Should the Packers Bring Back Either Isaiah McDuffie or Eric Wilson?

The Green Bay Packers have decisions to make on two linebackers who are both scheduled to be unrestricted free agents this offseason. Veterans Eric Wilson and Isaiah McDuffie both played significant roles for the Packers in 2024 and both have expiring contracts. Should GM Brian Gutekunst bring back either of them back in 2025?

Wilson has been with the Packers for the last three seasons. The former University of Cincinnati star enjoyed a strong training camp in 2024 and excelled during the preseason. In the past, Wilson had been mostly a special teams ace. He surprised most observers by winning a starting job before the season started.

Wilson may not be an elite athlete by NFL standards, but he is smart and has a great work ethic. He anticipates plays well and puts himself in the right position to make tackles.

Wilson played in all 17 games this season and started 12. He made 72 total tackles, including seven tackles for loss while recording two sacks, forced a fumble and broke-up two passes.

Wilson graded out better against the run than in pass coverage according to Pro Football Focus. In fact, he was a liability in pass coverage. Opposing quarterbacks completed 83.8 percent of their passes when throwing to receivers covered by Wilson.

Wilson provides this young Packers team with veteran leadership. He played 51 percent of the Packers defensive snaps and remains a core part of Rich Bisaccia’s special teams units.

The Packers selected McDuffie in the sixth round of the 2021 NFL Draft. He has played four seasons with the Packers and now his entry-level deal is up.

In his first two NFL seasons, McDuffie played mostly on special teams. In 2023, when injuries struck the linebacking corps, the former Boston College star stepped in and started eight games.

In 2024, the Packers switched to a 4-3 base defense and McDuffie earned a starting job. He had played one season under Packers defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley at Boston College and was familiar with Hafley’s approach on defense.

McDuffie made 97 total tackles this season which placed him second on the team behind Quay Walker. He also recorded half a sack, forced a fumble and broke up three passes.

Like Wilson, McDuffie is more effective against the run than when he drops back into coverage. His limited athleticism makes it tough for him to keep up with receivers, running backs and tight ends when he has to cover them on pass patterns. Opposing quarterbacks completed 83.9 percent of their passes when throwing to receivers covered by McDuffie according to pro-football-reference.com and had a quarterback rating of 126.6.

McDuffie was on the field more frequently than Wilson, playing 64 percent of the Packers defensive snaps. He played on special teams as well, but did not have as big a role there as Wilson did.

Now, Gutekunst has to decide whether to bring either of these two players back in 2025. Wilson will turn 31 in September. McDuffie is younger and will turn 26 during training camp in July.

Assuming everybody stays healthy, the Packers have two starting spots taken at linebacker with Walker and Edgerrin Cooper. Both these players possess the speed and elite athletic ability that Wilson and McDuffie lack.

The Packers also have 2024 third round pick Ty’Ron Hopper returning next year. The team brought Hopper along slowly in his rookie season. The Missouri alum played in all 17 games for the Packers but only took 18 snaps on defense.

Hopper possesses the athleticism that Wilson and McDuffie lack but he needs to have a better grasp of the playbook and his assignments on any given play. The Packers are hoping he takes a big step forward in 2025 and can play a larger role on defense.

Regardless of whether Hopper makes progress, the Packers will need depth at linebacker. Injuries are a constant in the NFL and no team goes through a 17-game schedule without leaning on their depth at some point.

Gutekunst should bring back at least one of these two linebackers in 2025 to provide veteran leadership, continuity, and depth to the team. One or both of them may find a better opportunity elsewhere but bringing at least one of them back would make sense for the Packers this offseason.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (32)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
stockholder's picture

February 15, 2025 at 10:47 am

I doubt Gute drafts a LB.
We're stuck with them.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

February 15, 2025 at 01:08 pm

If Jihaad Campbell is available at 23 - Gutekunst should draft him.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

February 16, 2025 at 08:35 am

Versatility is a good thing.
And if Campbell runs slow.
Barrett Carter won't.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

February 16, 2025 at 09:25 am

Get pluggers, not huggers. Lander Barton, or Stutsman. They have enough chase LBs. Make an offer for Greenlaw, if you want a bad ass.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

February 16, 2025 at 02:20 pm

I still would take Campbell if they go defense.
Push the chase LBs back to edge / OLBs.
Your guys still would help do that.
But let's wait for the 40 and 3 cone.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

February 16, 2025 at 03:58 pm

Campbell is not slower than Carter. If anything - Carter may be a little slower than Campbell - while 15 lbs. lighter

0 points
0
0
Brhode's picture

February 15, 2025 at 10:55 am

bring back Wilson

0 points
0
0
realitybytez's picture

February 15, 2025 at 12:48 pm

yeah, if i had to choose one to keep it would be wilson.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

February 17, 2025 at 12:26 pm

We need a Mike LB. I'm not sure we have one on the roster?

