5 Takeaways From Packers 7 - 10 Eagles: Matt LaFleur Deserves Criticism

Green Bay's offense looks stale and poorly coached, and that falls squarely on LaFleur.

Matt LaFleur deserves criticism

There are a lot of things working against Matt LaFleur which make it easy to sympathize with the Packers head coach.

The offensive line has been in constant flux all year, which continued Monday night as Elgton Jenkins went out. Green Bay entered this game down Tucker Kraft, Jayden Reed, Matthew Golden, and Savion Williams barely played on offense.

It is not unacceptable that the Packers found it difficult to move the ball on this Eagles defense, and even then, they crossed the 50 plenty of times. But there was so much in this game that reflects extremely poorly on coaching.

Green Bay continued to shoot themselves in the foot whenever they got close to scoring range, whether it be penalties, missed assignments or turnovers. At some point, that is part of your identity and the lack of execution falls on the head coach.

Then there were the usual handful of very questionable decisions and play calls by LaFleur which had fans pulling their hair out.

Too many runs on 2nd and long to set up… 3rd and long. Sometimes too safe on 4th down and other times too aggressive. Called a timeout on 4th down with four seconds left in the first half which could have allowed the Eagles to try a hail mary.

A shotgun run on 4th and 1 with the game on the line, which was rushed – the Packers snapped the ball with 27 seconds left on the play clock – and was as disastrous as it was unimaginative. Even worse? The Eagles defensive line called out what the play would be before it was even run.

That is a terrible look for an offensive play caller. Green Bay also went with Brandon McManus at kicker again in this game, and he failed miserably with two attempts at a 64-yarder to tie the game.

McManus told the ESPN broadcast crew this week that this was the first time his quad had felt somewhat healthy, which calls LaFleur’s decision to roll with him for the last two weeks even more into question.

There is no point in firing LaFleur midseason, as whoever would be available to take over at this stage is not going to make the Packers any more likely to win a Super Bowl this year. LaFleur also has an excellent track record which should not be tossed aside based on a poor stretch.

He will very likely turn things around and end up getting a contract extension in the offseason, but right now, his offense looks stale and poorly coached, and that has to change.

Josh Jacobs is still that guy

Jacobs was one of the only offensive players who could hold his head high after Monday’s game. He fought hard for every yard behind a subpar offensive line and got more than was blocked all night.

He is doing all he can to get the offense moving, and if the rest of the unit can get themselves together (whether that happens is anyone's guess), Jacobs could start to put up the kind of production he did last season and hit some big plays.

Lack of YAC evident without Tucker Kraft

Perhaps a choice based on the opponent, the Packers abandoned a lot of their screens and horizontal passing game, but when they did need their pass catchers to pick up extra yards, it quickly became clear how crucial Kraft was to that endeavor.

The Eagles consistently got Packers ball carriers to the ground quickly, and the YAC element of the offense was basically nonexistent.

They will need to rely less on that formula when possible, although it is difficult to do so when facing soft defenses that are begging you to throw the ball short. Green Bay needs Jayden Reed back badly.

Jordan Love compounding shaky offensive line

The offensive line had a rough night in pass protection, but more concerningly, their up and down play throughout the year has started to impact Love’s play.

He is not confident standing in the pocket and delivering, too often dropping his eyes to the rush and even bailing on relatively clean pockets.

There were multiple times in this game where Love had begun to scramble and could still have thrown the ball downfield, but had blinkers on. He has to be calmer and let things play out more.

Packers defense is championship caliber

The Packers defense got after Jalen Hurts and the Eagles all night, limiting them to just 10 points, frequently getting out of bad spots their offense left them in, and giving Love and company the chance to get back in the game.

LaFleur, Love and the offense need to figure things out, because they are risking wasting a Super Bowl worthy defense this year.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (104)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Packerpasty's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:11 am

How many negative comments did Aikman make about Love last night...a few for sure...not seeing the field not leading the WRs with the pass, not throwing the ball away and taking massive losses....horrible game by a mediocre QB and coach...

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:36 am

Was Aikman pressured 40% of the time as a QB?

0 points
0
0
pete-nado's picture

November 12, 2025 at 07:36 am

If I recall correctly, he was a human tackling dummy his first couple years before the OL got great. And then in contrast was really well protected the rest of his career, and with a strong running game. So he knows how much the OL play affects a QB mentality.

0 points
0
0
dblbogey's picture

November 11, 2025 at 03:35 pm

Love, like all QB's, do best when they have consistent protection. We've generally had above average offensive lines for decades, but this year's version is bad.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:45 pm

Which raises the question, is the talent bad or the coaching?

0 points
0
0
CheeseWhiz1's picture

November 11, 2025 at 06:01 pm

I actually considered watching ESPN Deportes and opening my Google translate App instead of Aikman and Buck.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:44 pm

Aikman is an idiot as a commentator.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:22 am

The last time the Packers were led by the Defense was 1996. Fortunately the Offense was also potent and STs were very good.

The Packers again have a Head Coach who is primarily an OC who delegates 2/3rds of the team coaching duties to his coordinators. LaFleur lets them do the managing with their squads, make the decisions, while he focuses mostly on the Offense.

Like McCarthy, year 7 has the OC/HC LaFleur also stalling out. He's been figured out by DCs but seems unable to change.

Change may not be in his DNA. He is very status quo. Some may call him stubborn...I just believe he fears change, making difficult decisions that are never fun, but necessary as a leader.

Ed has some problematic policies to review. He inherited the Acting GM role. Let's see how he enjoys the current structure. The plate is filling up for the lawyer/financial expert.

0 points
0
0
BELIEVER's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:01 am

Jeff Hafley for our next head coach, soon please!

0 points
0
0
jlc1's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:20 am

YES!

