Vikings 27, Packers 25: Game Balls / Lame Calls
The final score was close; the game wasn't.

It might be that the Minnesota Vikings are better than the Detroit Lions, and will secure the top NFC seed next week. What is certain, after the Vikings smoked the Packers 27-25 on Sunday, is that the Packers belong in their third spot in the NFC North.
Yes, smoked, despite some too-little, too-late drama in the last five minutes. On both sides of the ball, the Packers were out played, out muscled and out coached, in addition to hurting themselves with drive-killing, point-subtracting penalties at key moments. Minnesota had 441 total yards to Green Bay’s 271, and dominated time of possession. For the past few weeks the chatter has been all about how the Packers have beaten everyone they’ve played except three teams with a combined seven losses. The corollary is that the Packers appear unable to beat those teams, including losing twice to the Lions and Vikings.
It would be nice if we could chalk up Sunday to one bad game, but this was a litmus test of where Green Bay stands in the NFL pecking order, and they proved that as a franchise they are a tier below the top teams. The Vikings have more top-shelf talent and exposed long-standing Packer deficiencies: A middling pass rush, inadequate coverage in the middle of the field and an offense that relies too heavily on high-variance plays to win consistently when the explosives aren’t there.
The Packers can certainly play better than they did Sunday, and strange things can happen once the post-season starts. But it sure looks like this team has to be nearly perfect to beat the best teams, which is not a recipe for a deep playoff run.
GAME BALLS
Edgerrin Cooper — Once again, Cooper showed he’s head and shoulders above the rest of the linebacking corps, with a whopping four tackles for loss, half the team’s total. I’d like to see him take on a little more of a fiery leadership role, but for a rookie he’s been outstanding the past several weeks. 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈
Romeo Doubs — Doubs continues to be Jordan Love’s go-to, with seven receptions for 58 yards, which would have been higher had Love not missed on a couple of Doubs’ targets. His route-running is the best of the bunch, his hands are reliable and he can make some hay after the catch. 🏈 🏈 🏈 🏈
Karl Brooks — Brooks was the only Packer to actually sack Sam Darnold, working his way through blocks and traffic to get there. He registered a tackle for loss as well in limited snaps. 🏈 🏈 🏈
UNSUNG HEROES
Carrington Valentine — His interception in the fourth quarter came at a key moment, and overall he did a solid job in coverage. You can’t stop Justin Jefferson, you can only hope to contain him.
Tucker Kraft — Only three targets, which is odd, but the two receptions were the Packers’ biggest chunk plays. He needs to be involved much more in the passing game.
LAME CALLS
The D — Jeff Hafley’s crew has padded some stats over the past few weeks against weaker teams, and the group plays with hustle and has been improving. Nonetheless, the Vikings had only one three-and-out, and when the chips were down at the end of the game the defense couldn’t get the stop. Give the Vikings offensive line credit, they kept Darnold clean and often provided ample time for the resurrected QB to pick apart the Packers, especially between 10 and 20 yards in the middle of the field. The Packers lack an elite pass rush; Rashan Gary is fine, but O-lineman have figured out how to use his speed against him because he lacks sophisticated rush technique. So far, Lukas Van Ness is mediocre, and the interior DLs have been average in pressuring the quarterback.
The defense simply didn’t have answers much of the time, and were reacting rather than dictating. It doesn’t help that the Packers lack sufficient talent at corner, and they miss Evan Williams. The result was that while Green Bay held Jefferson to modest numbers, Jalen Nailor, Jordan Addison and TJ Hockenson torched the secondary.
Matt LaFleur — There are only a couple of NFL coaches I would rather have, but the man can be a head scratcher. Everything that works one week can disappear the next, and so once again we saw little of the motion and misdirection that has served the Packers so well in several previous games. His decision to go for it on fourth down early in the second quarter — rather than kick the field goal — was defensible statistically but not when you consider how many points the Vikings are capable of putting on the board. And his insistence on choosing to take the ball first rather than deferring is simply bad strategy. If it wasn’t, everyone would do it. Lastly, how about letting Love use his legs more? Turning him into a pure dropback quarterback is leaving an important part of modern football on the table.
Josh Jacobs — Yes, he ran well again in the first half, but for the second time in three weeks he put the ball on the ground, and that just can’t happen. His fumble killed what was shaping up to be a successful Packers’ first drive and altered the tone of game from the jump.
FINAL WHISTLES
The Packers are now destined for either the sixth or seventh seed, and with the way Washington is playing, the seventh spot looks more likely. Which would mean a very tough visit to Philadelphia, a team that does everything that gives Green Bay trouble. So now, the Packers don’t have the luxury of resting people against the Bears next weekend.
The season is certainly not over, and Hafley is clearly an upgrade over Joe Barry, but here’s hoping Brian Gutekunst is recognizing the serious need to upgrade the edge, middle linebacker and corner positions in the off-season. Perhaps the Packers will use this game as fuel to power a higher level of play next week and beyond. They need to, or the off-season will come sooner than later. GPG.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Jonathan Krim grew up in New York but got hooked on the Packers — and on hating the Cowboys — watching the Ice Bowl as a young child. He blames bouts of unhappiness in his late teens on Dan Devine. A journalist for several decades who now lives in California, he enjoys trafficking in obscure cultural references, lame dad jokes and occasionally preposterous takes. Jonathan is a Packers shareholder, and insists on kraut with his brats. You can follow Jonathan on twitter at @Jkrim.
__________________________




Comments (157)
T7Steve
December 30, 2024 at 07:43 am
"Tucker Kraft — Only three targets, which is odd, but the two receptions were the Packers’ biggest chunk plays. He needs to be involved much more in the passing game."
If they weren't stopping the pass rush anyway, why not dump a few quick ones to the TEs and backs to open up the D a little?
Razer
December 30, 2024 at 08:04 am
I am with you on this. The Packers never really figured out how to use TEs in the offense - always a downfield ball type of team. As they said during the broadcast, this was a chess match early. Given we weren't using the TE and backfield passes effectively, the Vikings had a much simpler job.
jannesbjornson
December 30, 2024 at 08:47 am
They put no pressure on the viqueen's LBs to cover. There are too many errors with fundamentals, repeated weekly. Wicks has to know to get the hell out of bounds to kill the clock on their last series.
dobber
December 30, 2024 at 10:07 am
At the moment, the Wicks mistake seemed crucial...in the end, it really didn't matter.
jannesbjornson
December 30, 2024 at 05:52 pm
I hope you're not defending him.
murf7777
December 30, 2024 at 09:58 am
Oh, do you mean like they did to us with A. Jones just waiting in the wings when we pressured Darnold? Yes, that would’ve been smart, not sure why we didn’t do that more. A lot of things went wrong in that game, too numerous to mention.
Packerpasty
December 30, 2024 at 10:05 am
COACHING
Packer_Fan
December 30, 2024 at 07:52 am
I see this game as three things that went wrong.
First, self inflicted mistakes. Wicks with two procedural penalties. The offside on the missed field goal at the end of the half. Holding on a touchdown run and skipping the field goal in the first half. These happen most of the year or in big games. Even Lafluer needs to rethink things.
Second, this defense can get torched by good QB's. And it happened last night. Until the DB's can stop the dagger route, the defense will struggle. Nixon was close, but Stokes was terrible. And Stokes has NO hands. He had a chance at an interception and his hands were two feet apart and the ball went through them.
And last, Love needs to learn to use check downs more. Darnold did all game. With Jacobs and Kraft great at run after the catch, these guys need to be used more to open up the long game.
The mistakes were more than enough to win. They have to be eliminated.
T7Steve
December 30, 2024 at 08:02 am
" Love needs to learn to use check downs more. Darnold did all game. With Jacobs and Kraft.."
