Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - Ranking the Moves
The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.
By JerseyAl

Now that things have calmed down, I thought I would use this week's post to go over the Packers' moves since the start of free agency and list them in what I think is their order of importance. I expect plenty of disagreement, so feel free to have at it in the comments. So here we go.
Ranking the Packers moves (best to worst).
1) Getting something useful for Rashan Gary - One has to assume the Packers were going to part ways with Gary regardless, but prying a 4th round pick (even if in 2027) from Jerry Jones instead of getting nothing is a big win. Not to mention not having to watch Gary jogging like he just didn't care. Maybe he already knew his time in Green Bay was ending.
2) Zaire Franklin in, Quay Walker out - Zaire brings some much needed experience and maturity to the defense. Quay Walker proved the hypothesis that athleticism isn't everything. For those badmouthing Franklin because of his poor 2025 season, I'm seeing a De'Vondre Campbell situation where he re-finds his "juice" and balls out with a new team that wanted him.
3) Sean Rhyan signing - It HAD to be done. The free agent center market was crazy (Lindenbaum) and then very meh after that. Rhyan was a known quantity and you couldn't count on a drafted rookie center to be NFL-starter ready.
4) Benjamin St-Juste in, Nate Hobbs out - St-Juste is a true boundary corner that found his groove last season, even if in a part-time role. Hobbs was a nickel corner asked to play outside and was a close second to Marshawn Lloyd for most annoyingly injured Packer in 2025.
5) Elgton Jenkins out - This isn't a move to celebrate, as Jenkins was a good player and a good Packer, but the money saved can be spread among several new players or extension.
6) Javon Hargrave in - I'd be more excited abou this if he was a run-stopper and not 33 years old, but if he can bring some inside pressure on passing downs, who am I to complain?
7) Brenton Cox Jr back - Gary and Enagbare are gone. Parsons is going to miss some games, Cox missed close to the entire season last year, but if he's healthy, he's an important rotational piece at Edge.
8) Nich Neiman back - Losing their best special teams performer when it looks like they may finally be trying to improve the operation of those teams would have been a bad look.
9) Skyy Moore - staying on the special teams theme, the Packers actually signed a real returner capable of handling punts and kickoffs? He probably should be ranked higher here but can we trust the Packers to keep him on the final 53 after they teased us with Mecole Hardman last year?
10) Darian Kinnard back - The OL depth is paper thin. Kinnard can fill in at guard or tackle, and the Packers had success using him as the 6th offensive lineman in their Jumbo package. I could be cynical and say the only way the Packers offensive line could open any holes for Josh Jacobs was to use an extra lineman, but I won't say that. Oh wait...
11) Chris Brooks back - I still find it curious that the Packers weren't willing to bring back Emanuel Wilson at a low cost (he got $2M from Seattle), but that being the case, a backup that doesn't get hurt every season was needed on the roster and they do love Brooks' pass protection capabilities.
12) Josh Whyle back - Whyle is no Luke Musgrave athletically, but I think he can match Musgrave and possibly surpass him in terms of his overall game day contributions.
13) Bo Melton back - He's the ultimate team player and LaFleur loves him, but is this the year the Packers finally have to let him go?
14) Kristian Welch signed - The Packers bring Welch in yet again. Will they cut him yet again?
15) Donovan Jennings back - Well, someone has to take that spot on the roster until they draft a couple of OL in April.
16) Jonathan Ford back - Someone had to take Colby Wooden's spot on the roster. At least for right now.
Go Pack Go!
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of various hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan living in the land of the Giants (and Jets). Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP.
__________________________




Comments (101)
TKWorldWide
March 18, 2026 at 06:33 am
Can they block a little for Moore? Or will the yellow flags rain down for clipping, holding, and just generally illegally attempting to block anyone and everyone?
Tundraboy
March 19, 2026 at 02:10 am
We're all thinking the same thing! Admit it. At this point It's pretty much expected on every punt or kickoff, a yellow flag!
Doug_In_Sandpoint
March 18, 2026 at 06:43 am
Al, if Gute signed Rodgers to back up Love on a $10mm one year deal, would that be at the worst or best end of your scale?
BradHTX
March 18, 2026 at 07:28 am
I can imagine a scenario if that happened.
Where “The Complicated Fella” has grown simpler in his old age, where fences are mended and he wants to close out his career back in green and gold. Where he exits the tunnel for the first game to a standing ovation, and then is happy standing with LaFleur and Love on the sidelines, holding a clipboard. Where Love gets hurt, and Rodgers comes in and does what he does best, winning the Pack a few games, and then goes back to being the backup. Where his name is revealed on the Ring of Honor before the NFCCG at Lambeau Field, and he gets his second SB ring. A true storybook ending to a storied career.
Unfortunately, I also can’t imagine that scenario actually playing out in reality.
JerseyAl
March 18, 2026 at 08:26 am
Doug, So you have a polluted mind too? Anyway, it would probably be somewhere in the middle because while I would want it to be a great thing, it could go wrong in so many ways. Pure fantasy anyway.
greengold
March 19, 2026 at 11:53 am
Doug is definitely polluted. Perfectly so. I don't like it, but I get it.
GregC
March 18, 2026 at 06:56 am
It's not a very exciting offseason when the best move is a trade for a fourth round pick next year. But that's where we're at. It looks like Gutekunst has done a pretty good job filling in potholes. This team is ready to compete at a high level as long as the injured players come back fully healed.
Spock
March 18, 2026 at 09:04 am
Exciting? Hell, no. But do I like it (so far) Hell, yes!
T7Steve
March 18, 2026 at 07:00 am
"offensive line could open any holes for Josh Jacobs was to use an extra lineman, but I won't say that. Oh wait."
