We're Finally Gonna Find Out About The 2020 Draft Class

The 2020 Packers draft class has not been the most productive bunch we've ever seen, but that could all change this year.

It's usually wise to wait 4 years before evaluating a draft class.

But that hasn't stopped a lot of people from passing judgment on the Packers draft class from 3 years ago.

Most draft classes don't offer much value in rounds 5 through 7.

The Packers got Jon Runyan, who's been a solid starter, and Kamal Martin, who gave them one decent year. In the grand scheme of things, that's not a bad return for the last 3 rounds of a daft.

It's the first two days of that draft that have fallen into question.

The returns there have been minimal... so far.

Jordan Love, famously, has seen only limited opportunities, but it's not through any fault of his own - there was a pretty good player ahead of him.

AJ Dillon was a bit of a surprise pick. He's also had limited opportunities because of a really good guy ahead of of him, as well as a quarterback who (allegedly) changed a lot of play calls, limiting Dillon's opportunities.

Josiah Deguara is a hybrid player who serves a unique role. That role probably wasn't used much in the 2020-2022 version of this offense.

That's a pretty low 3-year return on investment.

But, remember: it's wise to wait 4 years before evaluating a draft class.

This is the 4th year.

And this is the year where this class will have a chance to prove its worth.

Jordan Love, obviously, will get all the attention as the starting quarterback after soaking up the finer points of the offensive system for three years as an understudy.

We've heard more than enough about the transition at quarterback, but there's a lot more that could come out of this class.

AJ Dillon stands to get more carries this year. The Packers have never been a run-heavy team. Even when they brought in a coach looking to commit to the ground game and had one of the better running back tandems in the NFL, they didn't even rank in the top half of the league for rushing attempts the last two years.

This year, Dillon figures to get more work as the team leans on the run game and Aaron Jones's share decreases as he creeps up on 30.

Josiah Deguara will probably have a bigger impact in the running game, too. He's a mobile blocker who can get out in front on misdirection runs from multi-back sets (or for a mobile young quarterback). The multi-back sets and misdirection runs weren't used much the last few years. That could change this year, increasing the impact of Deguara.

He'll also have an expanded role in the passing game. The Packers have a pretty empty cupboard at tight end after declining to re-sign Robert Tonyan and Marcedes Lewis. Even if they draft a tight end early, Deguara will have an increased role in the passing game.

When Jordan Love got mop-up duty in the season finale against Detroit to end the 2021 season, Josiah Deguara came up with career highs in yards and touchdowns. He runs the type of outlet routes that the LaFleur system values (even though the former quarterback didn't throw them often).

These three players can all take their games to a new level this year and completely rewrite their draft grades.

When this draft happened, the picks surprised me and I was left with a lot of head scratching.

After thinking about it for a few weeks and looking at what kind of offenses LaFleur had built in the past, I started to understand what the team was trying to build.

Now, three years later, we'll get to see it in action.

Then we can accurately assess this class.

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Bruce Irons has played, coached, and studied football for decades. Best-selling author of books such as A Fan's Guide To Understanding The NFL Draft, A Fan's Guide To Understanding The NFL Salary Cap, and A Fan's Guide To NFL Free Agency Hits And Misses, Bruce contributes to CheeseHeadTV and PackersForTheWin.com.

Follow Bruce Irons on Twitter at @BruceIronsNFL.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
8 points
 

Comments (153)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
NickPerry's picture

March 24, 2023 at 06:40 am

Gute has taken a TON of shit for the 2020 draft class. While I agree he could have used those first 3 picks on players who may have been more of a help to Rodgers, there's absolutely NO guarantee Rodgers would even used those "Other" possible draft picks. Hell, based on what history with Rookies tells us Rodgers wouldn't have even looked at them. Not with Adams still on the Roster. WAIT, was that Allan Lazard STILL running WIDE OPEN across the middle??? Just in case anyone forgot, Rodgers didn't look especially good in 2018 and 2019 either.

