The Lass Word: Some Family Night Feedback
Thoughts and questions after Saturday night's practice.
By KenLass

Despite way too many commercial breaks, I really enjoyed the opportunity to watch the live stream of Packers Family Night. It was great to actually see one of the training camp practices rather than relying on the eye witness accounts of the beat writers. Here are some thoughts and questions I have after seeing the session, which drew over sixty thousand folks to Lambeau.
When is it time to start worrying about the offense? Ever since camp began, I had been reading descriptions of how the defense was ahead of the offense. But Saturday night we got to actually watch it. Yikes. It was more one-sided than I thought. Particularly in the run game. I don’t think I saw a single rushing attempt that wouldn’t have been stopped at or behind the line of scrimmage if the defense had been allowed to tackle. In the two minute drill, the first team offense lasted four plays from its own 25. Jordan Love threw three incomplete passes to receivers who were covered like a blanket, and then completed a harmless checkdown on 4th down. There seemed to be pressure on the QB on every pass play which would have resulted in several sacks. Our defense should be better this year, but are they THAT much better? We won’t know until we see what the offense does in the preseason games.
Is there a third tackle on this team? Rasheed Walker and Zach Tom will start, but the position seems quite shaky behind them. Andre Dillard was a bust as a former first round pick in Philadelphia, and last year with the Titans he led the NFL in sacks allowed. Jordan Morgan seems headed for a starting spot at right guard. The other prospects are Kadeem Telfort, Caleb Jones, Luke Tenuta, and Travis Glover. Elgton Jenkins could play tackle if he had to, but that only weakens the inside. Dillard really needs to step up.
Receiver Grant DuBose is playing like a guy who does not intend to spend another season on the practice squad. By all accounts, the 2023 seventh round draft pick has been catching everything, and that continued Saturday night when he got open and made impressive catches at least twice. It’s hard to see a spot for him on the final season roster, what with Christian Watson, Romeo Doubs, Jayden Reed, Dontayvion Wicks, Malik Heath, Samori Toure and Bo Melton all entrenched ahead of him. It’s a nice problem to have, but DuBose is forcing the coaches to take notice and perhaps make room.
Was I the only one who let out a gasp when Christian Watson went down hard after a violent collision with rookie safety Evan Williams on a seam pass? Watson got up wincing and holding his right arm. The cameras didn’t follow him after that and I was afraid he might have suffered yet another injury. But the third year receiver was back on the field a few plays later and I managed to breathe again.
Jaire Alexander and Malik Heath seem to have a little something extra going on. After Heath had caught a short out during a red zone drill, Alexander tried to poke the ball out well after the play was winding down, and wound up knocking Heath to the ground hard enough that Heath’s helmet flew off. The receiver didn’t appreciate it and came up talking. Seems to me it’s not the first time I’ve read of dicey interaction between these two in this camp.
Okay, I’ll say what some of you may be thinking. Did the Packers bid farewell to one injury-prone running back and sign another with the same issue? Josh Jacobs says his latest groin injury is minor, and he did take part in individual drills Saturday night, but no team stuff. In college the Alabama star dealt with a broken ankle and a pulled hamstring. He missed three games his rookie season with a shoulder injury. He missed two games in 2021 with ankle and toe problems. Jacobs missed four games last season with a quad issue. He was hampered in this year’s OTAs by a hamstring problem, and now the groin injury. Maybe this is all part of the normal beating a running back takes, especially one with the physical running style of Jacobs. Hopefully these things truly are minor and he is ready for a full, productive season. But it sure seems like a lot of issues for a player who has not even had any real contact this summer.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Ken Lass is a former Green Bay television sports anchor and 43 year media veteran, a lifelong Packers fan, and a shareholder.
__________________________




Comments (55)
T7Steve
August 05, 2024 at 06:58 am
Thanks, Ken. Now I'm really depressed and worried.
We can't wait half this season to get the O warmed up again like last year. Actually, we can't wait half the season to get an O-line put together and working together acceptably, which is what's holding and has held them back. Not having a healthy running back might have attributed to the problem so we can't have that happen either. Depth on the line and in the running back room are the priority, it seems.