Did you see how many times early that Jacobs leaked through the line on pass plays and was wide open? Don't know why they didn't play Jacobs in the second half much. Still worried about that.
Razer
December 30, 2024 at 07:53 am
Well said Jonathan. The team is young and raw but it is becoming clear that we are a level below the top teams including the two in our own division. It also appears that Hafley is on the same track that Barry, Pettine and Capers were on. Not a good enough D-line to control a game and not enough pass rush to make a QB uncomfortable. This falls on Gutekunst, who repeatedly drafts Nick Perry then bargain shops in late rounds for the rest of his big body projects.
Not sure what to think of Love in the grand scheme of things. He fearlessly stands in a collapsing pocket, eyes downfield then doesn't quite make the throw. I think he is good but isn't playing up to potential. It would help if we had true route running quality WRs. Again, Gutekunst likes to shop at the discount store for our receivers and it shows. Aside from actually catching the ball, our kind of offense needs guys who can separate. Doubs is about the only guy who can create a window of time for a QB. Maybe a WR coach who actually played the game could help.
Overall, it is disappointing to know that the talent isn't quite there to challenge for the big prize. My worry is that our formula for building a championship team is wrong and we won't have good enough D-line, secondary or wide receivers to make the leap. Defeat Monday coming down. Arrrgh.
T7Steve
December 30, 2024 at 08:10 am
My teeth were hurting from grinding while the pass rush just couldn't quite get there and the Viking receivers were catching everything when it counted.
Actually, I D as a whole stood up as well as could be expected given the O was hanging them out to dry so much. Giving up 27 points including the penalty kick is a fair showing against that O and we should have had more scoring against that D. Would have been nice to see a clean pocket once in a while. The O-line looked like they were on skates.
Guam
December 30, 2024 at 08:51 am
I agree with you about the defense. The D was missing two starters in the secondary (Alexander and Williams) and then had Bullard change positions early in the game due to the injury to Andersen. Not a good situation when going up against one of the best receiving groups in the NFL and yet they still held Minnesota to their average points per game (27.0 versus 26.4 average).
The larger blame lies with the offense. When you can't score and leave your defense on the field for extended periods of time, you are going to lose. The offense couldn't get out of their own way for three quarters. Too many pre-snap penalties, too many drops and too many inaccurate throws.
dobber
December 30, 2024 at 10:16 am
The funny part was that if you listened to the Vikings announcers--which I had to do with the radio feed for part of the game--they were howling that the refs were favoring the Packers and out to get the Vikings.
NJ-RICK
December 30, 2024 at 08:19 am
Agreed the Packers need a new GM. I applaud what is going on in Minnesota right now. Their GM has assembled a very good football team. The Packers are falling back in their division and not heading North. Time for new MGT in Green Bay.
jannesbjornson
December 30, 2024 at 08:56 am
The purple's GM recognized his whiffs, moved people out, including All-Pros. He basically rebuilt their defense with Veteran free agents on second contracts. A guy like Van Ginkle should be in Packerland. The dial really hasn't moved since 2014.
Coldworld
December 30, 2024 at 10:44 am
The purple GM hot hugely lucky with Darnold (as their pre injury actions illustrate), but he also refused to accept a moderate OL. In that sense he made his luck whereas Stenavich has positively invited ours by refusing to recognize weaknesses. Is that on Gute or despite him?
dobber
December 30, 2024 at 10:47 am
The Cam Robinson trade after Darrisaw got hurt saved the Vikings' season.
That has turned out to be an A+ move.
egbertsouse
December 30, 2024 at 09:24 am
Exactly. Gute is enamored with the Mr. Universe, Nick Perry muscle-men at edge who have no agility or bend and have one pass rush move, the bull rush. He invariably passes on the Nick Bosa, TJ Watt types who use speed and agility to disrupt the quarterback’s game and give the DBs a chance.
Coldworld
December 30, 2024 at 10:47 am
That may change now we are a 4:3 base of course.
dobber
December 30, 2024 at 01:09 pm
Can't address everything in one draft. Do you want safeties?...those you can find throughout the draft. Speedy, skilled pass rushers--especially those with a pedigree--go in the top 10.
packerbackerjim
December 30, 2024 at 08:00 am
Why the long passes when shorter, possession ones designed to develop rhythm would have complemented Jacobs runs. There was a Musgrave sighting and as mentioned Kraft being underutilized. Defensively, GB is lacking a dominant pass rush(er). The DL is mediocre at best. Gary, Engabare, LVN, Cox all pretty much MIA. I would like to think Hafley will have input on the next draft and free agency.
coolhand
December 30, 2024 at 12:23 pm
I thought the D played well against the run but that lack of pass rush is definitely a problem. If we can't get pressure with 4 then we get killed. Playing zone all of the time is too predictable. We can't ever play man? And for example, the short pass to the back that sealed the game. No one was near the guy when he made the catch. How does our D, knowing they only needed a couple of yards for the first, NOT play tight coverage to avoid that type of play? I don't get it. It was all or nothing at that point and if you give up a big play it would not have mattered.
Doofapotamus
December 30, 2024 at 01:20 pm
What kills me is they played man at the very end of the game and forced Darnold to be extremely accurate with his throws. The very last meaningful play, they were in man coverage against a play action, which the Vikings ran multiple times and they left the RB wide open and uncovered for an easy check down first down to ice the game. GB has been historically bad against PA this season. I know you can't play man the entire game, but this soft zone coverage didn't work for Pettine, it didn't work for Barry and it's still not working for Hafley. I'm starting to think that GB just can't draft defensive talent because underperforming units across 3 straight defensive coordinators, with all of the first and second round talent spent on positions until this point, is simply inexcusable. They need to get it figured out and they need to spend some money to get a receiver who can catch the ball because Reed, Wicks and Doubs all have 6+ drops this season which is INSANE given the amount of targets they receive.
CanPackFan
December 31, 2024 at 11:28 am
Like most of these comments, I can't understand why Love constantly throws deep balls on short yardage plays? I realize every once in awhile it works, but it's a poor percentage play. It just isn't intelligent for a QB to do this as often as Love. I now think last seasons' long ball success has had a detrimental affect on Love. IMHO, he needs to forget about his big contract, throwing long into bad coverages and concentrate on completing more short passes.
SinceLombardi
December 30, 2024 at 08:13 am
Against the “physical” NFC teams ( Tampa, Detroit, Minnesota and Detroit and SF) the last two years the Packers are 1-7 and the one win against SF this year should not even count.
It’s not about mistakes.. mistakes are what happens when physical teams pressure you. They will happen EVERY time when you are “out physicaled”
We signed Jacobs and McKinney and it wasn’t enough.
We need a physical leader and philosophy on defense. We have neither.
It’s a regression from 2023 unless they win a divisional round game.. that’s just a fact.
Another big difference is we’re paying $220 million for a quarterback that I can think of at least 10 that are playing better than him right now. And none of them have Josh Jacobs. Love is ok, but certainly not a “ franchise quarterback “ like we have had for 30 years previously.
NJ-RICK
December 30, 2024 at 08:23 am
Exactly, you can start by obtaining a new GM. Packer MGT has this team headed in the wrong direction. Lions and Vikings have leaped over the Packers in the division. I call it the way I see it... Time for new MGT in Green Bay.
LambeauPlain
December 30, 2024 at 10:06 am
Packers will have a new GM. The Acting GM is retiring next July. I fully expect New President Ed Policy will finally make Gutey the GM of the football team aka Wolf and Ted.
Gutey is only GM of Player Personnel currently...and youngest team in the NFL has good talent. I believe LaFluer and Murphy overruled Gutey to keep Rodgers in 2022 vs trading him for all that Denver Gold available in the 2021 offseason. Gutey, with actual GM authority, would have made that deal and the team would further down the road to being a top NFC team.
