Many Decisions to Make For Packers’ 2022 Draft Class
The 2022 draft class, which includes Christian Watson (9), Romeo Doubs (87) and Zach Tom (50), will be playing on the last year of their rookie contracts in 2025.
With the release of former Pro Bowl cornerback Jaire Alexander this week, the Green Bay Packers freed up future cap savings with the move. The release saves about $36 million over the next two years, which will be very important as the Packers have some very interesting decisions about their 2022 draft picks.
The 2022 draft by the Packers has been a sparkplug for the team’s recent resurgence, with two playoff appearances in the first two seasons under quarterback Jordan Love. This will be the 4th season for the seven remaining players taken in 2022, which will lead to decisions to make on all of them, as six of them will be free agents after the season.
Last offseason, the Packers traded with the Tennessee Titans for quarterback Malik Willis. Willis, a third round pick in 2022, will also be a free agent after the season.
Here’s a look at the 10 picks from 2022 (and Willis):
Round 1: No. 22 - Quay Walker, ILB, Georgia
Walker has been a mainstay at linebacker since he was drafted out of Georgia. He’s started 43 of 44 games played, registering over 100 tackles in each of his three seasons. He has 6.5 sacks and has 1 interception which was returned for a touchdown against the Bears in Week 1 in 2023. Walker has started at inside linebacker in both the 3-4 and 4-3 defenses. A big watch this season is how are him and Edgerrin Cooper used in Jeff Hafley’s defense. Will Walker continue being the defense’s playcaller or will be used to make plays sideline to sideline instead? It’s a big question whether the Packers brass will invest in Walker long term.
JUSTIN FIELDS THROWS A PICK AND QUAY WALKER MAKES A CRAZY RETURN FOR A TOUCHDOWN!!!!
pic.twitter.com/mhdIZsxmrT— JPAFootball (@jasrifootball) September 10, 2023
Round 1: No. 28 - Devonte Wyatt, DT, Georgia
Wyatt was drafted with the hopes of being an interior pass rusher, playing opposite of Kenny Clark. In three seasons, Wyatt has 47 games played, 5 starters, 12 sacks, 74 tackles and 1 fumble recovery. Wyatt was off to the best start of his career last year before spraining his ankle in Week 4 against the Vikings. His fifth year was picked up last month, a guaranteed salary of $12.9 million in 2026.
Round 2: No. 34 - Christian Watson, WR, North Dakota State
Watson was the first of three wide receivers taken in 2022, after the Packers traded up with the Vikings to select him. He has been a dynamic weapon when in the lineup, starting 35 of 38 games played. In three seasons, Watson has 98 catches for 1,653 yards and 14 touchdowns, and two more rushing touchdowns. His availability has been a frustration for the Packers, since he has been the lone deep threat in the offense. The report is he’s ahead of schedule in coming back from an ACL injury suffered last season. If Watson is available to play in 2025, it's possible he’s offered a short, prove-it deal.
Christian Watson with the 50/50 touchdown catch from Jordan Love! #Packers #GoPackGo pic.twitter.com/YNpNWYXF6c
— Packerfan Total Access- Clayton (@packers_access) December 4, 2023
Round 3: N0. 86 - Malik Willis, QB, Liberty
Drafted by the Titans and traded to the Packers for a 7th round pick last August. Willis has played in 18 games and started five games over the course of his three seasons. He had a career-best 550 yards and 3 touchdowns in seven appearances for the Packers last season. With the Titans he had just 350 yards in 2022 and 2023. He became one of the league’s most reliable backup quarterbacks last season.
Round 3: No. 92 - Sean Rhyan, G, UCLA
Rhyan was the first of the offensive linemen drafted in 2022. He started at tackle in college, but has become a reliable guard in the last two seasons, starting all 17 games in 2024. Rhyan will have some competition for his starting spot at right guard, with recent draft picks Jordan Morgan and Anthony Belton both projected to play both guard and tackle. Rhyan could also be asked to move to center if Elgton Jenkins is unavailable this year (contract or injury). He is playing this year to get a payday similar to what Jon Runyan Jr. got last offseason.
