The Josh Jacobs Contingency Plan

What to do at running back now

Before we get started, I want to say that yes, anyone accused of a crime is innocent until proven guilty. Selfishly, as Packer fans and from a football standpoint, we hope these allegations against Josh Jacobs are incorrect. Still, we also need to hope they are incorrect from a humanitarian standpoint. No one deserves to be the victim of such crimes, and if the allegations are true, then the perpetrator deserves to be prosecuted within the full extent of the law. My thoughts are with both Josh and the alleged victim at this time. No matter which story ends up true in the end, hopefully, truth and justice will prevail. 

I actually started writing an article before the news broke, and the topic was supposed to be who will back up Josh Jacobs come week 1. I never thought I'd be rewriting to reflect this type of horrible situation, but as news changes, we must change as well.

Despite the position's value being in a downward spiral over the last few decades, running backs continue to be very valuable parts of an NFL offense. If you can't get it done on the ground, a defense is going to have an easier time stifling your production. The Green Bay Packers have known this well in years past. Either they didn't have a running back capable of leading the way, or their lead back suffered an injury, and they didn't have a backup capable of taking over effectively. The only chance a one-dimensional offense is going to go a long way is if that single dimension is virtually unstoppable. The Packers have had some extremely potent passing games in the last few decades, but even they have hit a tipping point. You need a complementary offense to go far. 

The Packers have had their lead back in Josh Jacobs. Despite a drop-off season in 2025 compared to his Packers' debut season the year prior, Jacobs has still been valued as an effective running threat heading into 2026. Whenever Josh Jacobs wasn't quite getting it done on the ground in 2025, the Packers had Emanuel Wilson to turn to, who filled in fairly nicely. Unfortunately, Wilson has left the Packers in free agency and is now on the roster of the defending Super Bowl Champion Seahawks. Remaining behind Josh Jacobs on the Packers' roster heading into OTAs at this time is currently Chris Brooks, who has been mainly utilized as a blocking back to this point, undrafted rookie free agent signing Jaden Nixon, returning 2025 practice squad RBs Pierre Strong Jr and Damien Martinez, and then former 2024 third-round pick, Marshawn Lloyd.

At this point, with Jacobs facing criminal allegations and an uncertain future, Chris Brooks is probably the only running back guaranteed to be on the 2026 roster. His two-year extension, signed in March, and his pass protection upside make him a valuable piece to the offense. One might hope that Marshawn Lloyd will be on the roster given that he was a third round pick just two years ago and the Packers have yet to see any type of return on that investment, but his injury history and the fact that he's barely played in the last two seasons tells us that if he doesn't show the ability to be a contributor in 2026, the Packers could just cut ties with him. That would leave the Packers very inexperienced and unproven, and that likely isn't where they want to be heading into a season with championship aspirations. 

Could they look elsewhere for a running back to take the reins if Jacobs isn't available?

It's hard to imagine the Packers going after a big name on the market; it's just not "Packers-like." But if Josh Jacobs isn't available, their backs may be against the wall. Most of those big-name players still available are looking for the chance to prove themselves coming off injuries. Green Bay may not look like a potential multi-year destination to them unless there's a good chance Josh Jacobs will not be returning, so they may hold out for a team that suffers an injury blow before the season, as their preferred destination, giving them a better chance at more of a featured role.

Nick Chubb, Najee Harris, and Joe Mixon could fit this description. All three have been highly productive in the past and are coming off injuries, hoping to revive their careers. Father time may not be on the side of Nick Chubb, sitting at 31 years old, especially from the viewpoint of the Packers, who often seek youth. But circumstances could push the team to ignore those standards. Harris and Mixon could fit the bill, given that they are closer to Jacobs in age. But all three still come with the question of whether or not they can return to their previous form; the Packers would still need Lloyd, Brooks, or another back to play a close second if they want to ensure production. 

Whether Jacobs is available or not, Zamir White, a former Raider who actually spent time with Josh Jacobs on the Raiders, could be an intriguing depth option. White is normally described as a downhill, power runner and isn't necessarily an effective receiving back, but he could be a complementary back with a high upside. 

What about a trade? With the Packers missing a first-round pick in 2027, they're not likely to trade for a guaranteed number-one running back. But they could afford some intriguing options with even just late-round capital. Tyler Allgeier of the Arizona Cardinals signed a two-year, $12.25M contract in March. So game over, right? Not so fast. James Conner is the Cardinals' lead back as of right now. Allgeier was thought of as a complement to Conner, but with the third overall pick, the Cardinals drafted HB Jeremiyah Love. I somewhat doubt Allgeier is going to be held above a third overall pick, and he might turn into an RB3 option. Then you factor in former third-round pick Trey Benson, and that RB room is crowded. Due to Allgeier's cap hit, he may not be a big target for the Packers unless the Cardinals absorb some cap, but never say never, especially for a mid to late round pick. 