IMO I think we find out lots of things in 2023 and not just about the Top 3 picks of the 2020 draft. I think we find out a shit-ton about our HC too, Mr. Matt LaFleur. I got on the "Maybe MLF Isn't That Good" bandwagon last year but mostly for his failure to stand up to Rodgers and his INABILITY to FIRE Coaches who just plain ole suck!

Nobody saw the 2007 Packers coming, not really. I mean did you see them going 13-3 and playing in the NFCCG? Sure the 2006 team won the last 4 games of that season to give us hope, but I didn't see THAT coming which brings me to MLF.

Kyle Shanahan who I still say is one of the most overrated HC's in the NFL. I mean the dude finally went over 500 after the 2022 season taking 6 seasons to get there. The 49ers sucked for several years before (and after) Shanahan got there being able to stock pile a bunch of high draft picks. MLF, not so much.

LaFleur runs a similar offense to Shanahan so why can't LaFleur do with Jordon Love what Shanahan did with Brock Purdy. OBVIOUSLY having Deebo Samuel, George Kittle, CMC, and Ayuck there helped a LOT. I mean I may have gone 500 with that Defense and those skill players. Now with Watson, Doubs, and Toure in year 2, I think progress follows.

Watson is a stud, Doubs I think can be a very good number #2, or great #3. I think we get out Kittle and Ayuck in this class too. But the running game is the key to this offense, just like it is in SF. Jordon Love won't be undermining every damn thing LaFleur does with his own agenda. I think we see an improved MLF, a READY Jordon Love, a AJ Dillion chopping at the bit and running wild in the 4th quarters of games, and do a little of everything Deguara in 2023. Good thing we had that 4th year eh?

10 points
18
8
croatpackfan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 06:59 am

Nick, I agree on the most points you wrote.

But have one thing I want you to correct - Love's name is not JordOn, but JordAn. You know, like that middle east river, or Kingdom Jordan.

This post is I think 50th in the row that you call Love Jordon, so it obviously isn't typo, but wrong memory about name of this young guy.

4 points
5
1
RCPackerFan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:55 am

Kind of reminds me of when I see people still calling Rodgers, Rogers.

3 points
3
0
dobber's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:23 am

Maybe they're talking about Thesautuses...

0 points
1
1
PeteK's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:04 am

Rogers, Jordon, Dillion that should make you pull your hair out. LOL

4 points
4
0
jurp's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:05 am

I looked up Dillion; the first hit was a porn star. Hmmm.

2 points
3
1
NickPerry's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:26 pm

Thanks Croat

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:31 pm

You are welcome ;-)

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:41 am

Yes, I believe that Dillon and Deguara were “system” picks, and like most, this upcoming year should be a showcase for said system.

I am also convinced that Love was a player they REALLY liked, so they traded up to get him. Also, remember, at the time, 12 appeared to be in decline. I’m certain they did not see 12’s resurgence and looked forward to a quicker transition and the opportunity to cash in on the cap impact of an expected “franchise” QB on a rookie deal.

Aaaaand, that’s not what happened.

Really curious how things are going to look this year!

13 points
14
1
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:07 am

Deguara was definitely a system pick but I think Dillon was a "best available player" pick. It was a pretty big drop off in talent after him.

2 points
3
1
RCPackerFan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:32 am

To be fair there really wasn't a ton of talent with the Deguara pick either. Perhaps he was the best player available on their board as well.

-2 points
0
2
jannes bjornson's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:21 am

I'll take Antonio Gibson over Dillon.Willie Gay and Logan were there to fill the ILB void. See how he shows this season. He has to pick up his feet. Better with inside zone or power sets. He's not a RPO type of fast cut RB.

1 points
2
1
LambeauPlain's picture

March 24, 2023 at 10:24 am

I think it is how your utilize your individual players' strength to build team synergies, isn't it?

