Around the NFC North: Vikings Draft Preview

Where no draft picks is analytics. 

Onto the Vikings draft preview. Last year's most overachieving team picks right after the Packers in the first round and then has just three more picks. For years, the analytics have said GMs should do all they can to gather more draft picks because the draft is little more than a crapshoot for even the best scouts. The Vikings GM, Kwesi Adofo-Mensah, the league's foremost analytic GM, has taken this theory to its logical conclusion by trading most of his picks for veterans. This probably does help inasmuch as you can usually tell which NFL veterans are good players, but it makes it hell on the salary cap to barely have any rookie contracts. We'll see how the strategy goes. 

Needs

The lack of draft picks paired with a surplus of cap space caused the Vikings to go HAM in free agency. They signed several big-name free agents and brought back guys like Harrison Smith, Aaron Jones and Byron Murphy Jr. The buying spree shored up most of their needs, though they could definitely use a guard, linebacker and corner still. Safety and running back are in need of a succession plan. Interestingly, their biggest need right now is QB. 

Kwesi reportedly drafted JJ McCarthy last year without the blessing of head coach Kevin O'Connell and McCarthy proceeded to get a freak leg injury in the pre-season. Now, they've let Sam Darnold go after a dream season and seem to have no interest in Aaron Rodgers. I doubt Kwesi will go full analytics and take a QB again this year, but we do need to recognize that lack of QB could kill a team with the best supporting cast in the NFL.

First Round

The most common prediction for the Vikings' first-round pick is a trade-down. I think there's probably a 50/50 shot of that happening. As before mentioned, the analytical approach would be to gather more picks to take more chances at hitting on a great player on a rookie deal.

If they don't trade down, I would guess they'd go defensive back with the first-round pick. Maybe even if they do trade down. A do-it-all safety like Nick Emmanwori or shutdown corner like Jahdae Barrn could be the final piece this defense needs. 

Third Round

Assuming the team stays pat and has just one third, I think they go QB or guard with it. Those are probably the two biggest needs but neither is one they'd spend a first on. They could take a page out of the Packers playbook and draft a short-armed tackle with a good short shuttle here to play guard or gamble on someone like Riley Leonard or Dillon Gabriel at QB knowing there's a legitimate chance that guy will start sometime in the next year or two. 

Another option would be to gather more defensive line depth (edge Andrew van Ginkel weighs like 220 pounds and the interior guys are like 40). The best way to do that would either be to draft a freak athlete at edge or an unmovable run-first defensive tackle. Both of those options have proven good investments in the third round in the past.

Fifth and Sixth Round  

I know these picks don't matter but there were only two other ones so we should at least talk about them. If it were up to me, I'd go for a speedy wide receiver and a super athletic offensive linemen. The receiver can potentially clear out space for your two all-pros there and the offensive lineman can develop into a starter potentially a la Rasheed Walker. 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Mike Price is a lifelong Packers fan who recently moved from Utah to Stoughton (a Madison suberb). You can follow him on twitter at @themikeprice.

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (8)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Coldworld's picture

March 28, 2025 at 05:07 pm

McCarthy had won the starting competition last year. If he’s healthy then not starting him this year would seem nonsensical given that. How good he will prove under pressure is impossible to know, but they thought him their best option with Darnold around till he got hurt.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

March 28, 2025 at 07:50 pm

As for this article...i don't care about the Vikings draft, whatsoever.
And i care even less if Rodgers plays for them or not (golfpacker)

What concerns me, is the Packers recent draft history under Gute.

Why do the Packers miss on so many draft picks?

I’m not saying they’re all bust, some are serviceable.

But we aren’t seeing impact players.
Hell, the majority of draft picks aren’t getting a 2nd contract.
2018 draft class…Alexander is the only pick on the roster, and he’s got a foot outside the door.
2019 draft class…Gary and Jenkins are still on the roster.
Gary is grossly overpaid and over hyped. Jenkins was a solid pick who might stick around for awhile maybe..
2020 draft class….Jordan Love is the ONLY player on the roster from that draft. And as the second highest paid QB in the league, he still needs to prove himself coming into his 6th season.
2021 draft class…6th round pick Isaiah Mcduffie is the only player on the roster from that draft as far as i know.
2022-2024 draft classes too early to decipher.
But nothing about the 2018-2021 class resembles draft and develop in anyone’s world.

When you tout being a draft and develop team, that starts to ring hollow when you don’t return players after their 3rd or 4th season.