Next is a running back Wisconsites would love almost too much. New York Jets running back and former Wisconsin Badger, Braelon Allen. Allen was on my wish list for the Packers in the same draft where they grabbed Marshawn Lloyd. Last year, due to an MCL sprain, Allen missed most of the season. In his absence, Isaiah Davis stepped in very effectively behind starter Breece Hall. Hall was resigned to an expensive three-year extension, and with Davis showing promise, that may leave Allen out as a trade candidate. He still has two years remaining on his rookie deal and is only 22 years old, a perfect candidate for the Packers. Allen may only cost the Packers a late-round pick and would provide the Packers with a bruising running back option. 

It's unlikely any of these options will fully replace Josh Jacobs should he be unavailable for the 2026 season. But adding one or two could help keep the Packers' running attack effective enough to relieve the passing game for success. 

 

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
2 points
 

Comments (87)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Coldworld's picture

May 27, 2026 at 10:16 am

Wait. There is more coming and nothing proven. More has to come out soon and all ranges of outcome are plausible at this point.

+ REPLY
4 points
8
4
Turophile's picture

May 27, 2026 at 02:30 pm

Exactly. It is all "If this, then that" speculation. Let us wait and see how it all falls out.

There could be any result from this, anywhere from no action needs to be taken, all the way to him being kicked off the team. Speculation at this point is just guesswork.

+ REPLY
4 points
6
2
Since'75's picture

May 27, 2026 at 02:59 pm

They had 3 days to examine this case, i'll assume they had many eyes and opinions on this....for 3 days.

Being a Packer...if this case was weak, i don't think 5 charges would have been brought (after 3 days to mull it over).
Unless they are fools.
The D.A. ultimately decides what charges to pursue, based on their own merit.
Or.....something else 🤷‍♂️

.02

+ REPLY
2 points
4
2
Coldworld's picture

May 27, 2026 at 03:51 pm

That’s not how it works. The police just need to show credible evidence something occurred in essence. In a domestic violence case they ordinarily then detain one party as the most likely aggressor (that’s usually the bigger one). Here they did not (suggesting Jacobs was no longer present). Thus they probably did not even have a statement from him when they got the warrant and issued their charge sheet (which are not formal charges).

As the DA statement noted today, the investigation is on-going, they currently do not have evidence sufficient to support proceeding. To do so requires considerably more and more conclusive evidence before they even consider formal charges. Interestingly they seem to believe that that is available. If so that language potentially leans in favor of Jacobs if anything.

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
Since'75's picture

May 27, 2026 at 05:13 pm

As i said, the DA ultimately moves forward, or doesn't.

Don't think for a second the DA didn't know about this case over the weekend

The cops, and the Detectives get as many facts together as they can, charge...then give the D.A. the info and facts they provide him.
Then....he takes it from their, based on the merits.
*********
Also...lets not 'assume' someone wasn't present.
THEN....'assume' another thing, based on that assumption.

C'mon man.

+ REPLY
0 points
3
3
Coldworld's picture

May 27, 2026 at 06:04 pm

I have explained that assumption elsewhere, based on the law’s requirements on the officers there. It’s the most likely explanation for the fact that he wasn’t taken into custody immediately given the obligations placed on the officers and subsequent published timeline. Obviously, most likely is not the same as certain, hence the assumption.

+ REPLY
0 points
2
2
Since'75's picture

May 28, 2026 at 02:23 pm

Well CW, your first assumption ended up being correct.

Jacobs wasn't there....lol

Unfortunately, he wasn't there, because?......he didn't want to stick around.
Where he went for 3 days, i don't know.

But what i do know 100%.

Is him leaving, wasn't/isn't.... a good look.
That isn't going to scream. 'innocent!!'....to anybody.

+ REPLY
-1 points
1
2
davekenya's picture

May 29, 2026 at 12:44 pm

I would not make any assumptions on innocence/guilt based on someone being present or not. As you say, don't read anything into anything other than the facts...

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

May 29, 2026 at 07:02 pm

Sounds like good advice....
*************
The FACT is.....instead of dealing with the cops, he got in his car and bolted.

Again, not a good look, no matter who you are.
**********
Lol....Surely, there is more than one Dullard here who disagree's with what i wrote.

C'mon Dullards, let your voice be heard!! Grab a thumbs down and then get back to downing that bag of cheetos.