0 points
0
0
FumundaStank's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:52 pm

Why?

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:48 pm

If the only way to keep him in GB is to make him HC. I think the likelihood of him getting HC offers goes down if GB doesn't win.

0 points
0
0
KenEllis's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:28 am

Wow, when CheeseheadTV is permitting articles critical of the Packer Head Coach, you know things are getting bad in GB.

Welcome aboard Mark, many Packer fans have been there for sometime regarding LaFleur and the bandwagon keeps getting bigger. Plenty of room and welcome aboard.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:31 am

CHTV hasn't quite allowed objective critiques of Gutekunst yet (whom I place a Lion's share of the blame--actually the dysfunction started with Murphy--no one allowed to talk openly about his influence on the team's competence)

0 points
0
0
KenEllis's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:59 am

Nagler went after MLF last night and the permission has been granted for the rest to do the same.

When the next coach struggles, CHTV may finally acknowledge the rot began at the head and allow criticism of the beloved Gutey.

Any objective observer taking a look at the dumpster fire along the OLine would know that while MLF deserves the heat it is Gutey who has utterly failed when it comes to the personnel, but the GM loyalists are not there yet.

Give it a year or two.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:39 pm

The due date has passed over Gutedkunst. Change the paradigm.

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:59 am

This site is at least 90% pissing and moaning about all things Packer: players, coaches, head office, Gold Package fans, you name it. Various conspiracy theories with Murph as the prime evildoer bounced around the comments here and just ask Stocky about Gute.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:27 am

Is this roster better than it is playing? I believe we are consistently getting less from more. With Hafley’s arrival that’s probably not true on defense. It certainly was not last night. However our offense is consistently underperforming and has been for seasons when it matters.

As for the OL, Banks may well be a big mistake, but the problems are not new. Nor have they diminished aside from him. For me there is only one place to look, and that’s the head coach.

It extends to coaching choices, on field personnel decisions, player usage, offensive design and attitude. We play not to lose, on offense and defense, we don’t play to win, we don’t focus on how to get our playmakers the most and best opportunities.

I think no GM changes these things. Whether Gute goes down with LaFleur is a different question, but firing Gute and keeping LaFleur seems like it’s guaranteed to deliver the same.

Promote Hackett or Getsy to OC. Challenge them to redeem themselves. Give Stenavich the choice of OL coach or departure. Make Hafley the interim HC. Change the mindset, the level of ambition and instill urgency. Otherwise this is all we have been and all we will be.

There is no way LaFleur is back now if Policy is credible. Let’s not lose Hafley, let’s fire up those left and challenge he them and go out with a win-or-bust attitude on field and off till the season is over.

If nothing else, our O might not be so conservative and predictable in its tendencies and we may add some fire to a few bellies if the personnel preferences and usage are opened up.

Last night played out almost exactly how I feared it would on offense, from attitude and approach through outcome. The D exceeded expectations by some way, but the O wasted that. Last night showed yet another team has LaFleur decoded as well.

Change, dramatic change, means risk of getting worse, but now seems the only hope for escaping the Groundhog Day repetition of weaknesses and errors and thus for progression.

0 points
0
0
HawkPacker's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:59 am

Yes, Banks was a mistake and I was not happy when he got that holding penalty or jumped early which negated a good play by the offense. The type of money he makes, he is not only not that good but takes a lot of penalties.

I would have to say the cb free agent we signed is also a waste of CAP money as well.

As you can see, I am totally p*ssed about the way our coaches coach and how some of out players play.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:52 pm

Wow, you stated that case well.

0 points
0
0
pete-nado's picture

November 12, 2025 at 07:49 am

A lot of the issue is coaching on offense. Draft and develop team needs high level coaching, or all you do is draft and deteriorate. OL coaching seems lacking since Stenavich was elevated. Yet LaFleur stands behind failing coaches for too long, and Butkus is the latest example. In addition to skills coaching, you can't keep moving young players from position to position through camp and preseason...just creates a steeper learning curve. Make decisions and coach up first. Then cross train to other positions in anticipation of the injuries you'll need to adjust for.

0 points
0
0
GBPfaninMO's picture

November 11, 2025 at 06:00 pm

New guy here I've been reading this site for awhile & enjoy the articles & comments,well most comments.I wanted Lafleur fired before the season started & repl. with Mike Vrabel but since that isn't happening how about Klint Kubiak coordinator for the seahawks and LaFleur can take Gute with him.

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:35 am

ive had a few WTF moments when it come to the Packers in the last seven or eight years, two of the biggest were when the Packer hired MLF when other well known candidates were available but people said he's brilliant mind from the same coaching tree as McVay, and the other was when they drafted Love especially where they did in the draft....I never really grew to like either choice and I still don't...MLF's first couple of years looked great with Rodgers playing great ball and having a good team around him, and for Love many draft "experts" warned about him and his time in college, leading all of ncaa's in Int's ....neither person has shown any real growth to me in the last seven years....it is what it is...but losing twice at Lambeau in dreadful fashion has to catch the eye of Mr Policy...

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:45 am

Murphy hired 2 men he could control-after hiring Gutekunst, he stripped him of GM autonomy and Gute remained. Most GMs would not have accepted that role. I think Gute may have been lead to believe he would succeed Murphy.
LaFleur was an eager 39 y/o who would have never challenged Murphy. Murphy then focused his energies on the development of Titletown and did not supervise either Gutekunst nor MLF. As long as seats were filled and revenue high, it was OK to win 'just enough games'

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 11, 2025 at 05:16 pm

"I think Gute may have been lead to believe he would succeed Murphy."

By who? Murphy? Murphy would not even let Gutey assume the football team control Ted had! So Mark was grooming Brian to take over his job as team President by having him focus on player personnel?