Gutey also did not have the power to get Barry out of town in 2023 when none other than Brian Flores was on the market. Murphy agreed with LaFleur's decision to retain Barry for another lost year of defense.
Also, It would have been nice to suit up Alexander the Occasional, Williams, Walker and Watkins yesterday to go against the Ugly Purple's healthy squad. Had they played would the Packers have won? Possibly...then the comments today would be flipped 180 degrees.
Coldworld
December 30, 2024 at 10:42 am
Go back to the old structure. Remove the ability to hide. If Gute can’t improve things in a true TT role, then that will be clear. Right now, I firmly believe that for at least 5 of the last 7 seasons we’ve got less from the roster assembled than we should have and for reasons that continue to surface. Let Gute hire his HC and go from there. Who here would really fear LaFleur as the HC of the Bears?
Leatherhead
December 30, 2024 at 06:50 pm
Because the first rule of good management would be to demote Matt LaFleur, which is what you're advocating. Right now, it's a Triad of CFO, GM, HC with the Prez at the head of the table. You'd be making Gutekunst the boss of LaFleur, again. I'm sure this makes sense to some people, but not to me.
13TimeChamps
December 30, 2024 at 10:12 am
Death, taxes and "Time for new MGT in Green Bay."
Good lord, you are tiresome.
Aldo
December 30, 2024 at 08:26 am
I couldn't agree more with your assessment. Each and every point is spot on.
LambeauPlain
December 30, 2024 at 10:08 am
Quick question...how did Rodgers and Favre do in the playoffs after their second year as starter?
dobber
December 30, 2024 at 10:14 am
"but certainly not a “ franchise quarterback “ like we have had for 30 years previously."
To amplify your point, LP, there's a difference between a "franchise QB" and a "generational" or "all-time great" QB.
Coldworld
December 30, 2024 at 10:49 am
There is also a difference in even generational QBs throughout their career. Some of that is them, but large parts roster and coaching.
coolhand
December 30, 2024 at 12:50 pm
Darnold is a perfect example. He looked terrible everywhere he played and was considered a BUST until he got to Minne. AND he only became the starter because McCarthy got hurt. Coaching and play calling are critical.
dobber
December 30, 2024 at 01:10 pm
Would you be willing to bet on him as a franchise QB?
Coldworld
December 30, 2024 at 04:58 pm
In his case, add an OL. One could say the same of Goff. Our refusal to see weakness on our OL only to have teams demonstrate it year after year ought to be getting more attention.
Leatherhead
December 30, 2024 at 07:00 pm
You keep saying "refusal to see". It's a strong line, but Minnesota was better yesterday. Most games this season it's been plenty good enough. Yesterday, it wasn't. It's not a refusal to see....more like a refusal to fixate. It's a good enough line to win with, most of the time.
Every year, our season ends with backup offensive linemen on the field and guys like Bakhtiari, Jenkins, and Tom are on the sidelines injured. I've been barking about the Oline,and I will, again, in this offseason.
I think it works like this: You win games with offfense. Passing gets you more yards and more points than rushing, so you want to be able to pass. That means having a good QB and giving him protection to do his job.
Yesterday, we couldn't score, because we couldn't pass, because we couldn't protect our QB well enough. Addressing that should the #1 priority in the offseason. If we can protect Love, nobody can stop us from scoring 30 or more.
LambeauPlain
December 30, 2024 at 03:20 pm
True. Coaching and Team Culture is paramount to success. Outstanding coaching with an average - good roster will get you a competitive team and playoffs.
Outstanding coaching with good to excellent roster will get you to SBs. They do call it "The Lombardi".
KenEllis
December 30, 2024 at 08:14 am
From the article: "here’s hoping Brian Gutekunst is recognizing the serious need to upgrade the edge, middle linebacker and corner positions in the off-season."
Is this the same Brian Gutekunst who drafted Edge Rashan Gary (he of the 6.5 sacks on the season) 12th overall and then gave him a 4 year-$96,000,000 deal despite Gary never having reached double digit sacks?
The same Brian Gutekunst who last year drafted Edge Lukas Van Ness 13th overall and subsequently watched LVN fail to deliver through his first 33 games in the NFL?
The Gutekenust who drafted LB Quay Walker 22nd overall only to see Quay completely lack the instincts to play the position? (To be fair, Gute seems to have hit on Cooper).
The Gutekunst who drafted CBs Josh Jackson in round 2 and Eric Stokes in round 1?
I too hope Gutekunst recognizes that the defense continues to lack talent at Edge, LB, and CB, but Gute's drafting track record at Edge, CB, and LB does not exactly inspire confidence that he will fill the voids at those positions.
And as he heads into his 8th season as Packer GM, perhaps it is worth considering whether the Packers ongoing talent deficiencies at Edge, LB, and CB are not due to Gutekunst's failure to recognize those deficiencies but rather his inability to rectify them.
NJ-RICK
December 30, 2024 at 08:24 am
Maybe its time for a new GM....? I've been saying it for years...
LambeauPlain
December 30, 2024 at 10:12 am
Right, you are saying you been here stating this for 7 years now?
Because the Acting GM, since 2017, has been Mark Murphy...you know that right?
13TimeChamps
December 30, 2024 at 10:19 am
Mark Murphy has nothing to do with the draft...you know that right?
Coldworld
December 30, 2024 at 10:52 am
But a great deal to do with the coaching and cap decisions, unlike Gute.
13TimeChamps
December 30, 2024 at 11:08 am
I believe the topic being discussed was the drafting of players, not the salary cap.
Coldworld
December 30, 2024 at 11:11 am
The topic being discussed is culpability and responsibility. As usual broader than the narrow definition of your preference.
13TimeChamps
December 30, 2024 at 11:33 am
I know you like to think you have the scoop on everything that goes on inside of 1265, but maybe you should stick to ripping on the HC, something you're really good at.
Yes, the GM reports to the President. That doesn't mean Murphy is lurking over Gute's shoulder critiquing everything he does. Personally, I believe Gute has way more autonomy than people, like yourself, believe.
LambeauPlain
December 30, 2024 at 11:38 am
Not according to Murphy. He was asked about going back to the Wolf, Ted GM structure and he said would not...and it would be up to the New President after he retires.
It was Murphy who told Ball to make another Cap Hell contract extension for Rodgers after the 2021 season.
LambeauPlain
December 30, 2024 at 11:26 am
No, it was the constant droning for a NEW GM when most making that comment do not know Gutey is only the GM of Player Personnel...and even then, his player decisions can be overruled by the Acting GM Murphy.
Who do you think made the final decision to hire JJ and X? It was Murphy, even if just an "ok Gutey do it after financial input from Gutey's CO EQUAL on the Packers Football Committee...and probably some input from his other CO EQUAL LaFluer.
Unlike Wolf or Ted who had full authority.
Good grief.
13TimeChamps
December 30, 2024 at 11:38 am
"Who do you think made the final decision to hire JJ and X? It was Murphy with input from Gutey's CO EQUAL on the Packers Football Committee...and probably even his other CO EQUAL LaFluer."
And you know this how exactly? Next time you're in on one of these meetings, could you bring me along? I think it would be fascinating.
LambeauPlain
December 30, 2024 at 12:07 pm
That's not required. You can just read and follow history. Ball used to report to Ted as Vice president of football administration/player finance. When Ted wanted a player, Ball told him what the financial implications were and how the player would impact the cap. Ted made the decision.
In 2018 he was promoted to Executive vice president/director of football operations (including the Cap) and began to report to President Murphy.