Never give up. We're rooting for you. 😛

+ REPLY
-1 points
0
1
Cheezehead72's picture

May 27, 2026 at 02:38 pm

Depends on what you mean by wait. I really hope that the Packers organization is not waiting. Gute and his personnel should be looking at all RB possibilities in the event we need someone to replace Jacobs. But then they should be looking at every position. It just that this one should be a priority.

Fans yes we should wait and see what happens.

+ REPLY
6 points
6
0
Coldworld's picture

May 27, 2026 at 03:57 pm

I mean I wouldn’t pull the trigger on anything I wouldn’t have prior to yesterday yet were I Gute.

+ REPLY
0 points
1
1
Starrbrite's picture

May 27, 2026 at 08:49 pm

Yes—the search begins immediately.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
davekenya's picture

May 29, 2026 at 12:45 pm

Agree. You always work on contingency planning...so no need to wait.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Since'75's picture

May 29, 2026 at 07:09 pm

Exactly...you have to (at least) plan for the worst.

I'm guessing that is part of the duties of the GM.
Unless it's Policy's decision....i'm not really sure anymore, what's going on down there.
**********
I don't really care how early it is...in my opinion, the Packers, NFL, and NFLPA are trying to get as many details as they can, as quickly as they can.
Like i said previously....this isn't a good situation for anybody.
***********
Also, i think the reason the D.A. announced that more investigation was needed.
IMO....that was because they probably didn't have a sit down with Jacobs and his attorney to get his story yet.

I think this is one of two things, a money grab, or something happened.

But i'm leaning one way, for one obvious reason.

+ REPLY
-2 points
0
2
iamiz's picture

May 27, 2026 at 10:21 am

Time to find the next Ryan Grant or James Starks.

How hard can it be?

+ REPLY
5 points
5
0
Cheezehead72's picture

May 27, 2026 at 01:05 pm

or Samkon Gado

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
Turophile's picture

May 27, 2026 at 02:32 pm

You have condemned him already ? Based on what information exactly, that no-one else seems to have....

+ REPLY
3 points
5
2
Coldworld's picture

May 27, 2026 at 03:59 pm

Per the DA press statement on Jacob’s release, nobody currently has it, including them. He’s not bailed (he’s not been formally charged), just released pending the outcome of further inquiries.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
WD's picture

May 27, 2026 at 10:28 am

Realistically the only solution is for Lloyd to stay healthy and step up big time.
We can't sugar coat this. It is a major disaster. The rest of the league is giving high fives!

+ REPLY
0 points
2
2
Brewcity_BearsFan's picture

May 27, 2026 at 11:18 am

No one is giving high fives over Domestic Violence charges.

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
WD's picture

May 29, 2026 at 03:04 pm

Have you been around any Bear's fans lately?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

May 27, 2026 at 10:58 am

Best options?
Promote from within.
Marshawn Lloyd-can't be counted on as a fix until he can stay available.

Strong or Martinez, or both. Celebrated college RBs who are as ready as they will ever be.

Make a trade. Trey Benson and Braelon Allen look like tremendous options. Both were highly rated but haven't shown "It" yet. Both should be available for late round picks but has that "cost" gone up as teams realize the Packers predicament? Maybe trade player for player? An article today says Musgrave, Valentine, McDuffie, & Havrisik could be trade candidates for GB.

Worst options?
Wait to 30-45 days to see who gets cut. Emmanuel Wilson is just insurance now in Seattle and could be waived.
Do nothing. This is the absolute worst. GB should be proactive now and find insurance thru a trade.

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 27, 2026 at 11:34 am

Emanuel Wilson's situation is so ironic! He left because he wanted more of a chance to play. Does he come back before waiting even one season? I'd love it, wanted to keep him here. That Braelon Allen is even a possibility is good news ...

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
Starrbrite's picture

May 27, 2026 at 08:52 pm

Yes—I really like the Braelon Allen possibility.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Cheezehead72's picture

May 27, 2026 at 12:15 pm

If I were Gute I would be on the phone to Seattle to get an idea if they are interested in trading Wilson. If you wait you may not get him.

+ REPLY
-3 points
2
5
BuckyBadger's picture

May 27, 2026 at 12:26 pm

If the allegations prove to be true I think the waiver wire will be the best way to get depth and they will bring in a vet via a trade or one of the ones available. RBs is a position teams like to stash guys on the PS and this year the Packers might have to be vultures. There will be talented guys to be had.

Not much to promote to look at for promoting from with in. Before this I thought they should be looking for younger back as Jacobs at the age they hit a cliff. Brooks isn't a lead back and Lloyd will be hurt before I hit submit.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
Brewcity_BearsFan's picture

May 27, 2026 at 11:04 am

Given the charges against Jacobs, it would be really tone deaf to sign Mixon. JMO.