If they had actually opened some holes, it would have been a win. The only thing that worked when they went JUMBO is the pass because the D would stack 7 or 8 in the box and the Packers couldn't make a running lane with a road grader.
JerseyAl
March 18, 2026 at 08:26 am
fun sucker!
T7Steve
March 18, 2026 at 09:23 am
I liked the JUMBO package with Kinnard especially near the goal line and I'm glad they retained him, but I think they had to run it because the TEs couldn't help enough after Kraft was hurt. It didn't help Jacobs much and his TD streak ended and he got banged up. Don't you think a good TE should take pressure off the line not add to the pressure?
SicSemperTyrannis
March 19, 2026 at 06:59 pm
What about a FB?
Turophile
March 18, 2026 at 07:21 am
If you add up all the moves the Packers have made, it's all designed to give the Packers more flexibility in the draft. If, when their picks come around they do not get good choices at their positions of need, they at least can avoid some of the pressure to improve those positions, like DT, CB, ILB, OL, because they have already puts vets in there, or re-signed Packers (like Rhyan, to play Center).
Without a 1st round pick this year and no multiple picks in any round until the 7th, the Packers need more than ever to have the maximum freedom to pick the best players available. There were underrated trade, FA, and swap moves by Gute here - and I like his plan.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course everyone wants to get excited by a big splash in FA, but this year we are looking for smaller moves that don't cut too much into our many comp picks next year - and the Packers also have an eye on having enough cash reserves to afford as many near-future key contracts as they can, like Kraft, Reed, Watson, Wyatt.........and to do that without pushing every possible dollar into future debt.
Finally, as part of the planning for future cap health, Gute and Ball have Morgan in place to take over from Walker at LT, Golden to take over from Doubs at WR, Banks and Belton to each man a guard spot with Elgton gone and Rhyan shifted to Center. There is also LVN to take over from Gary (though I think that was unplanned). Taken as a whole this team is in a good place, with more additions to come in the draft...........and possibly a small move or two post draft and finally, post roster cut-down.
That SB window looks realistically doable, at least for two years - and maybe more.
BradHTX
March 18, 2026 at 07:31 am
Yup. This. Great summary, Turophile.
Cheezehead72
March 18, 2026 at 07:38 am
Watch your use of the word everyone. This fan does not get excited about a big splash in FA. This fan gets excited about smart moves in FA even if it is signing a great LS.
You mention all the moves on the OL which yes they had to happen but you fail to mention where are the reinforcements. We have no proven backups except for Kinnard and he is average right now.
TXCHEESE
March 18, 2026 at 08:13 am
Yep, that's why he is a backup.
dobber
March 18, 2026 at 08:15 am
Agreed: the primary way you have starter quality backups on the OL is if you draft them. Otherwise, they're all destined to be steps down.
Turophile
March 18, 2026 at 04:47 pm
....and Glover who is healthy now. The Packers certainly need better depth this year, Isurely will not argue against that - but I see CB and DT as more like day 2 picks, then O line. There is also Monks who the Packers obviously like enough to have kept around, but I have no idea if he will be good enough to be a credible backup or more. I am not the greatest fan of Kinnard.
as for my 'everyone' comment, yes, it was an exaggeration, but you get the gist of it.
PS Did you not get excited by the Parsons trade ? Sure it was a trade and not a FA signing, but a move that big does give most of us a buzz.
golfpacker61
March 18, 2026 at 08:29 am
As you said Turo, the Free Agency moves does give us more flexibility in the draft and if we could add a solid Edge rusher like Clowney or Epenesa, GB could go into the draft feeling really good. CB still needs to be the #1 need because the ST Juste signing helps, but the Packers are still very weak in the CB room. After our first 3 picks in this draft, with so many other needs, we can look at the phrase I hate, Best Player Available (at positions of need.)
Tundraboy
March 19, 2026 at 02:22 am
And maybe they hit big on one or two of those picks!
LambeauPlain
March 19, 2026 at 09:18 am
Good post Turophile.
I'd label the offseason by the GM of Personnel so far as "prudent". Wise moves. Good judgement. Common sense approach.
No first round pick? Perception is reality and my perception is the Packers already have their first round pick on the roster. And Micah's reality seems on par with Christian Watson's: Beat the rehab timetable expectations.
Are the Packers: 1. A better football team preparing for the 2026 season with Parsons and no 2026 first rounder? Or 2. A better team in 2026 with a first round rookie selection and no Parson's on the roster.
"Almost" everyone remains excited about option #1.
stockholder
March 18, 2026 at 07:22 am
Derealization by a NFL GM.
Gute has created uncertainty on edge.
Moving on from Walker's high-end athleticism
is Creating Illusions of deception, manipulation,
and carefully crafted narratives.
(Quay Walker would not have gotten paid)
And there is NO proven depth along the OL.
Gute misjudged the OL creating a "glass wall"
Sorry but I don't feel comfortable with these moves.
They're a step back.
We lost good players!
dobber
March 18, 2026 at 08:13 am
"Gute has created uncertainty on edge."
"And there is NO proven depth along the OL."
We don't agree on much, but these two things are the things that concern me most. I'd actually put CB third behind these two.
LambeauPlain
March 19, 2026 at 09:40 am
My view is the only uncertainty on Edge (back to Edge/OLB terminology again as no DEs now, all DL are 3-4 DTs again) is when will Micah be back on the field...and Gutey did not create that "uncertainty".
He DiD remove a great on uncertainy at Edge in Gary who was an enigma, wrapped in shroud, surrounded by a mystery. I don't know what his next act will be in Dallas after his great disappearance show in 2025.
I believe the Edge room of Parsons, Van Ness, Cox, Jr., Sorrell, Oliver, a likely rookie and perhaps an another FA or trade will exciting.