Also reporting to Murphy were ML and GB...all three are co equals on the committee chaired by Chrm. Murphy. Ball cannot overrule Gutey's hiring of players but Murphy can...especially if Ball advises him on the cap pros/cons.
I recall a few years ago when Gutey was asked about the implications of being over the cap after increasing Rodgers' compensation after the 2021 season. He said unhappily "I guess we will do more extensions and void years. It seems that's what we're doing these days."
Oppy
December 30, 2024 at 05:23 pm
Lambeau, you are 100% correct, but I fear you're wasting your breath.
I've been trying to explain to people the tell-tale signs of Murphy/Ball interfering with Gutekunst's ability to truly act as a proper GM as Ted Thompson and Ron Wolf once did, but they don't listen.
Gutekunst absolutely made those comments a few off-seasons ago, and it was without question a sly nod to the fact that Rodgers had Murphy's ear and Murphy was instructing Ball to find ways to keep aging vets on the roster (you know, the type Rodgers prefers) no matter the cap implications.
Murphy finally woke up to the fact he's been taken for a ride by Rodgers and gave the OK to Gute to ship him out. At that point, and only at that point, has Gutekunst truly been able to start working unimpeded to really work on rebuilding the roster as he sees fit.
Razer
December 30, 2024 at 09:11 am
Spot on KenEllis. Packer drafts follow a formula that is not yielding many second contract players. Defense has not really improved in over a decade and any positive change usually comes from free agency. While I like athletic players, the preoccupation with RAS is loading us up with Darnell Savage, Stokes and Walker type of players. Pass rush generally needs to be bought and secondary is chronically weak. This is all on poor drafting.
On offense, we still think that drafting tackles and converting them to guards and centers is the ticket. Again, chronically weak interior line plan is trademark of this team. You only have to listen to Love's post game comment that "we weren't winning our one-on-ones" to know that WR, while cheap, isn't good enough to beat the better teams. It reeks of Aaron Rodgers trying to make tight window throws to win games.
Bottomline is that Gutekunst needs to draft better if this team is going to compete with Philly, Detroit and Minny. I am not holding my breathe.
bleedgreen
December 30, 2024 at 07:53 pm
So many wasted defensive picks by both Gutenkunst and TT before him. How many were wasted on failed defensive backs alone?
Packerpasty
December 30, 2024 at 08:18 am
Perhaps Love is not now top tier QB and maybe never will be and to be successful he has to be surrounded by very good talent at WR and O line...I really dont see much growth from him and that is also on MLF and his mediocre staff...the D line while rushing four has very little impact on a game...Gary, Clark, LVN, they should be traded while something can still be gotten from them....MLF is not a great HC that should be obvious..good OC not a great leader of men...his locker room speeches after games are rather cringe to these guys is my bet...he try's to seem tough but it dont work...will they make much noise in the playoffs?? Still to be determined, sure hope they dont play Eagles, with or without Hurts...oh yah, enough of the "young" team excuse...so are the Vikes and a few other teams with true rookie QBs....
SinceLombardi
December 30, 2024 at 09:09 am
10 quarterbacks I’d rather have than Jordan Love heading into the playoffs:
Mahomes, Burrow, Jackson, Stafford, Goff, Allen, Mayfield, Herbert Daniels and even Darnold. None of them have a best friend like Josh Jacobs either. Maybe Darnold won’t be on the list next year, but Bo Nix will be.
There is pressure on this organization to equal last year , which would be a wildcard victory and a good showing in a divisional game. Unfortunately the Saints won’t be in there.
It’s not a one bad game and the sky is falling, rather it’s the same old story.. Physical well coached teams have no problems with GB. Even if it’s close.. we lose. We are more than one or two players away.
Upgrades at defensive backfield , linebacker, several d line spots, and center are needed. Too much for one offseason. Hafley has been pretty solid, but he doesn’t have the players.
The fact that the Packers are young should be negated by their playoff experience from 23. The concerns about the defense against teams like Jacksonville and Chicago are coming home to roost. Including a win against a crippled SF team we are 1-7 since lat year against Tampa, Detroit Minnesota, Philadelphia and SF. All teams that play physical defense and have O lines that dominate GBs d line.
Yesterday the comeback was a mirage.. Love himself said the offense couldn’t do anything until the Vikings started playing defense”soft” That’s twice the Vikings and Lions outclassed GB this season. I felt we could have beat Philly, but I think they have improved and we haven’t shown me the next game would be any better. Washington is only a few players from being better than GB too.
tobinrote
December 30, 2024 at 08:25 am
face it. we are clearly a second tier team and will stay one because we bet our future on Love who just is incapable of making accurate routine throws often enough. He has his moments, but what one needs at that position is reliability. watching the amazing jayden daniels he will never be, but hell he was outplayed by sam darnold.
ricky
December 30, 2024 at 08:26 am
The game was decided in the trenches. The Packers couldn't generate any pressure with four rushers. When they did send more, they were quickly and efficiently picked up. Meanwhile, Love was constantly finding himself facing opposing players. Brian Flores is a master of finding ways to pressure QB's. Hafley hasn't found a way yet. If Saleh is still "advising" the team, maybe he could come up with some way to get pressure without weakening the back end. And the continued inability to protect the middle of the field has been a problem for several seasons.
This team is still a work in progress. Which is frustrating. Another very slow start to the year for Love, who then improved considerably, only to seemingly regress the last two weeks. And only three passes to Kraft? I can understand wanting to ease Musgrave back into the mix, but Kraft has shown he is a top tier TE.
In short, a better team (painful to say, but true this season) allowed their opponent to make things interesting in the end. But this only occurred when the defense changed, and the Vikings went into more of a "prevent defense" at the end of the game.
Aldo
December 30, 2024 at 08:32 am
Several points:
1. Love is NOT that good. Accuracy is problem, and he lofts the ball far too much.
2. The D line is pathetic. Play after play they lack the ability to break away from blocks, giving qb's all sorts of time.
3. What was with the O line? It looked like the Vikings were playing with 15 guys. There was way too much pressure on Love.
Leatherhead
December 30, 2024 at 07:03 pm
But Aldo...all last year, and this offseason, people have lamented our inability to stop the run. Yesterday, Minnesota got sixty-some yards on the ground in 26 carries. So we stuffed the run. That's what we wanted. We got a new DC, new players, a new scheme, and we stuffed the run. We should be happy.
Bitternotsour
December 30, 2024 at 08:07 pm
I was assured it wasn't about the points, it was about how the points were scored.
GregC
December 30, 2024 at 08:32 am
I was okay with going for it on 4th and 2 in the second quarter. That is the usual call in the NFL nowadays, especially against a high scoring team like the Vikings. The Packers already had to settle for a field goal earlier in the game, and I'm sure the Vikings would have been very happy to hold them to another field goal.
SinceLombardi
December 30, 2024 at 09:12 am
Twice in big games the lack of those 3 points hurt.. yesterday and the divisional round game last year. Hopefully MLF has learned something.
dobber
December 30, 2024 at 10:12 am
Really going to litigate 2nd quarter FG decisions as if the whole game plays out the same way if they score 3?
Razer
December 30, 2024 at 09:20 am
I agree GregC. At some point you got to try and make it happen. A better, road grading interior line would make these decisions much easier and way harder to defend.
Coldworld
December 30, 2024 at 10:39 am
LaFleur/Stenovich consistently overrate our OL in game planning and in game decisions. Our IOL is not good. We refuse to challenge weaker elements in it. It comes back to bite us every year.
coolhand
December 30, 2024 at 01:28 pm
I disagree on going for it. It was 4th and 2. 4th and inches or less than a yard yes, but it was only 7-3 at the time and early in the 2nd. I would have taken the points. We didn't score but Minne did get 3 after that so it was a 6 point swing.
