Can Jaden Nixon Make A Run At A Roster Spot?

The undrafted rookie just might have more of a path than first thought. 

The Green Bay Packers started organized team activities this week and unfortunately that’s not the biggest news coming out of title town. While the news regarding Josh Jacobs is still in the very early stages, the first thing many fans thought of was what would the Packers due at running back in the event the allegations prove true and the team moves on. The running back depth is very thin to say the least. The team did not sign a free agent or draft any players. Outside of undrafted free agent Jaden Nixon they are running back (no pun intended) the same group from a season ago minus Emmanuel Wilson. So can the newcomer make a surprise run at the roster if the opportunity presents itself?

At first glance, Nixon faces an uphill climb. The Packers have former third-round pick MarShawn Lloyd who still possesses intriguing upside if he can finally stay healthy (a big IF). Add in veterans like Chris Brooks, Pierre Strong Jr., and rookie Damien Martinez, and it becomes clear the competition will be fierce throughout training camp and the preseason. While Strong Jr. and Martinez have yet to appear in a game for the Packers, they were both draft picks and in Strong’s case has 99 career carries to his name.

Still, Nixon has a very real chance to make this roster, or at the very least position himself as a strong practice squad candidate who could eventually contribute during the season. The reason is simple: he brings explosive playmaking ability and special teams value, two traits that often separate fringe roster players from final cut casualties.

Nixon’s college journey was anything but traditional (are any these days?). He spent time at Oklahoma State, Western Michigan, and UCF, gradually evolving into one of the more dangerous big-play backs in college football. In 2025 at UCF, Nixon averaged an eye-popping 7.8 yards per carry while showcasing home-run speed every time he touched the football. He recorded multiple touchdown runs over 50 yards and added value as a kick returner, including a 96-yard return touchdown. 

That explosiveness is exactly what gives him a fighting chance in Green Bay.

Nixon understands the type of player he is. During the pre-draft process, he openly described himself as an explosive back who can contribute in multiple ways, emphasizing his ability as both a runner and return specialist. The Packers have long valued versatility at the running back position, especially under head coach Matt LaFleur. Green Bay’s offense asks its backs to run wide-zone concepts, catch passes out of the backfield, contribute in protection, and help on special teams. Nixon’s skill set checks several of those boxes immediately.

The biggest thing working in Nixon’s favor may actually be special teams.

Making the back end of an NFL roster often has less to do with offensive snaps and more to do with how many phases of the game a player can impact. Nixon’s experience as both a kickoff and punt returner could become extremely valuable. Green Bay has continued to emphasize improving its return units, and roster spots are often reserved for players who can contribute there immediately. While the signing of Skyy Moore limits that to an extent, his experience there would give him the theoretical edge over Strong or Martinez as we sit here today.

The Packers’ official roster and training camp previews have already highlighted the growing competition at running back behind Jacobs. If Nixon can prove he offers more explosiveness in the return game than some of the veteran depth options, he could quickly force the coaching staff into a difficult decision.

Another factor helping Nixon is Green Bay’s long-standing willingness to keep undrafted players who flash during camp. The Packers are one of the league’s most patient developmental organizations. They routinely prioritize younger players with upside over older veterans with limited ceilings. Nixon fits that mold perfectly. Especially if the team moves on from Jacobs and if Lloyd cant stay healthy, they’ll need the cheap controllable contract that Nixon provides.

Community buzz surrounding Nixon has also steadily grown since rookie minicamp. Packers fans on Reddit and other forums have repeatedly pointed to his highlight tape and speed as reasons he could become this year’s surprise undrafted contributor. One UCF fan described him as “shifty as hell,” while others immediately became intrigued after watching his big-play ability on film. While fan excitement alone means very little in determining roster spots, it does reflect how noticeable Nixon’s explosiveness appears when watching his tape.

There are, however, legitimate hurdles Nixon must overcome if he wants to survive final cuts.

Pass protection will likely determine whether he has a true chance at offensive snaps. Young running backs often struggle to earn trust from coaching staffs because of blocking assignments, especially in offenses that rely heavily on timing and quarterback protection adjustments. LaFleur has historically leaned on backs he trusts in pass protection situations, and that can be difficult for undrafted rookies to master immediately.

