The 18 Game Season is Closer Than it Appears
Word on the street is the season could be extended as soon as 2027.
By Kevin Gibson

I grew up loving the NFL, breathing it in, consuming every morsel I could get. But with the news trickling out that the league will push for an 18-game season as early as 2027, one thing has become abundantly clear: the NFL hates its fans. Not to mention its players.
Adding an extra bye week was among the first “concessions” discussed to appease players who for obvious reasons, beginning with injury and including general wear and tear on their bodies, don’t want an 18-game season.
And the latest whisper reported last week by Mike Florio was a potential capping of players’ participation at 17 games for non-special teams players. Which just makes real football feel more like fantasy football, sadly. When you head into a Sunday fantasy matchup knowing that your top wide receiver is on a bye that week, you often have to either scramble to find another one on the waiver wire or pray that your preferred backup doesn’t screw it up.
Now we’re considering doing this in real life?
“The NFL has always fundamentally misunderstood why it is such a cash cow,” NFL writer Ben Gretch wrote, per Newsweek.com, “but if their lust for more games leads to random deactivations of fantasy stars on Sunday mornings, they will seriously damage that hobby for casuals, which would be the biggest misstep yet.”
Here’s another wrinkle: The NFL has in recent years embraced gambling. Forget fantasy football, what about the poor guy that places a bet, only to see the outcome – much like with potential replacement refs – fudged up by a star player being unavailable due to the game cap?
Similarly, imagine as a fan paying top dollar to get tickets to a Packers home game, along with paying hundreds of dollars a night for a hotel room, travel, etc., and then finding out that Jordan Love or Micah Parsons or whomever your favorite player is won’t play. What is this, the NBA?
We all know what this – another money grab from greedy NFL owners. More ticket sales, more money in their pockets. More injuries to players? Hey, that’s why there’s a practice squad!
And this doesn’t even address the fact that these changes will extend the season by either forcing it to start earlier or by pushing it back. So, will the Super Bowl be played in March now?
Another mentioned concession is that the NFL would cut the preseason to two games. Which gives coaches less time for real-time player evaluation and robs young players of an extra opportunity to potentially show what they can do for another team if they get cut at the roster deadline. And nixing a preseason game isn’t going to help reduce injuries when most of the key players don’t play much or at all in preseason games.
But as with so many things, the love of money trumps all else. For the NFL, it might even be worse – it’s the love of money without taking great care to protect the product on the field. I don’t see my fandom fading anytime soon (or ever), because I’m far too invested, especially when it comes to the Green Bay Packers. So in that sense, I’m part of the problem. But it becomes clearer and clearer all the time: the NFL is indeed a cash cow, and boy oh boy, is the league milking Elsie hard.
As John Mellencamp said, “Ain’t that America?”
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Kevin Gibson is a professional writer and author based in Louisville, Ky. He's also a former sports writer who covered high school, college and professional sports, a Packers shareholder and a fan since 1975. Even John Hadl couldn't break him. Follow him on Twitter: @kgramone
__________________________




Comments (47)
Boneman
March 27, 2026 at 06:45 am
It has been proven over and over that the owners and corporate executives don't care about the product on the field. Unfair travel schedules to play on sub par soccer fields in foreign countries, replacement refs whenever they dare to want a sliver of the financial NFL pie. Non guaranteed contracts that give the owners all the leverage while the player risks his health and career every game. The extra games guarantees a lower level of play from players literally surviving car crashes weekly as they try to drag themselves onto the field. As the year stretches into the second half of team schedules and it becomes apparent to everyone that certain teams are already out of contention, how many 'business' decisions are going to be made by the high priced talent that already made their money? How much personal sacrifice will multi-millionaire players make just for the 'love of the game'? We're already past the point of no return with this greedy system and it will continue to churn forward until some future time when the whole thing implodes. I say bring it on, I seem to enjoy screaming at my streaming service monitor at the lack of effort and faulty game plans on any given Sunday. Fifty shades on NFL grey. Now just let me know which service I need to buy to watch my team play on a Wednesday in Stuttgart Germany.
Cheezehead72
March 27, 2026 at 07:07 am
I agree with a lot of your comment and I was not going to reply until I read your last sentence. For two years I have been using this internet site UZZU to watch football. There is no app as it is a IPTV and it has every NFL, MLB, NHL, and NBA game. It shows most NCAA Football and some NCAA Basketball. It has ESPN, NFL, FOX Sports, BIG Ten, and other channels and it is reasonable. You can order it for one week, one month, or one year.