Houndog
December 30, 2024 at 08:41 am
The word "Middle" says it all, as that's where the Packers stand as an NFL team!
"A middling pass rush"? Where? Other than Brooks and Cooper it was almost non-existent yesterday!
"Inadequate (coverage) in the middle of the field". Inadequate? Coverage, what coverage? Both the D and the O treat the 'Middle' like the Bermuda Triangle, almost refusing to enter it. Hafley allows weekly beatings to take place there, and MLF would rather have Love throw a 40 yard, inaccurate bomb on 3rd or 4th and 3, or run it for 2 yards than throw over the Middle for 6 or 8! First downs be damned, and to hell with putting points on the board!
Worse yet was that as the Packers often wait until halftime, the Middle of the game, to get their heads out of their asses, yesterday they waited until the Middle of the 4th quarter.
The good teams will eat them alive!
SinceLombardi
December 30, 2024 at 09:18 am
Jordan Love said the offense didn’t get untracked until Minnesota started playing “soft” .. a terrible indicator of how they match up against the Vikings.
Quarterbacks like, Burrow, Jackson, Allen Mahomes make their teams much better. Love is only paid like them. Throw in Goff, Stafford , Herbert, Mayfield, and what do we really have?
I’d also take Daniels and probably by next year Nix over Love. If Darnold can replicate his success, we are paying $220 million for a QB that can crack the top 12 in the league.
Razer
December 30, 2024 at 09:26 am
This may be true - time will tell. If Love doesn't "pan out" then I think a move needs to be made on the GM front. Gutekunst and to some extent LaFleur will define themselves with Love. Given his draft track record, I don't see why our GM shouldn't be shown the door.
murf7777
December 30, 2024 at 10:07 am
So, to be objective on Gute’s draft record it should be compared to the others with data points. Show me the data that backs up your statement.
dobber
December 30, 2024 at 10:22 am
So far, the Packers have managed a roster rebuild and retool--and are on the verge of a 12-win season--without having had to visit the land of multi six-and-fewer-win seasons that many teams have to struggle through. The "bottom" was a 7-win season.
Coldworld
December 30, 2024 at 11:00 am
In The NFL the GMs job is not realistically to put together a perfect team. The league is structured to prevent that without massive luck and to quickly destroy it if that fails.
The GMs job is to put together a good enough team that a good Coach can win with, with a little luck. I’d argue we’ve had that with the exception of 2022 and 2018 since LaFleur arrived. One was due to Murphy bring ing the band back too many times and the other a rebuild from the pre Gute roster mess.
Over those 5 seasons, never once have we matched or exceeded expectations. In fact we’ve predictably shot ourself in the foot or simply been derailed by holdover failings not addressed. At some point one had to accept that other coaches have hit more out of less and continue to do so. LaFleur has never elevated a season. Seven years in he’d unlikely to change and shows no sign of the personal growth many hoped would improve things.
GregC
December 30, 2024 at 12:41 pm
They exceeded expectations last year. Before that, they at least matched expectations a few times, getting into the playoffs most years and making it to the NFC championship game one time.
Razer
December 30, 2024 at 11:21 am
Sorry murf7777 my analytics department got canned after it was recognized that facts and truth really don't matter in this day and age. As for data points, lets look at how many drafted secondary players or linebackers have survived to a second contract. My data only shows Alexander. How about the D-line? Other than Kenny Clark from the TT era only star pass rusher Gary was deemed worth saving.
Is this good enough or should we expect better team building?
MooPack
December 30, 2024 at 09:31 am
“ Both the D and the O treat the 'Middle' like the Bermuda Triangle, almost refusing to enter it.”
Probably the best description of this team yet, and for years. The better teams know to use it, the Packers do not.
TXCHEESE
December 30, 2024 at 08:42 am
Head scratching decisions by MLF. Going for it, instead of kicking the field goal to get within striking distance. Two weeks in a row, either play caller and/or Jordan Love fail to run the 2 minute offense at the end of the first half, but instead throwing up hero balls on third and manageable distance and instead hand the ball over with plenty of time on the clock. Against the the JV last week, it didn't hurt, but Minny made them pay. Just very, very poor game management.
Regardless of the score, Minny was visibly the better team. JA better heal up fast, or this team will go nowhere trying to play zone defense against the 2 or 3 seed come play off time.
Love has simply got to play better. He's missing receivers left and right.
Razer
December 30, 2024 at 09:39 am
Well said.
...Regardless of the score, Minny was visibly the better team...
This is hard to hear and makes this Monday morning tougher.
Coldworld
December 30, 2024 at 11:17 am
Was it the better team? It was on the night but was that performance or potential? It was the better coached team. I suppose it comes down to how you view the change in the O approach in the last quarter versus the prior strategy and if you think the Vikings had simply taken their finger off the gas as alleged versus Detroit, the Eagles and now both Vikings game.
Personally I see it as a coach driven issue of getting less out of the roster in these games than it merited, and that being shown by what happens when he’s forced to throw his plans away. It’s something we’ve seen regularly, notably last season and not merely with Love at QB.
Starrbrite
December 30, 2024 at 08:53 am
…Is Hafley truly an upgrade over Barry? I see the best D-Coords blitzing far more often than Hafley.
…I have consistently raved about Jacobs, but the fumble was unacceptable and reminded me of what Aaron Jones did in some critical moments.
…Can there be a game where the officiating doesn’t help determine an outcome. The free FG given to the Vikings was another pathetic overreach by the officials.
…Love seldom looks for a check down—move the chains.
…the game plan and management by LaFluer was lacking. Reed, Wicks, and Jacobs could have helped the narrative, but I felt Lafleur was badly out coached.
Go Packers!!!
Since'61
December 30, 2024 at 08:58 am
Game Balls: Edgerrin Cooper and Romeo Doubs.
Lame Calls: MLF play calling, choosing not to kick the FG in the 2nd quarter. Officials calling neutral zone infraction against Cooper on the Vikings missed FG.
In a game that ended in a 2 point difference not kicking the FG and the bad call against Cooper resulted in a 6 point swing in the Vikings favor. Admittedly the Packers did not play well enough to win but those 2 plays made an impact in the final result of the game. Thanks, Since '618
murf7777
December 30, 2024 at 10:11 am
I liked that they went for it on 4th and 2….Playing away against a very good team you need to show you can beat them. Hitting FG’s doesn’t do it, especially in the first half when you are trying to show dominance. Detroit is proving that you have to put trust in your players and play aggressively.
Since'61
December 30, 2024 at 02:26 pm
If you're playing at home I would be more inclined to agree with you. But playing on the road against a good team I would prefer to put the points on the board. Granted you never know what is going to happen later in the game but as we found out those 3 points would have been the difference in the game.
Besides that the Packers offense didn't play very aggressively until halfway into the 4th quarter. The Vikings played much more aggressively and like they needed/wanted the game much more than the Packers.
Thanks, Since '61
jannesbjornson
December 30, 2024 at 06:05 pm
3 > 0, in Version One reality
EnemyTerritory
December 30, 2024 at 08:59 am
We got manhandled and are clearly a second tier team. That’s the consensus and it’s hard to argue. Reading the 20 or so comments above the fanbase wants to fire the GM, fire the coach, change QBs, and trade the entire D line as well as upgrade the O line. Let’s do that (assuming you can find any takers for such a group of untalented bottom feeders). If we work really hard we can be the second iteration of the Bears, Giants, Jets or Panthers. The only thing not suggested is to rip up the organizational structure and offer the team to a multibillionaire. Perhaps Murphy should just notify the NFL that the team forfeits week 18 and desires to skip the playoffs because they need to work on their offseason plans. Sheesh….