Nixon’s size could also limit him in certain short-yardage situations. At around 5-foot-10 and 199 pounds, he is not built like a traditional power runner. That means he will need to consistently prove he can create explosive plays rather than simply grind out tough interior carries. Another factor that might actually work in his favor as Jacobs (if on the roster) Llyod and Brooks are all bigger more powerful backs. Having a more shifty change of pace option could be appealing.

Ball security will also be under the microscope. Coaches can tolerate many mistakes during camp, but turnovers from fringe roster players are often fatal. Nixon’s margin for error will be smaller than that of established veterans or drafted players.

Still, the path to the roster is not unrealistic and could even have improved since the Jacobs news.

The Packers may ultimately decide to keep four running backs plus a return specialist. If Nixon proves he can handle both duties, he suddenly becomes much more valuable than a traditional RB4. Injuries could also open opportunities throughout camp, something that inevitably happens every summer across the league.

Even if Nixon does not initially crack the 53-man roster, the practice squad feels like a very realistic possibility. Green Bay has repeatedly shown a willingness to stash developmental players there and elevate them later in the season when injuries occur or roles evolve.

What makes Nixon especially intriguing is that he brings something different to the room. Jacobs provides power and experience. Brooks offers toughness. Lloyd brings athletic upside. Nixon, meanwhile, brings instant acceleration and big-play potential. Every roster benefits from having at least one player capable of flipping field position with a single touch.

The Packers clearly saw enough in Nixon’s skill set to prioritize him immediately after the draft. That alone matters. Teams aggressively recruit undrafted free agents they genuinely believe fit their system, and Green Bay’s track record suggests they know exactly what type of developmental athlete they want. Training camp will ultimately decide Nixon’s fate, but he absolutely has a legitimate opportunity ahead of him.

If the Packers do have to make a decision one Jacobs, then the options outside the building are not great. It’s possible that changing between now and week 1, but if it doesn’t that’s plenty of time for Nixon to go the way of Emmanuel Wilson and make the roster as an undrafted free agent. Suddenly backup running back might be one of the biggest roster battles on the team.

If he shines on special teams, protects the football, and continues flashing the explosiveness that made him such a dangerous weapon in college, Nixon could become one of the more interesting underdog stories on the Packers’ roster this summer.

-Dan Saia

NFL Categories: 
8 points
 

Comments (43)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Coldworld's picture

May 28, 2026 at 10:23 am

I think he’d have to win the return battle to make the 53. The PS seems a more likely goal as a returner/RB.

+ REPLY
0 points
2
2
Starrbrite's picture

May 28, 2026 at 08:37 pm

That’s how I see it CW.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 29, 2026 at 06:44 am

We go from Nixon#25 as an elite returner, to nobody, and now actual competition for the position? Seems like a good section of this roller coaster ride ...

While not an official combine time, he has posted a 4.34 40. In basically a CB body. If he were to be used as the lightning to somebody else's thunder that sounds like an upside that ends quickly due to injury. He's also been timed at 4.55 40. His actual play speed in pads could be hard to predict?

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Since'61's picture

May 28, 2026 at 10:47 am

His size doesn't help in terms of running the ball in the NFL but he could utilized on jet sweeps and as a receiver out of the backfield which keep him away from the big interior DLs and give him a chance to make plays as a receiver. Do we know if has good hands for receiving passes? Thanks, Since '61

+ REPLY
5 points
5
0
Cheezehead72's picture

May 28, 2026 at 11:17 am

Not sure but he had 61 catches in college.

+ REPLY
5 points
5
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 29, 2026 at 06:48 am

This surely contributes to Gutey's tendency to draft on athleticism over College production; how would his efforts have fared against NFL competition? While he looked very impressive on the field, would that have all been shut down? (Those are designed to be rhetorical questions, and he'll have to shine throughout off-season and preseason before they get a chance to be answered)

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 28, 2026 at 11:30 am

Football guys says this:

“Nixon's college receiving numbers are gaudy, but he doesn't win as a pure route runner. Coaches often designed plays to get him the ball in space. He also struggles as a pass-blocker. Given his size, he'll likely need to improve his route running and blocking to find a role as a rotational back in the pros.”