And this Board will be anything but a bore if Gutey trades for Josh Sweat...who wants out of AZ and has mentioned he'd like to reunite with DC Gannon. Most here would cheer...and a few heads would pop.
TKWorldWide
March 18, 2026 at 08:28 am
I have come to derealization that GB is not two deep at every position, and there is nothing I can do about it.
dblbogey
March 18, 2026 at 01:15 pm
Stockholder isn't happy. Water is wet. Next.
Tundraboy
March 19, 2026 at 02:24 am
Lol. Almost expected, like a yellow flag on a kick rerurn.
jannesbjornson
March 18, 2026 at 03:14 pm
Mock and Load:
#43 Lee Hunter DT T-Tech
#84 Jadarian Price RB Notre Dame
#120 Logan Jones C Iowa
#160 Kendall Daniels LB Oklahoma
#201 Nate Boerkircher TE Texas A&M
#236 Ricardo Hallman CB Wisconsin
#255 Cole Wisnewski S T-Tech
Run stuffer to replace Kenny Clark with inside game and can bring pressures. Move Karl to DE. Get a viable backup RB. Jones is similar to Scott Wells. Daniels as a SAM LB has better cover ability than Quay. The Blocking TE. Hallman under-rated as a cover guy. Wisnewski from Sparta WI. can be a Sp Teams guy right away and play run in the slot.
stockholder
March 18, 2026 at 03:47 pm
Nice draft.
My fear is Gute passes on a DT that falls.
Karl too DE is a must now.
jannesbjornson
March 19, 2026 at 11:14 am
The fear accompanies most of his picks. If he thinks Brinson is his guy, good luck. Should have moved on Harrison Phillips last season, for what little the Jets gave up. They're not serious about bringing home the hardware.
greengold
March 18, 2026 at 07:48 am
Hargrave? He’s got both pass rush and run D. Knows Gannon/system and won a ring together in PHI. There’s nothing to not like about this signing.
Mentorship is a thing.
Can’t help but think Micah Parsons had his voice heard regarding both the Gary release and the Brenton Cox Jr. re-signing. Parsons knows the quality of players he wants to line up with. Hargrave likely got a nod from Parsons as well. Just a thought connecting dots.
Gimme quality veteran leadership all day. “Youngest team in the NFL,” year after year won ZERO rings.
Gutekunst finally course corrected towards a balanced roster.
Cheezehead72
March 18, 2026 at 08:08 am
There is one thing not to like about Hargrave. Age, he is 33. I doubt he will make much of an impact.
dobber
March 18, 2026 at 08:28 am
Hey, what's this warm, smelly yellow stuff in my Cheerios?
Smells a little like asparagus...
Spock
March 18, 2026 at 09:12 am
Well, Reggie White was, I believe, 32 when he came to the packers. Seemed to do okay for us (disclaimer: in no way am I saying Hargrave is RW). :)
Cheezehead72
March 18, 2026 at 09:30 am
You are right not to compare them because White was an athletic phenom. But I will go down that road being as you picked the most successful old FA the Packers ever signed. They played in two different positions. Yes White was one year younger. After 30 defensive players tend to decline faster every year. Hargrove has never been the player that White was.
I hope Hargrave makes a difference but yes his age is not something I am excited about.
LambeauPlain
March 19, 2026 at 09:48 am
Hargrave does not have to play like Reggie...he needs to play like Hargrave. I look forward to his play on the field and the leadership he brings to the DL room.
dobber
March 18, 2026 at 08:08 am
They still need a pass rusher. It's a roll of the dice--especially if it takes 6 games for Parsons to get into the lineup and really start to get his legs back--to roll with the group they have. You can't win a playoff spot in the first 6 weeks, but you can definitely lose one.
"“Youngest team in the NFL,” year after year won ZERO rings."
I don't know so much about a course correction....youngest team was the rebuild phase post ARod/Bakh/Z.Smith/Amos contracts. Now they're trying to turn the corner and make those deep runs that give you a chance to win it all.
golfpacker61
March 18, 2026 at 08:45 am
"They still need a pass rusher. It's a roll of the dice--especially if it takes 6 games for Parsons to get into the lineup and really start to get his legs back--to roll with the group they have."
1000% agree Dobber. The need for a FA Edge is so obvious. Not having much cap space is also obvious and even with the Hargrave signing, GB has been careful in players they have signed. Upgrade the roster but protect the 2027 game changing Comp picks is a great strategy this year.
The Edge market salaries are outrageous after seeing what Enagbare signed for. But if the projected salaries are close for what Clowney and Enagbare are said to recieve, I can't see any reason to wait longer to sign 1 of them.
If we had some real young stud waiting in the wings I would sign Clowney, so we didn't slow down the younger players development. Clowney showed his talent again last year. Because we don't have that young stud in waiting, I would sign Epenesa because he is 8 years younger, could easily be just as productive if given the snaps, and his salary should be less than Clowney.
Edge is the biggest FA need, but unless GB thinks one of the practice squad RBs is ready to make a jump, we should try to sign Antonio Gibson for the projected $1.1 million he is projected to get. I really like Pierre Strong and I won't even consider Marshawn Lloyde until he can stay on the field for more than 6 games straight.
Coldworld
March 18, 2026 at 09:12 am
I think we are better on the edge already. We only have one primarily run player (LVN) now not 2 (3 after Gary fell off the map). I see more chance of 4-6 sacks from Sorrell, Cox and Oliver this year than LVN, Enagbare and Sorrell as a rookie.
Would I be happy to add more experienced production? Yes, but, if he can stay healthy, Cox might offer the greatest upside this year, so I don’t want it to be at his expense, so how do we fit another one in? Oliver could be added to the ILB group or carried as an ST “extra” (I think he’s overlooked as a potential boost on teams). Obviously, a break out from LVN would be transformative, but I see no genuine signs that it’s likely.