Too often either MLF called or Rodgers changed the call that saw AJD getting handoffs from the shotgun. It was almost always a wasted play and was used all season.

I believe AJD is a perfect fit for the I of C offense...give him the handoff from a running start, and he will get positive yards. Establish that, then use him with play action to set up the pass, motion him into screens, etc. He's a solid receiver.

Too often "Thunder and Lightning" with AJD and AJ was Dillon forced to be Lightning. It is like playing Alexander in zone, prevent D.

2 points
4
2
jannes bjornson's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:38 am

He never was a Thunder runner, even in college. He needs open spaces in front of him. May have to get Stockholder's guy, Hunter Luepke, or Nichols from C. Michigan.

-4 points
0
4
stockholder's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:51 am

Hunter Luepke. !! KUUUUUUHN.

-1 points
2
3
TKWorldWide's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:23 am

When they drafted Dillon, I saw that his “NFL comparable” was Steven Jackson. That guy was a horse!

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

March 24, 2023 at 03:54 pm

Yessir!!!

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

March 25, 2023 at 10:12 am

"I am also convinced that Love was a player they REALLY liked, so they traded up to get him."

People point to the Aiyuk pick and say that the Packers were outgamed by the Niners, but I would argue that the Packers don't move into that spot without multiple players they liked. When you're a team regularly picking in the mid-to-upper 20s with a QB who was born during the first term of the Reagan administration and a QB you have a first-round grade slides to you, taking him makes sense. I think the key is that--as you said--they must have had a high grade on him. We're about to find out if they were right.

1 points
1
0
Since'61's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:37 am

Nick good post. One note about Shanahan. The Packers played the 49ers in the 2019 NFCCG. They were over .500 during that season and they obliterated the Packers defense with their ground game to the tune of 285 yards rushing with a 3rd string RB. Their QB, Garapolo only threw 8 passes for the entire game.

If MLF's offense can do that we'd be in great shape. However, I don't believe that our OL is anywhere near as good as SFs was in 2019 or even in 2022 for that matter. But we'll see. You never know. Thanks, Since '61

5 points
6
1
RCPackerFan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:22 am

I feel good about our OL after the season.

Bakhtiari and Jenkins I feel like they will be back to their Pro Bowl level. Myers improved every game, and I believe he is primed to take a big step next year. Runyan started to settle in at RG and with a full offseason he should have the footwork mastered. Right now our biggest question is RT, but we have candidates that could play there. Tom can easily start there and be the RT version of Bakthiari. Maybe they bring Yosh back. Maybe Caleb Jones, Rasheed Walker, Luke Tenuta, or even Sean Rhyan emerge as the player taking over RT. I like that they have given themselves options. Maybe they look to draft a guy in the first few rounds.

But either way, since they made the switch last year to flop the OL around, the OL improved. Jenkins was back to his natural spot, Runyan and Yosh(if he is back) now have an offseason to practice the right side, get their footwork and hand placements mastered.

I feel really good about our OL.

1 points
1
0
Since'61's picture

March 24, 2023 at 02:55 pm

RC I agree. Our OL should be improved if they can remain healthy. However our OL depth concerns me. Hopefully Gute will address our depth during the draft. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 05:15 pm

We have to hope that some coaching lessons were learned too. That was not pretty last year

1 points
1
0
Since'61's picture

March 24, 2023 at 06:17 pm

Coaching hasn't been pretty since MLF was hired as HC. Thanks, Since '61

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:44 am

A Front Four featuring three All-Pros, doesn't hurt either. I still believe Gutedkunst was after Aiyuk in that draft. A speed receiver to take the second look when Adams was doubled. Love was the default selection. The next QB could have been selected in 2022-23. A fair-value Veteran QB is always better to backup, or help the transition to a Newbie. Even with the Love selection, I would have moved up in the second to secure Tee Higgins. WR was the #1 Need. Packer edge guys could not contain the run. They were washed out.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

March 24, 2023 at 03:00 pm

jannesbjorson - I was hoping for the Packers to draft Higgins as well. Unfortunately, it didn't happen. Gute should have passed on Love and traded down to get additional picks in the second round and they would have had a solid chance to take Higgins. Well never how differently things would have turned out.