Guam
August 05, 2024 at 08:03 am
The O-line is missing Zach Tom. His return will help.
Bitternotsour
August 05, 2024 at 10:16 am
It's August 4th. It's practice. Steel your nerves.
TKWorldWide
August 05, 2024 at 10:25 am
There’s always room for one more on the Worry Bus.
LLCHESTY
August 05, 2024 at 11:13 am
I'd suggest Xanax but then it's no drinking for you, unless you want to take the Hunter Thompson Fear and Loathing in Packerland approach. Not recommended.
GregC
August 05, 2024 at 07:04 am
I'm not too worried about the offense because it was good at the end of last year, and all of the same starters are back with the exception of Aaron Jones and John Runyan. Josh Jacobs should be about as good as Jones, and Runyan was an average player who they should be able to replace. The #3 tackle job is the biggest worry. They need to get that figured out. Maybe there is still hope for Jordan Morgan to be that guy, even though he is playing guard right now. Could he be a starting guard and a backup OT?
If the offense continues to struggle in practice, maybe they will play a significant amount in the preseason, like they did last year, to get tuned up. But we may have to wait until the regular season to see the starting offense in action.
Grant DuBose may be the #7 WR now, ahead of Samori Toure, but he will probably still have to beat out Malik Heath for #6 in order to make the roster. It's not impossible. Whoever loses the battle may wind up on another team instead of on the practice squad.
Turophile
August 06, 2024 at 02:16 pm
Quote "It’s hard to see a spot for him on the final season roster, what with Christian Watson, Romeo Doubs, Jayden Reed, Dontayvion Wicks, Malik Heath, Samori Toure and Bo Melton all entrenched ahead of him."
I can understand that DuBose has Watson, Reed, Doubs and Wicks ahead of him, maybe even Melton based on last year...............but Toure, Heath, ENTRENCHED ahead of him ? Hmmm.
He was a bit behind the 8 ball with injuries last season and earlier this year, but now it seems to me it is an equal competition between Heath, Toure and DuBose, with the best of the three a possible 6th WR, or even 5th/6th depending on whether they are thought of as being better than Melton.
RCPackerFan
August 05, 2024 at 07:14 am
As of right now I think we have 6 WR's on the 53. Watson, Doubs, Reed, Wicks, Melton and DuBose! I know Heath performed well out of the gate last year but I feel like he faded late and I haven't heard a lot out of him this year. Now I'm not at practices to see what is going on, but I'm following along like most people. From everything I have seen DuBose has been making plays almost daily and Heath has had somewhat of a quiet camp.
"Is there a third tackle on this team?"
This is one of my biggest worries right now. At this point I don't know if we have a 3rd OT on the team. That is without shifting Morgan or Jenkins outside and putting Rhyan in at OG. Which maybe that is the best option, but I feel like they really need that Yosh backup OT that can come in and plug and play. There isn't a massive shuffle.
I think OT might be a spot that they could potentially be looking for a backup during cut downs. Unless someone emerges the rest of camp/preseason, I think that could be an option.
HawkPacker
August 05, 2024 at 07:49 am
Wouldn't you think that at least one of the reserve tackles the author mentioned could come through for us this season? How long does it take for their potential to be realized?
LambeauPlain
August 05, 2024 at 08:01 am
A long time it seems if the metric is to be able to stop a talent like Gary.
I hope one of these huge, stashed Tackles begin the step up like Walker did his sophomore season.
Walker completely sat for a full year before his potential was finally seen on the field. And it took another injury to Bakhtiari to let him show it. He struggled early last year but came on strong after the musical chairs with Nijman...who's body language got progressively worse during the job share which told me his heart was affecting his head that affected his play.
I do not get why Dillard is taking reps from younger players. Time to cut bait with him.
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 08:34 am
With Tom and Jones out (still and till late last week), using Dillard made some sense over Tenuta and Telfort for practice purposes. A chance to evaluate Dillard and at least have a player who can fulfill a role in non contact or limited contact practices.