Cheezehead72
March 18, 2026 at 08:53 am
Parsons has said and many people on this board claim that Parsons will miss only one game.
Now I have gone on the record saying that Parsons will miss the first half of the season. So I guess we agree on that point.
dobber
March 18, 2026 at 10:08 am
Even if Parsons is active week 1, he's not going to play 80+% of the defensive snaps and be the Micah Parsons we saw against Washington or Detroit last year. There's going to be a ramp-up period to whatever the post-injury Parsons becomes.
LambeauPlain
March 19, 2026 at 09:54 am
Wow you remain a "Debbie Downer" on Parsons.
You are on the record with Parsons missing 8-9 games before he is on the field. Micah looks forward to proving you wrong...again.
greengold
March 18, 2026 at 09:19 am
Yeah. DE/EDGE - we need more there. No doubt. Same for LB, CB, NT, OG, OC, RB, TE…. It’s a long list, but we all know that they’re not done.
GB has cap space & options remain.
LambeauPlain
March 19, 2026 at 09:58 am
Josh Sweat reunited with Gannon?
greengold
March 19, 2026 at 11:44 am
I'd LOVE to see that, LP!!!
murf7777
March 18, 2026 at 08:26 am
Hargrave is definitely one of the best pickups this year. He hits a major need for the team, and his durability is a massive plus—aside from that one season two years ago, he’s been a total ironman. Even watching his Vikings tape from last season, that first step is still lightning-fast. He doesn't look like he’s losing a step at all.
I also think people are sleeping on Cox. He should be ranked way higher after that second half of 2024; he was a dynamic pass rusher during that stretch. He’s going to be a huge value add for the Packers, especially as a playmaker while Parsons is sidelined those first few weeks.
I’d add one more addition to this list, and might be the most important. You can’t put a price on veteran leadership on the field, in practice, and in the locker room. Being the youngest team in the league is a liability, not a plus.
Young players often tune out "coach speak," but they listen when a proven, hardworking vet talks. Leadership is the X-factor that keeps a team together when things get tough.
Coldworld
March 18, 2026 at 09:18 am
Thumbs up for the Cox comment. I don’t expect him to sustain his 2024 cameo (which would have produced a little over 13 sacks over a season even on a relatively low snap count per game), but I do believe he is capable of replacing Gary’s 7 if he’s healthy and given the chance. Obviously it’s a gamble, but he’s shown the ability and he’s played the run well too. I also expect Sorrell to benefit from more chances as well as a year more experience.
golfpacker61
March 18, 2026 at 09:44 am
All really well said Murf, Hargraves coaches sure liked him and talked up his talent. So what if he isn't the 2021 Hargrave any more? The 2026 Hargrave is better right now than anyone on our DL not named Parsons.
I am also in the Brenton Cox camp. His 2024 highlights were better than Gary's in a smaller sample size. We could have given up on him just like KC gave up on Moore, and it's way easier to pitch aside a later round pick. I think they will both make a big impact on the team this year.
100% on lack of veteran leadership and the impact it has on a team. I was one of the few who wanted Bobby Wagner the last couple of years for his still above average LB play, but also for the leadership he would have brought. He would have been a coach on the field and you can't put a price on that.
murf7777
March 18, 2026 at 10:37 am
Agreed. He doesn't need to be the 2021 version to be a big upgrade over Wooden. And, getting St-Juste for Wooden was a savvy move by Gutey; having a high-end special teamer who can actually compete and start at boundary corner provides critical depth. I wasn’t impressed with Wooden’s game.
If Wyatt and Hargrave stay healthy, that interior push will be a game-changer. Collapsing the pocket from the middle is the most effective way to disrupt modern NFL offenses. It also allows the Edge to clean up after the QB starts to scramble.
Thegreatreynoldo
March 18, 2026 at 02:07 pm
Hargrave has a one year, $13M deal with an option for a second year at $10M. He is a moderately better run defender than Wooden and a whole lot better pass rusher. He is not quite exactly what GB needed, but he probably works on the field and does not count against the comp draft pick system.
Off the top of my head, the Packers have about $9M available to spend, by which I mean they could take a swing at another free agent or trade acquisition with a pretty high AAV, say $18M or so.
I really like Cox and think he could possibly replace Gary adequately. If a good Edge becomes available, I think one's belief in Cox should not be so strong that it should preclude acquiring that player.
Swisch
March 18, 2026 at 09:48 am
I'm wondering about whether it would be good to trade one of our WRs (Reed/Wicks/Watson) for Josh Sweat.
If Sweat is excited to be reunited with Gannon and Hargrave, could that be a good synergy for our defense to go along with Parsons and perhaps a rejuvenated Franklin?
Someone here at CHTV said Sweat is only 28 and on a reasonable contract.
dobber
March 18, 2026 at 10:42 am
I ask why a crappy team like the Cardinals in need of a rebuild would want someone else's castoff on an expiring deal in an FFL type trade when they can get draft capital, pick their own player, and have that guy cheap for 4 years?
Swisch
March 18, 2026 at 04:22 pm
I wouldn't call Reed or Wicks or Watson a castoff.
What the Packers have is a plethora of talented wide receivers.
So, the Packers would be trading a veteran and yet ascending WR, from a position of abundance, for a veteran in Josh Sweat.
If the Cardinals made the trade, they would presumably want one of our WRs in the same way that the Patriots wanted Romeo Doubs, and so re-sign him for a few more years.
As for the Packers, they could be getting another huge piece toward making their defense truly formidable. Sweat is still fairly young, and reunited with Gannon as our current defensive coordinator, might be rejuvenated.