As for backup QB a veteran backup would be the best move then and now. I doubt the Packers will make a move on a vet QB until after the Rodgers deal and the draft are done. Thanks, Since '61

1 points
1
0
NickPerry's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:31 pm

Yup, I agree there but I'm holding out hope Since '61... You know, I've often wondered where this O-Line would be had Gute drafted Humphrey instead of Meyers. I didn't understand it then and it makes me cringe now.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

March 24, 2023 at 03:02 pm

Nick I don't get taking Myers over Humphrey either. Myers may continue to improve but he has been a big drop off from Linsley. If we had Humphrey he would have solidified our interior OL by now. Thanks, Since '61

1 points
1
0
SensualInfluence's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:55 am

Sweet novel

1 points
1
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 24, 2023 at 02:02 pm

Whatever offensive system the team used in 2020 and 2021 is the one they should have used. Yes, AR goes deep too much. He was better about that in 2020 than he was in 2021, and he got worse in 2022 probably by trying to do too much. Allen Lazard led the NFL in targets 20 yards or more downfield in 2022. I don't think he will ever do that again. I rather doubt Lazard gets in the top 20 of that category ever again - and that's even if AR and Lazard are reunited in NY.

I liked Toure in practice. Hard to remember that he got 112 snaps last year and two starts. Watson missed a ton of time and was on snap counts for several games. He finished with just 509 snaps. I agree that Watson might blossom. Doubs also missed 5 games and seemed limited when he returned. Doubs only played 529 snaps. Doubs was not a good receiver last year, but obviously from my practice articles I am very high on him. Routes weren't good, 9 drops is charitable, but my, he has talent and considerable RAC ability.

I think GB might be fine at WR if Watson, Doubs and Toure can stay healthy. That being optimistic rather than playing the odds. It does behoove them to find another WR and some help at TE, which was a wasteland last year for receivers, while the blocking figures to get worse if Lewis leaves.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:14 am

Duplicate

0 points
2
2
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:14 am

At the time that draft class was seen as one to give LaFleur the pieces he wanted to fully install his O. Gute, LaFleur and Murphy were quite explicit about that regarding certain picks and intent respectively, although the Love pick tended to distract the focus of many it is true. 2020 turned out to be a high water mark in that direction before we retreated from it. It was also the best year for our O by far and the last truly elite year from Rodgers.

We’ve debated the reasons for the retreat from the 2020 offensive approach at length and we all know the unknowable core around which the debate largely centers. With that core now presumably in the past. The question is what O will we see this year? For players like Dillon and Deguara, does that mean use as we anticipated and more in line with perceived attributes? To me that is the pivotal question.

Love stands apart. He wasn’t a system pick. He was an ultra high perceived upside project. As such inherently a gamble, perhaps in the mold of Gary in some senses. We have never seen him with his own game plan or an offense at least part is tailored for him or receivers he’s spent a lot of time with in game like conditions. Now we will.

In a sense that draft will now come into focus, but for me there are two separate issues. The wisdom of belief in Love, the answer to which requires us to give him time is one. The other is what will LaFleur do differently on O, if anything. If nothing then the problem with that draft is it was one giving toys that the recipient then chose not to use for the purpose intended.

If we see a very different O with more motion, complexity and the like that uses the H-back role consistently, does more from under center and thus allows those picks to play as envisaged, only them can we evaluate the drafter and players reasonably and fairly.

It’s going to be a very revealing season for this reason and others, and on D as well as O. In my mind it will speak far more to the wisdom of hiring and then the ability LaFleur than Gute, but I think a light will be shed on many facets. Will people thrive, liberated from constraint or fold without Rodgers keeping the roof from falling?