Coldworld
December 30, 2024 at 10:35 am
Or we could just go back to the Harlen mode and have a clear line of responsibility through the GM. Our coach is a dead end in my view, but Gute didn’t hire him or sanction his decisions since. Therefore it’s hard to know whether the failure is joint. Personally, I think this roster is, and prior ones have been, better than it’s played when it’s mattered. Thus I see LaFleur as the problem. Under Harlen culpability wouldn’t have to be deduced though.
sugarbair
December 30, 2024 at 09:13 am
Everyone keeps calling Alexander a starter. He's only started 4 or 5 more games than me this year. Lol
dobber
December 30, 2024 at 10:25 am
Yeah, and I have some pretty critical comments about your track record in press coverage...
LambeauPlain
December 30, 2024 at 03:05 pm
About that complete zero stat sheet, sugarbair...Coach Hafly and Coach Lafleur want to see you in the DB room.
mjbrogno
December 30, 2024 at 09:16 am
I’ve read all the responses to this article and to say that I’m quite surprise would be an under statement. This team cannot win against a quality opponent with the mistakes that they make, plan and simple. Comparing Hadley to Joe Barry is not right. Hadley will probably be a head coach next season. The GM will address the defensive needs in the off season. Gutey needs to stop drafting high picks from the SEC. We wasted three number one picks from that conference ( Stokse, Wyatt and Quary). Alexander has missed 19 games in two seasons and will probably be gone. How many teams are fortunate to keep winning year after year.
I’ve been a true fan since 1967. It pains me to watch this tough losses just like everyone else but, let’s be realistic, we’re a young team that needs to keep on improving. The mental mistakes are killers. LaFluer is one of the best coaches in the NFL. Let’s just relax and hope for the best in the playoffs.
There are millions of other fans that wish that they could just have a winning season let alone make the playoffs, GO PACK GO!!!
SinceLombardi
December 30, 2024 at 09:42 am
There is NO WAY Hafley will be a head coach next year. He’s done ok with mediocre talent. Nothing more, nothing less.
Coldworld
December 30, 2024 at 11:03 am
He might be a good DC next year. The Lions and the Vikings DCs may well be HCs.
SinceLombardi
December 30, 2024 at 09:50 am
What you are missing is they won a playoff game and almost a divisional game in 23. Stats say we are improving, but several other teams have improved more ( Detroit, Philly , Minnesota) Now Washington has a better quarterback.
Being happy about winning a lot of games for 30 years pales in comparison to having two of the greatest QBs of all time and one ring each. Losing back to back playoffs as the #1 seed etc.
we have pinned our hopes on the worst quarterback we have had in 30 years , lol. Let’s be honest. He doesn’t tilt the field. He’s about the 12th best QB in the NFL. And with young talent like Nix and Daniels, he’s trending downwards.
Packerpasty
December 30, 2024 at 10:15 am
Spot on...no growth from Love that I see...
LeotisHarris
December 30, 2024 at 08:04 pm
"Being happy about winning a lot of games for 30 years pales in comparison to having two of the greatest QBs of all time and one ring each."
I see this sentiment expressed quite often, sometimes as a taunt from opposing fans. It was great to have 30 years of Favre/Rodgers as players (too bad both ended up sucking as humans) and there is disappointment that Favre-led teams went 1-1 and Rodgers 1-0 in Super Bowls. As a fan and an American, of course I am entitled to more. I should have had more and it's someone's fault I didn't get it! And, that person should be held accountable, preferably by losing their job because I don't get to wear a Super Bowl XIII, XIIII, XLVI and XLVII commemorative hat and sweatshirt. I'm also chafed about not being able to invest in Highland Mint figurines, but enough about me.
If we turn our gaze back, back to NFL history, the "only one ring" mantra applies to many. What, you say? That's correct, keyboard warrior, It's not unique to Green Bay. We can start with Lamonica/Stabler in Oakland (SAD!), review the combined years of Tarkenton/Moon/Cunningham in Minnesota (OH MY!), examine Air Coryell and Dan Fouts/Rivers in San Diego (No SB for poor Fouts), gaze upon lonesome Dan Marino slinging it for 17 seasons in Miami with no Lombardi Trophy to show for it. John Unitas? Only in 1958 really, Super Bowl V he wasn't a factor. Len Dawson and Joe Namath? ONE SB! Finally, poor wretched unlucky Sid Luckman played 12 seasons and won only one title. So sad so many fans had to watch these great players not win enough for so many year, right?
The glass can be half full or half empty. Maybe you're a there is no glass there kinda person. Whatever. I'd like to see this team improve and finish the season strong.
two roads diverged it the wood and I was like, can i just go home? - Melissa Broder
Bitternotsour
December 30, 2024 at 08:17 pm
just checked. Bears - 1 super bowl, 1985. I think correct me if I'm wrong, that will be 40 years ago. The Vikings haven't won one. 64 going on 65 years. The Lions? Yikes.
This no way obviates my obvious right to multiples, which is my birthright. Nonetheless, I've not hated having 3 decades of hall of fame quarterbacking.
Razer
December 30, 2024 at 09:52 am
As a Packers fan, it is hard not to be grateful for a winning franchise. As you point out, repeated mistakes in drafting, coaching and execution make it hard to swallow that we inevitably fall short. As I pointed out, Hafley is forced to do exactly as his DC predecessors because of his inability to play man or generate enough pass rush without leaving the middle of the field open. I just hate seeing the same scenario play out for the same reasons
Packerpasty
December 30, 2024 at 10:11 am
Who the hell is going to hire him next year when there are many more qualified and proven guys out there just waiting for a chance...funny stuff..
murf7777
December 30, 2024 at 10:16 am
So true….our fans are spoiled by the Packers great success over the past 30+ years. I think Wyatt is pretty darn good player thou.
jannesbjornson
December 30, 2024 at 06:10 pm
He should be featured.
bjkdad44
December 31, 2024 at 08:11 pm
Laflower is NOT one of the best coaches in the league!…
Packers0808
December 30, 2024 at 09:29 am
LaFluer is simply stupid in early on decisions, take the effing points and forget the try at first downs. Second game he lost because of early on going for first down and team failing to do so!
BuckyBadger
December 30, 2024 at 09:29 am
We all have seen that the Packers are are 11-0 vs teams no the Lions, Vikings or Eagles but another stat that is telling is the Packers are 1-5 vs teams that will be making the playoffs. They are consistent in that they beat the teams they should but in the big games the team is falling short as well.
With that said they are in a good place in the 2nd year with Love and having a team that is one of the youngest in the league. The Packers finally have a run game they can hang their hat on but the defense is still a problem. LVN needs to step on and become the pass rusher opposite of Gary and Gary himself should be causing more havoc then he does. In the past it was the offense that got all the big contracts and high draft picks but that isn't the case at the moment. There is a lot money and high picks on that side of the ball, it needs to improve in 2025.
SinceLombardi
December 30, 2024 at 10:06 am
I’m not sure Love will ever tilt the field against quality opposition. He’s barely a top 12 talent. By next year he won’t be that either as Nix will pass him too. Daniels is already clearly better.
To say the future is bright with Love is perhaps reasonable, but not certain. Like Goff ( who is clearly better than Love ) he needs to be surrounded by a championship caliber team. We are a loooong way from that, especially on defense.
BuckyBadger
December 30, 2024 at 10:17 am
Nix won't pass him. He is already regressing with teams having film on him and a below average arm. Love has the talent to be as good as anyone, needs to get his accuracy under control.
Bitternotsour
December 30, 2024 at 10:37 am
that's what they said about Drew Brees. Bo Nix has a big pair, and he has the right coach. Nix can play. He won't be Daniels, but he's an NFL quarterback and at least the talent that Brock Purdy is, and Purdy played in a super bowl.
