Can the Packers Only Rely On the Draft To Address Nose Tackle?

Brian Gutekunst needs to flip over every stone to find a solution at nose tackle. 

The most important part of NFL free agency has come and gone. The first week-plus is when the biggest names get scooped up and the largest contracts are signed. In the following weeks, each passing day might have a nibble of news, but for the most part teams are getting ready for the draft.

The Packers have addressed some of their biggest roster needs already. First, they traded for Zaire Franklin to be the replacement for Quay Walker in the middle of Jonathan Gannon’s defense (and created another need in its place, more on that later).

Their next move was bringing in some competition for incumbent outside corners Keisean Nixon and Carrington Valentine when they signed special teams ace and cornerback Benjamin St-Juste, who thrived in a part-time corner role for the Los Angeles Chargers last season. Finally, they acted quickly to reunite Javon Hargrave with his former defensive coordinator Gannon to help anchor and provide the interior of the defensive line with some pass rush. The hope is that playing again for Gannon will help bring out the best of what Hargrave has left in his 33-year-old body.

But with most quality free agents plucked off the market at this point, is the draft the best avenue for the Packers to acquire a true starting nose tackle? It’s arguably the biggest need left for Brian Gutekunst to address.

When the Packers decided to replace Walker with Franklin, they had to trade away their starting nose tackle from a season ago in Colby Wooden. The 6’4”, 273-pound Wooden was always a little undersized to play nose tackle, a big reason why he started to wear down toward the end of last season. He also wasn’t the best fit for the system we think Gannon is going to play in Green Bay for the 2026 season.

Known for using both 3–4 and 4-3 elements in his scheme, Gannon requires a true run-stopping, big-bodied nose tackle to anchor the middle of the defensive line, something the Packers don’t have on their roster and frankly didn’t even have before trading Wooden away. Hargrave played nose tackle last year for Brian Flores, but it was one of his lowest-graded seasons, showing nose is not his strong suit.

The biggest issue with the draft is that the best big bodies go quickly, true for both the defensive and offensive lines. Quality big men that can come in and make an impact quickly don’t typically hang around into the later rounds. If the Packers are going to want to get one, they will likely need to act with one of their first two picks (#52 & #84). Based on the 2026 consensus interior defensive line rankings, there are seven defensive tackles in the upcoming draft that are actually classified as true nose tackles. Two of those seven are top-40 prospects: Kayden McDonald and Lee Hunter. It’s likely both of those guys will be off the board before the Packers even get on the clock in the second round.

Once they get on the clock with their first pick deep into the second round, if they follow their true best-player-available philosophy and take a player at another position, then by the time they are back on the clock at pick 84 there might not be a nose tackle worth taking. That could put them in the precarious position of either taking a player higher than they normally would to fill a large need (not the Packers’ style), or maybe trading back to acquire some more picks for more bites at the apple.

Nose tackle is historically a hard position for rookies to come in and make an impact right away, which is what Green Bay is going to need. Relying on a rookie or two to come in and solve all their woes might be foolhardy on Green Bay’s end.

As mentioned, the free agent market is well picked over at this point, but there are still a few options out there that could be getting cheaper by the day. DJ Reader is the biggest name. The 31-year-old appeared in all 17 games for the Lions last year and was solid, if not spectacular, against the run. While he is not the same type of player as in his younger years in Cincinnati, he could come in and help provide some solid run defense on early downs while his counterparts Devonte Wyatt and Javon Hargrave focus on rushing the passer. His 68.9 PFF grade was good for 30th among 134 qualifying interior defensive linemen. If they can get him on a team-friendly deal, that could be a great short-term solution on the free agent side of things.

If the Packers really want to get wild, they could bring in another Jonathan Gannon favorite by signing 40-year-old mercenary Calais Campbell, who has played nose tackle well in his scheme. This offseason has shown they are no longer opposed to the older player, after all.

If they are looking for veteran help and none of the available players tickle their fancy, then they could look at the trade market. Harrison Phillips is a player who might pique their interest. The 29-year-old is currently a member of the New York Jets, a team that is far from being a contender. Maybe dangling a draft pick to them could be enough to acquire the run-stuffing Phillips. Phillips would come in and provide the Packers with a proven and reliable nose tackle that has racked up tackles at every stop he’s been.

The Jets traded away a 6th-round pick in 2026 and a 6th in 2027 for him last year. Maybe repaying them their 6th for next year will get the job done. They will have at least three comp picks coming their way, after all.

The best solution for the Packers’ hole at nose tackle is honestly probably a combination of all of these. Drafting a player in the middle rounds to come in and provide competition and fill out the bottom of the depth chart, while signing or trading for a capable veteran. More players will shake loose post-draft as the June 1 cuts start to roll in.

If I’m Gutekunst, I want to add a body sooner rather than later, and simply going into next month’s draft with your fingers crossed that a quality player falls to you isn’t the best way to play this out.