As for the officials. I do not feel sorry for them. They make a lot of money per game on a parttime job. If they do not like how they are being treated stop officiating. No one is forcing them to officiate. If I walk out on my job I get fired. Yes fight for better benefits but in the end agree and work or find another parttime job that pays that much money. Bring on the replacements.
PackerBackerAZ
March 27, 2026 at 12:50 pm
I've done a little research on UZZU. There are various apps for different devices. It is recommended that you use a separate email address and not your normal and make sure the credit card is masked. There are several reports about not honoring refunds. Many reports of unreliable streaming (buffering, freezing and loss of service). There are some legality issues (distribution rights etc) and I wonder how long before it's shut down. I've decided that the UZZU platform is too risky for me at the $120.00 yearly price. Getting the app on your smart tv, fire stick or roku device looks to be an exercise in deception. The apps aren't in any legitimate app stores only on uzzu.com. That's only my first impression since I haven't attempted to put the app on my devices.
This is on the UZZU web site at: https://uzzu.tv/
Watch on your favorite device
We have apps for almost all devices available in the market. You can watch on Android TV, Firestick, FireTV, Roku, TV Box, Chromecast, Xbox & Nvidia Shield.
BuckyBadger
March 27, 2026 at 10:47 am
I agree mostly except for the soccer field comment. Those owners take better care of their fields than the NFL, they don't even allow artificial surfaces.
Oppy
March 27, 2026 at 10:55 pm
They take better care of their fields than the NFL, but they allow an NFL game to play on it (and utterly destroy it) for some quick cash.
MaruishiEmperor
March 29, 2026 at 04:39 pm
That Brazilian field was a piece of garbage and contributed to Love hurting himself. How much did that affect the Packers overall that season. Methinks a LOT MORE than you realize. HUGE thumbs down to you.
WD
March 28, 2026 at 08:30 am
While there is a grain of truth Boneman you seem to be wearing your grumpy pants. LOL
MaruishiEmperor
March 29, 2026 at 04:37 pm
AUGEZEICHNET!!!!
Savage57
March 27, 2026 at 06:48 am
The owners' obsession to get to 18 games is understandable; they have another opportunity to spread their fixed costs over another game, and use half that revenue to increase earnings at whatever their margin rate is.
Where it's going to hit fans is play quality. The preseason development and conditioning will be diminished. September will become the new preseason, practice-hardening won't happen, injuries will diminish rosters, and the overall NFL product quality declines.
In exchange for the 18th game, the NFLPA is going to ask for a couple points of revenue and other concessions from ownership.
The end result will be lower value to fans at higher prices, but like the addicts we are, we'll brainlessly sign up for another fix.
Guam
March 27, 2026 at 07:59 am
"...but like the addicts we are, we'll brainlessly sign up for another fix."
Bullseye Savage. The NFL will continue to dilute the product for as long as fans will continue to pay for it. Hard to be too critical of the owners when we the fans continue to enable their behavior. I always thought 14 games was the sweet spot, but I continue to sign up for more streaming services so I can get my weekly Packer fix. Between the owners and me, I guess I'm the dumb one.
crayzpackfan
March 27, 2026 at 08:36 am
"Between the owners and me, I guess I'm the dumb one."
Unfortunately, I'm also floating in that crowded boat of morons. Will we go down with the ship when she starts taking on water, or will we finally jump into the lifeboat? Time will tell.
BuckyBadger
March 27, 2026 at 10:53 am
"The preseason development and conditioning will be diminished. September will become the new preseason, practice-hardening won't happen,"
This is all true now. Preseason isn't for conditioning, these guys have to show up that way as they are pros. Development is now largely done on their own as well with personal coaches (who many times have connections with the team). This all changed when the CBA limited practices.
TKWorldWide
March 27, 2026 at 06:49 am
Is there a breaking point? Is the NFL about to reach it?
NickPerry
March 27, 2026 at 07:17 am
I know Nick Perry has reached it. Last year I paid $400.00 to watch the Packers on You-Tube because I live in Los Angeles. If I want to watch the Packers, I need to pay. Throw in Amazon, Peacock, and Netflix and I'm paying even more some seasons.