+ REPLY
12 points
12
0
golfpacker61's picture

May 27, 2026 at 11:53 am

You beat me to it Brew. Mixon had his own assault case with a horrible video available when he was in college. The punch he landed on his girlfriend should have gotten him prison time. The Bengals organization was famous for signing players that no other team would sign.

The best, cheapest option would be to sign Antonio Gibson. He is a solid runner, great receiver, and pretty good blocker. And he would only get vet minimum, $1 million.

The best long term options would be trading for Trey Benson or Braelon Allen. A late pick would get it done and we would have a new RB1.

+ REPLY
9 points
9
0
HarryHodag's picture

May 28, 2026 at 06:35 am

Spot on .

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
brenner's picture

May 27, 2026 at 11:20 am

By no means am I condemning Jacobs until this whole thing plays out, but protecting the team against him not being there is a must.

Getting Allen for a 5th or 6th would be a good add regardless of the Jacobs outcome. 2 years under contract that he would only be 24 at the end of, while having a hopefully healthy Lloyd would make for a fun backfield.

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 27, 2026 at 11:35 am

A move Gutey should do even without this nightmare ...

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Starrbrite's picture

May 27, 2026 at 08:53 pm

Absolutely Sicsemper

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Mike Rossmeier's picture

May 27, 2026 at 02:41 pm

If they got Braelon Allen, they better be able to open some holes. Everyone would like to have a physique like him, but I've never seen any wiggle.

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
Starrbrite's picture

May 27, 2026 at 08:54 pm

He’s Dillon with ability.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
vin0770's picture

May 27, 2026 at 11:25 am

Good article, realistic known rb’s out there as a possibility. Very believable. Thanks

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
dobber's picture

May 27, 2026 at 11:56 am

Remember that if the Packers end up parting ways with Jacobs, it opens up significant cap space--depending on who you read, it could be about $4.5M or it could be $9M (depending on Jun-1 designation). There's room there to absorb the cap hit of a signing or trade.

If Najee Harris's medicals are good, he might be the most cost-effective and least disruptive way to go. An achilles doesn't heal overnight, and players often struggle to get back up to speed very quickly, but he's an accomplished guy whose run style mimics Jacobs and he can catch and block.

I thought Allgeier would be a great off-season get to back up Jacobs and then take over in 2027. Remember that the bonus/guarantee structure in Allgeier's Cardinals contract stay with AZ as dead money if he's dealt, so he's actually quite affordable to the Packers.

That said, I think Allgeier stays in AZ and that James Conner and Trey Benson would be more accessible from the Cardinals. Conner just redid his deal to stay put. I think Benson wants out...Gannon knows him, so if he's a locker room problem, Gannon would be able to warn the Packers off. I think he wouldn't cost much in trade if the Packers are interested.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
BuckyBadger's picture

May 27, 2026 at 12:05 pm

Harris was slow before the injuries. Was never a big fan of his.

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
dobber's picture

May 27, 2026 at 12:08 pm

Yeah, I agree.
I just see him as the most Jacobs-like of the FAs who has been successful.
None of these vets left on the market are thrilling, and they're almost all coming off some kind of injury.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
golfpacker61's picture

May 27, 2026 at 03:59 pm

Achilles injuries scare me more than ACLs even though ACL recovery time can be longer. Especially on skill position players. I would be a hard pass on Najee Harris.

If the price is right as far as a pick or player, I would be 100% on Trey Benson or Braelon Allen. Both are bigger & faster than Jacobs, Allen is 15lbs heavier as well. In order to get a bell cow back in the 2027 NFL draft, we would have to spend at least a 3rd round pick, maybe even a 2nd. If we could get either of Benson or Allen for a 6th, no more than a 5th, it would be draft capitol well spent.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 28, 2026 at 11:09 am

You hit that nail on the head. Nothing special, mostly with injury issues.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

May 27, 2026 at 03:40 pm

Ok...lol

Lets stop digging the grave, and see what happens here.

+ REPLY
1 points
3
2
BuckyBadger's picture

May 27, 2026 at 12:08 pm

The first thing I did last night was check depth charts and of course the Cardinals stick out. Maybe MLF can put his brother in a headlock and give him nuggies until he gives us a RB.