7 points
13
6
Guam's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:06 am

Many thumbs up if I could CW. An excellent encapsulation of the issues and questions surrounding our beloved Packers. The 2023 season should provide many answers.

1 points
4
3
croatpackfan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:14 am

Coldworld, we were informed that coaching staff weren't at Combine because they are tailoring new play book. Does that means that last 3 season play book would be significantly changed? I bet on that claim.

I also believe that all task Jordan Love have to improve, he'll do it before OTAs and that he will be ready for the season.

To add to this, I suspect Packers draft choices will really show us what kind of offense and defense Packers will implement in training camp. Those are all connected vessels for the team to success.

Also, your claim that we will see true MLF offense is correct and that we will be able to judge his abilities no matter what will be level of the execution.

September can not come to soon...

1 points
2
1
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 10:43 am

If there are to be changes, we should start seeing them in camp and preseason in the approach to camp, opportunity distribution and personnel groups.

2 points
2
0
jurp's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:08 am

"September can not come to soon..."

Personally, I absolutely love our too-short summer, so for me, yes, September CAN come too soon. :)

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:16 am

Bruce, no draft class of any Pckers GM will be announced as superb. Why? Because he will not hit in all 7 rounds. Many fans expect all drafted players to be rookies of the year and immediate contributor to the team.

But the main objection will come from situation when Brian will not draft their draft crush player. It will be the moment where many fans will declare bad draft from GM.

Despite we all knows that, no matter how good this or tjat player is, young players rarely excells in all categories. And GM knows what are the plans from HC and his coordinators which the type of players will suit the best for their psylosophy of O or D. And logic says that when you pick between similar players, you should take the one who excells in strategic plans for the season.

Players who can do everything on specific positions are rare (like Davante Adams, young M. Lewis, Aaron Jones etc) and you can find them only if they fall to your position on draft day (like Aaron Rodgers).

You may interview as much players as you want, but, especialy in late rounds (day 3) you can only guess will that player be the one who will reach his potential.

1 points
4
3
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:40 am

Yes, late rounds are a role of the die. So is injury (Martin and Stepaniak in a sense too). So any draft has to be analyzed primarily in rounds one to 5 unless it turns out one has hit gold thereafter in hindsight or found some core ST value.

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:26 am

26 QB Jordan Love
62 RB AJ Dillon
94 TE Josiah Deguara
175 LB Kamal Martin
192 OT Jon Runyan Jr.
208 C Jake Hansen
209 OT Simon Stepaniak
236 S Vernon Scott
242 OLB Jonathan Garvin

Now’s the time.

I agree that Top 3 will finally get an opportunity to shine. We might want to get some shades. It’s possible Rodgers skewed the timeline of all 3 players, to varying degrees.

There’s a chance we really don’t know what we have with any of our top 3 from 2020. With more reps, and employed differently, the results could surprise us.

None of us can say with any certainty what we’ve got outside of Dillon & Runyan.

Runyan is the big prize from R5 in illustrating the importance of every pick, every round.

Garvin showed promise.

Does Hansen become a player? That would be a commendable bit of work by Stenovich.

1 points
4
3
RCPackerFan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:59 am

"Runyan is the big prize from R5 in illustrating the importance of every pick, every round."

Not to quibble but Runyan was a 6th round pick. Same as Hanson and Stepaniak.

Runyan was a great find. I think Hanson is an OC only. He tried playing OG and he struggled there.

4 points
5
1
Leatherhead's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:05 pm

Wasn't every one of these guys on the active squad the last two years?

I mean, you only dress 45/46. Most of those guys will be holdovers from the previous season. If you're adding another 5 or 6 guys to your active roster, that's pretty good.

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

March 24, 2023 at 03:57 pm

Kamal Martin. Wow. That guy never materialized, after one helluva body of work at U Minnesota.