It doesn't seem all that outlandish to ask fans to give their opinion as to such a trade.
I don't know all that much about Sweat. In general, I genuinely was interested in what other fans think.
I appreciate the reply, dobber, but maybe next time don't be so dismissive.
No big deal, though. In the hope of a more congenial exchange in the future, I won't Sweat it.
LambeauPlain
March 19, 2026 at 10:09 am
I don't dismiss this idea at all, Swisch!
Sweat wants out of AZ...has been reported the Packers are one team he'd like to be traded to, primarily due to Gannon and Parsons.
I would not trade Watson but Reed or Wicks might help to get a deal. May need to toss in 2027 4th rounder to close it. (Sweat was a 4th round selection)
Last season Sweat had 30 total tackles...and 12 of those were SACKS.
Swisch
March 20, 2026 at 10:16 am
I didn't know Sweat had 12 sacks last season.
Maybe we trade Wicks plus one of our young linebackers to the Cardinals for him, and they give us a middling draft pick as well.
Thanks for the reply, LP.
SicSemperTyrannis
March 19, 2026 at 07:16 pm
Don't trade #9 or 11.
Oppy
March 19, 2026 at 04:44 am
I like the hargrave signing, but "run D" isn't a strong suit
dobber
March 18, 2026 at 07:57 am
1. Gary--absolutely. When everyone knows you're unhappy with a player (and his contract) and you're about to let him go, it's a boon to get something for him. He's already taken a pay cut--albeit a small one--from Jerrah. Which takes us to Jenkins--who doesn't play a premium position--where everyone knew he was getting cut, so team(s) were ready when he was finally available. Nobody was offering anything to have to take on his deal.
2. Franklin--I'm higher on this trade than others. The Packers clearly weren't happy to offer Q what he wanted, so they dealt a guy they were done with (Wooden) for a vet who could play under a familiar eye. People pee on his age, but he's only got four full seasons of snaps as a starter (and four seasons of extensive STs play), so the hope is that--for two years--he's still got the legs. High effort, high character, team leader, VOCAL leader--which this team needs. He's not the athlete Q was, but has better instincts and is more likely to be where he's supposed to be. That's what just about every defense is predicated on. This puts every LB in GB within 2 years of finishing their deal, so they need a draft pick here.
6. Hargrave--Wyatt seems to get dinged every year. He'll play hurt, but his recovery and effectiveness afterward makes him a much lesser guy. When he got hurt last year, things really backslid for this defense. It's not so much pairing Hargrave with Wyatt that I like, but having someone who can still bring it in the middle when Wyatt gets dinged that makes a difference. The Packers likely draft a DL, and they like to rotate their IDL, so I don't worry about his snap share being too much.
9. Moore--I'd ask us all to temper our expectations. He has one year as a returner, and he flashed. It's encouraging that the only units in SF's special teams rankings that did well were the return units--whether they held up Moore or Moore propped them up remains to be seen. I'd have rather had Duvernay, who signed for similar money and has a longer track record as a returner and of being able to play some WR.
10. Kinnard gives the Packers ONE OL past their top 5 who they know can play...so at this point they can gimp through one player on the OL missing meaningful time....ONE. There are some unknowns: John Williams never got off IR last year, Glover apparently looked good in camp before getting hurt, and Brant Banks was poached off the PS--promptly brought back--and had an elevation or two. This unit is woefully thin--as you'd expect when two of your top 5 OL from '25 leave--and there's a lot of work to be done here.
greengold
March 18, 2026 at 09:25 am
Great points, especially re:OL. Quality depth is essential.
vin0770
March 22, 2026 at 11:33 am
And Moore is tiny and not exactly courageous fielding the ball.
Coldworld
March 18, 2026 at 08:12 am
I mostly like the moves made, but they are mostly bridging moves to allow us to move on for cap, age and not living up to draft/FA status. Overall, Gute has done a pretty good job of finding ways to plausibly refill departures at lower cost and with mostly effectively team options not future cap heavy deals.
That includes belatedly addressing the Clark trade (or more accurately perhaps moving on from the bizarre belief that Wooden was a plausible replacement). Are we better? Not really, though if the one year option on Hargrave works out, then arguably we are in terms of interior pass rush potential and he’s better against the run than all but Wyatt of the 3Ts.
Sky Moore for me has no logic as a WR absent a trade of Reed (or injuries). He’s Hardman. Like you, AL, the only way I see him retained is if LaFleur has had a dramatic change of heart on the value of a punt returner and thus is willing to deactivate another position on game day. I don’t see that as very likely (though I’d like it).
I’m open to seeing what Donovan Jennings is. I thought they might not bring him back, but there was some small buzz around his progress late (before he got hit in the throat) in the season. My OL “from-the-depths” hope is LT Brant Banks, as an aside. I also note that we have an “extra” draft pick in John Williams (G) and Dalton Cooper is a player I was very surprised we could pick up on the PS last year (he’s listed as a T, but I see him as a better G prospect). Both are essentially sight unseen for me though.
This year I think we see Melton actually play CB. He showed he can cover last summer. A quarters type D is much more likely to suit him than the Hafley one and he remains a core STer. I’m also of the view that Jamon Johnson came a long way last year in coverage and could be a force in the run game as LB depth. It’s going to be a good fight behind Cooper and Franklin. I think Johnson could offer more than McDuffie, particularly now we have a new veteran presence in Franklin.
As to TE and actually RB3, I wish we had either a true FB or a true blocking TE (I’d like both) not the “ok-but-not-great-at-anything” back up TEs that are only ever used to block (and not well). That extends to RB. Nothing wrong with Brooks; he’s excellent in pass protection, but he’s not a good lead blocker. Give me a Henderson type any day (and they’d likely get just as many overall yards as well).