Round 4: No. 132 - Romeo Doubs, WR, Nevada
Doubs has turned into a steady presence at wide receiver and a favorite of quarterback Jordan Love. In three seasons, Doubs has 147 catches, 1,700 yards and 15 touchdowns, playing in 43 games. His numbers are all team highs since 2022. Recent concussions and his disappearance before a game last year, puts his long-term projection into question. If Watson were to be available by Week 1, would the Packers make Doubs available to other teams in cut-down trades? If both Doubs and Watson are on the Week 1, 53-man roster, it would be a very crowded receiving room with Matthew Golden, Jayden Reed and Dontavion Wicks.
A #Packers go-ahead touchdown. Clutch play from Jordan Love to Romeo Doubs pic.twitter.com/vOGN2r8Y9n
— Lily Zhao (@LilySZhao) November 19, 2023
Round 4: No. 140 - Zach Tom, G, Wake Forest
The likely first player from this draft class to get a long-term extension is Zach Tom. When drafted, he was a very similar player to Elgton Jenkins, because of versatility to play all over the offensive line. In his rookie season, Tom played four games at left tackle, one game at left guard. In the last two years he has started at all 34 games at right tackle, becoming one of the league’s best players at the position. Tom will likley be a mainstay on the Packers offensive line for years to come.
Round 5: No. 179 - Kingsley Enagbare, LB, South Carolina
Drafted as a standing up outside linebacker, Enagbare made the transition to a down defensive end last season. He came back from a knee injury in the Cowboys playoff game to being a reliable third edge rusher, finishing last season with a career-high 4.5 sacks. He has played in all 51 regular season games since being drafted, starting in 18 games, with 9.5 sacks and 107 total tackles. He will have serious competition this year for playing time with rookie edge rushers Barryn Sorrell and Collin Oliver.
Roster Battle: Kingsley Enagbare vs. Brenton Cox Jr. https://t.co/DFOycqNdE1 #Packers #GoPackGo pic.twitter.com/jE8e0yLXS6
— CheeseheadTV 🧀 (@cheeseheadtv) June 12, 2025
Round 7: No. 228 - Tariq Carpenter, LB, Georgia Tech
Drafted as a hybrid linebacker/safety and special teams player, Carpenter lasted just one season in Green Bay, playing 14 games in the 2022 season. He played in three games for the Pittsburgh Steelers in 2023.
Round 7: No. 234 - Jonathan Ford, DT, Miami
Ford did not play in a single regular season game for the Packers despite being on the roster or practice squad for all of 2022 and 2023. After being released, he played in four games for the Chicago Bears in 2024.
Round 7: No. 249 - Rasheed Walker, OT, Penn State
Another late-round starting offensive lineman produced by the Packers. Walker, who has been the biggest lineman for the Packers the last three years (6-6, 324), has become a mainstay at left tackle. He has started 32 of the team’s 34 regular-season games since 2023 and all three playoff games. With the drafting of Morgan and Belton in the last two drafts (both college left tackles) and the likelihood that Tom gets an extension, Walker could be playing for a hefty contract with another team. If he shows he’s a much better long-term prospect than those other two, then Brian Gutekunst will have a decision to make about paying Walker or letting him walk.