Knees.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:28 am

Find out what we already knew?
"That this was the worst draft class ever."
That it never filled any missing pieces.
A status Que; insert plan B.
That it was designed to move on from Rodgers.
And make Gutey greater than Lombardi.
All the while directing the pressure from himself?
We have 1 priority now.
To make the first rd pick be a success.
The rest are just hyped.
A good GM and class, is judged by All-Pros.
Something missing; from a guy who's been
in the packer organization for 25 years.
Not one pick will be a All-Pro.

-13 points
5
18
TKWorldWide's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:43 am

Is that iambic pentameter?

1 points
6
5
stockholder's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:48 am

“Winners never quit and quitters never win.”
The FO Quit!

-9 points
4
13
packer132's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:25 am

SH: Why don't you quit the hatred of Gute and Love. If you are a Packers fan (debatable), give some POSITIVE thoughts instead of berating these two. Read some of the posts above by Packers FANS who understand the rationale of the draft pick and difficulty in hitting a home run on every player picked. Take a hike.

7 points
11
4
PASSdaRELISH's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:15 am

So you think this site should ONLY contain positive comments? Wow talk about being fragile. Let’s keep it real and just admit that Gute blew that draft. There’s a handful of GM’s in the NFL that have the IT factor and Gute isn’t one of them. Those handful are always two steps ahead of Gute and the rest.

-4 points
4
8
DoubleJ's picture

March 24, 2023 at 10:11 am

Doesn't have to be nothing but positive comments but Stockholder's comments are beyond negative and happen every time Gute and Love are bought up.

We cannot say whether Gute blew this draft or not. The entire thing hinges on whether Love is good or not. If Love ends up being a top 10 QB for the next decade then it doesn't matter about any of the other players in this draft it will be an A+ draft. That said AJ Dillon IS a very good RB. IMO he is RB2 from this draft, only JT is better, while others might say he is RB3 with JT and Gibson being better. Considering he was the 5th RB taken that is pretty good.

4 points
6
2
jurp's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:12 am

His anti-Gute and anti-Love rants occur even when neither is in the accompanying story. This kind of obsession cannot be healthy.

5 points
7
2
stockholder's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:21 am

There isn't 1 professional Draft Guru,
that would agree with Gute on this class.
The draft grades reflected that.
And if they revisited the Draft.
The E would turn into a F.

-5 points
3
8
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:49 am

Anyone professional grading a draft where a QB was the first pick and about to become a starter for the first time would be a fool of the highest order, because not only is it nonsensical in concept, but in a year we will actually have some idea, maybe sooner. Whatever the standard of current punditry, mist have been well aware of that and caveated accordingly. That’s without getting into the merits of Dillon, Runyon, Deguara.

4 points
5
1
Oppy's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:00 pm

I mean, unless Love becomes a solid, long term starting QB for the Packers.

1 points
1
0
DoubleJ's picture

March 25, 2023 at 07:16 am

You mean the professional draft guru's who say every player is great when drafted and then change their tune and statement if the player is a bust? It is easy to be Mel Kiper and such because there is no accountability to your grades or analysis. You can also change your stance after said player has played for a while and no one will challenge you.

2 points
2
0
dobber's picture

March 25, 2023 at 12:06 pm

The professional draft gurus who are selling their own product and have no interest in team needs, depth charts, and schemes. If a team takes their guy, that team's leadership is great and smart. If they don't, they're 3/4 of the way into the shitter.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:14 am

“And people with obsessions, reflected Bond, were blind to danger.” Ian Fleming

5 points
7
2
jannes bjornson's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:36 am

Rodgers' Play got them All, Three-Year Extensions, on their Contracts. In Five years he could not provide the Correct personnel to get them over the top and into the Big Game with two-time MVP quarterback play. This is year Six. He should not be in office. Let the Choir Chime-in. GB flat major. You Play to Win, not fill aluminum bleachers.

