Gadget Plays: More, or Less?
Out-of-the-ordinary play calls on offense can be effective, but how often should the Packers use them?
By GregMeinholz

What's more exciting to see on 3rd and 11? A standard Quarterback to Wide Receiver 12-yard forward pass for a first down? Or the QB hands it off to the Running Back who flips it back to a Wide Receiver and then the WR passes it to another WR for 12 yards and a first down? If you said the standard pass, well, more power to you for finding more excitement in the ordinary. But most of the time, it will be that crazy WR reverse pass that goes on the highlight reel. Why? Because it's different, it's unusual, and it most likely made the defense's head spin for a few minutes. But here's the thing with those plays, the big exciting, and confusing ones can often be called out of desperation.
What is a gadget play?
A gadget play, or trick play as it can often be called can be anything from a standard jet sweep to the "Philly Special" that we saw in Super Bowl 52 where the QB moved up behind the line and the center snapped to the RB who pitched to the tight end, who then passed the ball to the QB who walked into the endzone for a touchdown. It's essentially any play that uses deception to fool the opposition. A jet sweep has become a standard play call, but it still uses the deception of a receiver going into motion and taking a pitch or handoff out of the backfield. Probably not as exciting but still a gadget play nonetheless. Plays like the Philly Special are a bit more complicated so tend to be used more sparingly.
When do teams run these plays?
Your standard jet sweeps due to their less complicated nature can be used multiple times per game. They can be used sometimes just for the sole purpose of getting a speedy wide receiver more involved in the game and less as a type of trickery. The more complicated gadget plays though, tend to be used as an act of desperation. You won't often see a team that's imposing its will on the opposing defense run any type of complicated trickery. Though it has happened, it's less likely. Usually, you see that desperate trickery when nothing else is working and the team needs a spark. Or a team is behind and needs to score quickly so they pull out that gadget play to catch a defense off guard. It's even common to see it from a team with a losing record that's trying to light a fire under its players right off the bat in a game. You won't often see big gadget plays from an offensive powerhouse.
So, where do the Packers stand with gadget plays heading into 2024?

To trick, or not to trick
The Packers ran a fair amount of gadget plays in 2023. With speedy receivers in Christian Watson and Jayden Reed, there were definitely a fair amount of wide receiver jet sweeps. But like I said, those are pretty standard today. When it comes to big trickery though with gadget plays, the Packers did have a handful of attempts. There were some flea flickers ran, and a few failed attempts at long laterals turned-passes, but there was a successful wide receiver pass that was memorable. In week 7, Jordan Love seemingly threw a WR screen pass to Dontayvion Wicks who then threw the ball to connect with Aaron Jones for a 14-yard gain. That was definitely an exciting play despite it only going for 14 yards. But, will we see much more of that in 2024?
Vince Lombardi used to say that he didn't care if the defense knew what was coming, he would still beat them with it. I'll forever be an advocate of the idea that you don't need to trick or outsmart your opponent, you just need to beat them with what you have. If your offense is good enough, and you execute plays properly the way that they are drawn up on every down, you will be successful.
When I look at the trickery that was run by the 2023 Packers offense, I mainly see it occur in the first half of the season. During that stretch where the team went 3-6, the idea of scoring a touchdown in the first half was seemingly foreign. These plays were run by a team that was just trying to get some kind of spark going. Some kind of good luck to push them in the right direction to get their offense back on track. They were desperate and it showed with those playcalls. The second half of the season you didn't see those calls anymore, because the offense had gotten itself on track.
It became common knowledge in the early 2010s that wide receiver Randall Cobb could throw the ball. He played quarterback in high school and some in college too, so he ended up being the Packers' emergency quarterback. Given how dynamic of a playmaker Cobb was, Mike McCarthy would occasionally field questions on whether or not the Packers would run some trick plays having Cobb at QB throwing the ball. These questions were often met with Mike McCarthy asking why reporters think he would want anyone else throwing the ball but Aaron Rodgers. At the time, I would often be disappointed by that answer because I thought it would be pretty cool to see Randall Cobb run plays out of the wild cat formation or something. But now I realize, that Coach McCarthy was right. If his passing game isn't struggling, why make changes to it unless he absolutely has to? It's that old saying, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
In 2024, I expect to see the jet sweeps and reverses continue. Maybe even more than last year. You can't have speedy dynamic receivers like Jayden Reed and Christian Watson and not try to get the ball in their hands by any means possible. They're like the Swiss army knives of the Packers offense. They can do a lot, so we should take advantage of that. I think that may be though where it drops off. Jordan Love proved in the second half of the season that he can be that Franchise Quarterback. And though Love has a long way to go before he can be compared to Aaron Rodgers, you still don't take the ball out of the hands of your Franchise Quarterback.
This year, I expect the Packers offense to win games more by executing and beating their opponent like Lombardi's teams did. Not by deception. There might be a few wrinkles here and there, but they will be done at the right moments, and not out of a desperate need for something positive. The 2024 Packers have a chance to become a powerhouse and win on their skill alone.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings.
__________________________




