Don’t Panic About Lack of Pass Rush Addition……Yet

I'm sure Brian Gutekunst has a plan to address the pass rush. 

Brian Gutekunst and the Green Bay Packers made a big splash on Day 1 of the legal tampering period, agreeing to deals with guard Aaron Banks and cornerback Nate Hobbs. By the end of the first day, they ranked in the top five for free-agent dollars spent—an uncharacteristic move for the Packers. However, with the salary cap rising and a relatively weak free-agent market this year, teams are seemingly having to pay more than usual.

Yet, if you look around the Packers’ fanbase, you’d think they did nothing but sit on their hands because they didn’t address what many consider the team’s biggest roster need: pass rush. Well, I’m here to tell you—it’s not time to panic about that… at least not yet.

As Gutekunst often says, roster building is a 365-day-a-year job, not just a few days in March. This year’s free-agent crop of edge rushers and interior linemen wasn’t exactly stacked with talent just waiting for Green Bay. When Myles Garrett announced in early February that he wanted a trade out of Cleveland, fan bases from all 31 other teams immediately started Photoshopping him into their jerseys. Then the Browns paid him a boatload of money just before free agency, and that dream quickly died. Let’s be honest—the Packers were never going to spend the draft capital necessary to acquire Myles Garrett.

None of the options on the market ever really made much sense, in my opinion. Nobody fit the Packers’ free-agent mold, which they’ve adhered to almost religiously: someone coming off their first contract, still young (25-27), with their best football ahead of them.

Khalil Mack would have been a nice option, but he quickly re-signed with the Los Angeles Chargers, suggesting he never seriously considered testing the market. Plus, he doesn’t fit the Packers’ typical profile. Josh Sweat was another intriguing option—he’ll only be 28 when next season starts. You do have to do a double take when you realize the contract the Packers handed Aaron Banks was actually half a million dollars more than what the Cardinals gave Sweat. But maybe the Packers believe he benefited from playing alongside a stacked defensive line and wouldn’t translate that success to Green Bay. He’s also had mixed results outside of the Super Bowl, which doesn’t quite align with Green Bay’s modus operandi.

The prospect of trading for disgruntled Cincinnati Bengal and 2024 sack leader Trey Hendrickson still exists (as of this writing). However, reports suggest the Bengals want a first-round pick “and more,” and the Packers would need to fork over a massive contract. That doesn’t pass the sniff test for me. Hendrickson would certainly transform their defensive front and could catapult their defense into a top-five unit, but I just don’t see Gutekunst selling the farm for one player.

No, to me, it was always more likely that the Packers would address their 2024 pass-rushing woes through the draft—after all, this is the Packers we’re talking about. Their current roster of edge rushers consists entirely of players they acquired through the draft. With an extra pick to play with, thanks to the compensatory selection they were awarded this week, it’s possible Gutekunst packages a few picks to move up and grab a premium pass rusher. It’s also possible he takes the same approach to pass rushers as he has with safety and wide receiver in past drafts—throw multiple picks at the problem and hope one or more hits right away. Think Christian Watson and Romeo Doubs in 2022 or Evan Williams and Javon Bullard last year. Adding more talent could increase the chances of immediate results rather than shelling out big money for a single player.

Gutekunst also spoke convincingly at the end of the season about his belief that the Packers already have the talent up front to affect the quarterback. He said, “There were times that we showed it, so I know it’s capable. I think we’ve got the right guys. They’re workers in there.” If he truly believes that, he may simply be banking on a coaching change—bringing in defensive line coach DeMarcus Covington, the former Patriots defensive coordinator, to coach them up more effectively than last year’s Jason Rebrovich did.

He could also be counting on a second-year jump from players adjusting to Jeff Hafley’s scheme. After three years of playing a very different style of defense under Joe Barry, perhaps Gutekunst is giving them some grace to find their footing. Or maybe he has something up his sleeve that will shock us all, and we’ll feel silly for assuming he was just sitting on his hands all offseason.

Whatever the case may be, it’s not time for Packers fans to start wringing their hands just yet. We have six months before the Green and Gold take the field again. Come mid-season if the pass rush is performing the same way as it did large stretches of last season, then we can panic. For the time being its has to be in Gutey we  trust.