I'd think there's enough cap space to be able to keep good players. These are both good players. As much as I love the way McDuffie plays, Wilson may be the better LB. These are good problems to have!

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

February 15, 2025 at 11:28 am

I'd resign both for a touch above league minimum. Both had good games(Wilson had an incredible game) and bad games but their drawbacks are different and sort of compliment each other.

The only LB type I'd draft is a two down plugger late in the draft. A bigger guy that could play MLB for ⅓ of the snaps.

0 points
0
0
realitybytez's picture

February 15, 2025 at 12:47 pm

i think they're both going to get better offers than "a touch above league minimum" from other teams. but both guys are awful against the pass, so maybe not.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

February 15, 2025 at 12:25 pm

What we really need to do is develop Hopper into a solid rotational piece and take advantage of his athleticism on passing downs to cover receivers and TEs. We have two new faces on the defensive staff that can coach linebackers, so they'll need to get to work right away. You just hope he's not on the Oren Burks trajectory where he turns in his best work for another team seven years later....

0 points
0
0
RobinsonDavis's picture

February 16, 2025 at 07:06 am

I'm rooting for Hopper, but It is problematic that he could not get on the field this year, despite injuries to our LBs. He is aggressive, but more of WILL type than a MIKE according to some, which may be the answer to "Why?" I do expect the Packers to draft a "versatile" MIKE on day 3.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 15, 2025 at 12:48 pm

We carry 5 on the active roster, 6 on the 53.

We have Cooper, Walker, and Hopper under contract.

I'd like to bring both McDuffie and Wilson back. Veterans, familiar with the team, familiar with the scheme.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

I did a little digging on these guys. Wilson will be 31 and his market value is less than two million. He was #7 on the team as he got in on 72 tackles. He played over 500 snaps on defense and a team high 321 special teams snaps. IOW, he was on the field for us quite a bit. One of our main defenders.

McDuffie is 5 years younger, but also more than twice as expensive, with a market value of almost $5M. He played 64% of the defensive snaps, and another 125 on special teams. Again, this is one of our main defenders.

How many holes do you want to try to have to fill? For $7M, we could maybe get both of these guys back. For another $4M , $11M total, we could keep slaton.

We have the money to keep these guys, and we should try to do it, IMO. We suit up 21 defensive guys. If we don't keep these guys, we might have to replace Stokes, Slaton, Mcduffie, Wilson, ....that's four holes in our Top 21 right there. Just on defense. If we bring them back, there's only 1 hole, at starting CB.

On offense, we're looking at replacing Watson and Myers. This is only 3 holes on the 45 man roster to fill, which should leave us resources to upgrade some other areas, like the backup Oline.

If we want to get a guy in FA who would make a big impact, like McKinney did, we could probably get a starting caliber CB in FA for about $15M, and a veteran Olineman for about $8M. That's $23M Add t h at onto the $11M you spent on defense and we're at $34M....which is pretty much what we've got to spend.

Then we can draft guys we want, not guys we need.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

February 15, 2025 at 06:33 pm

"How many holes do you want to try to have to fill? "

Even if Hopper is ready to play, they use 3 LB in base...LBs get hurt and you need them for STs. You've got to have guys who can play.