Coldworld
December 30, 2024 at 11:21 am
A really astute coach can win with a less talented QB than Love is at this point in his career. Better tactics, culture and game plans can make a real difference.
jlc1
December 30, 2024 at 10:19 am
To all the Daniels, Nix and other rookie QB love around here.....CJ Stroud. Some or all these will regress as Stroud has.
dobber
December 30, 2024 at 10:27 am
Too true: Stroud has looked shell-shocked later in the season as his OL has fallen apart.
LambeauPlain
December 30, 2024 at 03:30 pm
Wait now dobber...so you are saying the OL and DL make a difference to Team success? But they are only 41% of the starters on Offense and Defense during game days!
You are starting to comment like LH!
Leatherhead
December 30, 2024 at 09:37 am
Gloom, despair, and agony on me
Deep dark depression, excessive misery
Losing a game doesn't bother me as much as the incessant blather about one of the best franchises in the NFL. Seriously, some of y'all should root for the Browns.
T7Steve
December 30, 2024 at 09:48 am
To be fair, LH, we bitch about the wins too. Only 30 on the Saints and they almost scored once?
dobber
December 30, 2024 at 09:53 am
We are equal opportunity blatherers! ;)
dobber
December 30, 2024 at 10:02 am
Yeah, it sucks that they lost. Yeah, they made it close at the end. Yeah, they made some questionable plays and decisions (frankly, while I would've kicked the ball, I like the aggression of the 4th down play) that make it easy for us to second-guess. Based on the reactions--mostly from the "we only come out when they lose" crowd that we ironically haven't heard much from this season--we'd think they went to Chicago and got manhandled by a 4-12 team, and not played a 13-2 team on a 8-game winning streak on their home field where the Packers have traditionally struggled.
Bitternotsour
December 30, 2024 at 10:12 am
Minnesota may find themselves as Super Bowl favorites in a week, and we played poorly and lost by 2... at their place. (ellipsis placement by ChatGBP)
I hope Love plays two series next week, and we rest the safety room as well as Ja - unless he specifically asks to play to knock off some rust. Jacobs a healthy scratch, please.
Damn, Cooper is a player. I can't wait to see him with Quay and Eric Wilson. The wildcard teams are FORMIDABLE this year. Commanders have a gamblers chance, thanks to the Bears for not drafting well.
coolhand
December 30, 2024 at 01:43 pm
Sure, we only lost by 2 but we had 64 yards passing into the 4th quarter. We got slaughtered. Mistakes, penalties, bad play calling and decisions plague this team even from last year.
Bitternotsour
December 30, 2024 at 06:23 pm
so? the season starts in two weeks. strap yourself in, you may not have the fortitude to watch football. perhaps a more gentle sport would suit you.
coolhand
December 31, 2024 at 12:17 pm
GFY
Leatherhead
December 30, 2024 at 07:07 pm
Nah. This aint slaughtered. I've seen slaughtered. 61-7 is slaughtered.
We made too many mistakes. Most games are not won, they are lost, and we lost this game by a really narrow margin, and we surely made enough mistakes to lose it.
Not a slaughter. Not close.
coolhand
December 31, 2024 at 01:07 pm
Even though the score wasn't a slaughter, having 64 yards passing after 3 quarters is a disaster. Abandoning the running game and heaving deep passes into triple coverage on 3rd and 5 shows a desperate team and is like a surrender to your opponent.
Packerpasty
December 30, 2024 at 10:13 am
glad your happy about our mediocre coach and QB...never gonna see the promised land with these two is my bet...
Bitternotsour
December 30, 2024 at 07:47 pm
you're, try to get it right.
murf7777
December 30, 2024 at 10:24 am
Yes, from a fan who went thru the misery of the 70’s and 80’s. I had a Cleveland fan over for our Packer game with the Cleveland game on the other TV. He was rooting for Cleveland to lose so they can get a higher draft pick. Of course, all I could do is remember when I used to do that with our Packers far too often in those days. Guess what, those type of teams with poor management seldom get to the top by drafting in the top 10 year in and year out.
YES, our fans, especially the younger ones who didn’t live thru the 70”s and 80’s are spoiled!
1standten
December 30, 2024 at 12:14 pm
If it weren't for bad luck I'd have no luck at all.
Bitternotsour
December 30, 2024 at 09:42 am
the game was exactly as close as the score. that's how it works. welcome to overreaction Monday.
the season starts in two weeks, take a valium.
NFLfan
December 30, 2024 at 12:08 pm
@BN-Scrub-a-dub-dub
Handsback
December 30, 2024 at 09:58 am
I posted this in another article, but this team is living on last year's laurels. Their EFFORT was horrendous. The offensive gameplay was very flawed, if Love followed the script. I mentioned before the game set up the run, which they did sans fumble, short passes over the middle- slant, TE and RB swing passes, then go with throws down field.
The Packers have enough talent to compete. What they are missing is heart. Last year w/o Jacob's they were in the final eight. This year it's like they think they can turn it on whenever they want...except that can't.
Just MHO
dobber
December 30, 2024 at 10:03 am
...because you win 11 games by not playing with heart or riding on last year's (9-8 record?) successes?
Bitternotsour
December 30, 2024 at 10:14 am
they're not really ready for the post season, the trolls have sent out replacement quality writers.
NFLfan
December 30, 2024 at 12:16 pm
@BN-your work is never over, esp. after that embarrassing drubbing-lol
I'll put in a good word for your effort, though.
Bitternotsour
December 30, 2024 at 06:27 pm
I can't quite figure if you're 13 years old and signing onto this site thinking trolling provides you a quality outlet when you aren't allowed to be gaming, or conversely if you're just a really low IQ adult with limited life experience. I guess both track.
Leatherhead
December 30, 2024 at 07:10 pm
An embarassing drubbing? Losing to a 14-2 team at home by two points? When we repeatedly shot ourselves in the foot? That drubbing?
I do not believe that word means what you think it means.
LambeauPlain
December 30, 2024 at 10:20 am
With the parity driven NFL where the trip from worst to first can be a very short journey, there is no way a team, especially the youngest team in the NFL, gets a double digit winning season by playing no "heart".
That's naive. For crying out loud, a team with no heart would have folded early in the second half yesterday.
Did you ever play the game?
jlc1
December 30, 2024 at 10:15 am
Add to Brooks' game ball the recovery of Valentine's fumble.
dobber
December 30, 2024 at 10:30 am
That was a potentially very high to very low moment in a single play saved by Brooks' hustle and hands.
jlc1
December 30, 2024 at 10:20 am
I think the statement you are what your record says you are is absolutely true of this team. Good but not good enough.
Bitternotsour
December 30, 2024 at 10:42 am
winning the regular season doesn't get you into heaven, son. #1 seeds have a history of failure in the playoffs and with good reason. the point of the regular season is to play in the post-season. mission fucking accomplished. now settle down for 2 weeks.
Coldworld
December 30, 2024 at 11:28 am
If one establishes a clear pattern of outcomes for related reasons, ignoring that is irrational and actually does shed light on future potential. Yes, it doesn’t guarantee recurrence, but the patterns under LaFleur have tended to end up derailing us fairly predictably, regardless of QB or the latest nemesis opposition, no matter how many times we’ve played them that year.
NFLfan
December 30, 2024 at 12:06 pm
The final score means nothing.