I like the Allen but I would worry about him pass blocking at the NFL level. Alvin Kamara is a veteran back that could be looking for a change of scenery. Not sure I love that option at his age but he is experienced and great in the passing game.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

May 27, 2026 at 12:15 pm

I just don't think the Jets will let Allen go easily, but I like Isaiah Davis who is behind him on the depth chart. I don't know if Davis can be a primary runner in the league, but he showed well in limited play last year as a runner and receiver.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
golfpacker61's picture

May 27, 2026 at 04:06 pm

"Alvin Kamara is a veteran back that could be looking for a change of scenery."

Too old & expensive. Yes he has had a great career but he has missed 20 games the last 5 years. And not much production. Its a better option to grab a younger RB with a ton of tread left on their tires.

Benson & Allen are 25-26 years old. Benson is a better blocker although Allen is 235lbs.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Snap the ball's picture

May 27, 2026 at 01:12 pm

Let’s see. Wilson went to Seattle.

+ REPLY
-2 points
0
2
Snap the ball's picture

May 27, 2026 at 01:14 pm

How about Amar Johnson.

The kid ripped it up last pre season.

+ REPLY
-1 points
2
3
Snap the ball's picture

May 27, 2026 at 01:17 pm

From yahoo news

Chargers Roster Spotlights: Amar Johnson, An Overlooked Explosive Weapon

Another mistake Gutey let go

SHOULD HAVE KEPT HIM

+ REPLY
-2 points
2
4
Leatherhead's picture

May 27, 2026 at 01:40 pm

Who would you have released to make room for him? Jacobs? Wilson? Brooks? Lloyd was on the IR , so he wasn't taking up a roster spot.

I liked Amar Johnson, too, but I wouldn't have released any of those guys in order to keep him.

+ REPLY
6 points
6
0
dobber's picture

May 27, 2026 at 02:20 pm

Yeah, RB wasn't a problem in 2025 and Johnson couldn't be active for the Chargers who couldn't keep RBs on the field.

Let's not over-glorify a back based on preseason performance. Take away one long run in garbage time and he's a 3.4 ypc guy.

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
William Brauer's picture

May 27, 2026 at 02:46 pm

Always his fault in some minds

+ REPLY
-1 points
2
3
Packers0808's picture

May 27, 2026 at 01:24 pm

The NFL has become and getting worse as a league of Thugs! Sad to see!

+ REPLY
-8 points
1
9
William Brauer's picture

May 27, 2026 at 02:47 pm

Don't watch if you feel that way

+ REPLY
-4 points
0
4
Since'75's picture

May 27, 2026 at 03:04 pm

0808.....
I don't think anyone thinks of J J as a thug.
I don't recall anyone saying....why did the Packers trade for that thug.
************
A. Hernandez...yea

Aqib Talib ...yea

Vontaze Burfict...yea

Romanowski....yea
*********
This will no doubt humble Jacobs, but a thug?....i don't think so.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
Packers0808's picture

May 27, 2026 at 05:30 pm

League as a whole, where did I single out Jacobs, you did that not me! Remember this is not first time Jacobs has been arrested.

+ REPLY
-1 points
2
3
Packers0808's picture

May 27, 2026 at 06:47 pm

There is an average of 40-50 NFL players arrested a year on the average for minor to severe crimes. That 300-350 over 7 years, my bet is the word THUGS fits quite well.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
golfpacker61's picture

May 27, 2026 at 04:09 pm

You have 21 posts Dave, don't start insulting people until 521 posts.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
Packers0808's picture

May 27, 2026 at 05:31 pm

If you don't like what I said, don't read it!

+ REPLY
-2 points
2
4
Leatherhead's picture

May 27, 2026 at 01:37 pm

This will be resolved. Most likely is that this won't interfere with Jacobs' availability in the second half of the season, including the stretch run and the playoffs.

I was a little surprised/disappointed that the Packers didn't use their pick at #52 on an offensive guy, particularly since we'd used our #1...and next year's #1...on a defensive player. The departure of Wilson and the questionable reliability of Lloyd has left us kind of thin after Jacobs. If he were to miss time,injury or otherwise,we'd be in a tough spot. I'd feel better right now if we had drafted Mike Washington.

We had 1010 offensive snaps. On 464 of those, the ball was given, or thrown to, an RB. That's pretty close to 45% of the plays. It's the bread and butter of the offense.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
golfpacker61's picture

May 27, 2026 at 04:11 pm

Well L H, since our 3 biggest needs were CB, DT, & Edge, it looks like we filled 3 needs. GB didn't plan on Jacobs getting arrested.

+ REPLY
0 points
2
2
Leatherhead's picture

May 27, 2026 at 07:34 pm

The 1265 braintrust agrees with you about our "biggest needs".