Now we see Jones back practicing fully and should see Tom back, I will be surprised if we see too much of Dillard except as depth when starters are off the field. If Jones isn’t a better option than Dillard then we will need reinforcements. Dillard, like Newman, just isn’t good, despite undoubted athletic ability.
Guam
August 05, 2024 at 07:54 am
After watching Family Night, the O-line is a concern. I had the same impression as the author - the Packer running game showed very little on Saturday night. They got absolutely nothing inside and maybe had a couple of runs outside provided the RB could beat one tackler (non-tackling drill so hard to tell).
Zach Tom's return will help this group as well as the continued development of Morgan at RG. However depth is a serious concern. Rhyan was just okay as a reserve IOL, Monk had a rough night and Newman was Newman. It seems they are grooming Rhyan to play every IOL position as he played LG, C and RG.
Reserve tackle is wide open. None of Telfort, Tenuta, Jones or Dillard looked good in run blocking and pass protection was spotty. The D-line spent the entire night attacking and dominated the O-line.
Melton got lots of special team's time as a gunner on the punt coverage team. Between his WR play (speed) and his special teams play I think his spot on the 53 looks pretty secure. Heath, Dubose and Toure will be battling for the last WR spot.
Either some reserve OL start stepping up in TC or Gute will need to do some late preseason shopping.
LambeauPlain
August 05, 2024 at 08:09 am
I don't believe any of the trio of Melton, Toure, and Heath are yet safe on the 53..DuBose has juggled the depth chart. He is going to be difficult to keep off the 53 if he stays healthy and continues to catch everything. Good route runner.
Still way too early. Doubs, Watson, Reed, Wicks, and DuBose would probably be 5 on the 53 right now...with the other three and some interesting rookies challenging for the 6th spot. Hicks is making noise. Stanley too.
Guam
August 05, 2024 at 08:57 am
On WR duties alone you have a point although Melton's speed makes him the only real replacement for Watson. The others just can't take the top off a defense as easily. It is Melton's special team's prowess (and I didn't see any of the other three on special teams but could have missed them) that will help set him apart. He can do things the other guys can't. Versatility............
LambeauPlain
August 05, 2024 at 09:04 am
I like Melton too but he's not a lock yet. Seems DuBose is ahead of him. Time will tell the tale.
Excellent camp competition going on and three WRs will likely be on the Practice Squad anyway in case of injury and for game day elevations.
Solid, deep group.
GregC
August 05, 2024 at 09:35 am
What makes you think DuBose is ahead of Melton? I haven't heard that at all. Melton proved himself down the stretch last year and is the clear #5WR. Hard to see him not making the team.
LambeauPlain
August 05, 2024 at 10:40 am
Just my opinion based on Coaches raving about his camp so far. Melton, like Heath has been quiet so far and I like both these players too.
Long way to go before rostering the 53 and PS. I would not be shocked if Melton was on or not on the 53 with all the talent at WR if they keep 6.
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 12:54 pm
Dubose seems to me to be in a straight up fight with Heath. Their snaps to date in practice and on family night suggest that’s the 6th WR battle. I’m not sure why you think Melton hasn’t been praised, he has. However, Melton is a completely different proposition physically and in terms of role to Dubose. Melton likely takes the spot Toure had. The back up classic slot and Y. Dubose or Heath gets the physical possession role (to the extent it remains with the growth of Kraft and Musgrave) situational usage and backing up Wicks as a big slot and alternate X.
I suspect Dubose is a better possession WR in terms of upside, but that Heath is more physical. Which one LaFleur and GUTE value most in a 6th WR (Doubs, Watson, Reed, Melton (unless Toure shocks) and one of Heath/Dubose) will be interesting to see.
Dubose and Heath probably have an upside of 4th receiver at best, due to physical limitations. Thats perfectly respectable and valuable, but it is context in the scheme of things.
In contrast, Melton already has a 100 yard game and, among the 127 receivers who were targeted at least 23 times (Melton’s regular season tally), he ranked fifth with 2.83 yards per route. That was behind only four established stars: Tyreek Hill, Nico Collins, Brandon Aiyuk and Justin Jefferson. He also added a TD in the playoffs. Sure, those stars had to sustain that much longer, but that kind of witnessed potential is wholly of different value to roster builders and coaches, here and elsewhere.