-Dan Saia

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (13)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
stockholder's picture

March 19, 2026 at 12:06 pm

The packers I knew were about
unity, tradition, and excellence in football.
Free Agency - questions.
Loses Addressed - yes
Solved - No

Obviously Gute thinks they're fully resolved and removed.
Why-?
Because he's used versatile defensive linemen @ NT!
(like Kenny Clark or Devonte Wyatt)

Thinking pass rush only was the priority.
He didn't sign Slaton.
The same attitude; year in and out, has kept this team
from the super-bowl.
I expect Gute to keep holding off on the DL.
It's just not what he focuses on.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

March 19, 2026 at 02:09 pm

Slaton had a lousy year for the Bengals, and that was playing with Trey Hendrickson next to him. Ain't no stink on Gute for letting TJ walk.

I'm not bright enough to understand the rest of your post.

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

March 19, 2026 at 12:07 pm

No mention of Nazir Stackhouse, 6'4", 327, who was on a great Georgia team and was on the Packers roster last year.

1) Don't promote the idea that FA's are NECESSARILY better than the player you have on the squad. The FA's might be better but one thing is certain: they will cost more. Franklin better than Walker? We'll see. St. Juste, better than Valentine or Nixon? We'll see.

2)Stackhouse wasn't ready for the NFL last year. But I will bet a six-pack of Point he will be this year. Jonathan Ford is also back.

3) Always left out of the yearning for big-name free agents is the salary cap. Sorry fans, but to those of you caught in the illusion of Green Bay's unlimited cap space and wealth, the reality is not that easy. They will likely want to extend Tucker Kraft before the season and maybe others, you need to sign the draft picks, pay bonuses, other considerations. Plus you want to have some space available during the season to sign someone should a major injury occur or a trade.

For me it has always been annoying that somewhere, some how, there's a perception that the perfect fit just waiting out there, be it a coach, GM, or player. The reality is that sort of acquisition is rare.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

March 19, 2026 at 02:11 pm

"For me it has always been annoying that somewhere, some how, there's a perception that the perfect fit just waiting out there, be it a coach, GM, or player. The reality is that sort of acquisition is rare."

Agreed, Harry. As they say, the grass ain't greener, wine ain't sweeter either side of the hill.

0 points
0
0
MitchAnthony's picture

March 20, 2026 at 09:50 am

Good beer choice on that six pack Harry. Point Bock is in season now as well.

0 points
0
0
deepsouth's picture

March 20, 2026 at 09:02 pm

I think they should sign D.J. Reader though
I wouldn't describe him as a big-name free
agent; at least not anymore. The cost wouldn't
be prohibitive for Reader for one or two years
and if he wanted more than we are willing to
pay we could look into D.Q. Jones. We should also
draft a true nose tackle. If we're going to try to
bring in a FA nose tackle we better make the move
soon.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

March 19, 2026 at 02:32 pm

I've been seeing mock drafts that don't have the Packers taking a defensive tackle until the 5th round or later, which seems kind of crazy. Maybe it's because so few of the DTs in the draft are run stuffers. I know it's a position that's hard for a rookie to excel at, but you've got to start somewhere. I'll be disappointed if they don't get one in the second or third round. I wonder if one of the non-run-stuffers could be coached up to play well against the run. College offenses are so wide open nowadays that maybe they just aren't learning those skills like they used to.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

March 19, 2026 at 03:42 pm

You're going to need a nose tackle for now and the future, so don't be afraid to draft one early if a good opportunity presents itself. We don't need to add any more DLs to the bottom of the depth chart; jeez, don't we have enough of them already? The Packers' more recent philosophy of trying to get away with a low-round or UDFA space-eater to man the position really hasn't produced the desired results, so it's time for a change. A little patience may be required, but you can say that about most positions. Temporary fixes can only take you so far, so look beyond the imagined championship window for a long-term solution.

0 points
0
0
brenner's picture

March 19, 2026 at 11:31 pm

I think that for the limited time he played, Riley has to be at least in the rotation at nose. Brinson needs to concentrate at nose to see the field much. ST reps wouldn't hurt either. Stackhouse to PS.

Still, if we can have Miller fall to us, might as well have another bulldog on the team...

On a side-note, wouldn't mind drafting Everette at CB later at round 4...

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 20, 2026 at 05:12 am

Remember that Riley blew out his Achilles late in '25 and will likely miss most if not all of '26.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

March 20, 2026 at 08:34 am

Are they playing games already? Lots of time for trades, cuts and another wave of free agent signings.

0 points
0
0
lou's picture

March 20, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Still can't understand letting Slaton walk for $7M AVA to the Bengals but can understand why Jerry Montgomery who left to join the Bengals staff wanted him. He was a sold run stopper, handled the double team well and had surprising quick penetration to disrupt the passer when you didn't expect it and his game was ascending.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

March 20, 2026 at 02:03 pm

$7 million is a good chunk of change for a role player. I was okay with them letting Slaton go, although of course at the time we did not know they would end up trading Kenny Clark away. It is some consolation to know that, by all accounts, Slaton had a bad season in Cincinnati and may not be retained in 2026.

0 points
0
0