I don't see it that way. I think you need to score points to win, and the top offensive teams in the league are always that ones that advance in the playoffs. Plus, an offense that keeps itself ON the field keeps the defense OFF the field. The Packers finished 16th in scoring average last year, and they've lost 2 of their top 4 WRs, their #2 RB, their backup QB, and two starters from the offensive line. We've replaced them with.......?

If we start taking injuries, this offense is going to struggle. The defense, on the other hand, was a top tier defense last season right up to the point we lost Parsons and Wyatt. We did lose some people, like Gary, Enagbare, Hobbs, and Wooden. We have guys like Oliver and Brinson ready to play more. We got Hargreaves in FA, and St. Juste in FA. We swapped out Quay for Zaire.

I hope I'm wrong and we go out there with one of the best offenses in the NFC, like Seattle and the Rams. Because that's what it's going to take to get to the Super Bowl.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Tater's picture

May 28, 2026 at 09:39 am

NOW, you might want Mike Washington, but we would have had to pass on Dani Dennis-Sutton. One of the best picks in the draft.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 28, 2026 at 10:42 am

I would have preferred Washington over any defensive player last year. I think improving the offense is/was more of a priority than any edge rusher at that point. We had already drafted Sorrell and Oliver last year, we spent our first round pick (and next year's) on Parsons, we have Van Ness under contract.....that's the 4 you're going to play. Sutton is the #5 Edge rusher if everybody is healthy.

Meanwhile, the #16 NFL offense lost their #2 RB, two starting Offensive linemen, two of the their top 4 WRs.....and none of that is as important as your #5 Edge Rusher?

I don't disgree with the 1265 Braintrust very often, but I just think we could have gone in a better direction. I know that to reach the Super Bowl, we have to outscore Rams, Seahawks, Eagles, Detroit.....I'm not seeing it at this point unless every offensive player stays healthy . We're too thin on offense.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

May 29, 2026 at 09:26 am

Washington had some glaring warts too L H. For a big guy he avoided contact like the plague. And as they say about most RBs, he was a very poor blocker. The RB I thought could really help the Packers was Nic Singleton-Penn State. And he was available with the pick @ #160 that we traded away. If only we would have had a crystal ball with Jacobs, RB wasn't in the Top 5 needs before the draft.

Anyway I would argue Edge was a much bigger need than RB then. DDS was the steal of the draft for us.

Barring injuries our offense will be Top 10. And we have a potentially great WR corps.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
stockholder's picture

May 27, 2026 at 02:26 pm

"The best-laid plans of mice and men often go awry"
Which is why Gute will never win a SB in GB.
Elliot Wolf took Jam Miller RB with his 7th.
We give are extra picks away

+ REPLY
-4 points
4
8
Since'75's picture

May 27, 2026 at 03:15 pm

Hey Hey now....don't pick on my man Guter!!

+ REPLY
0 points
3
3
pantz_bURp's picture

May 27, 2026 at 06:25 pm

Stocky:

"Gute will never win a SB in GB"...I agree, not with LaF as the HC.

Hammer time...you can't touch this,

Pantz B. draggin'

*Plus, you seem to merge two novels together using: Of Mice and Men AND Catcher in the Rye.

**An article a few days ago listed the mad lad Gutester, as the 6th best GM in the NFL.

+ REPLY
2 points
4
2
packer132's picture

May 27, 2026 at 08:33 pm

Atta boy Stock. The black cloud follows you wherever you go. Gute makes multiple 7th round picks every year except this year, when he had so few picks. Valentine is still on the roster as is Jonathan Ford. Rasheed Walker was a 7th rounder. Another great post.

+ REPLY
1 points
4
3
Leatherhead's picture

May 28, 2026 at 10:53 am

Here's the reality: Finding a player in the 7th doesn't happen very often. If you go back to the 2021 draft, and see who is still in the league, it's a short list. Jonathan Cooper is the best player taken in the 7th with an AV of 32, and the next closest guy has 11. 23 of the draftees are not in the league anymore.

The next year, Rasheed Walker was the second best pick of the 7th round, with an AV of 29. Brock Purdy is 44. Only one other player had more than 13 (Isaiah Pacheco). 13 of them are already out of the league and a bunch more will be after roster cutdowns.

You get a guy like Driver, or Tauscher, or Walker in the 7th round, that's like finding a chunk of gold in a compost pile.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
golfpacker61's picture

May 29, 2026 at 09:30 am

Yeah, well I will argue that if we had kept our 2 7th round picks this year, we could have drafted any 2 of Smack, Dallen Bently, or Diego Pounds, and any of the 3 would have made the 53. It's usually luck if a 7th round pick even makes the PS, those 3 would have been locks.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 27, 2026 at 06:20 pm

So I would pump the brakes a little on the Jacobs replacement plan. While the current outlook looks grim for Jacobs - research indicates that only about 36% of domestic violence arrests involving professional football players lead to a formal conviction. While nearly all of these arrests result in initial charges - many are ultimately dropped - resolved through pre-trial diversion programs, or result in lesser, non-violent plea deals. If so - this still might not give Jacobs immunity from some level of penalties by the NFL and/Packers .