Starting Offensive Linemen drafted in Round 5 or later since 1995
| Year | Player | Round | Pos | School |
| 2022 | Rasheed Walker | 7 | T | Penn State |
| 2020 | Jon Runyan Jr | 6 | G | Michigan |
| 2014 | Corey Linsley | 5 | C | Ohio State |
| 2010 | Marshall Newhouse | 5 | T | TCU |
| 2006 | Tony Moll | 5 | G/T | Nevada |
| 2005 | Will Whittacker | 7 | G | Michigan State |
| 2004 | Scott Wells | 7 | C | Tennessee |
| 2000 | Mark Tauscher | 7 | T | Wisconsin |
| 1996 | Marco Rivera | 6 | G | Penn State |
| 1995 | Adam Timmerman | 7 | G | South Dakota State |
Round 7: No. 258 - Samori Toure, WR, Nebraska
The last of three WRs taken in 2022, Toure finished his two years in Green Bay with 13 catches for 160 yards and one touchdown, a touchdown catch from Aaron Rodgers. He was released in the final cuts before the start of the 2024 season. He was picked up by the Chicago Bears, spending the entire season on their practice squad.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Mitch McLaughlin is a Packers fan and shareholder residing in Sacramento, California. He will be writing Packers stories each week on Cheesehead TV. He can be found on Twitter: @McLaughlinMitch
__________________________




Comments (43)
LLCHESTY
June 15, 2025 at 11:58 am
I wouldn't be in a hurry to resign Quay but I think they will. My guess would be Tom, Quay and maybe Watson if they can get him on a one year prove it deal for around $6-8 million. Unless one of the others has a great season or is hurt and can be resigned on the cheap I'd let them walk, be judicious in FA, and load up on 2027 comp picks.
PhantomII
June 15, 2025 at 02:18 pm
No way Watson signs for less than 15 mill...one year prove-it deal with incentives for pro bowl-all pro voting,,,catches / yards and TD's. It's time to get paid and we should see the best we are going to see from ALL the WR's this year and next....This is the window...for now, until we have a true 1-2 punch and I believe Kraft can be a 2 if ML was a better game planner and used the best players to their potential or even close to it. If I was KC, I would trade for Kraft.....that's how much I think of what he could be with a good coach and good game plan for him.
dblbogey
June 16, 2025 at 12:11 pm
Nobody has any idea what Watson will sign for. He had the ACL tear, along with the hamstring issues. He's missed a lot of games. Nobody knows how he'll play this year, or even when he'll play this year. Will he be 100% again ever, will he continue to have injuries?
PhantomII
June 16, 2025 at 12:39 pm
That's part of my comment....everything is speculation....and you have mine...LOL
LLCHESTY
June 16, 2025 at 12:48 pm
If he comes back early and plays well you're probably right. If he doesn't I probably am.
Handsback
June 15, 2025 at 12:08 pm
It was a good draft class for the Packers. I expect to see some of these players being traded and or signed to a team friendly deals. All except Tom...he will get a very lucrative contract.
JMHO
TarynsEyes
June 15, 2025 at 12:11 pm
You missed Derek Sherrod (T) in 2011.
Oppy
June 15, 2025 at 12:43 pm
It was a list of Packers starting OL's drafted in Round 5 or later.
Sherrod was, unfortunately, a 1st round pick.
TarynsEyes
June 15, 2025 at 02:02 pm
OOOPS!
TKWorldWide
June 16, 2025 at 08:31 am
Yep, not a successful pick
BUT
I love to see GB prioritize the OT’s!
dblbogey
June 16, 2025 at 12:33 pm
In defense of Ted drafting him, Sherrod was the 32nd pick, and broke his leg badly his rookie year in 2011, missed the entire 2012 year because of the injury, and that was pretty much the end. Tough break but he graduated with a 3.5 GPA with a bachelor's in business and hopefully did well. Ted took some heat over that pick from some fans, but the Justin Harrell pick at #18 in 2007 was the one everybody was mad about for years.
LLCHESTY
June 16, 2025 at 12:49 pm
You can't do anything about a shattered leg. People that call him a bust are idiots.
Bitternotsour
June 16, 2025 at 03:50 pm
hindsight gm's - they suck.
TKWorldWide
June 21, 2025 at 03:44 pm
Totally agree!
stockholder
June 15, 2025 at 12:52 pm
I'd start re-signing them now.