OK, then.

0 points
0
0
PhantomII's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:01 pm

You are sometimes afforded a few key moments in time....The to do thing was Gute MOVING UP to #20 and picking Jefferson with Adams still on the team for a SB run with a stacked Veteran team with AR. This would have put a trophy or two in the case for GB. Currently we have had a bunch of WR's catch a bunch of balls and elevate our offense then fall to earth and drop balls for an eternity. The facts are we have a bunch of WR's that are not consistent at catching the ball, a QB that is also very inconsistent, an OL that is playing out of position and is playing net more poorly than 2024. ML not realizing Kraft is the most consistent target for the last 2 seasons. Now Kraft is gone and we don't pick-up a solid TE to partially replace his lost production. It appears getting Parsons was a reach with so many positions on Offense needing a true upgrade as follows: Offensive Center Stud / TE2 / WR1 and WR2...none of the current batch show they can be either. Defense 2 better CB's.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 04:36 pm

In a 'Draft and Develop' team, coaches need to be excellent, but the GM has to find the proper talent in the first place. I would ask are Wicks, Doubs, Watson & Golden as inherently talented as J Jones, Driver, Jennings, Nelson, Adams? Are the positional coaches as good? what kind of protection did Rodgers get as opposed to Love?
What is the problem and who is responsible? . The O-Line's major problem is the decline of two, such as Jenkins and maybe Walker. The addition of Belton, Banks and Morgan are the fault of the GM, then there is the possibility of poor coaching. Even Butkus said the Line lacks depth and talent.

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:36 am

"He will very likely turn things around and end up getting a contract extension in the offseason, but right now, his offense looks stale and poorly coached, and that has to change."

This made me throw up in my mouth when I read it.

0 points
0
0
jlc1's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:25 am

It's a sentence that contradicts itself. How does a guy who coaches "poorly" "very likely turn things around"?
If you are going to write a critique have the guts to then not try to have it both ways. The only writer who has my ear on this site is Jersey Al.

0 points
0
0
SinceLombardi's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:33 pm

Sorry he’s on a two year slide. My guess is
3-3 in the division, and an 8 loss season. Possibly missing the playoffs and contacting a Green Bay real estate agent.

0 points
0
0
bleedgreen's picture

November 11, 2025 at 02:51 pm

Me too, I can't take another year of this nonsense.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:43 am

Packer fans need more information re: Murphy's influence.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:43 am

"(MLF) will very likely turn things around and end up getting a contract extension in the off-season..." You sure about that?

But to be fair, the offensive players just didn't execute at times. There were a couple of big dropped passes and an instance late where Jacobs went the wrong direction on a Love pass which erased the possibility of a big gain in crunch time. And that penalty on Kinnard was a killer.

With Golden and Kraft out, the team lacks shifty/slippery receivers that can make yards on their own and break tackles without the perfect play calls.

Offensive line: Will need to be reconstituted in the off-season. One of the uglier episodes was when Walker let an inside rusher free rein to the ball carrier in the backfield...I feel bad for Jenkins--and man, do we have a problem at center that has to be addressed in the off-season.

Defense: They played great last night, but remember the Eagles have been feast or famine all season long. They also have an OC problem, and anyone who visits Bleeding Green know how much they despise him...Nonetheless, the defense couldn't play much better than it did, and they deserve a ton of credit for carrying us all game long.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:50 am

How will they fix the OL? Rhyan and Walker may be offered better deals. Banks may be let go as well. It takes years to form a good O-L.
GB does not have first round picks for two years and many of the best Linemen are snatched early.
I feel strongly that Gutekunst, if he remains (I do not think he should), cannot be in charge of selecting in the Draft.

0 points
0
0
BELIEVER's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:06 am

This team is loaded with talent Gutekunst is not the problem. The offense is a mess, the players are there. Quarterback needs to be coached,it’s broken.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:20 am

Gutekunst is a major problem.

If he remains he will be in charge of reconstructing the O-Line-the one he failed at so miserably just this year. He has proven he often stutters at evaluating Draft talent in early rounds for pivotal roles. He is good in later rounds and some FA but he has utterly failed in O-Line construction this year which is why this team is failing.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:48 pm

It goes back to his scouting in the Southeast territory. Recommending Josh Jones to McCarthy, a rover guy.
Was he in on the King decision vs TJ Watt? We know Ted wasn't up to the task. Time for a reset in Packerland.

0 points
0
0
Idaho Cheese's picture

November 11, 2025 at 03:24 pm

The "magical thinking" has to end. MLF wishes we could run block...MLF wishes his team wouldn't commit so many penalties...MLF wishes that players would just "execute" so his "perfect game plan would work, and he gets to look as good as his manscaped beard. Gutey wishes that all his players could play 7 different positions at All-Pro levels

0 points
0
0
vkpolidora's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:05 pm

Comments keep talking about getting different players. O line and defense are full of 1st round picks. GM seems to prioritize players who can do several different things, who are "versatile", especially offensive lineman and receivers. WHY?
I'd prefer a WR who can run the route to the first down and catch the ball. Lineman who can beat or control his man. Just be the best at the positional needs. I don't care if the left tackle can play center or visa versa - just protect the blind side. Drafting Meyer instead of C. Humphrey is an example. Wanting multiple late pics instead of high pick - difference makers! 5th, 6th 7th round picks don't even make a good teams roster! Why do we trade down? We need top talent not special teams players (Savion Williams)

0 points
0
0
exbody's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:51 am

This game tonite revealed many things
1 The MLF /.Love relationship is fractured
MLF clearly does not trust Love and Love realizes that and plays timid, unsure of himself and at times looks completely clueless
2 The consistent in game play calls have been atrocious at times exposing MLFs frustration at Love that results in numerous head scratching calls in the games most crucial moments.
3. There is an obvious and palpable DISCONNECT with play calling and players consistently making mental mistakes that cost the packers ANOTHER preventable loss.