+ REPLY
2 points
4
2
Leatherhead's picture

May 28, 2026 at 10:57 am

I think that it's unlikely that he gets the Death Penalty. Lawyers will negotiate this and Jacobs will be available for most of the season. The league may impose a suspension, but it's unlikely he'll be suspended for the entire season.

My best guess: A negotiated settlement with the plaintiff, a six game suspension from the NFL.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 28, 2026 at 07:11 pm

Also my guess.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

May 28, 2026 at 07:37 pm

I’d say it’s no more than 50:50 that this goes anywhere based on the facts known to date. If it does, and they decide to prosecute, there’s still a long way to go before we will know if it truly has legs and if so, how hard they may kick judicially and in league terms.

There is no significant physical injury (they only cite basic battery). There is no witness other than the victim. It’s even possible the victim is an incorrect assumption. In Wisconsin the police must designate an aggressor and arrest them (if no witnesses that’s the bigger partner absent someone looking like Nicholson in The Shining). That’s not a determination of fact absent witnessing the dispute, it’s a risk management tool. The fact of an altercation reported and her claims would be easily enough to get a warrant in a domestic violence situation (normally he would automatically have been detained had he not left).

The Police only had her story at charging. The neighbor heard nothing but then apparently had contact with the woman post Jocobs’ departure (later she says there’s been an assault whereas before Jacobs left it was only hearing noise). There is no known history of calls like this either, recently or in his background as far as I know.

If the evidence was cut and dried, there was really no need to delay charging. It’s not like charges can’t be dropped if a different truth emerges. Some substantive doubt must exist in the prosecutor’s mind. We will see, but all the speculation and jumping to conclusions is almost as disappointing as the situation itself.

+ REPLY
0 points
2
2
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 28, 2026 at 10:38 pm

I'm not expecting an unfavorable court ruling or legal outcome for Jacobs - as he's contracted a couple of hot shot Las Vegas lawyers to represent him. My guess is that they are from the same firm that handled his DUI arrest in 2021. So once again the 2-tiered justice system will be engaged.

Rather - I think that Jacob's greater problem will be getting past the NFLs personal conduct policy. We have seen Roger Goodell still suspend players - who were ruled to be not guilty. If so - then he's looking at a mandatory 6 game suspension.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
golfpacker61's picture

May 29, 2026 at 09:37 am

Whether Jacobs is guilty or not, the embarrassment he has caused the Packers could very well see his exit from GB. The money savings alone could sway whether he stays in GB or not, over $11 million after June 1 with dead cap of $3 million in 2027.

Yes, he IS innocent until proven guilty in this country, but he has damaged his reputation and the Green Bay Packers. Losing Jacobs for 6-8 games is also a no brainer, cut/trade him and move on. The majority of fans and people in general will want him gone regardless of guilt.

+ REPLY
0 points
1
1
Starrbrite's picture

May 27, 2026 at 08:48 pm

I like the Braelin Allen idea no matter how the Jacobs situation progresses.
Go Packers!!!

+ REPLY
4 points
5
1
Starrbrite's picture

May 27, 2026 at 09:11 pm

Sorry—misspelling

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Mike Rossmeier's picture

May 28, 2026 at 12:08 am

Not a dynamic runner - very little wiggle. Needs a big hole.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
HarryHodag's picture

May 28, 2026 at 06:43 am

It's possible the NFL will hit Jacobs for six games regardless of the legal outcome. If a felony charge is filed, and he's found guilty, he's likely to spend some time in the Brown county jail. If not guilty, of course, he would be free to return to the team.

In two of those three scenarios the Packers would not have him available. The current crop of back ups likely will not compete to be the 'beast of burden'. Finding another back makes sense. I think you might see a couple of new names emerge after June 1.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 28, 2026 at 11:06 am

Agree with all of this. I do think that he'll avoid jail time, and there'll be some kind of settlement. I don't think we'll have him for the early part of the season.

This is a workhorse back in an offense that goes to the RB on 45% of the snaps. We can't replace him with an average guy and expect the same results. I'm not going to say that we're screwed right out of the box, but Jones is a vital part of this offense, and without him, we can maybe still make the playoffs but we can't really compete for the Super Bowl.