Ultimately, Gute has held ground quite well and increased his flexibility in the draft. He now needs to have a good draft that helps elevate us despite the lack of a first. We aren’t materially better, but we’ve shed cap and not obviously got worse. That’s not easy to accomplish.
However, the real opportunities to improve from who we have currently seem to me to depend on LaFleur changing his attitude to roles like returner, lead blocker and TE. I’m not particularly confident in LaFleur’s willingness to evolve, unfortunately. Without that we will again miss opportunities to get the best final roster and the most from it. Obviously we also need to be far more astute in our handling of the OL too. We can’t waste both the summer and half a season trying to force Ts to be Gs and vice versa, whether that’s Morgan (T), Belton (G), Glover (T) or whomever.
dobber
March 18, 2026 at 08:16 am
"Sky Moore for me has no logic as a WR absent a trade of Reed (or injuries). He’s Hardman. "
To be honest, I don't even think he's Hardman.
We shall see.
Coldworld
March 18, 2026 at 08:46 am
Fair, he’s really only returned punts in one season, but he did that pretty well then and one can afford some optimism at this point in the year. Hopefully he is focused on that role, given a genuine chance to show he can make it better enough that the team is better with him as an active game day returner. If he doesn’t, I doubt he lasts even as long as Hardman.
Honestly, I think Neyor and Sheppard among returning players are more likely to threaten the roster under LaFleur (and neither seems a candidate to return punts). I could see Shepherd as a dark horse candidate to take over the role Doubs has vacated (particularly if Wicks were traded). Not a stand out athlete in NFL terms, but very good hands, a route technician, catch radius. Neyor is more of a Watson role fit in my estimation.
LambeauPlain
March 19, 2026 at 10:20 am
Moore has been a no show at WR. He's clearly not good at the position now. If he can't take advantage of footballs zipped to him by Mr. Mahomes, I don't think "All he needs is Love".
He has created a rejuvenation for his career with returning, but he's not a lock to make the 53, especially if another returner is acquired via draft or FA.
Turophile
March 18, 2026 at 04:59 pm
Quote from Coldworld. "I mostly like the moves made, but they are mostly bridging moves to allow us to move on for cap, age and not living up to draft/FA status. Overall, Gute has done a pretty good job of finding ways to plausibly refill departures at lower cost and with mostly effectively team options not future cap heavy deals".
Yep, I certainly agree with this.
Regarding blocking TEs. I'm 100% on board with getting one in the draft. When I first looked at scouting reports of draft prospects much earlier in the season, it didn't look like there were many good blockers out there. With the passing of time and reading many more reports I realise there are plenty of good blocking TEs, but they are not among the top half dozen TE prospects, they are available later in the draft, which suits GB very nicely.
PS. Would love to see Melton get a full offseason to polish his CB skills. I'm hoping he is one of the few guys that makes a major position switch and succeeds.
Bitternotsour
March 19, 2026 at 12:13 pm
I'm much more interested in finding a pass catching tackle than a blocking tight end
LeotisHarris
March 19, 2026 at 02:15 pm
Did you know the surname Tom means "hands of stone" in Dutch?
Major Snafu
March 18, 2026 at 08:35 am
Thanks Al. I was thinking our new guys saw pictures of the Lambeau blizzard and said 'oh no I'm not going there, get my agent on the phone rat now' 'where the hell is this place Siberia? 'Doesn't Miami need help?'
LeotisHarris
March 18, 2026 at 08:39 am
Wouldn't be prudent at this juncture to proclaim any derealizations, and it's too soon to say we like our guys, but imho these moves made us a better. That's enough for now. GPG
greengold
March 18, 2026 at 09:35 am
Leotis. You did NOT… pullin’ out the Dana Carvey.
A++++++++++++++++++
LambeauPlain
March 19, 2026 at 10:33 am
"And Dan Quayle, still gaining acceptance!"
the_gavia_pass
March 18, 2026 at 09:06 am
grade D everywhere, and at the bottom end of the NFL, 31 or 32.
this is the reality.
Coldworld
March 18, 2026 at 09:20 am
Are you talking about your Vikings? Probably true if so.
Oppy
March 19, 2026 at 04:48 am
Gavia isn't a Vikings fan, he's Italy's self-proclaimed most knowledgeable Packers fan.
HarryHodag
March 18, 2026 at 10:13 am
So hiring expensive free agents puts them in contention? That would be nice if there was no salary cap. But if there was salary cap, there likely would be no Green Bay Packers in a short time.
dobber
March 18, 2026 at 10:39 am
In this case, the only way the Packers could satisfy this guy is if they go back to ARod and dig up Ron Wolf to run the show. He's an automatic "scroll past" whenever I see his name come up.
the_gavia_pass
March 18, 2026 at 02:01 pm
mr dobber "small town guy".
sometimes you could take your nose out of green bay...there is life here! :) come to Italy on our Alps and you'll never get back to Wisconsin cheese.
anyway I Just wrote what I read... PFF gave a D to packers, dead last in the NFL. Yahoo sports gave a D, 31 out of 32 teams...and so on...so this time it's not my grade it's an almost unanimous grade from the media.
SicSemperTyrannis
March 19, 2026 at 07:28 pm
Repeating the mockingbird media, the 1950's called and want their naivete back.
HarryHodag
March 18, 2026 at 10:11 am
The most significant thing for me this off season is the Packers are realizing they can't keep paying the kind of money they have. If you look at the contracts of Love, Parsons, etc. this team is very top heavy dollarwise. Those players are paid like that to perform but it leaves little room to hire more players on the depth chart.
For Green Bay the future is now. They have to take the talent they have, a few draft picks, and go for the gusto. Otherwise, it's back to the 70's.
dobber
March 18, 2026 at 10:36 am
Jordan Love's cap hit in '26 is about $36M. That's 12th among QBs, and he goes to 10th next year at $42M. Parsons is just under $20M for this season, 14th--he moves up to 10th at $26M next year.