People ....it's not getting better. It's getting WORSE!!
Week after week ...game after game we are the same issues with Love , Lafluer and the offense all together.
This relationship has run its course.
Either Love or MLF has to go at seasons end....
I think we all know who's staying and who's going. This team is fractured and what makes this mess even more painful is this organization is wasting a Superbowl caliber defense performance week after week. So sad and so unacceptable. This is not Packer standard. Changes must and hopefully will be made at seasons end

0 points
0
0
CanPackFan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:02 pm

In all other franchises, an owner could make a fast and urgent decision to deal with a bad coach. Not in GB. We will have to ride out the rest of the season with a subpar HC. I remember the recent years not-so-fondly that I got up every morning hoping that Joe Barry had been fired. He was an obvious strategic weakness to this team during the season that would not be addressed. The same story will play out with LaFleur except I know that urgent action in GB senior management is not even remotely a possibility.

0 points
0
0
pete-nado's picture

November 12, 2025 at 08:00 am

You may be right. But seems like neither MLF or Love trust the offensive line.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:08 am

I believe that the principle of Occam's Razor (OR) should be in play with the Packers– which states when faced with multiple explanations for the same puzzle/problem – the simplest explanation is most likely correct. OR is also a method of troubleshooting – checking the most simple and obvious solution before moving on to the more complex ones.

It has become increasingly evident that the design, development and coaching of the Offense has become problematic. For a long time now. The person in charge and responsible for all facets of the O has been MLF. So this is where the problem-solving should begin. With the HC. After which to be followed by the regressive O-line play, inconsistent QB performances and WR drops.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:23 am

Who constructed the current O-Line?
MLF needs to go but who could manage this impotent O-Line?

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:34 am

He should be the choice of the next HC.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:43 am

Not a scientific sample, but Myers has been a much better player with a different coach. Nijman has also looked like he actually is a competent starter. To what extent is it coaching not players? That is both player technique, but also what they are being asked to do and how they are prepared to do that. The suggestion is that our personnel handling and coaching are deeply suspect and getting less from what talent we have and have been for seasons.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:00 pm

As an aside - I have long thought that Stenavich was a better O-line coach than OC.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:11 pm

Impotent O line? No. They looked bad at times last night, but over the first half of the season they've been one of the better pass blocking groups, and we were average in most rushing measures.

IF MLF needs to go, he can go when the season is over. Right now, we're halfway to a 10-6-1 record and we have eight games to fix what's happening on offense. The line play is part of it, but certainly not all of it.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:07 pm

"""It has become increasingly evident that the design, development and coaching of the Offense has become problematic. ""

When I see WRs getting hit in the back of the head, or receivers dropping passes they had both hands on, or running into each other , it makes it makes me question the players, not the play caller. And what are the coaches supposed to say/do? "Don't run into each other''? Don't let the pass hit you in the head? That's now how they practiced it.

I know that it's fashionable here to jump on MLF right now, but I'm going to point out that we still have EIGHT regular season games, along with the practices , to fix this. We're halfway to a 10-6-1 record right now.

Since everybody has an opinion, here's mine: We lack focus on offense much too often. We have veteran offensive linemen, in midseason, jumping the snap. We have veteran WRs lining up offside. We have had injury issues with Watson, Reed, Wicks, Kraft, at one time or another. Reed and Kraft, in a perfect world, would both be preferred starters and now they're gone until next year.

Love played quite poorly last night. I haven't re-watched yet, but in real-time I thought he held the ball and didn't see open guys. He's a six year veteran, the centerpiece of the Gutekunst/LaFleur Plan. He's just got to play better. That fumble....that absolutely looked like a panicked attempt to not get sacked. Dude, he has you. Protect the ball and take the sack.

For all the noise, we came within ONE PLAY of beating the defending champs. Our defense looks like it's a playoff defense, but you can't ask them to pitch a shutout every week. 7, 10, and 13 points are not enough. The remainder of the regular season is going to be about putting an offense on the field that can reliably score points.

We've got the Giants. Does anybody remember the last time we went to NY and their 9th string QB, or something, pretty much diced us? I don't think that'll happen to this defense, but the offense has to do something.

Every team that has faced the Giants this year has scored at least 17 points, which is more than we've scored in any of our losses. They've given up 21 or more eight times, all of them losses. If we can't score some points on these guys, I'm going to start to think we have problems we might not be able to fix this season.

IMO, Jacobs-Musgrave-Doubs-Watson-Wicks is a good enough group of skill players that we should score more than 7 points.

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:19 pm

So are you blaming the coaching for fielding unprepared players, or are you blaming Gute for drafting bad players who can't be coached? You are fast painting yourself into a corner here. You can't have it both ways. We are one lucky second away from being 5-4. Who is to blame Sir?

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:41 pm

The players are prepared. They've practiced. They just fukked up. People make mistakes. Officials make mistakes, coaches make mistakes, and players make mistakes. Even on good teams.

We've had bad luck with injuries to Reed and Kraft, and Golden last game, so we're playing guys that aren't first stringers. It doesn't help.

Still, we came within ONE PLAY of beating a very good Philly team. We're some FGs and an extra point from being 9-0, if you want to play that game.

Blame? When you point a finger, you have 3 pointing back. I don't think most fans realize how many things can go wrong in a football game.

A week from now, we could be 6-3-1. The Giants are a weak team defensively. Maybe they'll be the slumpbuster. And then follow that up with a home win over the Vikings and we're 7-3-1 heading into Thanksgiving. Too many people are hyperventilating ,IMO.