I thought we should have addressed this in the offseason. It's like a car with no spare.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
the_gavia_pass's picture

May 29, 2026 at 05:53 am

noway the packers keep jakobs if domestic violence Is confirmed. he'll be released Just minutes after the confirmation.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
the_gavia_pass's picture

May 29, 2026 at 05:59 am

If domestic violence (strangulation and soffocation) will be confirmed the packers will release jakobs immediately.

it's disturbing to read all these hopes on a return after a suspension.

+ REPLY
0 points
1
1
golfpacker61's picture

May 29, 2026 at 09:50 am

The Packers had a big decision to make before this Jacobs incident, who the #2/3 RBs would be. And now it's magnified 10 times because of this situation. Now our projected #1 RB, if he remains a Green Bay Packer, at the very least, probably misses the first 6-8 games of 2026. That is unacceptable. The Packers will not allow this to hang over their heads and risk the teams reputation and 2026 season on Jacobs now.

Even if this is settled out of court, or charges are dropped, the damage is done. Guilty or not guilty, Jacobs has become a huge problem in GB. And he probably was done anyway in 2027 anyway because of $$$. This just moves the timeline up.

Next man up usually is caused by injury or losing a player, this is much worse.

+ REPLY
0 points
1
1
Leatherhead's picture

May 29, 2026 at 11:36 am

Inspired by dobber, I did some digging over at Spotrac.com

Jacobs is 28, and is under contract to the Packers for two more seasons, with cap hits of $14.5 and $16.5. Both years are heavily loaded towards salary, meaning he'd have to be on the team. If we just released him,we'd have a dead cap hit of a little over $6M, which is the pro-rated portion of his signing bonus.

If Jacobs misses some games because of this, if the NFL suspends him for .....six games?....then basically unless he's 100% for the other 11, we're paying $14.5M this year for a part-time player

In 2016, the Packers running attack was Montgomery, Lacy, Rodgers, Rodgers and Stark, combining for about 280 carries. The next year, rookies Williams and Jones accounted for 235 carries, and when you added Montgomery, that was 300+carries by our top 3 guys. In 2018, Jones-Williams-Rodgers had 297 carries, and about the same the next year.

The Jones/Williams 1-2 punch was very good for the Packers. They both stayed healthy and protected the ball and got into the end zone. But when their 4 year deals expired, they kept Jones and Williams left in FA. Anticipating this would happen, they drafted AJ Dillon, and when Williams left, Jones/Dillon remained a solid combo on the field. Then, we replaced Jones/Dillon with Jacobs and Wilson for two years.

The POINT of all this rambling is that we change our backfield up all the time. We've had 4 different leading rushers in the 9 years since Gutekunst started driving the bus. Good ones. And I think that the Packers personnel department has a pretty good record of identifying the kind of guys we want at RB.

The more I think about it, the more it starts to make sense that the Packers could move on and TRADE for somebody who can carry the rock. Perhaps Brooks/Lloyd/Strong/everybody else can be a good answer at #2, but we need a better guy if we're not going to have Jacobs.

If we will trade two #1s for Parsons, how much is a RB worth who can get 240 touches, protect the ball, and get his man blocked? And who would that player be?

Because I'm feeling crazy, let me give you a name : Rico Dowdle. Compared to Jacobs, he's about the same age and in 2025, they had pretty similar production in terms of yards, touches, etc. Where they are different is that Dowdle has a $3.75M cap hit this year. He's gone over 1000 yards rushing the last two seasons....one in Dallas, one in Carolina. Now he's in Pittsburgh. We should make a run at trading for this guy.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Bitternotsour's picture

May 29, 2026 at 01:06 pm

If only we had a pro personnel dept that was charged with assessing and acquiring talent

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Bitternotsour's picture

May 29, 2026 at 01:09 pm

when Jacobs was signed I never thought he'd be on the roster for these big dollar seasons

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 29, 2026 at 02:07 pm

I was kind of surprised when I saw that we change up RBs so frequently. Four different leading rushers, maybe 5, in 10 years. But once I wrapped my head around this, then moving on from Jacobs started to seem more plausible to me.

Also, you've got the stinking Seahawks, who we're chasing now. Their RB combo racked up 2200 yards of offense and 17 TDs. Jacobs and Wilson were a good combo for us, but managed only 1800 yards of offense. Now Wilson is gone and maybe we're going to bring in a new guy, part company with Jacobs, and save a bucket of money. It would fit the Gutekunst pattern.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0

Log in to comment and more!

Not a member yet? Join free.

If you have already commented on Cheesehead TV in the past, we've created an account for you. Just verify your email, set a password and you're golden.