0 points
5
5
jannes bjornson's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:49 am

Some wanted to tank the second half of 2022 for the draft order.

3 points
4
1
Johnblood27's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:08 pm

I sure wish you would quit.

Your schtick is way past old and borders on the insane.

Move to Minneapolis, get some golden braids, learn to love an obnoxious horn and prepare to lose for all of eternity.

2 points
3
1
mrtundra's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:51 am

More like a dactylic quadrilateral.

7 points
9
2
Savage57's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:53 am

A new writing style. Lunatic pedantry.

8 points
11
3
Johnblood27's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:09 pm

This is a winner!

Nice job Savage...

After watching the Packers secondary I never said those words all together before...

2 points
4
2
greengold's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:05 am

I don’t think he’s got the feet for it.

4 points
5
1
jurp's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:10 am

Vogon iambic pentameter, yes.

1 points
2
1
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:17 pm

More like terminological pomposity!

2 points
3
1
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:17 pm

Duplicate - slow internet today!

0 points
1
1
Bitternotsour's picture

March 24, 2023 at 02:49 pm

that there are four downvotes on quality poetry snark, well, all I can say is that Stockholder has several alias'.

3 points
4
1
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:08 am

Obviously we don’t know what Love will be. You apparently do in your mind, but sadly the rest of us lack that precognition. Of the rest, Dillon has been adequate but used in a questionable manner and Deguara largely not used for the role LaFleur wanted him for. Martin had an injury that the Packers thought would degenerate. Stepaniak had personal troubles. Those two were not known in advance I believe, but that kind of bad luck can tip a draft on its own.

Runyon still looks to me like a value pick. Garvin Has never put it together despite his athleticism-a classic 7th flyer and outcome. Hanson seems a bust. Scott liked like he might contribute last year before his injury. So this draft rests on Runyon and the top 3. Dillon is averaging 4.3 ypc for his career, which is decent, despite questionable usage. Deguara has just never been used properly. He’s got an over 80 percent catch rate but few opportunities. Maybe this year he gets that chance or proves a wasted pick because we didn’t use the position.

Ultimately, first picks often define. Here, ours hasn’t played a single game with his own game plan and precious little without one. We are going to find out now how good a pick that was, gradually. We are also possibly going to see Dillon used more directly and Deguara used meaningfully.

For those of us without your foreknowledge, this draft will look very different in a year or two. It could be deemed great. It could be deemed saved by Love, or it could be a bust from which only Dillon and Runyon were the only decent pieces—in a par with TTs 2012 perhaps. However, drafts by a GM should be looked at as a group anyway.

They do say Love conquers all. That may well be true in the case of this draft.

5 points
8
3
stockholder's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:15 am

Again you miss.
ALL_PRO! Do you know what All-Pro means?
This GM can bring in anyone
of the street.
And you'd praise him .

-5 points
3
8
jurp's picture

March 24, 2023 at 03:49 pm

We all here know what All-Pro means; just because a draft doesn't contain an All-Pro doesn't mean it sucks. Maybe you should only consider drafts that contain Hall of Famers as successful. That would give you far more drafts to bitch about.

1 points
2
1
bottlefliper's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:27 am

Lombardi was great and his legacy will be here forever. On and off the field even more.

Gutey was better than the most GM in the drafts he had already. He is smart, strong and absolut unselfish. Everyone can see thats around the NFL. If Love turns out decent he will be looking great.
He had the guts to stand up to a selfish Diva who did not really win anything since 2011. Gutey was fearless and he won for the PACKERS. A David versus Goliath thing and the better person is still here. Lombardi would be proud as hell.
Funny how AR asked the Packers to fire Gutey. Or better crazy, never seen a QB doing such things. Let him run the Jets and there joy of football into the ground. Seems just fiting

0 points
6
6
jurp's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:17 am

Find out what we already knew?
"That this was the worst draft class ever."
Seriously? 1981 (and many other years) would beg to disagree. Presenting as evidence the horrible terrible no-good Class of the Packers' 1981 Draft:
Rich Campbell
Gary Lewis
Ray Stachowicz
Richard Turner
Byron Braggs
Bill Whitaker
Larry Werts
Tim Huffman
Nickie Hall
Forrest Valora
Cliff Lewis
Now THAT was a putrid draft.