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:25 pm

So if players and coaches keep making mistakes week after week it's just players and coaches making mistakes? No big deal? It just happens? Even the good teams are making the same mistakes over and over and yet they are good teams? Other teams don't have bad luck with injuries? It's just here in GB where our luck is always bad or worse than every other team? Why are we always just one play away from winning, as you claim? Many teams can make this same claim. The fact is, many times we aren't making that one play. Why? Why do you always give us GB's record as a forecast of what we might be and not what we are currently? If we do this and we do that, we're gonna be 7-3-1. You are the one playing games here. I'm just glad the games you are playing are in your own mind. The GM, coaches and players are not Burger King LH, you don't get to have it your way. They are what they are. Shit sandwiches are all over the menu while you try to convince us all that at least the bread is fresh and while the horse is in a losing battle fighting off rigor mortis, there you stand with a bat in hand whacking away at it. Good luck.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 11, 2025 at 04:34 pm

"The GM,coaches and players.........are..shit sandwiches"

Wow. I didn't realize you were such a fan.

0 points
0
0
CanPackFan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:11 pm

EVERYTHING about LaFleur is coming into focus now. His play calling is atrocious and now painfully obvious to teams. Strategic decision-making is terrible - the decision to punt vs trying a FG unexplainable. He has a gun slinger of a QB that he will not let play to his potential. His offensive coaching staff - including him is, well, offensive. The OC was a "supposedly" good O-line coordinator that is NOT a true, overall OC. He is spiralling downward quickly with no end in sight.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 11, 2025 at 05:37 pm

Don't you have coaching experience? If so, I am more than a bit curious at your blaming of the players for coaching failures. Is that how you did it?

Coaches need to be teachers. At times, stern task masters and mentors, not just supervisors of a process. Shoot, LaFleur has 13 coaches on the O...about one coach for two Offensive players. (D has 9 coaches, STs 3)

Coaching matters. And in the parity driven NFL, it matters big time. For good or ill. Look at the North leading bares. Conversely...the Giants and the Titans.

Usually coaching is the "Edge" or the lack of one. And there is no salary cap or League leveling rules to even the coaching field.

The Packers, of all NFL teams, can hire the best coaching talent money can buy.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:24 am

That was unpleasant.

First possession, Love launches a surface-to-surface missile downfield that hits Watson in the back of the head. I'm under the impression that you have a better chance of a completion if the WR actually turns his head and looks for the ball.

After that, a long night of Love holding it too long, not seeing open guys, drops by Doubs, Wicks, and Melton.

Here's the unvarnished truth: We have a playoff caliber defense. We do not have a playoff caliber offense. You cannot win games by scoring 7 points.

It's back to the drawing board. The Packers have some time to figure out the offense before the stretch run starts, but if they don't/can't, then Policy is going to have to make some hard decisions. I, personally, cannot believe that in 9 games this year we've had scores of 7, 10, and 13. This is a better offense than that, but at some point, you are what your record says you are and our record says we are amazingly feeble on offense about 1/3 of the time.

0 points
0
0
jlc1's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:30 am

Exactly. Watson looked like he had decided he needed to play defense and stop the interception. Except he had the better position. And even if it gets intercepted its in the end zone so a decent field position. Foreshadowed the whole night.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:39 am

"Foreshadow". THAT's the word I was groping for. It's like the first scene in a bad movie, and the scene is so bad that you know you aren't going to like the movie.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:02 pm

The fault was on Watson. Play to the ball, Perfect strike by Love.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:20 pm

It was a ball that should never have been thrown.
Rodgers threw to the corners.
Love doesn't.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 11, 2025 at 04:44 pm

It HIT HIM IN THE HEAD!!!!!!

Please....start a GoFundMe to teach Watson how to high point the ball. Or in this case, actually look for the ball. Seriously, if he'd just turned around, the ball would have probably wedged in his facemask.

First possession, perfect throw......why not?

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

November 11, 2025 at 05:12 pm

No doubt he totally mis judged it.
But it still should not have been called.
They were moving the ball.
And he was covered.
Watson might just have eye trouble.
Crossing patters and hit him in the corners.

0 points
0
0
Snap the ball's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:41 am

We barely beat the cardinals and Joe falco

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 11, 2025 at 05:09 pm

We scored 35 in Pittsburgh and won. We scored 40 in Dallas in a tie. We had a narrow win over the Cardinals where we scored........27. Those are three road games, two wins and a tie. Now we have another chance at the Giants, who aren't particularly strong on defense, and maybe we'll end our slump.

We can't win with 7,10,13 points per game. Miracle offensive linemen are not going to just fall out of the sky. How do we score more points with what we have?

1) Continue to get the ball to Jacobs/Wilson. They have 242 touches between them, for an average of about 4.5 yards/touch. They move the ball, they don't fumble, they can catch, they can break tackles. They're over half the offense.

2) I'd consider simplifying the targets and throwing from max-protect . Downfield. Off play action, if possible. Love has a plenty good enough arm if he's protected.

0 points
0
0
Snap the ball's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:40 am

Bring in the extra linemen on that play.

Go for the Hail Mary never know

Do a qb sneak I bet you get it

You don’t loose two at home and make the playoffs when you have 8 games at home

When has a Packer receiver caught the ball and ran like every other team

It’s all sit down routes and crossing routes that they run out of bounds

They are open you need them to get the ball

0 points
0
0
Malland56's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:59 pm

Did you notice when they showed our receivers running the routes how they were going at half speed! Crossing routes, half speed. If they were going flat out like they should Love would have had a better chance of completing his pass. But the real kicker is how MLF has not used Watson and Golden like he should. Their speed is such an advantage against the DB's its a joke. They could run double post patterns and that would also open the middle of the field for Doubs to cross an open middle because they would have to cover the WR's. the safeties would be playing deeper.