I’ve no idea about his protection skills either. He added 10 plus pounds for the combine and tested very much worse than his film. He was playing in the mid 180s on film.

+ REPLY
5 points
5
0
Since'61's picture

May 28, 2026 at 11:37 am

Coldworld - I appreciate you taking the time to provide feedback. Based on what you have posted it sounds like Nixon best chance will be to make the PS where hopefully he can develop his route running and blocking skills.
Maybe he makes the 53 as an ST return specialist. Too soon to tell.

I'm sure you're aware that Jacobs was released from jail yesterday and that the DA stated they need more evidence before they can move forward to charge him. Things could definitely continue for a while at this point if anything comes of it at all. Thanks, Since '61

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

May 28, 2026 at 12:43 pm

The first thing I want to see with him is does he still have his speed and burst? If not then I don’t think he’s a factor at all. If he does, at what approximate weight? I don’t see a 180s RB holding up. I don’t see use of him schemed in space over Reed, Golden or even Williams as making much sense—even less so if Lloyd is healthy. Better to use their skills first unless unavailable and save a roster spot. Certainly he’s not a Jacobs substitute either. I think he is competition/insurance for Moore

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
Since'75's picture

May 28, 2026 at 02:15 pm

First, i wish the guy the best, i do. Being the underdog is tough.
We've seen some players break through, but's it's very rare when you look at the numbers in percentages.

Guys are UDFA's...for reasons.

+ REPLY
3 points
4
1
splitpea1's picture

May 28, 2026 at 10:50 am

If he shows he belongs, it seems like Nixon would be a damn useful player to keep around with the speed and versatility. Big play potential is always welcomed and something the Packers could use more of in both the offense and special teams. It's up to the coaching staff to use him to the best of his abilities. Nixon, by the way, is related to Adrian Peterson, so the genes are also working in his favor.

+ REPLY
6 points
6
0
Since'61's picture

May 28, 2026 at 11:39 am

If he's related to Pederson the Packers need to keep Nixon away from switches. Thanks, Since '61

+ REPLY
6 points
6
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 28, 2026 at 10:50 am

Will Jacobs be fully available week 1 of the season? Until he is, RB is going to be one of the most followed positions during Camp and Preseason.

Nixon's chances of making the team just shot up with JJ's troubles. The young man will now get many more opportunities to display his talent. Undersized, but packing 200 lbs on a 5' 10" frame to go with electric RB skills and return ability could make him a Camp story.

+ REPLY
3 points
4
1
Since'61's picture

May 28, 2026 at 11:42 am

Jacobs was released from jail yesterday. The DA stated that they need more evidence to pursue charges against him and they are continuing to investigate. Time will tell concerning Jacobs availability. Thanks, Since '61

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Mike Rossmeier's picture

May 28, 2026 at 10:54 am

I can see his potential, but why wasn't he drafted, at least by someone in Round 7? Also, I didn't see much in the article about catching passes. It would seem that swing passes would be a primary play for him.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Cheezehead72's picture

May 28, 2026 at 11:19 am

I prefer RBs for returning kicks and punts because they generally have better ball security. I like WRs because they generally have better hands.

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
PackEyedOptimist's picture

May 28, 2026 at 11:41 am

I prefer Strong Jr’s highlights and experience.
He’s equally explosive.

+ REPLY
7 points
7
0
golfpacker61's picture

May 28, 2026 at 01:46 pm

Exactly PEO, this article pretty much doesn't include Strong as a possibility. Strong is basically a bigger, faster, stronger version of Nixon. I would choose Strong.

GB isn't going to be wanting to rely on a UDFA, small, not that fast RB to backup the backups if Jacobs is gone. I predict a trade for a much high rated young RB like Benson or Allen. Or a RB with more NFL experience. Nixon is camp fodder.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

May 28, 2026 at 01:53 pm

Strong wasn’t used much in the passing game in college, so that’s a question. He didn’t have obviously bad hands, it just wasn’t common in that offense. He did do a lot of gadget work. Apparently he made some nice plays yesterday with his hands though, albeit in shorts. It is another thing to add to the list to watch this summer. If he is a factor in the passing game in preseason then that would be a big plus for his chances.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 28, 2026 at 06:16 pm

In three seasons, Strong has had 125 touches and scored 2 TDs. On the plus side, he's always available and doesn't turn it over. He's a solid piece, but I'm not seeing more than that.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

May 28, 2026 at 06:38 pm

I’d have to go back and look at how they used him before I could leap to that conclusion. He was impressive in college and is undoubtedly fast. Was he given a real chance to do what he does best? Or was he used to just used as a fill-in when the run game was obvious or to pretend to be a different type of back—just mimicking the game plan for a different player?