All of that, explains WHY we've been the youngest team in the NFL.
It's not a master game plan by Gute, it's simply because we aren't keeping our draft picks around.

Draft and develop my....

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

March 29, 2025 at 07:27 am

Most NFL careers are over within 4 years. Any player still on his original team 7 years later is highly unusual. If you look league wide at the 2020 and 2021 drafts, they are almost uniformly poor. Just google them. You’ll see the Packers are not even in the bottom half of the league for draft grades 4 years later. Which is mind blowing. Yes, Gute missed a lot. But he was hardly alone during the Pandemic years. 22-24 look really good.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

March 29, 2025 at 11:45 am

Well.....if your argument is, most other GM's are just as bad. Well, i don't know how to respond to that, but ok 🤷‍♂️
Plus i don't put much stock in draft grades.
Most draft grades are made a few days after the draft when none of the players have played a snap in the NFL yet.
IMO...A draft grade in that scenario is about the biggest waste of time i can imagine.
It's an article filler, of nonsense.
I value that one step below somebody's mock draft.

Again, i don't care what other teams do, i care what the Packers do.

I stick by my opinions, mostly because they are accurate.

I remember a GM who picked 6 players in the 4th or 5th rounds, that were mostly Pro Bowlers, or very very solid starters, and got 2nd contracts.

Lange, Sitton, Wells, Linsley, Tretter, Bahktiari. Aaron Jones.
All got 2nd contracts sans Tretter.

Those are pretty impressive 4, 5th round picks.

We're going to see how 22-24 pans out, we're not there yet.
Yes, hopefully it's much better than 2018-21.
I hope to God it's better.
I'm a Packer fan.
************
I'm going to take a minute to explain how long the average career in the NFL is formulated for you.

That 'average' is based, on all players, who have signed an NFL contract.
Doesn't matter if they are cut after a week, month, 7 months, 1 year, two years, three years....they ALL count against the average.
That is hundreds and hundreds of players, out of the league EARLY because they didn't belong in the NFL. They all count against the average.

What is more accurate is...starters.

How long is the average NFL life of starters.
It's much longer than 4 years.
My guess would be 7-8 years, if not longer.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 29, 2025 at 08:20 am

"Draft and develop my...."

17 of their current projected 22 starters were drafted by the Packers. (according to OurLads.com)
10 of Minnesota's (and only 3 of their defensive players)
15 of Detroit's
10 of Chicago's

You can argue, if you like, that it doesn't mean much: you can throw anyone on the field that you like and claim development, but the Packers are a playoff team two years running, and several before that.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

March 29, 2025 at 09:06 am

Draft and Develop could be another monogram for the GBP, but is it what it used to be? I don't believe they draft as well or develop as well as they had in the not too recent past. Perhaps a reason that they have retained so many of their draft picks then their Division rivals, is their failure in obtaining enough FA's to allow some draftees to be released. This seems to be a reason why we retain many a lesser player for longer, and resign them to second contracts out of necessity rather than high level of ability/talent.

Yes, the Packers have maintained a long playoff appearance run, but how much of that has been due to the failure of the Division being weak, because outside a few decent playoff runs, we've look like the kid that got in the game and was quickly ignored and patted on the head and sent home.

This isn't to say they fail in the draft completely, but it sure does place a stain on the mantra of being a great Draft and Develop organization.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

March 29, 2025 at 12:26 pm

dobs....I think you (seriously) missed my point in my comments above. My viewpoint was how many draft picks, stick around on the roster, and get 2nd contracts.
Right?
Right

I never once mentioned 'anything' about draft picks being starters.
Just because they are starters, isn't proof they are draft and develop.
I don't know man.
If your thirsty, drink the kool aid, that's fine, quench.
****************
A lot of players start, because they earned it, or the team doesn't have a better option, or because of their position taken in the draft.
Just because the team has starters they drafted, doesn't mean they draft and develop well.
That is flawed thinking, sorry.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

March 29, 2025 at 12:08 pm

I don't know what to tell ya dobs.

I'll stick by my comments, details and facts because they are reality based.
************
Tayran makes a great point about playoff appearances.
There are vital details we had in common with the Patriots.

The NFC North and the AFC East........

Things are a bit different recently, but .....

1) For a very long time both the Packers and the Patriots, enjoyed substandard competition in their respective divisions. Making the playoffs an easier get.

2) They both had highly skilled first ballot HOF QB's. That matters huge in the NFL.

3) They both operated as well run organizations.

To me one of the differences, the Patriots had a much more consistent defense over the years.

0 points
0
0