0 points
0
0
Dragon5's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:42 am

I don't recall a year that has been so spot on with numerology / astrology.  For the believers, the naysayers, and for those who quite frankly DGAF, remember it's not perfect--but it does provide an edge, and a handsome one at that (60%+ accuracy).

Gute an OX, continues to provide his enemy sign, Matt, a GOAT, a roster that falls short, particularly re: depth due to injuries.  I've stated many times this opposing management structure is unlikely to win a Lombardi.  Having reached critical mass this year, more people are awakening from their slumber to see the light--hell even Nags has appeared to flip his normally protective posture. For those calling for MLF's head now, why is there not the slightest mention of OC Adam Stenavich? (🐷year born, currently in enemy year of 🐍)

Last month, I stated expect more disappointment from Jenkins despite his return to pseudo health, whilst he too in his enemy year:

Dragon5
October 02, 2025 at 03:48 pm
Elgton Jenkins born 12-26-1995, a 🐷year. We're in the year of the 🐍 till Feb 17th 2026
🐷&🐍 = ENEMY SIGNS
As I outlay prior to every season, poor performance was to be expected; our GM is clueless to metaphysical science and how it can impact roster predicaments.

Dragon5
October 06, 2025 at 10:01 am
Elgton Jenkins and Adam Stenavich are the two 🐷 year born peeps on this team, currently in their enemy year of the 🐍, who are likely to continue to struggle through mid-Feb. In February, Bisaccia's enemy year will hit--what's the most likely outcome? Bye-bye Rich. Book it.

Last week I laid out, in detail, the 7 energy injury dilemma afflicting our roster this year.
Dragon5
November 05, 2025 at 08:18 am

Just can't shake injury prone 7 energy this year . Majority of it can be avoided at the GM position (Gute 👀) calling the personnel shots. Numbers don't lie...ask any executive officer. Most however, want to hold on to feelings / opinions.

<<Dragon5
September 19, 2025 at 02:39 pm

KRAFT DOB: 11-03-2000 11+3+2= 16 1 + 6 = 7 ✅
REED DOB: 04-28-2000 4+2+8+2 = 16 1 + 6 = 7 ✅
WICKS DOB: 06-16-2001 6+1+6+2 +1 = 16 1+ 6 = 7 ✅
VAN NESS DOB: 07-06-2001 7+6+2+1 = 16 1 + 6 = 7 ✅
WYATT DOB: 03-31-1998 3+3+1+1+9+9+8 = 34 3 + 4 = 7 ✅
MCMANUS DOB: 07-25-1991 7+2+5+1+9+9+1 = 34 3 + 4 = 7 ✅

All 7 life paths 👉7s most injury prone👈. Wicks & McManus also born on 7 days further increasing their odds of injury. Ditto for Wyatt as he's in a personal 7 year.>>

I gave the majority of the answers to the test before the season began, if only management knew 🤷‍♂️

0 points
0
0
jlc1's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:19 pm

Woof! Nicely done Nostradamus. Could you run down some of the rest of the NFC North? Pretty sure we and they are in permanent enemy years.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 02:06 pm

How do the '8 life path folks do? Perhaps I have the lucky charm and can go out and contribute-lol

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:14 pm

It all depends on which toy you get in your box of breakfast cereal.

0 points
0
0
HalnLakeGeneva's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:48 am

Fire Matt lefluer before the season really gets going, Rich B. Can coach and Jeff Hatley too. I have suffered for 7 years with dummy Matt lefluer who is a terrible coach. Look at Chicago Bears with their Benny Johnson coaching them to possibly winning this division. Brian G. Should be Fired too. He passed on TJ watt

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:55 am

Ted passed on TJ. He was drafted in 2017.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:28 pm

Russ Ball in reality. TT was no longer himself by that point and Murphy had quietly let Ball run things.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 11, 2025 at 05:45 pm

Yeah I know. In fact Ted was failing badly a year prior and Ball vs McCarthy was not good. MM even threatened to resign if Ball took Ted's place. That was the impetus for Murphy's football committee structure in 2018...which the president clearly enjoyed as he implemented status quo management.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:15 pm

Our ST coach is arguably MLF's biggest mistake.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:52 am

I wish Gutey was the GM...then he could be held accountable for poor team performance.

But as it is now, if Ed Policy is unhappy with the roster, he needs to replace the GM of Player Personnel...since Ed has now assumed Murphy's role as Acting GM of the Football Team...an 8 year experiment. Is he unhappy with the roster?

If Ed is unhappy with the team performance and overall record...he needs to make coaching changes if LaFleur is unable to...and the HC seems capable at being unable.

Or maybe Ed will decide being the GM of an NFL team is not in his wheelhouse and appoints a real GM to do the house cleaning.

In the parity driven NFL, the great equalizer is coaching. And there is no salary cap or "equity" provisions to keep the best coaches from going to the best teams.

A good roster with great coaching is usually in the playoffs making noise. A great roster with poor coaching is usually struggling to get to the post season. And a great roster with great coaching are usually SB favorites...hoisting Lombardi's.

0 points
0
0
CanPackFan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:20 pm

I think you're argument really centers on senior management - both its personnel and structure. This team is now suffering from the lackadaisical management structure of Mark Murphy, not trusting a GM and/ or HC enough. A GM should manage the HC. The owner / Board should manage the GM. If one of them fail, their immediate boss replaces them, and lives with that decision / consequence. This current system lacks DIRECT accountability for both of these critical roles. I wonder if ED Policy has the power to change it or does the Board still have the training wheels on him as well?

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 11, 2025 at 05:51 pm

Ed can appoint/hire a GM of Football Operations by breakfast, tomorrow. It is his decision.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:17 pm

Will he though? What if he prefers to be hands off the football stuff?