The cost to replace; has always been problem #1.
Problem #2 -
Pay the reasonable amount.
The sums should align with the NFL standards.
Problem #3.
Gute hasn't drafted a franchise player yet.
When he wants - he over-pays.
Exceeding the cap is hell.
Oppy
June 15, 2025 at 03:33 pm
Alexander, Love, Tom, Jenkins, Cooper are all "Franchise" type players right off the top of my head.
We get it, you don't like Brian Gutekunst.. you're simply a hater.
stockholder
June 15, 2025 at 03:52 pm
Alexander is gone.
Love is just a QB that has a contract.(So Far)
Tom is a RT- that has been a revolving door.
Jenkins is 28 and being moved.
far cry from his all-pro status.
Cooper isn't a franchise player.
There isn't anyone you tag.
This has nothing to do with hate.
Oppy
June 15, 2025 at 06:04 pm
Alexander being gone doesn't change the fact Gutekunst drafted him and he's an elite talent.
There are very few if any GMs in the league who would argue that Jordan Love -isn't- a franchise quality QB
Jenkins being moved has nothing to do with the fact he's a franchise-level talent you can build around.
Zach Tom being "a revolving door" at right tackle while somehow being the 6th highest rated OT (not just RT, but all tackles) in the league in 2024 is a mystery you'll have to explain for us.
You are out of your mind if you don't think Edgerrin Cooper is a franchise type talent.
All of those players are players you can build around and give multiple contracts to.
If this isn't about hate, it's about your inability to gauge football talent.
stockholder
June 15, 2025 at 08:07 pm
Follow the article.
Your hyping everyone. Over Reach!
To soon- does not translate into
a franchise player.
Your confusing Building blocks
with roster building.
Team - Fair price - Compare.
I contributed to the article.
Your evaluations are dangerous.
Oppy
June 16, 2025 at 08:17 am
5 players out of 53 doesn't remotely constitute "everyone".
And I strongly believe the only player I've mentioned that is a projection is Cooper.. but the evidence on film is pretty overwhelming- the kid can flat-out play.
dobber
June 16, 2025 at 09:03 am
you're
too
you're
the_gavia_pass
June 16, 2025 at 11:48 am
love is a bust. worse than a bust. because we traded up and we did not take the last piece to sb we were missing. and now he is draining money to cap as an elite qb and he is far away from beibg that player.
cooper is a good player but is not luke kuechly and not even patrick queen who is not elite also.
LLCHESTY
June 16, 2025 at 12:52 pm
Cooper was much better than Queen was as rookie. Coverage wise it's not even close.
dobber
June 16, 2025 at 01:48 pm
His annual cap hits run about #12-14 among NFL QBs.
Yawn.
Packers0808
June 16, 2025 at 12:05 pm
Dunce.
Leatherhead
June 15, 2025 at 05:53 pm
I was most interested in that table.
In 30 years, we've drafted 10 OL in round 5 or later that became starters for us. Since you need to replace two offensive linemen every year, I don't think that counting on those late picks is going to get the job done.
Inspired by this fine article, I did a little digging, going back to when Gutekunst started calling the shots.
Cole Madison in the 5th. Never played.
Elgton Jenkins in the 2nd. Very good player and the veteran leader of the offensive line.
Jake Hanson, John Runyan, and Simon Stepaniak in the 6th. Runyan was a very good player for us.
Van Lanen in the 6th, traded away. Never played for us...neither did Stepaniak.
. Royce Newman in the 4th. Josh Myers in the 2nd.
Not so good. But then,the great miracle of 2022, when we drafted Sean Rhyan...ahead of Tom...and also scored Walker. Three good starters in one draft.
Now, a 2nd rounder in Belton and a primo FA in Banks, but we're scheduled to lose 3. Many of us would see the resign priority as Tom, Walker, Rhyan. It may not work out that way.
