the Jets.
NFLfan
December 16, 2025 at 03:36 pm
When Hafley leaves-this team will struggle
gsd3
December 16, 2025 at 03:39 pm
They are going to have to weaponize Cooper. Move him around , shoot gaps , whatever.
Activate Cox and Oliver if they are ready to go. Fresh legs can count for a lot at this point in the season.
Oliver may only be a situational pass rusher at this point in time, but he brings something they currently don't have. Watch some film from his time in college. May be exactly what's needed.
pantz_bURp
December 16, 2025 at 05:37 pm
Letz find Peanut Tillman before the game and force him to teach us how to punch the football out (when other teammates have stopped the opposition).
WWLD? He would have his team ready no matter the record. Pride goes along way and hopefully lasts longer than a paycheck.
WWPBD? Be in the moment. Stare at my Farrah Fawcett poster and pray. These are the moments we got. Letz enjoy them unfold. No angst, just pride and gratitude.
PB and J
***Holy shat!!! I had a THC drink and started staring at Farrah. I think it was around the 45 minute mark when she mouthed, "come here you sexy mofo"!!! I aint kidding...I've been waiting for this for a looooong time. I mean, I kinda thought she had eyes for me, but I wasn't completely sold. Hell yeah!
THESZOTMAN1
December 16, 2025 at 07:14 pm
Look.
Beat da Bears Saturday.
The rest is just palaver.
The Szotman
Tex49
December 16, 2025 at 09:17 pm
What happened to Cow? this seems like a perfect time for cow to chime in.