Comments (20)
mnbadger
July 17, 2024 at 12:43 pm
Great article Greg, I especially hope your last paragraph is correct.
It could be a really fun year. Definitely exciting, for better or worse.
I agree with you and Big Mike - at this level, it may be best to let your QB throw the ball.
GPG!
Cheezehead72
July 17, 2024 at 01:21 pm
I am not big on gadget plays unless you have a specific play you believe will work against the team's defense and you made it a point to practice it and the offense can execute it. Then only at a specific time of the game. So to me gadget plays should be very infrequent. With the limited time the coaches have to work with the team they need to concentrate on execution.
One of the benefits of a gadget plays is that practicing them and then using them can break up the monotony of practice. It gives the team something different to work on.
jannesbjornson
July 17, 2024 at 08:18 pm
Best to spring them in the playoffs. Andy Reid concocts a few of them and Wins SBs.
T7Steve
July 17, 2024 at 01:33 pm
Although they're fun, I'm not much a fan of gadget plays either. They're fun but not sustainable. It is good to do them enough for the other team to have to take extra planning time for. Otherwise, when the QB and skill players are on the same page, a broken play works about as good and there's no way to plan against them.
Leatherhead
July 17, 2024 at 02:33 pm
You can call them gadget plays, but at the end of the day , it's a run or a pass.
If you can execute them, great, but when you try to execute a "trick" play and do it poorly, it really makes you look desperate.
Bitternotsour
July 17, 2024 at 04:29 pm
He's a product of the Shanahan tree and they run trick/gadget plays. They've hurt us with them. So too does Sean McVay. Getting gutted by a gadget play is pretty demoralizing.
dobber
July 18, 2024 at 12:47 pm
Having your gadget play blow up in your face is pretty demoralizing, too.
Leatherhead
July 18, 2024 at 02:31 pm
Yes, the Shanahan Tree is tricky.. I had no reason to complain about that when we had #12, because he was tricky, too. Tricks are fun when they work.
You know what trick play I like? The one where a QB with time throws to an open receiver downfield.
stockholder
July 17, 2024 at 02:45 pm
We don't need Mlf imitating Dan Campbell.
Cheezehead72
July 17, 2024 at 02:58 pm
I was finally able to give you a thumbs up
egbertsouse
July 17, 2024 at 03:40 pm
I prefer they just line up and beat the other team. Gadget plays denote softness. I used to hate it when Rodgers would try to get a first down by getting the other DL to jump offsides. Talk about being soft. Just line up and beat your man and get the yard, dammit!
BuckyBadger
July 17, 2024 at 05:30 pm
Don't make gadget plays your identity. That never lasts. If you have a few clever ones to throw in now and then, go ahead and have some fun. Keeps the game fun. In the end to win games you will have to line up and be the better team but if you can get a chunk play now and then or keep defenses honest with them of course they should be in the playbook.
Tundraboy
July 17, 2024 at 05:35 pm
And use them when they least expect it.
LLCHESTY
July 17, 2024 at 06:28 pm
I'd like to see some 02 formations with Reed or Doubs in the backfield and Watson going in motion. Doubs was a very good RB in high school and Reed obviously has the shiftiness to make an occasional off tackle run.
CheeseEdWest2
July 17, 2024 at 07:08 pm
When I think gadget plays they often are slow developing and have too many sets of hands with the ball, increasing the chance of an error. But I do like the creative plays like Andy Reid comes up with, where he takes a standard formation, or a play the team is known for, and does the unexpected--creating a mismatch or an error in coverage.
Turophile
July 18, 2024 at 05:42 am
Simple answer - the better your team is, the less you have to resort to gadget stuff.
Think of the Lombardi era Power Sweep. The other teams knew what was coming but (by and large) couldn't stop it. While misdirection and deception is always useful, if you can do fairly straightforward things that the other side has trouble stopping, just keep on doing it until they DO stop it.
Equally, if the opposing team is better than you are and able to stifle the basic stuff, that is the time for something tricky, like a gadget play. Break out something like the seldom used flea-flicker, or double pass, or fake field goal. It might just be enough to get you back in the game.
At its best, the gadget play is something hoarded, saved for when you really need it, maybe in a tight playoff game.
barutanseijin
July 18, 2024 at 06:14 am
Fewer gadget plays, please — except if it makes the Bears, Vikings or Lions look stupid.
dobber
July 18, 2024 at 12:50 pm
Illusion of complexity: sweep action is all about forcing your opponent to defend the unexpected...who's getting the ball? The more you do out of your sets, the harder you are to defend.
...you don't have to run gadget plays very often for them to add a little effectiveness to your more routine play calls.
Leatherhead
July 18, 2024 at 02:16 pm
I think most defenses would prefer that their opponent not run trick plays. and not have to worry about it. Which is a good reason to throw them in.
dobber
July 20, 2024 at 08:38 am
The more trick plays you run, the less they're trick plays and the more they're part of your scheme.