Oppy
June 15, 2025 at 06:11 pm
I don't think Jon Runyan was a very good player for us. He wasn't bad. He was a placeholder. Too many people let the family name cloud their vision.
Sean Rhyan is an incomplete lineman. I fully expect the RG position will be a full open competition this year in camp because I don't think Sean Rhyan has proven he's a long term solution at the position- and I don't think he has done enough to be any sort of priority resign / extension. Based off his body of work up to today (not accounting for whatever may transpire in 2025), I think the Packers would make him a modest offer to retain his services but wouldn't blink twice if he walked.
LLCHESTY
June 16, 2025 at 01:00 pm
Rhyan had too many penalties, allowed too many pressures and his over aggressiveness on running plays gets him into trouble too often. But he's gotten better every year and last year was his 1st year starting. If he corrects his mistakes he could be a top 32 guard, if he doesn't he won't be starting. He has good athleticism, even for a tackle and is probably a top 10 athlete at guard. Who knows if he can put it all together but the talent is there.
Leatherhead
June 16, 2025 at 11:12 am
Runyan......on the active roster for all 67 games. Started 50 games in a row. Played a couple of positions. Was called for 5 penalties in four years....three holding, I call that good. You can say not good, or average, or JAG, a 'placeholder' who held his place for 3 straight years, but this is pretty much the definition of a solid starter.
Left for $10M/year from the Giants.
I think he was a pretty good player for us. I don't think the reason we didn't go to the Super Bowl was because Runyan wasn't 'good enough'.
Rhyan is a Day 2 guy, end of the third round, who didn't contribute as a rookie, started to work his way into the lineup his second year, started his third year. This should be one of the best seasons in his career, because it's the one for the money. A crappy, injury marred season would cost him many millions, but a good season for him could put him in the same position as Runyan was. I doubt we'll keep him.
I would put the priority of resigning the 2022 class this way:
Tom. Wyatt. Walker. Walker, Enagbare. I think Watson is going to be unreasonably priced. I think Doubs is a bad bet healthwise. I think Rhyan will get at least one offer that's higher than we'll match.
Oppy
June 16, 2025 at 06:58 pm
>>Left for $10M/year from the Giants.
::Indeed he did, and Giants fans believe Runyan stole from them in 2024.
>> I don't think the reason we didn't go to the Super Bowl was because Runyan wasn't 'good enough'.
::Well, that's fabricating an argument that nobody's making.
Placeholders hold their places because the team doesn't have anything better to put out there. That doesn't necessarily mean they're an above average player. Sometimes, it means the depth is lacking. You have this massive blindspot for this situation. Savage, Wells, etc etc. Because they're starting, they must be good. That's just not always the case.
nagawicka
June 17, 2025 at 01:21 am
On the flip side, too often the starter everyone deems 'not good enough' turns out to be far better than anything the Packers (or their fans!) can manage to come up with. If a starter is so bad, why ya got so much trouble finding an upgrade? Rasheed Walker case in point. Balled out in training camp rookie year, YET the following spring was totally written off by self-styled authorities on the matter. Stated as having zero chance (despite prior strong impression), yet took on all comers and won the starting spot. Last year, without so much as having seen a single snap in camp with which to compare Morgan & Walker, local analysts repeated the mistaken early call: stating as fact that Rasheed was not the preferred starter because #1! pick Jordan Morgan 'would be given every chance to start'. They keep saying that. Like it's somehow different from every other position every single year. Turns out Rasheed Walker is their preferred starter.
If Tom is so great, why isn't he playing Left Tackle. And if Rasheed is so bad, why hasn't anybody beaten him out? why are other teams willing to pay him so much? Every team has to find that Franchise Left Tackle, granted, yet if Rasheed is so average, it seems like the market rate the Packers would pay to keep him would be a bargain relative to the salary the Big Franchise Player you're lookin for would command.