I really like Hicks, but I see him needing some time to develop. Hes a pipeline prospect not one for this year at this point. Stanley is small, he’s a pure slot and returner. Like Hicks, a small school guy: they are making a huge jump. These guys and the remaining WRs are competing for PS slots and restocking the pipeline in all probability.
Melton will not make it to our PS after his performances and 3rd party metrics last year. Toure, Dubose and Heath might, but they may not be interested in doing so in Green Bay if they do. Hicks and the rest of the WRs potentially add upside for the future and probably get to the PS easily.
WestCoastPackerBacker
August 05, 2024 at 11:19 am
Wasn't Melton the first WR to get over a hundred yards in a game last season? I think doing it against opponents in a real game probably beats out having a good camp. There's plenty of time yet to make this call, but Melton has speed you can't teach.
LLCHESTY
August 05, 2024 at 11:38 am
It was a limited sample size(12 routes) but Melton had a horrible 8.9% win rate vs man coverage last year. He'd have to run those deep routes from somewhere other than the X spot.
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 12:29 pm
Allowing for development, it’s possible that a player can grow, especially one with his athletic attributes. Given that our new D plays a lot of man, I’m looking forward to seeing if Melton shows growth against it.
Based solely on last season, Melton is, however, a more obvious parallel with Reed. Given that we really don’t have a classic number one hierarchy, the likely alternates at X start with Wicks, backed up by Dubose or Heath among WRs, but Musgrave might factor as well. Neither Heath nor Dubose have long speed, which means finding ways to get it in the field elsewhere.
We are just getting to the point in camp where we start to have a chance to see if Melton and others have taken a step to change that. Something to watch for when pads are in and contact is full.
Bitternotsour
August 05, 2024 at 01:02 pm
Wicks appeared to have plenty of long speed to me, at least as much as Adams had.
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 01:27 pm
Adams didn’t have much and has accepted as much openly. He wins with his hyper fast feet and route precision to break free. Wicks has freakishly elite explosion and burst, but in a long foot chase he too will get caught and was.
Who cares? Adams showed that one can rack up yards by routinely separating and YAC from that, without ever being a speedster. It does, however, affect the potential to use him on certain routes, which is why I mentioned it, but it opens up others if the receiver has other elite physical attributes. Adams and Wicks do: Heath and Dubose do not.
For what it is worth, Adams tested 4.56 in the 40, Wicks 4.58. Dubose split the difference at 4.57. Musgrave recorded 4.61 as a comparative. Doubs ran 4.47 vs at his pro day. Melton, with whom I was contrasting Wicks essentially, ran 4.34. Watson ran a 4.36.
LLCHESTY
August 05, 2024 at 02:03 pm
Dubose had a faster 10 yard split than Wicks and Melton, way faster than Doubs and Adams. Gearing down quickly and exploding out of breaks is more important than straight speed IMO.
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 02:16 pm
Dubose had a 10 yard split of 1.52. Melton 1.47. Not that the 2 are great comparatives, for reasons stated.
When an athlete records a slower 40 and yet a rapid 10 yard split, it warns us that the high end speed is potentially overstated by the 40 figure.
Of course, testing can be false (Reed being a great example) or there might be a tight hammy or other reason, but much as I value the 10 yard split, one has to see the potential pitfalls too.
LLCHESTY
August 05, 2024 at 06:32 pm
The RAS I saw for Melton had him at 1.53. I went back and looked and two others did too.
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 11:29 pm
According to the official nfl combine results, I see 1.47. I have seen 1.5 and 1.51 referenced elsewhere. I don’t know why there is this discrepancy, since he didn’t do the dash at his pro day. Best and worst times? Average? Usually it’s the best time that’s reported though some split the difference. I did find a RAS with 1.53, but that seems an outlier (though picked up in a few places citing it). Dubose’s time always seems to be the same number in contrast.
I will grant you that Dubose’s 10 yard split is better than I recalled. Interestingly, so was Heath’s at 1.53 though as well.