0 points
0
0
bleedgreen's picture

November 11, 2025 at 03:46 pm

Ed Policy needs to find a new GM and let him find and hire a new coach. Maybe the new coach is Hafley maybe not. But the coach needs to report to the GM not the president. Murphy made a big mistake when he made mlf direct report. Gotta be accountability. The way it is now mlf and gute can just point the finger at each other for failures.

0 points
0
0
Gman1976's picture

November 11, 2025 at 05:01 pm

Players can't outcoach the coach. The coach has not put them in position to win. He isn't getting any better. What better time than now to replace him?

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:15 pm

It is clear as day (to me) that both MLF and Gutekunst have contributed to the failure of this team.
I don't see any other road back to excellence than firing both of them and hiring an authentic, competent GM who can then hire his own HC and coaches.
Policy needs to be in 'gathering information' mode right now. His father is well-connected and Policy should be talking to respected NFL execs and coaches right now. The best GM's and HC's will be in demand-he only has several months.
If Policy takes a half-hearted approach by keeping Gutekunst-be prepared for another poorly-constructed O-Line at the very least.

0 points
0
0
SinceLombardi's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:30 pm

Matt LaFleur is 6-7 in the NFC North since Rodgers left. It’s hard to make a playoff run when you’re inferior against division opponents.
This season only illuminates the shortcomings of last season. My biggest take away is we have added draft picks, a safety, a running back, a pass rusher, a quality DC and we are worse than 2023.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 11, 2025 at 05:56 pm

Yeah, and the next 4 weeks will tell the tale with the Ugly Purple, lions and bares lining up after the Gints.

After this Division Gauntlet, we will see if they are worse, or better than 2023. Could be 9-3-1, or 5-7-1.

0 points
0
0
CanPackFan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:52 pm

Mercifully, I turned the game off after the first offensive series. It was the same old predictable offense we have come to expect from LaFleur. Run, run, maybe get a first down, a QB sack and a long throw on 3rd down. I have never turned off a GB game on Prime Time/MNF but here we are. From the stats I saw today, glad I turned it off. LaFleur is supposed to be the offensive guru and he is failing this team miserably. I don't care about his W-L record which was pumped up by Rodgers and Adams. I don't ever want to listen to one of his post game pressers ever again. He is a liability to this team, pure and simple.

0 points
0
0
GBPfaninMO's picture

November 11, 2025 at 06:55 pm

You are spot on, minus MVP AR LaFleur is around 500 and a fingertip from being O for the division last season IT'S TIME.

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:53 pm

Some guys got subtracted: Myers left in free agency, and then there have been guys lost to injury for varying durations.

0 points
0
0
Lare's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:16 pm

Frankly, I’m not overly impressed with MLF, but I think he’s doing about all he can do with the lack of player and coaching talent he’s given to work with.

I think it’s time for an overhaul.

0 points
0
0
jlc1's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:20 pm

Pretty sure he picks his own coaches. So that's on him.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 11, 2025 at 02:08 pm

LaFleur chooses all his own coaches and keeps them well past their "use by" date. Pettine, Barry, Menninga, Drayton, Bisaccia, Stenovich, Butkus, and Ribrovich (who should have left with Barry but retained by LaFleur) and a few D coaches left in disgust due to Barry's prevent defense (Mike Smith Edge/outside LBs and Jerry Gray DBs).

I wish Gutey had input for the coaching staff like the Wolfman and Ted did. Head coaches do assemble their staffs but team GMs usually conduct the performance reviews of those decisions.

Ed Policy has that job now...managing and evaluating if LaFleur is meeting or failing to meet expectations.

All Gutey is accountable for is the roster. Does Ed Policy believe the team is meeting expectations? If not, and Ed believes the roster is weak, he needs to make a change. If he believes the roster is talented he has to make coaching changes.

Unless he wants to hand all this off to a real GM. It is becoming a managerial mess. And Packers have not had a GM since 2018.

0 points
0
0
pete-nado's picture

November 11, 2025 at 03:15 pm

Agree. Coaching is a huge part of the problem. For a draft and develop team, strong coaching is absolutely essential to ensure that development. If you draft for athletic ability and assume your coaches can foster skill development...but don't have the coaching to do it...you end up with the OL we have. And all the stupid penalties reinforce the thought that the coaching is bad.

MLF hasn't shown the ability to assemble a solid lineup of coaches, and has been late to moved on from coaching failures. Exceptions are Stenavich and Hafley. Stenavich was great on OL, but now it's Butkus and there's a noticeable difference. Hafley is here now, but we had to suffer with Barry too long. Bissachia continues to show nothing.

0 points
0
0
bleedgreen's picture

November 11, 2025 at 03:51 pm

We Need to find a coach that does impress us. If not we will not get better.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:20 pm

How much say does MLF get over the rest of the coaching staff?

0 points
0
0
davekenya's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:46 pm

It seems hard to believe that MLF is not aware of a number of the offensive problems and is trying to address them. All the illegal formation penalties should NOT be happening. One one hand, while the player executes the fault by lining up incorrectly, the coach bears the ultimate professional responsibility for that lack of focus or preparation. This is on MLF and his staff. On the other hand, we're also watching they keystone cops masquerading as wide receivers -- Watson trying to catch long passes by using his helmet and not his hands, Melton using his shoulder pads and not hands, Jacobs turning the wrong way, Love not leading Watson into open space but instead into 2x coverage, etc. At times, it was clear MLF was frustrated on the sidelines and his patience is thinning out. Using Melton and Williams as WRs indicates how thin the group is (no Kraft, Reed, Doubs, Golden) and these guys just don't know what to be doing. The buck stops with MLF; he's also working with a very inexperienced group.