HarryHodag
June 16, 2025 at 11:27 am
Willis is an interesting question, perhaps the most interesting of all. I think the Packers will want to keep him around this year(obviously). I doubt he would want to sign as a back up with many teams needing QB help.
I don't know about resigning Quay Walker. He has also been hurt too much and they now seem to have depth at linebacker.
Wyatt is a yes unless he wants to make more in free agency.
Now that the team is "Golden", no to Watson. I always wonder if he had caught that sure TD pass against the Vikings his first season if his career would have been different. He seems bit by karma.
Rhyan is a yes unless he wants too much money.
Doubs is a no. He is a possible trade player.
Zach Tom is a sure yes, Walker is no. Rasheed Walker will want left tackle money and there are replacements available on the roster. You can't pay them both.
Kingsley E. is a yes unless he wants too much money. Good role player at the right price.
GregC
June 16, 2025 at 12:18 pm
Quay Walker is the hardest one to guess. I won't be surprised if they sign him to a big contract before the season starts, or on the other hand, I won't be surprised if they let him play out the season and don't make an offer. They may have options, depending on how Simmons and Hopper do this year.
I see Willis as actually very straightforward. He will spend this season with the Packers and then sign with a team that will give him a better chance to become a starter.
I think Sean Rhyan will sign elsewhere for John Runyan money.
Doubs will probably go elsewhere after this season. If Watson comes back strong from his injury, I would love it if they could find a way to keep him, but that will be hard.
Leatherhead
June 16, 2025 at 06:16 pm
I did some checking on Quay Walker. He's a $4.4M cap hit this year, which puts him at #16 among ILBs.
Only 4 ILBs make over $10M/year, and they're older than the 25 year old Walker.
I think it really depends on what kind of season he has. If he has a really good season, he might cost $9M or more. If he doesn't have a really good season, then the Packers still have some options. IMO, the greatest probability is that he plays pretty well, but he is not resigned because we have Cooper and McDuffie and others that we'll go with instead.
T7Steve
June 16, 2025 at 02:12 pm
I don't consider Quay Walker an injury problem. He's played almost every snap. I think he's only just starting to bud in this defense. The only reason he wasn't given the 5th year option, is because his inside LB position is lumped with all other LB positions including edge rushing LBs, so it was too expensive. They'll have an extension figured out for him when it becomes eligible for them to do it. Not sure if it's after this season or not.
LLCHESTY
June 16, 2025 at 05:52 pm
Would you resign a RB that missed the correct hole three or four times a game? Quay is a great athlete but his instincts are what they are now and it's a position where instincts are vitally important.
Leatherhead
June 16, 2025 at 06:24 pm
That would depend on what he did on his other carries, of course.
T7Steve
June 17, 2025 at 06:45 am
Would you consider it missing a hole if he was doing his assignment and the other LB or LBs missed theirs? How do you know what he was supposed to do on a given play? I'll grant that it would be great if he could freelance and still make all the plays. The D did a pretty good job stopping the run last season despite Quay being on the field and making the most tackles on the team?
Bitternotsour
June 17, 2025 at 08:27 am
Objection your honor, question implies the witness understands what he's looking at.
Packers0808
June 16, 2025 at 12:08 pm
Tom the only definite, Doubs and Watson iffy due to being very fragile guys!
LLCHESTY
June 16, 2025 at 01:11 pm
The limit on comp picks for players is four. They could get as much as two 3rds and two 4ths depending on how this season goes for some of them. I don't think a team has ever gotten three 3rd round comp picks in one draft for players.