Bitternotsour
August 05, 2024 at 02:07 pm
My point being Wicks is plenty fast as an X, that Adams regularly got deep and open (even though he could be run down from behind). It's not as though teams didn't fear Adams/Rodgers deep, but it's true if they really wanted to rip the top off, they went with MVS.
The wildcard is obviously Musgrave. There's no way he should be that fast, that tall and that big. Ain't nobody covering him deep with a slot or an off linebacker, and good luck to any safety running man-for-man with him.
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 02:21 pm
I wouldn’t argue with that in general, but he's not going to run the same routes as Watson playing X with the same frequency, if the play caller is a good one. Not every X is the same and thus they don’t all win the same way.
I don’t see Melton as an X without taking a jump not yet seen (and adding mass that might be counter productive), as I have noted, but I could see him running situational routes as one, particularly if Watson were out. I think we saw Reed do that from time to time last year.
Bitternotsour
August 05, 2024 at 03:03 pm
Jeez, I think I lost the thread. I don't disagree with you at all. Melton is a slot. He gets open, he catches the ball and is pretty good after the catch. I think he's plenty fast enough. But for me it's either Wicks or Watson as the X. Are we arguing the same thing?
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 03:06 pm
Pretty much.
Untylu1968
August 05, 2024 at 06:30 pm
Melton is safe and way too much upside for Dubose to not win a spot. I like Heath, but think he'll be replaced.
Matt
August 05, 2024 at 08:02 am
It was hard to be sold on Dillard with his latest resumee. I thought it could be a bad chapter and redemption is possible. Unfortunately the story continues.
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 08:24 am
Let’s get Tom back, let Caleb Jones get the rust off—he just started practicing last week—before panicking about the OL. Let’s also remember this was a very vanilla O, which means our defenders largely know what’s likely coming.
This comes from someone who has had long term doubts over our handling of O line personnel choices and approach. Those remain for me, but at this point let it settle in terms of personnel and positions and give time for everyone to get up to full speed either from injury or because they are rookies.
Hopefully now we are through the bulk of the experimenting with Morgan and Jones will rapidly get up to speed so we get a fair view of his capabilities, good or not. Walker certainly looks like the player he was at the back end of last year: that’s a huge win.
As to an injury prone RB, Jacobs hasn’t been, and apparently would have played if it was a game. Personally, I’m happy with being excessively cautious during a practice (albeit a televised one) prior to even preseason. Even if that were true, Wilson has looked really good in pass pro as well as the run threat he flashed as this time last year, and he’s likely the 4th option. Our draft pick is only getting up to speed but could also be a weapon this year.
As to Love, we know he’s not the finished article—the team knew that before betting on his having further upside. He’s also just getting into the groove. Even if he does, his growth will still be somewhat up and down and he’s unlikely to be Rodgers-like. He’s going to take chances.
Now what I want to see is not Doubs, Reed, Clark, Gary, McKinney and the certain starters but the rest of the roster candidates show they are worthy starters or situational players and depth in the roster and as PS candidates for the future. That comes in the preseason game period, and it’s why that is still valuable.
We have already seen that Stokes’ athleticism seems undiminished from his rookie year, that’s a win in itself. Now we should see which others are pushing to get playing time. We are already seeing King suggest he may be another 7th rounder who offers far more than his draft position, particularly as a slot option.
The next three weeks should be very interesting. Indeed, the period when we really get insights in any year has yet to begin. Probably wise not to get too depressive (or euphoric) yet.
GregC
August 05, 2024 at 08:59 am
Yes to all of that, assuming you meant Stokes' athleticism is undiminished rather than diminished.
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 01:04 pm
You caught me in yet another typo. Yes, by all accounts Stokes hasn’t lost athleticism, which wasn’t a given. Thats a win.
Guam
August 05, 2024 at 09:46 am
Way too early for any serious evaluations, but King looked more like a slot corner than an outside guy during Family Night. He had several PBU's in the middle of the field and certainly had the short area quickness to cover backs and slot receivers. However when he had to go one v one on longer routes he didn't seem to have much make up speed and gave up a couple of long completions. Pretty consistent with the college scouting report on him.