In the Packers' case, they've shed a couple of their high cap hits based on positions--Gary, Jenkins. Hobbs wasn't really all that high. I'd argue if they draft a good IOL, it will put Banks on notice.
In all, I'd say it's the number of second contracts they're paying rather than any one or two values that's pinching the cap.
Oxymoron 3339
March 18, 2026 at 10:53 am
It’s the lack of productivity from draft picks until right before their rookie contract expires. We need early picks to produce quicker and better.
Swisch
March 18, 2026 at 04:34 pm
IMO, it's good to pay those big contracts only on rare occasions.
Parson is so transcendent a player that I think he's worth it. He can push a good team like the Packers over the top for a title.
I wasn't as sure about Love, as he only had one season as a starter before re-signing. If the Packers thought he was a top quarterback, though, that's a position worth paying big money.
If a guy like Jaire Alexander insisted on being top-paid at his position (and I'm not sure if this is what happened in his case), I think I'd let him go. I'd like the Packers to pay their players generously; but if a guy needs an ego trip of being top-paid, then he's probably not right for the Packers. Only a superstar like Parson deserves that kind of consideration.
Also, with our early draft picks, we need to pick guys who are ready to produce right away. No more projects in the first two or three rounds. Save those for the later picks.
golfpacker61
March 18, 2026 at 10:14 am
The trade of Gary for something of real value is a minor miracle and Jerry Jones is already being crucified for it. Giving up a 4th round pick is outragous for a player everyone knew was going to be cut. I'll bet everyone in the Packers FO wanted to strangle Gary after that post he made. If Gutey had been able to trade Jenkins for something they would have erected a statue of him in front of Lambeau. The Gary trade gives him 5 passes.
Resigning Rhyan was really a no choice transaction. There are never many center options and teams were losing them every day for a while there. I have hope Rhyan will improve this year given the opportunity to play the position all year. If not he is basically on a 1year contract. Maybe we can trade back, gain a couple picks and draft a center of the future. I like Slaughter, Zuhn, or Coogan.
Franklin will be better than Quay. Yes, neither is great in pass cover, but Franklin is a true professional and will be very motivated to lead the defense. He, like Hargrave is a solid bridge until we get something better. And he has way more tackles than Quay over the last 4 years.
I am higher on Moore than most posters here. No, he probably isn't an All-Pro in waiting, but what he does bring is fix of 1 part of our special teams debacle. And since the word potential is so important to all pro teams, Moore has untapped potential as a WR. He was a damn good one, Top 10 in 2022, and maybe we can unlock that ability again. Love would be thrilled to throw to someone other than Kraft who rarely drops a pass, which was a big reason KC drafted Moore, along with 4.4 speed, ability to get open, the KR ability.
St Juste is a solid start to rebuilding our CB room. Another young, cheap, player with starting experience would be great too. Or else we draft 2 CBs before the 5th round.
Whyle is better than Musgrave. not quite as fast, but I will bet if given a chance won't fall down when a defender blows on him. He is also a better blocker. I think Musgrave is trade bait along with Wickes right now.
Cox should have a much bigger role now and if he stays healthy will have a better year than Gary had last year. I would still like GB to "Get off the Pot' and just sign Clowney or Epenesa to fill the hole @ Edge caused by losing Enagbare & Gary. Do it now before we lose 2 great opportunities.
Alberta_Packer
March 18, 2026 at 11:35 am
I think that the Moore acquisition is underrated. He is a legitimate kick and punt returner - which the Packers have lacked for years - with the exception of the Keisean Nixon anomaly. Plus Moore can step in as a 6th receiver. In short - a good incremental addition.
LambeauPlain
March 19, 2026 at 10:41 am
If he makes the 53, I doubt he rarely sees the field as WR...If ever. Not very good as a WR...and never has been. A whopping 48 catches total in 4 years as a 2nd round pick is bust territory for a WR.
Maybe he found a niche in the kick game. But he's not a lock for the 53. Definitely a good "kick the tires" hire as a returner.
Jeffw
March 18, 2026 at 11:00 am
Thanks Al, nice article. And thanks to the posters for some positive comments and analysis overall. I think we’ve helped ourselves, and I expect more moves before camp. GPG
Alberta_Packer
March 18, 2026 at 11:14 am
A constructive workmanlike off-season for Gutekunst thus far - in order to keep the road to the SB open for another 1-3 years. On the To Do list is still a one-gap DT and another boundary CB. It's probably best to address these needs with free agents - as the Draft cannot ensure immediate Year 1 contributions. However, so far so good.
splitpea1
March 18, 2026 at 11:30 am
2) Franklin: Here's a place where we needed the maturity and the leadership. I hope he can improve on his pass coverage, but how much worse can he be than Quay sometimes?
3) Okay, we had to sign Rhyan, but I'm still hoping to draft a center that's as close to NFL ready as possible. It's an important position, and there are a couple of them out there (at least that's what the scouting reports say) if we're in the right spot at the right time. Look to now and look to the future here.
6) Hargrave provides more leadership and experience. If he stays healthy, this signing will move up in the rankings. We were never going to be in the market for Franklin-Myers, anyway, so this is a good alternative.
14) Welch: The Packers favorite revolving door player...I wish they would make up their mind one way or the other and keep him out of constant flux. Maybe this is the season they really commit to special teams with an actual KR and two dedicated special teams LBs.
Emmanuel Wilson: I'd say Seattle got a good deal here for a proven reserve.