Why does the expensive and experienced FA Banks continued with the false starts? I got nothing for ya. Last night, Green Bay seemed to experience death by a thousand small cuts -- multiple players failing in a variety of smaller ways that added up. I'm talking the O. The D was great considering everything.

On ST, we only had one penalty? That might be a record for them! I cannot force myself to even talk about 'let's continue to play the still recovering from injury McMannus instead of a perfect kicker who broke GB's distance FG record a few weeks ago. Better to not let a player fully recover - and at a position where CONFIDENCE is key to success! - than trot out a kicker who's been perfect....Like I said, I just can't stomach opening up this topic!

Let me say this...we can fault MLF all we want, but the most boneheaded play call of the night clearly went to Sirianni going with an extremely low success play on the long throw on 4th and 6 at the end of the game. If Philly had lost, he'd've been deep roasted and served alongside Philly Cheesesteaks for the next month and deservedly so. Just punt the ball and pin the inept GB offense at it's 10 yard line with 30 seconds to go. Duh.

0 points
0
0
Snap the ball's picture

November 11, 2025 at 02:16 pm

Guty changed the o line didn’t make it better made it worse.

Hes more at fault than MLF

Play Walker. And Tom. Rhyan and figure out who wants to play for a starting job for here on out.

I felt sorry for McManus Like what are you thinking. Go for Hail Mary for a win vs a tie and ot

0 points
0
0
Idaho Cheese's picture

November 11, 2025 at 02:40 pm

Whadda mean?!? MLF looked good on the sidelines with his outfit all matching and his hair all coiffed and thousand-dollar beard groom and man-a-cure. He can't do all of this AND coach the team. Jeeze, give the guy a break. All this negativity will ruin his chances of landing on the cover of GQ. I, for one, am glad that this mentality rules in Green Bay (Gutey looks pimped out, too). Just imagine having a coach who dresses like Dan Campbell or Sean Payton...yuck! We have to remember that at some point, the team will always resemble the coach! Who would want that much unkemptness on the sidelines? Not me! I would rather look good than be good.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 03:06 pm

Bravo!
I still think MLF has a chance in Hollywood as Ryan Reynold's body double-lol

0 points
0
0
GBPfaninMO's picture

November 11, 2025 at 06:58 pm

Idaho nobody likes a smart ass except me 😁

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 03:02 pm

These are the main issues:
1. MLF over-delegates to Coordinators and then disappears
2. He refuses to fire under-performers
3. He essentially only obsesses over the Offense (not succeeding)
4. He thinks he is entitled to go out there and 'do his best' w/o feedback week after week after week....
I think a psychologist would say the Packers are providing the back-drop to work out some kind of childhood trauma
(it's not working, 'tho)

Gutekunst:
1. He gets to indulge in 'his favorite time of year'-(his words) and look for guys (early-rounders) no one else thinks are that good but he has special, Divine insight.
2. No one stops him, no one says, 'you have spent too much $$$ or Draft capital for a poor return on investment)
3.Whoopee-no consequences and better luck next year.
4. No apology or heart-felt acknowledgement as to how his 'guys' have failed the team-should I name all of them?
How about recent success stories such as Hobbs, Banks, Morgan, Belton--several in the past are Stokes, Savage, Van Ness, Josh Jackson, Amari Rodgers, etc.
5. He insists his first rounders play and play and play, often to the detriment of the team.

0 points
0
0
Idaho Cheese's picture

November 11, 2025 at 03:19 pm

Great analysis! The only suggested addition would be their abject failure to "fix" Special Teams by not drafting players that would do well as a core Special Teamer and their refusal to play established players on Teams for fear younger players won't get "reps". We have lost umpteen games due to this glaring oversight.
I remember a reporter asked Mike Krzyzewski what the hardest thing about being the head coach at Duke was, and he said that he didn't have a "coach" for himself. He had to demand accountability and impose consequences on himself, or no one would. The fact that Gutey and MLF act like they are beyond reproach, that no one dare impugn their authority or decisions, is a sure symptom of the need for exactly those two conditions: accountability and consequence. Here's hoping Ed Policy will offer that to this team. Those two have proven they do not have the capacity to learn from their mistakes; someone needs to help them do exactly this.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 03:27 pm

You're right--and this results in the Packers being held hostage by a group of the most mediocre, overly-paid men: MLF and Gute lead the pack but we have to throw in Bisaccia, Stenavich, Butkus, Getsy & Hackett.

0 points
0
0
Idaho Cheese's picture

November 11, 2025 at 03:40 pm

It seems that MLF doesn't really want to hire anyone too talented lest they might overshadow him. I think the hiring of Jeff Hafley was an exception to this rule; however, I do believe he outperformed expectations for a lot of people, including MLF...landing Micah Parsons doesn't hurt the cause either. Instead, he hires and retains guys who will always defer to him and not challenge him in any meaningful way. Our Special Teams coach also has the title of Assistant Head Coach; he fails miserably in both roles, so why keep him? Because MLF is comfortable with someone who won't threaten him.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

November 11, 2025 at 03:40 pm

Prudency dictates that if LaFleur is under examination - then Gutekunst should be as well. Because Gutekunst certainly does not grade out as an A+ GM. However there is the reality of corporate decision making - based on managerial hierarchy. This means that firings / changes will generally start from the bottom up. That being so - LaFleur (HC) will be the first casualty - then Gutekunst (GM) - then Love (Franchise QB). While a group firing is possible - e.g. MLF and Gutekunst - it is not probable. What is more likely are single serial dismissals until a satisfactory solution is found.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:04 pm

I think I've seen owners hire new GM's who then hire their choice of HC and so on.
If Policy retains Gutekunst, he will likely offer him a 3-4 year contract as he doesn't want a 'lame duck'.

0 points
0
0