-Dan Saia

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (25)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
PackEyedOptimist's picture

March 13, 2025 at 03:38 pm

Our current group is going to be okay, even if we don’t add anyone, though I expect we’ll draft a couple DTs.
Clark, Wyatt, VanEss, and Cooper will all be better this year.

0 points
0
0
KenEllis's picture

March 13, 2025 at 05:10 pm

Exactly, our current group of pass rushers that includes 4 former first round picks is AOK.

While Kenny had just 1 sack and LVN had just 3 in 17 games in 2024, they will most certainly cook in 2025.

And one cannot overlook Rashan and his eye-popping 7.5 sacks last season. Is there any doubt that Gary will hit double-digit sacks for (checks the record) the first time in his 7 year career next season?

With the most NFL ready 2022 draftee at DL Wyatt obviously ready for stardom in 2025 and up and comers like Wooden, Brooks, Mosby, and Cox this is not just a supremely talented group but a deep one as well.

With so much talent concentrated among one group of pass rushers, the Pack will be the envy of the NFL once again in 2025.

0 points
0
0
the_gavia_pass's picture

March 13, 2025 at 05:24 pm

of course you're ironic... :)

0 points
0
0
TOMMY'63's picture

March 14, 2025 at 04:35 pm

Is this your sincere opinion? Or is your sarcastic remarks! We ain't shit mate! After 2-3 years playing you can witness the talent and compentcy! It's like if you have a smi plumbing, masory co. You can immediately observe who has the trade,finesse , the values of a trade and who does not ! Our front 4 last season ouldnt penetrate old missing 2-3 ol.

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

March 13, 2025 at 04:50 pm

id be happy with Graham or Grant from UofM....or Jenkins in rnd 2 if he falls that far.

0 points
0
0
PackyCheese500's picture

March 13, 2025 at 05:19 pm

If the Packers want an EDGE to make an immediate impact pass rushing, they should target James Pearce in round 1

For a veteran to help, they should sign Calais Campbell for a year. Had 5 sacks and the #1 run defense grade per PFF last year. Would really round out the DT room

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

March 13, 2025 at 06:41 pm

Good thought Packy—Campbell has not been talked about.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 14, 2025 at 08:44 am

Pierce lacks upper body strength. He’s a one trick pony. That said it’s a trick we don’t have. He’d be a liability in the run game because he loses contain as well as being moveable, but he’d be a completely different threat on passing downs. I think he can add power to his frame though over time, I’d take him in a heartbeat if he falls because he’s exactly what we don’t have. However it’s questionable whether he will fall into our range.

0 points
0
0
WD's picture

March 14, 2025 at 11:45 am

Pierce should definitely be a consideration if available at 23. His one trick pony is a pretty good trick! He was the fastest edge at the combine (4.49) Granted, he is not built like a tank. He looks more like a tall 6'5 missile at 245LBs. He has an explosive first few steps. I think he could add another dimension to the rotation on passing downs. Moreover, he probably has the highest upside of anyone else at the position.

That said I would still take Matthew Gold at WR if on the board. As for CB it becomes much easier if we can somehow sign Jaire. Is it they don't care for his personality or something? It doesn't make sense to me. There is no transparency from management.

0 points
0
0
dblbogey's picture

March 13, 2025 at 05:25 pm

I'm still trying to make sense of the Aaron Banks contract. He better be a top 10 guard in an offensive blocking scheme that is supposed to better fit his talent than the Niners outside zone blocking scheme did.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 14, 2025 at 08:49 am

Check out Herman’s podcast today, which is a deep dive into his film.

0 points
0
0
PackerBackerAZ's picture

March 13, 2025 at 05:26 pm

I trust Gutekunst to get the Packers in the playoffs. I trust Gutekunst to not get the Packers in the Super Bowl.
Bringing in a mediocre slot corner and a mediocre to bad guard isn't showing me any urgency to win championships.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 13, 2025 at 06:19 pm

Hope the Packer coaches agree with Gutey's playoff push. Too bad they don't have much of a role to play...any responsibility for that playoff run.

0 points
0
0
GreenAndGold_1963's picture

March 13, 2025 at 11:16 pm

That is Gutes big plan. Make the playoffs. He thinks he’s successful if he accomplishes that

0 points
0
0
EnemyTerritory's picture

March 14, 2025 at 06:15 am

Yup because history shows that the sixth or seventh seeds never ever win the Super Bowl…. Except when they do.