Alberta_Packer
March 18, 2026 at 11:52 am
I root for players like Welch - a 2020 UDFA - who has persevered into a 6 year NFL career. Certainly the STs are better with him on it. It's the sum total of small incremental improvements that can create a greater overall result.
deepsouth
March 18, 2026 at 12:28 pm
I agee with your ranking of the moves and
I'd like to see us stack a few more.
Dragon5
March 18, 2026 at 12:42 pm
1000% agree on Wilson--my biggest WTF / 🤷♂️ of the offseason in the roster retention department. Like Willis, Wilson crushed the opportunities given to him. If Lloyd manages to be on the field w/o crutches or sans a cart taxi during a personal 7 year, will Gute feel vindicated not having wasted (another) 3rd round pick? Schneider saw Wilson's value and quickly snapped him up.
GregC
March 18, 2026 at 01:05 pm
It was surprising that the Packers apparently moved off Wilson even before the Seahawks signed him. I would love to hear the explanation, and it better not have anything to do with Marshawn Lloyd. Chris Brooks is not the answer either. I wonder if maybe Wilson told the Packers that he wanted to go to a team where he would get more opportunities. Seattle looks perfect for him. One of their top RBs left in free agency and the other is recovering from a late season ACL injury.
Thegreatreynoldo
March 18, 2026 at 02:49 pm
You should not be surprised. Disappointed is fine, though. I told you GB's priority would be Chris Brooks, and only then would they look at Emanuel Wilson. With Josh Jacobs going nowhere and Lloyd not having proved he sucks while still being a premium draft pick, in addition to the near certain return of Brooks, Wilson knew he would be RB #3 at best and #4 at worst.
Seattle only signed Wilson for $1.59M, but $550K was fully guaranteed. However, Kenneth Walker signed with KC and Charbonnet is injured. An ACL in the divisional playoff game, so he is going to miss a lot of 2026. Charbonnet had his surgery just 5 days ago. Seattle might take a swing at a starter - Archane is being mentioned - but Wilson figures to earn his entire $1.59M in Seattle. I think the Packers would have had to pay more and guarantee more than they or fans would have wanted. Charbonnet is the highest paid RB on the Seattle roster at $1.7M and Wilson is second at $1.595M.
golfpacker61
March 18, 2026 at 03:25 pm
Not resigning Wilson just leaves a hole that needs to be filled. Even without Lloyd I thought GB had 3 solid RBs they could depend on. I personally would have kept Wilson and subtracted Brooks if a choice had to be made . But for as cheap as Seattle got Wilson for, that was a no brainer.
So now we either promote 1 of the practice squad backs, I do really like Pierre Strong because he is fast, has good hands, and a good runner, or we pay out more money to sign 1. If that's the plan then why didn't we just re sign Wilson. I have floated the idea of signing Antonio Gibson who probably isn't better than Wilson either.
Marshawn Lloyd is on his last chance to be a Packer. It's get on the field & stay there or goodbye.
Alberta_Packer
March 18, 2026 at 08:36 pm
I checked Draft Sharks for their Injury Predictor. Info as follows:
Josh Jacobs - High Risk
Marshawn Lloyd - Very High Risk
Also regarding De'Von Achane (trade rumors to Packers) - Very High Risk
For what it's worth - Antonio Gibson - Low Risk
Houndog
March 19, 2026 at 10:13 am
I've never figured out the Kristian Welch thing.
A couple years ago when, I can't remember who was injured, Welch played a couple games where he seemed to be everywhere and was the darling of the broadcast team in those games, he WAS everywhere, and they couldn't stop telling us! From those games, I was a bit surprised to see him let go, and brought back only to be let go, again, and again.
He's also played well on special teams and has always been a strong if not major contributor there.
Maybe I'm senile, or maybe I'm just bucking for the 'Home town kid make's good' ending, but to me he seemed like one of those guys who Ron Wolf loved to say "he's a football player!"
LambeauPlain
March 19, 2026 at 10:51 am
I hope Franklin is only a partial "De'Vondre Campbell situation".
His exit from the Packers and from football was a bad situation. He was suspended by the Niners after he refused to take the field after having been moved to a back up role. Campbell actually left the field after told to take over after an injury at LB and instead stormed to the locker room. Head case.
Strat
March 19, 2026 at 01:13 pm
Not exactly a list of "electric" moves, . I'm glad they moved on from and got something for Gary. I'm also glad Rhyan is back, but not for that much. I think they flat out blew it with Emanuel Wilson. What else did they want from him? Lloyd is nothing but a myth right now. Like the Buffalo Bills winning a Super Bowl, I'll believe Lloyd can play RB when I see it. Oh well...
Rebelgb
March 20, 2026 at 09:11 am
"Josh Whyle back - Whyle is no Luke Musgrave athletically, but I think he can match Musgrave and possibly surpass him in terms of his overall game day contributions."
Is this a joke? Musgrave has shown hes about as athletic as a tooth brush.
JerseyAl
March 20, 2026 at 09:56 am
You mean the toothbrush with the 25th highest RAS score among 1100 TEs since 1978? (9.73) You mean the TE the Packers use to run seam and downfield routes? That toothbrush? His speed and athleticism is specifically what got him drafted at pick #42 in the second round. It's fine to not like the player, he hasn't panned out. But at least be factual in your criticisms.
Coldworld
March 20, 2026 at 11:43 am
I wish we would find a way to use him as the massive WR he is. He’s not a TE. He could be a better Tonyan/Lazard mix, but that role seems dead in the current offense. He’s a very good athlete but he’s far from an all around one. Just look at his balance for one thing.
However, decent coaches have made careers around that by figuring out how to use a weapon to its strengths and not its weakness and when. LaFleur seems to lack that imagination or ability. Instead we pretend he can play a standard TE role. Ironically, we used him better before he was first hurt and Kraft emerged than we have since.