It's gotten ridiculous!!!
Cheezehead72
March 27, 2026 at 07:20 am
Nick above I mentioned UZZU read the comment, if you are a veteran you can get Peacock for about $4 a month, if you have T-Mobile you can get Netflix for free.
NickPerry
March 28, 2026 at 09:02 am
Thanks Bud...I'm not a veteran and I'm locked in at AT&T for a little while but thank you for letting me know.
mrtundra
March 27, 2026 at 08:21 am
I live in Wisconsin, and either have to pay to watch the Packers, or find a streaming service, if the vikings are playing at the same time. Streaming sites are okay, but unreliable, quite often. The hoop jumping we do, just to watch our teams, is ridiculous. Hopefully, they won't come up with a "pay-per-listen" scheme, for radio.
sugarbair
March 27, 2026 at 08:59 am
I live in Florida. I have learned to listen on the radio.
Cheezehead72
March 27, 2026 at 07:16 am
I love football. I watch the NFL, NCAA and will be watching the UFL. I even watch as much as the preseason as I can. As much as I like the extra week of regular season football I did not like going to 17 weeks. Sixteen weeks just worked better. I like them going to 18 weeks because it fits better than 17 weeks. Now there are a couple things the NFL can do if they go to 18 weeks to protect the players. They can decrease or eliminate international games, they can add another bye week and extend the season, they can increase the play clock decreasing the number of plays, and they can increase the game day roster and the full roster to allow teams more players. Coaches can rotate players more so they play less plays. There are other things the NFL can do but it would have less impact and yes I know decreasing or eliminating international games will never happen.
egbertsouse
March 27, 2026 at 07:34 am
Oh great! We get another crappy game that will be carried on some streaming service that costs way too much. Thanks a heap, Rogey!
HarryHodag
March 27, 2026 at 07:56 am
The NFL is making a mistake that the NBA made years ago: more is not necessarily better. The NBA players and coaches do whatever they can to survive a ridiculously long season. That often means healthy scratches for top players and a kind of boring sameness until the playoffs arrive.
18 games is simply disrespectful to the players and fans. The NFL assumes the fan base will continue to pay whatever they ask for as long as the NFL demands, an assumption that could very easily backfire. The NFL preaches player safety then asks the players to risk severe injury one more game. They take games away from fans and ship them overseas. They won't pay the refs to keep the game professional. They routinely have games on Thursday night, endangering players health and recovery again. I could go on and on.
This, my friends, is an organization that needs a large fan push back to wake it up from it's greed.
murf7777
March 27, 2026 at 08:32 am
Like it or not, money and greed have always been the driving force in America, it what makes it great and disheartening at the same time. Despite critics' warnings, there is no evidence of fan fatigue, in fact it’s ever growing. The NFL’s expansion strategy is anything but a misstep. The league maintains a level of drama and urgency that the NBA simply cannot replicate, and the move toward an 18-game schedule only solidifies that advantage. The 'gladiator' element of the game continues to captivate a growing global audience. Global is the key word. They are finding more and more ways to make money. The financial proof is undeniable: a reported single-year 25% jump in team valuations, driven by scarcity and record-breaking media contracts, confirms that the NFL’s dominance has never been higher.
Young people are just watching differently than older generations. They’re not sitting on the couch for four hours.
They’re watching:
highlights
fantasy updates
gambling content
memes
player clips
RedZone
YouTube breakdowns
The NFL has become a digital ecosystem, not just a TV product.
HarryHodag
March 28, 2026 at 08:04 am
Sad.
MitchAnthony
March 27, 2026 at 08:14 am
One has to wonder when the product arrives at the point of diminishing marginal utility. I agree with pretty much every other post on this thread. This greed for an 18th game is going to have some effects on watering down the product. For sure, the NFL will make some more money from another regular season game and for sure, the owners and the NFLPA will want their cut as well.
With absence of another pre-season game it will likely mean a stinky start to the regular season as teams prepare in season. The lack of preparation may lead to more injury. The owners might rightly request for an expanded roster, at least an expanded practice squad to have more available bodies. So there goes some of that money.
Will 18 games have players and owners asking for another bye week? It makes sense when you think of the toll it takes on the health and well-being of the players.