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 01:09 pm
That’s something we needed. I agree, he profiled best as a slot in my view, and that’s a position where his limitations are diminished and his real skills become of amplified importance. Thrilled we got a true ball player and recognized the slot fit straight away. Taken the seventh round, he could be far more of a steal in the slot long term than the hero of so many in Detroit.
Guam
August 05, 2024 at 02:38 pm
I certainly wouldn't mind if he becomes a solid back up to Nixon. Rochell is the only other CB the Packers have that could be a slot CB at least as far as I have seen to date.
Bitternotsour
August 05, 2024 at 03:04 pm
I think both of the rookie safeties are potential slot corners. Situationally.
Leatherhead
August 05, 2024 at 05:35 pm
That's been my impression.
Remember back in the day when we wanted that "hybrid defender'? We kept trying Raven Greene, and he kept breaking. We brought in guys like Oren Burks and Carpenter to see if we could get a guy who covers like a Corner and tackles like a linebacker.
When we go to 5 DBs, there's no reason that couldn't be 3 safeties and 2 DBs, at least some of the time. It really kind of depends on where our best matchups might be.
If everybody's healthy, I assume it will be Bullard and McKinney and Alexander and Stokes. Nixon will be the nickel.
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 03:25 pm
Rochell has been more an outside type to date here and beforehand. Physically, I think that’s what he profiles as. I think King provides a stronger pass coverage skillset alternative behind Nixon to our slot options than Bullard or Williams. That’s something I think we have a need for.
LLCHESTY
August 05, 2024 at 06:44 pm
Hafley has been having the nickels run separate individual drills. I might have missed a few days but so far the only ones I've read about running those with Nixon were King and Ballentine. I was a little surprised non of the safeties have gone with them.
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 11:46 pm
Yet he’s used both Bullard and Williams there. I interpreted that as making a distinction between CBs, not as excluding safeties. In many ways, it seems to me that the Hafley slot is as much safety as CB. I don’t want to use the term hybrid, but somewhere ion between a true safety and a perimeter corner.
LambeauPlain
August 05, 2024 at 08:43 am
"Did the Packers bid farewell to one injury-prone running back and sign another with the same issue?"
OK, Ken...here's what I am thinking: No.
Last 5 years: Jacobs 1305 carries, 5,545 yards. 18 carries/game.
Missed 9 games, less than 2 games a season. (Missed 4 games last year.)
Last 5 years: Jones 963 carries, 4,764 yards. 13 carries/game.
Also Missed 9 games, less than 2 games a season. (Missed 6 games last year.)
Neither Jones nor Jacobs have been injury prone for an NFL RB...until last season when Jones just could not go while his team was in the playoff hunt. Red Flag for an older RB.
Jacobs missed games late last season as the Raiders were a mess and playing for draft position. In a few of those missed games, had they been playoff meaningful, Josh would have played.
Packers replaced an older productive RB with a prior season of injuries with a younger, more productive RB who can handle more work.
LLCHESTY
August 05, 2024 at 11:24 am
The problem is the guy that replaced Jacobs, Zamir White, performed better than Jacobs in his absence. Hopefully it was just a hangover from his heavy carry '22 season but if he is averaging under 4 yards a carry after 5 games the explosive offense won't be so explosive.
Jacobs was more productive due to volume not efficiency. He has never come close to peak efficiency Aaron Jones and LaFleur has never used a volume back. Hopefully one of those things changes this year.
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 05:10 pm
I was pretty undecided about the Jacobs for Jones change. On the one hand Jones was not available frequently, on the other he’s got a virtually unique ability to find openings where none exist, and is a danger from the first snap, not needing time to build momentum. He’s older, but with low mileage, is he becoming more fragile or was that just bad luck? Great attitude, sometimes fumbles in key games though.
That said, Jacobs has delivered yards and carried Ian O to an extent Jones never has. He is much more Ahman Green than Aaron Jones, but he’s been so with much worse QBs, OLs and, for the most part. Last year though, he wasn’t special, was he getting going just before he got hurt, and was the performance of his replacement reflecting the better play around him later in season? Is Jacobs, with many more Carrie’s than Jones, reaching fragility too, or was that just an injury that happens (it’s pretty common in RBs)?