0 points
0
0
SDPack's picture

February 15, 2025 at 07:41 pm

Great analysis! Just to build on it, if you think Hopper is going to replace a large percentage of Wilson’s and McDuffie’s defensive snaps, it leaves only special teams snaps and injury fill-in snaps for these two guys. It’s probable that a rookie or vet min guy on another roster or practice squad could serve in that capacity. It all really comes down to how they feel about Hopper. If they are committed to him, I think these two may be gone. If they are still hedging on Hop, then they likely keep the younger guy who has history with Hafley and was a draft pick of Gutey - McDuffie. I believe this means that Wilson ages out and gets replaced by a rookie with a cheap salary and upside.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 16, 2025 at 11:42 am

I don't think Hopper is going to an upgrade over either of these solid vets this year. These guys are experienced, and experience counts.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

February 15, 2025 at 11:08 pm

I smile everytime I read one of your elementary level math posts. While I agree on the LBs this is a draft heavy in big guy DTs. Slaton can easily be replaced by a rookie with more pass rush upside. You can't play early downs and rush four when one is a complete liability.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

February 16, 2025 at 09:34 am

See if Clark is on the trading block?

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 16, 2025 at 11:44 am

I keep them elementary so you can understand.

Yes, Slaton, who played 40% of the defensive snaps and was part of one of the better run defenses in the league can easily be replaced by some rookie who will undoubtedly stay healthy and play well.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

February 17, 2025 at 12:32 pm

We can afford to keep good players. Slaton is a good player. If a rookie wins the job and pushes him to depth? Great.

0 points
0
0
PatrickGB's picture

February 15, 2025 at 01:09 pm

Yes, but at the right price. Some have argued that they take away snaps from the younger draft picks. That’s true . Yet these two low cost vets are valuable on ST’s and as back of the roster fill ins.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

February 15, 2025 at 01:26 pm

What Wilson and McDuffie cannot do well is pass coverage. If the Packers D is to continue their improvement - better coverage LBs will be necessary. Cooper and Walker appear to fit the bill for now - but 1-2 others will be needed for depth and potential upgrade purposes. Perhaps Hopper is one but another coverage LB should be on Gutekunst's shopping list. Personally, I am intrigued with Jihaad Campbell. Whatever - it does not augur well if Wilson and McDuffie are your 3rd and 4th LBs for the next season.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

February 17, 2025 at 12:33 pm

Jihad is somebody's first name?!?

0 points
0
0
gsd3's picture

February 15, 2025 at 05:52 pm

McDuffie is too big a liability in coverage. Would bring Wilson back for the min or close to it.
Two possible day 3 guys are Simon and Higgins. Both are good tacklers and above average on coverage.

0 points
0
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

February 16, 2025 at 05:20 am

I don't think they will do it, but I'd be very happy if the Packers picked Jihaad Campbell with their first pick. Here's why: 1. Campbell is better than Cooper or Walker in coverage 2. Campbell has been one of the best blitzers in college football. 3. Campbell played against top-notch competition 4. Campbell is the epitome of a big-play-maker 5, Campbell looks a LOT like Cooper in his play, only he's better in coverage.

With a Cooper, Campbell, Walker trio you wouldn't need a nickel back, so your run defense improves, AND you add another great pass rusher. With athletic linemen who can drop, like Gary, VanNess and Wyatt and probably a new guy, you can rush any four of the seven.

0 points
0
0
gsd3's picture

February 16, 2025 at 06:06 am

Good point. He is a beast. With the 5th year option looming for Walker, it may be a realistic possibility.
I would be on board with that.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

February 17, 2025 at 12:35 pm

Is Campbell a true Mike LB?

0 points
0
0
RobinsonDavis's picture

February 16, 2025 at 07:12 am

I like both players. The reality is, one likely goes and the other stays. For me, Wilson provides a little more on special teams, and versatility to fill multiple LB roles. Yet, I do like that downhill, fill the gap attitude of McDuffie on run plays. My guess is that the Packers will look to draft a LB on day 3, preferably a rangy, MIKE.

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

February 16, 2025 at 09:22 am

You need one of them as a backup in the likelihood of injury. Walker has been hurt a lot so whoever they sign is likely to get significant playing time.

0 points
0
0
Packman60's picture

February 16, 2025 at 02:23 pm

The Packers can re-sign Wilson to a veteran's minimum deal. They should do so not only for his ability as a back-up MLB, but also for his value on special teams. Let McDuffie sign elsewhere as he'll probably get 5-6 million per year, money that can better spent .Use a 3rd day pick on a developmental depth piece. Hopper can take over as the 3rd starter at strong side LB.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

February 17, 2025 at 12:36 pm

We can afford to keep McDuffie.

0 points
0
0