TheKanataThrilla
March 27, 2026 at 08:28 am
It's all a conspiracy so that by adding another game the Bears can finally have a 4000 yard quarterback.
On the serious side all these changes are making historical records insignificant. At the least new records should come with an asterisk because of the number of games played. (ie sack record)
ricky
March 27, 2026 at 08:33 am
As Mark Cuban said about the NFL, "Pigs get fat. Hogs get slaughtered." The problem is that Goodell promised that the NFL would have revenue of $25 billion a year (he is already close to that goal, and the eighteen games would probably push them over the top). But this is also a classic case of hubris- of pride going before a fall. Will older fans put up with this? Yes. But younger fans could well move to another sport, in particular soccer, which is slowly becoming more popular.
Also, something unaddressed, and that is the player's salaries. Right now, contracts are based on a seventeen game season. Will the players just give up one game game check to make the owners richer? (Cue uproarious laughter). Add in the increasing amount of games that are behind pay walls, as younger people "cut the cable" and struggle to make ends meet in a terrible job market in a weakening economy, and the writing is on the wall.
Will the NFL heed the warnings or just move to gouge fans for more and more money? To ask the question is to answer it.
GreenandBold
March 27, 2026 at 09:01 am
Older fans will not put up with it at least not all . They grew up watching real football not what is called football today . I gave up on the NBA years ago when they stopped playing defense and started traveling to the basket . We already put up with poor tackling , injuries galore and is this a catch or not rule enforcement . If the owners cared about the history and integrity of the game 16 games would still be played . Wake up America and get off my lawn !
LeotisHarris
March 27, 2026 at 08:41 am
I've heard Wednesday Night Football will be streamed on Netflix, and Tuesday Afternoon Football will be an Amazon exclusive. Keep an eye on the next broadcast rights package, kids. Corporate greed grabbing all it can as we circle the drain.
Cheezehead72
March 27, 2026 at 08:52 am
There is nothing about Tuesday afternoon games that I can find. The NFL is playing a Wednesday game this year to start the year because Amazon has exclusive right for Thursday games and they want the game on NetFlix. They cannot play it on Friday because it is Melbourne Australia and due to the ports Broadcasting Act of 1961 they cannot broadcast an NFL game on Friday or Saturday nights due to High School and College games being played.
LeotisHarris
March 27, 2026 at 10:31 am
The Tuesday pm games will be AI-generated, so viewers can create their own experience. It's cutting-edge programing, and the sports gaming industry is planning on fans wagering on what other fans might see as outcomes of the AI games. So, we're looking at increased revenue from bettors betting on bettors' bets. Win-win.
On the back burner for now, and you didn't hear this from me, but the NFL is considering AI-generated seasons that viewers can binge watch. Think of it; and 18-game season consumed over a weekend. Sure, there are some kinks to be worked out, but that's why they make the big bucks.
Coldworld
March 27, 2026 at 10:46 am
AI is the way to go. No players and annoying agents. Unlimited games. Virtual Stadiums. Leotis might just be the one to point out what a lousy job of past paradigm thinking Roger Goodall is doing. We don’t need grass, we don’t need weather or roofs. From virtual drafts to virtual play, Leotis has seen the future.
Cheezehead72
March 27, 2026 at 10:57 am
Like I said in a previous comment I like watching football to the point I even watch the UFL when time allows. Remember it is played when the weather is nice. But I will not watch AI generated football. If others do that is on them. Maybe I should invent an AI fan.
As for betting. I started to wager on games, never in game wagers, and I found out I win more money not placing bets.
Bitternotsour
March 27, 2026 at 11:04 am
I see no point in actual games. In the AI future, we can craft a WWE experience that sends everyone home happy.
Cheezehead72
March 27, 2026 at 11:59 am
So this will be the Revenge of the Nerds
Coldworld
March 27, 2026 at 12:37 pm
Well, we can generate players at the freshman age, and “college coaches” and generate resulting records so the draft has meaning. We can also make them pretty, so enhancing the attraction for casual fans. Indeed, we could embrace pan gender football and be inclusive and wonderful and help world peace (somehow).
It’s a perfect world except for the throwbacks who want to risk injury or fund their schools and pensions. The possibilities are endless. Leotis has opened a portal to a brighter, more loving and definitely more lucrative future!