When the switch took place, my gut reaction was that, on paper the two don’t seem a lot different from a value proposition despite being very different in play style terms. It’s true, LaFleur may have to adapt his usage to get the most out of Jacobs, and that remains a valid reservation. In paper at least, I don’t see much between them in terms of what they are capable of or the risk that that is based on yesterdays not tomorrows. Here, heading into preseason, I have not seen any reason to change that assessment. Only the season will tell if it was a smart move or a foolish one.
LLCHESTY
August 05, 2024 at 06:48 pm
The struggles of the starting IOL is certainly concerning given Jacobs' strengths. Another reason drafting a true guard or one of the top centers would have been a plus.
Coldworld
August 05, 2024 at 11:54 pm
I wanted interior linemen and said so consistently, so I don’t need convincing. I still fear that our OL philosophy is our offense’s Achilles heel and that that’s reflected in the drafting as much as personnel choices. Regardless, We got one IOL prospect early in Morgan, at least for this year, but I was hoping we’d have 2 IOL in the first half of the draft, irrespective of whether we picked up a T. I think Morgan was seen as a dual prospect, but I’d have liked another G/C early on top of that.
GregC
August 06, 2024 at 07:01 am
The one big head-scratching moment in the draft was when they took Ty'Ron Hopper at the end of the third round. It seemed like the perfect place to take an interior O-lineman. Mason McCormick of South Dakota State was still there (the Steelers took him in the fourth round), and I'm sure there were others. Oh well, I hope Hopper is a good player for us.
Leatherhead
August 05, 2024 at 09:50 am
When is it time to worry about the offense? Not yet. It's a month yet until it counts.
Last year, in our losses, we scored 24, 20, 13, 17, 10, 19, 22, 20, and 21.
Last year, in our wins, we scored 38, 18, 20, 23, 29, 27, 33, 33, 17, and 48.
We're almost bulletproof when we score 24 or more. That's four possessions, out of 11, that produce some points. If we can convert on the opening drive, which is always a sign of a team that's ready, then that's only 3 out of the next 10 possessions. If we can't manage that, it'll be time to worry about the offense.
Bitternotsour
August 05, 2024 at 10:24 am
We're also competing in a diminished division. The Bears will start a rookie qb, who honestly wasn't all that impressive as a collegian. The Vikings are horrible, no QB, a gimmicky defense. The Lions had their hearts ripped out and their head coach is getting stale, they will fall back and become what we all know they are.
People need to quit panicking over a first public practice. The offense will improve by being a year older. Cohesiveness is all I'm looking for, and that will come with time. Relax, enjoy the journey. Count your blessings that you aren't a fan of the other three teams in the division.
My wild prediction on the year is that Bo Nix significantly outperforms Caleb Williams.
Slim11
August 05, 2024 at 04:39 pm
These comments caught my attention…
“ Ever since camp began, I had been reading descriptions of how the defense was ahead of the offense. But Saturday night we got to actually watch it. Yikes. It was more one-sided than I thought.”
“ Our defense should be better this year, but are they THAT much better?”
Perhaps this shows how bad a DC Joe Barry truly was. It seems Hafley really is lighting a fire under the defense. Time will tell and I’m certainly looking forward to the preseason games.
lpirlot
August 05, 2024 at 05:17 pm
I loved that they streamed it for us out-of-staters, but it wasn't only the commercials: Wayne and Larry seemed more interested in interviewing people than in showing and commenting on the action.
joejetson
August 05, 2024 at 08:05 pm
Glad to see Dubois doing well. I remember when they drafted him I watched his highlight reel from college. The competition wasn't great, but he made some difficult catches. Showed ability to adjust to off target throws, and good running ability after the catch. I thought he might have gotten some playing time towards the end of last season, but Melton got the opportunity instead. Looking forward to seeing what Dubose does this preseason. He had some injury issues last year that may have held him back. The depth of the WR room is impressive.