NFLfan
December 30, 2024 at 12:21 pm
@BN-I can see this is your busy season-this team is a challenge...keep up the good work.
jlc1
December 30, 2024 at 03:03 pm
Nicely settled down, Dad. Trying to think of #1 seeds that failed in the playoffs.....oh yeah MLF's Packers. I trust you remember that too. But I'm still working on how many #6 seeds won the SB or even got there. Help me out BNS. When that number comes back you'll see that there is some correlation between regular season success and post-season success. So it seems rational to think of this team as good but not good enough. You know, based on their record.
jlc1
December 30, 2024 at 05:05 pm
Yo, BNS. Here are some facts to help us sort through how meaningful regular season record has been in recent years. From The Athletic:
Byes matter. Seven consecutive No. 1 or 2 seeds won the Super Bowl after the 2013-2019 seasons, when the top two seeds in each conference enjoyed byes. Second seeds lost bye privileges after the 2020 regular season, when the NFL added a seventh playoff entrant to each conference. Since then, Tom Brady’s 2020 Buccaneers remain the only wild-card team to win it all (they are the only wild-card team since the 2011 season to even reach the Super Bowl).
Bitternotsour
December 30, 2024 at 06:31 pm
so you're saying there's a chance? SF was a one seed last year. How'd that work out?
LambeauPlain
December 30, 2024 at 10:28 am
"And his insistence on choosing to take the ball first rather than deferring is simply bad strategy."
That's your opinion, Jonathan and I do not agree with it.
I agree with this Jonathon who stated a few sentences later: "His (Jacobs) fumble killed what was shaping up to be a successful Packers’ first drive and altered the tone of game from the jump."
Looks like you feel strongly both ways!
So if taking the ball for successful first drive did end up "altering the tone of the game" would you have written the first sentence above? I doubt it.
Hindsight is perfect vision.
murf7777
December 30, 2024 at 10:29 am
We have to keep in mind, we have a team that is top 10 in offense and defense in most all categories. I’m confident this team can beat anyone and make a run for it. Yes, they need to clean up things and that will determine whether they fail or not IMO.
NFLfan
December 30, 2024 at 10:39 am
The dysfunction goes back much further to the time Mark Murphy seized control and upset the previous balance and decreed he retain full control as President/CEO. He was 'awarded' this role by the Board, many of whom are friends and business contacts.
He has hired men he can control. -For many years Gute did not operate w/the full autonomy one would expect as a GM.The best GMs would not tolerate Murphy's interference. MLF was hired as a fledgling 39 y/o with no HC experience.
And, though Murphy is scheduled to retire July 2025, I don't believe he will go quietly into the night. He is too invested in Titletown. Ed Policy is not a strong replacement-more of a company man, from what I've seen. Murphy can pull strings while in the background.
In order for Green Bay to compete with Minnesota and Detroit, a profound shake-up would need to occur-something like the metamorphosis in Detroit or Washington. Additionally, Bylaws would need to be re-written to return to the fairer, better-balanced individual silos. The current structure is not fair, crosses boundaries and gives one man too much power.
I do not see Ed Policy being that man, nor do I see Murphy graciously removing himself from covert influence.
As a result, MLF and Gute will remain, hopefully Hafley will over-ride Gute's D Draft 'projects' (most recent Ty-Ron
Hopper) and the Pack will emerge a B-B+ team. They won't go further though with this current management.
Strat
December 30, 2024 at 01:42 pm
I appreciate your honest take as opposed to a blinded one.
"A middling pass rush." That's being kind. I would settle for that. Vikes OL looked almost bored out there...even when the Packers blitzed,
"Jeff Hafley’s crew has padded some stats over the past few weeks against weaker teams." Everyone should be able to see this. Most don't want to accept it.
"Carrington Valentine — His interception in the fourth quarter came at a key moment." It stopped the game from being a blowout and was the toughest catch made while others on O dropped less difficult passes.
"Lukas Van Ness is mediocre." And he's not the only one. Reminds of Dean Lowry. But I just don't get Van Ness. He's got all the tools to be a force, so I'm not going to give up on him this early. I would think he could be developed into that force, but maybe tools don't mater as much as just being able to play the game.
You're right about taking the ball first being bad strategy, it's also stupid. You have a whole league full of teams that agree with you. It's not like he knows some secret the others don't. But to his credit, he's the only coach that hops up and down on the sideline like a bunny.
Landing the seventh spot. "Which would mean a very tough visit to Philadelphia, a team that does everything that gives Green Bay trouble." Even if Hurts doesn't clear protocol, Packers wouldn't get to play against a dismal back-up QB again (Allen, Howell, Streeter), as Kenny Pickett is not in that category.
I still don't know what to think about Jordan Love, but he's "the guy" since they paid him like "the guy." I'd be willing to bet Malik Willis could have got them into the playoffs also.
This constant "You are what your record says you are" BS needs to stop. They're 0-5 against the top three seeds and 1-4 in their division, almost 0-5. Right now they're fortunate to be a playoff team. Hope they're not "one and done."
jlc1
December 30, 2024 at 04:40 pm
Not BS. You just made the point actually. 11-0 against bad to good competition and 0-5 against elite. Their record says they're good not elite.
cdoemel
December 30, 2024 at 03:23 pm
Rodgers was 11-5 in his 2nd year, lost to the Vikings twice in the regular season and lost in the wild card round to the Arizona Cardinals.
LambeauPlain
December 30, 2024 at 03:35 pm
I recall all the prognosticators proclaiming Rodgers as a Franchise QB and a certain HOFer after that Cardinal loss (which the Pack should have WON, stupid refs).
13TimeChamps
December 30, 2024 at 03:54 pm
Rodgers was 29/42 for 422 yards and 4 TDs in that game. His "fumble" was a result of an uncalled facemask violation as he was being tackled, which pretty much sealed the win for Arizona. It was an incredible QB duel between Rodgers and Kurt Warner. Too bad the refs f****d it up.
jlc1
December 30, 2024 at 04:42 pm
Well there was at least some payback with the "facemask" on the play before the Rodgers to Rodgers Hail Mary.
jannesbjornson
December 30, 2024 at 06:19 pm
Not a Playoff Game.
Oppy
December 30, 2024 at 05:26 pm
What I've learned over my lifetime is Packers fans are ridiculously fickle. Many of us have opinions that wildly swing from week to week. It's kind of embarrassing.
Packerpasty
December 31, 2024 at 08:13 am
well thats what fans of any sport do....just follow some NBA blogs or even worse soccer...
Booner
December 30, 2024 at 05:54 pm
Gute needs to be held accountable for his bad decision making wasting draft capital on defense players who can't play in the NFL! Maybe Murphys replacement will hold these guys accountable!
RedMN
December 31, 2024 at 02:02 pm
"Rashan Gary is...fine".
I want to say something I've been thinking for a long time but hoped I was just overreacting.
He's a JAG but the Packers pay him like he's in the Watt,Von Miller category.
Look at his stats.
Has never hit even 10 sacks, his TFLs are low as well for an "elite" edge. Hes not good at playing the run and sometimes tends to lose contain on the edge against mobile Qbs.
Some will argue that sacks aren't the only measure.
That last year he was in the top percentage for pressure rate.
So he almost gets to the quarterback but then sucks at tackling so he can't bring down the qb.
We saw this against the vikings were he had him and blew the sack and we aren't talking about bringing down lamar Jackson here its sam darnold.
I had hoped that changing to the 4/3 defense would be beneficial to his game and he would finally hit his ceiling.
But when it comes to defense in Green Bay, any change ends up being for the worse or break even.
You move the Gatorade cooler from one side to the other and it ends up negatively effecting some of these guys play on the field.
To be fair Hafleys D is performing much better than Barry's but thats a real low bar. And I'm picking on certain individual players that we really wanted a rise in their play after having a disappointing career thus far.
As far as guys we'd hoped to take a step in this defense have not and have continued to disappoint(stokes,gary,van ness,alexander,walker).
Gary is now 27 years old and in his sixth season.
We should be seeing peak Gary(he will never be better than he is right now line from those old Madden games).
For the price tag, it hasn't been nearly good enough and I no longer expect anything more out of this JAG.