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

March 14, 2025 at 11:04 am

and have the stands full, title town making big bucks, training camp spectators spending money in pro shop and GB area...no need to go nuts and try to win a Super Bowl..

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

March 14, 2025 at 11:03 am

I hope three teams from the division make the playoffs again next year or I doubt the Packers will be in...

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 14, 2025 at 11:28 am

So who will in your view? Detroit and …

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

March 13, 2025 at 05:54 pm

The Bengals are currently asking for a first round pick for Hendrickson, but then, the Seahawks were asking for a first AND a third for DK Metcalf, and within a couple days they had traded him for a second. So I think a Hendrickson trade is still possible for the Packers, though not likely.

Josh Sweat was the only free agent edge rusher who interested me, but I don't think he's that much better than the guys we have now, so maybe he wasn't worth it. The Packers already have a deep rotation at DE. What they need is a difference-maker. Wide receiver is the same way. They were paper-thin on the offensive line however. So I understand what they did to some extent, although I'm not going to lie, if they had signed Josh Sweat instead of Aaron Banks, I would not be complaining that they should have should have signed an offensive lineman instead of a pass rusher.

The two charts I just looked at have the Packers at 9th and 10th in free agent spending, not in the top five. I'm not sure if those rankings mean much anyway, because I think they include re-signing your own players. When we think about teams using free agency for team building, we are usually talking about them signing players who had played for other teams.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 13, 2025 at 05:58 pm

We were 8th in sacks. 3rd in opposing QB passer rating, pressured QBs into the third most interceptions in the league. We had 30 more pressures than the Eagles.(btw, the 5 teams with the most pressures during the season won a combined total of 0 playoff games)

By any objective measure, we put on better pressure than Philly last year. IOW, it was good enough to win with.

Gary,VanNess, Ebagbare, and Brooks are all under contract for next season. We've got guys like Cox who are trying to break into that rotation. There are other areas of the team that could use the help more, frankly.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 13, 2025 at 06:26 pm

The DL is good, I agree. This is still a very a fine draft for DL to add the Abrams Tanks up front...and still add another solid CB prospect in the first 4 rounds. (including WR and OL)

Hafley has something going on. They attack and pressure with the front 4 already...imagine what the front 7 will do with another quick twitch wrecker at DT, or a speed/size/strength stud at DE. How much better will the LBs play? The DBs?

Not that far away...

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

March 14, 2025 at 08:24 am

Agree LP. I know I am in the minority on CHTV, but I think the Packer edge group will be fine next year as Cox and LVN continue to develop behind starters Gary and Enagbare. I do hope the Packers draft a DT high as they have a vacancy with Slaton's departure and Wooden has never developed. As you put it so well, "another quick twitch wrecker at DT" will generate more up the middle push which is the best type of pressure on a QB.

Definitely not that far away....

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

March 13, 2025 at 06:52 pm

Well, I guess I shouldn’t believe my lying eyes; I somehow missed we were outstanding pass rushers.
…It’s okay y’all, Hendrickson isn’t really that good.
Go Packers!!!

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 14, 2025 at 11:02 am

Starrbrite.....over 20 teams in the league WISH their pass rush was as good as Green Bay, and over 25 of them wish they could stuff the run like Green Bay. If you picture this like a Venn diagram, there's a very small group that isn't in either group.

We don't blitz. We're one of the least blitzing teams in the league. We could blitz more and have bigger numbers, but that would be a distraction from the fundamental reality, POINTS, where we were 6th in the league in scoring defense, and we played our fair share of games against pretty good offensive teams.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 14, 2025 at 11:16 am

Starrbrite - A Venn diagram (also called a set diagram or logic diagram), shows all possible logical relations between a finite collection of different sets (in Leatherheads description this would be referred to as the reality of the team and it's defense). These diagrams depict elements as points in the plane, and sets as regions inside closed curves. A Venn diagram consists of multiple overlapping closed curves, usually circles, each representing a set (blitz rates, overall success in the run game, points allowed, etc). The points inside a curve labelled S represent elements of the set S, while points outside the boundary represent elements not in the set S. This lends itself to intuitive visualizations; for example, the set of all elements that are members of both sets S and T, denoted S ∩ T and read "the intersection of S and T", is represented visually by the area of overlap of the regions S and T.

Think bigger, it will give you a better sense of what you perceive that you're watching.

0 points
0
0