SicSemperTyrannis
June 16, 2025 at 10:28 pm
SPEED KILLS
Our WR room, in order of speed:
the Golden Boy
Mecole Hardman
Bo Melton
Christian Watson (if he can return to that after injury remains to be seen)
Jayden Reed
Our most productive WR thus far has been #11. If all 5 of these speedsters can produce as much? GB would be unstoppable! While they're all different, I still say Bo Melton's best value would have been as a direct substitute for #9 anytime he's not on the field, if only to keep JL10 in tune with that much speed. Now there are other ways to do that :)
#9's biggest weakness has been not being able to track the ball over his head, a curious weakness for a WR to have all the way into the pros. Rather than trying to work on that last off-season they figured out and FIXED his hamstring issues. I see no fair way to evaluate him this season, unless he can miraculously return to his best form as if nothing happened. I'd rather see him not take a single snap this season instead of being judged during his comeback or being thrown into the fire before he's ready. I think he could still become a truly great WR, but he has to learn how to track the ball straight overhead. (As well as fully recover from a torn ACL, obviously; which is not at all a guarantee)
I've been a big fan of Bo Melton all along, while also being honest about his shortcomings. (Pun intended) Most don't seem to recognize he has a small catch radius. While most say a WR needs to CTFB even if it only touches his fingertips, #80 doesn't catch it even if it hits him all the way up his wrist. JL10 needs to hit him more accurately than that for a completion, but he can still be effective in "the MVS role." Even though he'd have to make a few deep catches before getting that respect from opposing defenses. (Which would be ok ;)
Likewise I've always been a fan of Mecole Hardman and not just because he ran a 4.33 40, but because he's come up clutch when it COUNTS. That property has been severely lacking in our WR room. I'm not saying he should be "a roster lock," I'm just saying that I personally am not ready to count him out as a contributor in the room.
All the other guys in the room are slower, and more of an overlap with our very talented RB and TE rooms. I still think JL10 should target #8 and 85 like they're our #1 & 2 playmakers (which they ARE) #88 should be given the chance to return to his rookie form and maybe he shows the world he's improved, which gives JL10 a nice midrange target. This approach puts the WR position more useful exclusively as a deep threat where speed matters more. This seems like a winning combination to me? If they can make it work, of course. This would reduce the roles for players like Doubs and Wicks. I think part of the problem has been deliberately trying to spread targets around, and the focus should shift to playing the hot hand, completion percentage, and winning games.
GPG! I still want to see a DYNASTY
greengold
June 16, 2025 at 11:23 pm
Sic, I've been a fan of both Melton and Hardman since their draftings. Thought we scored big with Bo after stealing him off SEA's PS, then more so with Mecole signing with the Packers in FA.
Mecole Hardman and Deebo Samuel were my top two WRs from their draft class because of their toughness and reliability entering that 2019 draft. Bo Melton put up incredible numbers at Rutgers with an insanely inaccurate QB.
Watson has disappointed because the needle tips more to glass than tough. If he can stay out of the hot tub... he'd be phenomenal.
Reed is a great WR who got bit by the Sophomore Slump like so many players do throughout NFL history. Jordy Nelson didn't get more than (Year 3) 582 yds until his Year 4 when he went ballistic for 1263 and 15 TDs in 2011.
I've been dying for DYNASTY in GB since Holmgren left. I do think it may now be possible with the talent currently assembled, and some shrewd FA/draft/trade additions over these next few years. I believe in the changes made in personnel thus far. We'll see, but, man, I'm all-in on that.
I love the Hardman, Golden and Williams additions this offseason at WR. There is a lot of promise on this current Packers roster all over the place, and I'm confident we are now heading in the right direction on many levels on both O and D. Gutekunst has grown into the GM he is today, and his addition by subtraction we've witnessed this offseason is encouraging. His Personnel Staff looks pretty solid, with the miscues nearly all GMs make thrown in. I'm encouraged after this last draft, on paper, but seeing this team realize their potential on the field will be GOLDEN. Without a doubt. Again, we'll see.
When GB snapped Golden, Belton and Savion with their first 3 picks, while sloughing off a ton of dead weight, it told me Gutekunst might have gotten it all heading in the right direction. And, I was unusually skeptical coming into this draft.