TKWorldWide
March 27, 2026 at 03:14 pm
I like where your head is at, brother!
dblbogey
March 27, 2026 at 12:49 pm
You heard wrong.
Coldworld
March 27, 2026 at 09:17 am
Forced rest games is a slippery slope. Moreover. Outside of kickers, punters and long snappers, what is a ST player? Often they become more than that over a season out of necessity.
Do we really want last games of the season decided by rosters being denuded by regulation not health? Sure, they often do not matter, but sometimes the fates raise questions. Suppose your QB is game barred and your back up gets hurt with things on the line? What we will see is tactical game dumping against weak non-divisional teams or if key players are out for us, keeping others out I suspect. That makes bad games likely worse.
Just a bad idea. If we are going to do this, it needs proper in season rest and is only compounded with ever increasing games on other continents in season.
246toothpicks
March 27, 2026 at 09:19 am
Good! It's what it should've been. 17 was a waste of time.
BuckyBadger
March 27, 2026 at 10:49 am
The NFL already is largely decided by health and the 18th game will just push it more in that direction and delude the playoffs. It is gonna happen and eventually there will be 20 games. The only way to stop it from happening would be to stop watching and if you reading my worthless comment about the NFL you aren't going to stop watching it.
Bitternotsour
March 27, 2026 at 11:06 am
Deluding the playoffs is a Stephen A. Smith level comment.
THESZOTMAN1
March 27, 2026 at 12:48 pm
After decades of playing a grueling 16 game schedule, they added the travesty of a 17 game, throwing everything out of kilter. Except for the money, some for the players; most for the owners. Now, only a few years later, they want 18 games. What's next? --- year around football? Here's my take: Any player who is hurt during the 17th or 18th game of the season should get a lifetime annuity ..... paid for out of the owners' pockets!
The Szotman
golfpacker61
March 27, 2026 at 08:41 pm
If the NFL is going to 18 games then they need to also expand the rosters to 60-64 players, not including the practice squads. More games means more injuries and it can decimate teams, look no farther than GB last year.
It's not like they can't afford the extra players.
Oppy
March 27, 2026 at 11:11 pm
Unfortunately, the quality of those extra players aren't up to snuff.
Fans already complain about the quality of most backup players in the NFL. Now you're talking about dipping into a pool of players that couldn't even make NFL team's practice squads, adding 150-300(ish) sub-par players into the league.
It would be great for football athletes, all of which are still some of the best football players in the world, but the overwhelming majority of which can not really compete with NFL talent- at least, not well enough to satisfy NFL fans. A boon for keeping the dream alive for truly talented young men, but a guaranteed source of non-stop belly aching from couch QB's across the land on sundays.
Pjb80
March 27, 2026 at 08:49 pm
Been a fan for many years but even I’m
Losing interest
Since'61
March 27, 2026 at 08:56 pm
I remember the 14 game schedule era. That was fine until the NFL/AFL merger and until the league expanded in the 70s. Since then I feel that the 16 game schedule was perfect for a 32 team league. Going to 17 and soon probably 18 games is just an unnecessary money grab by the league.
If the league is going to move to 18 games the NFLPA needs to stand up and demand a second bye week, plus expanded rosters, practice squads and a higher number of dressed players per game. I'm thinking rosters expanded to 60 players with, 52 dressed players per game and 20 players on the PS. Also only 2 pre season games. The decision to rest players should be left up to the teams. I would rest my best players during the early season games since the longer season provides time to make up for a few early season losses. Playoff bound teams will also want to rest their star players during the last week or two of the season. This is why teams should retain the freedom for when they rest their players.
Regardless of what is ultimately decided the level of play will be diluted further than it has already been. Too many games are unwatchable now. The 18 game schedule may finally be the move that results in the NFL becoming over saturated for the market. What the league really needs is a commissioner who will say NO to the owners and take a stand for the players and the fans. Unlikely I know but I'm not the only fan who is getting closer to the breaking point with each passing season. Thanks, Since '61
Oppy
March 28, 2026 at 11:06 am
The thing that makes this really gross is people being more concerned with how having an 18 game season but only allowing a player to play in 17 games is going to impact sports betting / fantasy football more than they're concerned with player health / product on the field.
Also really gross, of course, the league feeling the need to squeeze even more money from what is already an insanely fat cash cow. The greed is out of control- it's not like any of the owners are struggling.