The life of a tertiary back up running back is often making the most of a bad lot—swimming upstream. That kind of film dive seems far too much work. I think I will just watch him this summer and see, keeping an open mind. He does have 500 yards on the ground at 5.0 per attempt. Thats not too shabby.

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
golfpacker61's picture

May 29, 2026 at 08:24 am

"He does have 500 yards on the ground at 5.0 per attempt. That's not too shabby."

That seems like a pretty good starting point for Pierre Strong to put on his resume as to why he should be given a very real chance to be a lead RB in GB. Especially if GB ends up moving on from Jacobs, which could happen regardless of the legal outcome. And obviously throw in he is 6'0 maybe 215Lbs now, and still really fast. He has decent hands but yes in college they didn't have to throw to the RB much. I would hope the coaching staff has worked with Strong and Martinez with blocking.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
GregC's picture

May 28, 2026 at 11:48 am

The mythical change-of-pace RB. When was the last time the Packers had one of those, not counting Tyler Ervin running some gadget plays several years ago? All Packers coaches going back at least as far as Mike Holmgren have had a strong preference for power over movement skills at RB, and the GMs have acquired talent accordingly. Aaron Jones was about halfway between the two main types of RB. He was just so good that McCarthy and LaFleur had to put him out there. I think it will be hard for Nixon to make it with this team, but he wouldn't be on the roster if there was no chance.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
Cheezehead72's picture

May 28, 2026 at 11:59 am

Possibly Ryan Grant and Brandon Jackson; Aaron Jones and Jamaal Williams; Arron Jones and AJ Dillon.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
BuckyBadger's picture

May 28, 2026 at 12:43 pm

Travis Jervey?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
mvprzy's picture

May 28, 2026 at 12:43 pm

Nice article and an interesting story!
- I can't not see typos “Packers due at running” = “Packers do” +
“decision one Jacobs” = “on Jacobs”

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
Spock's picture

May 29, 2026 at 10:48 am

"- I can't not see typos" Likewise mvprzy. It's especially rampant now. The plethora of AI assisted articles containing obvious spelling and grammar issues drives me nuts (admittedly a short drive). I comment on these types of things once in a while but I'm always aware that someone will call me out for being "the grammar/spelling Police" (and I'm certainly guilty of making many of my own usage mistakes).
It's the times we live in. I put a lot of the blame on the Texting "shorthand". I've heard horror stories of students sending in near gibberish for a "writing" assignment and then not understanding why their "writing" is not acceptable. (Sighs) :(

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
GreenandBold's picture

May 28, 2026 at 02:54 pm

7.8 yards per carry with speed what’s not to like . Let’s see what he does with his opportunities this pre season . I hope they found a smaller Adrian Peterson !

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
WD's picture

May 28, 2026 at 04:14 pm

A 4.55 forty is hardly blazing speed. Just sayin.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
GregC's picture

May 28, 2026 at 05:08 pm

His RAS is terrible: 3.20, with speed as his only "good" rating. They list 4.54 as his 40-yard dash time. I snooped around on the internet and found some better times for him, though: 4.37 and 4.46. Maybe those are a better reflection of his true speed, considering how many long runs he had in college.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 28, 2026 at 05:46 pm

He played in the mid/low 180s. That’s who you see on film. He was 200 at testing. That seems to have dramatically reduced both his speed and athleticism. On film he does look explosive and shifty. He didn’t test as such. That’s a lot of weight addition in a short time, which can really impact performance.

I understand why. 185 ish RBs aren’t typically sought after. They have durability issues for one and struggle with protection. However, if the extra time elapsed has helped him adapt to his new weight (and improved it in terms of type) then it’s possible his burst, wiggle and speed return. Then he might be interesting as a runner to develop. If not, the smart move might be to revert, get his mojo back and focus on returning. Perhaps he has. He’s genuinely good at that, or was before bulking up.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 28, 2026 at 05:37 pm

I think the most dependable part of the RB room, at this time, is clearly Brooks. The rest are question marks. I could absolutely see Nixon winning the #4 spot if some of the other guys can't stay on the field. If you take Jacobs away, the only guy clearly ahead of him at this point is Brooks. He'll get plenty of chances to impress between now and roster cutdowns.

Jacobs is a guy that's been talked about. It's quite possible he'll miss a chunk of the season. dobber has suggested that the Packers might have some financial incentive for parting company with him.

How do you replace a workhorse back who is available, assignment sure, who protects the ball and can catch, run, break tackles and get it into the endzone???? Last year, Jacobs & Wilson touched the ball 410 times, Wilson is gone and Jacobs might be unavailable. That's a BFH (Big Freaking Hole) in the offense.

Currently, we have other guys who we don't even know if they can play in the NFL, and I'm looking at Gutekunst's past history and I'm wondering if he'll make a trade for an RB and part with Jacobs. I always thought this would be Jacobs last year, but I couldn't blame the organization for moving on a year earlier, considering the circumstances. This offense absolutely, positively, needs a guy who can bring what Jacobs brings, and I don't see that guy on our roster of the FA pool. We can try to be tricky and camouflage our jet sweeps and reverses, but we need a horse.

+ REPLY
5 points
5
0
Coldworld's picture

May 28, 2026 at 05:51 pm

The guy on our roster who could bring a little Jacobs in his absence is Martinez. If you watch his tape he’s a similar size and style and very effective.

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
PackEyedOptimist's picture

May 29, 2026 at 08:01 am

Completely agree, CW.
Martinez is a LOT like Jacob’s; he almost always gets more yards than he “should.” I think he can be a very effective NFL high volume back.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
WD's picture

May 29, 2026 at 03:10 pm

The only thing good about Brooks is his blocking . His running ability isn't going to scare anyone. If Lloyd is healthy this could be a blessing in disguise,
To be determined.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 28, 2026 at 06:09 pm

I decided to do some background on him. There's a lot to like in this guy. He doesn't have a lot of shake, but he can run over you, or carry you. He protects the ball and can catch passes. He could be part of the solution.

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
Esquetoi's picture

May 29, 2026 at 05:18 am

What's with all the NIxons lately?

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 29, 2026 at 07:15 am

Is he not a crook?

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Spock's picture

May 29, 2026 at 10:51 am

Does he love his dog?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

May 29, 2026 at 08:34 am

They should be looking at all the RBs that might fall to the PS across the league. They need to look for some gems in the rough to get some depth.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
golfpacker61's picture

May 29, 2026 at 09:09 am

Lloyd is the guy GB thought could replace Jacobs in 2027 when they drafted him. Martinez is a lot like Jacobs, just as fast, although bigger. Strong is a faster, bigger version of Lloyd, Nixon was "average" fast before gaining 20lbs, which I am sure his advisors told him to do because he was too small. With the extra 20 lbs, he is as fast as Martinez, who is 20lbs bigger than Nixon.

GB might be very happy with what they have "in the house" right now. But if Jacobs get released, which I think will happen, I would look to make a trade for Benson or Allen. They would have a chance to be the guy for 5 years and cost would probably be no more than a 6th/7th pick swap. Or they could sign an established veteran RB bridge for insurance in case the young guys don't produce. Hopefully a healthy one.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
gsd3's picture

May 29, 2026 at 03:06 pm

I would check on the availability of Jaylon Wright in Miami. Liked him in the draft much more than Lloyd.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

May 31, 2026 at 08:33 am

Nixon's 2025 stats
554 yds 71 carries 7.8 YP
Take out 4 TD Runs over 50 yds-264 yrs on 67 carries 3.9 YP
2 long TDs against North Carolina A&T ??
1 long TD against a bad West Virginia team
4.55 40

Take out the 4 long TDs against bad opponents and not much to see.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0

Log in to comment and more!

Not a member yet? Join free.

If you have already commented on Cheesehead TV in the past, we've created an account for you. Just verify your email, set a password and you're golden.