"And make Gutey greater than Lombardi."
Well, Lombardi was actually not a great GM; I'd say Gutekunst is at least tied with him in that role already.

"A good GM and class, is judged by All-Pros."
This is absolute nonsense. A good class can be judged on many things, the most logical of which is probably "we got two starters and two good backups from it". Expecting an All-Pro in every draft is idiotic.

You're getting more consistent lately - this "effort" is a solid 9 on the Bonkers Scale.

2 points
6
4
stockholder's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:26 am

Street Walkers are not logical.
But for your effort, I'll make an exception.

-3 points
3
6
jurp's picture

March 24, 2023 at 03:51 pm

Oh fuck! You broke the Bonkers Scale AGAIN! These things aren't cheap, you know! Dude, you gotta ramp down the crazy or you're going to bankrupt me!

1 points
2
1
Packerpasty's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:57 pm

Keep it up Stockholder...I'm liking your thoughts...and how they provoke the cult!!! Good stuff!!

0 points
1
1
croatpackfan's picture

March 25, 2023 at 10:48 am

You are just beside stockholder.

Both of you are (and few others) just small frightened mices that believe father time is beatable and ACR will never go old.

Next season when he, hopefully, will lead Jets to another 3rd place in division it will be interesting who you'll find guilty for his blunder. Maybe you'll put blame on Hackett, or Lazard or somebody else. Who knows. But, as I see (and as I saw 2021 & 2022 season) your beloved ACR is done. So many missed throws or underthrows or erratic throws out.

And there is nothing you can do than bitching here asking to find some support of people who are willing to believe in the craps you and stockholder are writing.

I respect everybodies opinion, until their opinions are not stupid. As jurp says - top level of the bonker scale...

-1 points
0
1
T7Steve's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:50 am

I hope Kamal Martin can come back. He was plagued by injury last season but I think he's an important depth piece at ILB and important STer.

What can you say about Runyan. ONE penalty in the last two seasons! Runs in the family.

The Love pick paid for itself in the first two seasons. He caused (or at least because of) 2-MVPs. The rest is icing on the cake. He's going to hit the ground running.

6 points
7
1
PatrickGB's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:11 am

I, honestly, did not know Martin was on the roster.

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:29 am

Martin wasn’t on ours. He was last on the Panthers IR I think, till an injury settlement after being waived injured last August. He had one start and 2 tackles after we released him in August 2021. Although the Packers never officially stated it, the belief reported was that the Packers believed he had physical issues that would increasingly make it hard for him to play and that was why they surprisingly released him.

1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:54 am

I think I confused him with (edit) Barnes? On a roll today. Good thing it's the weekend!

3 points
3
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:11 am

Packers cut Martin 2 years ago.

4 points
4
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:54 am

The 2020 draft was a pivot point in GB.

The decision to draft Love changed the direction of the franchise and put us on the path we are currently on. I can't help but wonder what would our last 3 years have been like had they decided to not draft Love. I am going to go down this rabbit hole for a minute of what our team would be like had we chose not to make this move.

Instead of Love what if they drafted Patrick Queen? Queen was a player that a lot of packer fans wanted. Our starting ILB's were Christian Kirksey, Krys Barnes and Kamal Martin. Queen started all 16 games as a rookie and finished 3rd in DROY behind Chase Young and Jeremy Chin. Queen has started every game he has played in and has averaged over 100 tackles per season. Had they drafted Queen, would they have signed Campbell the following year? Would they have drafted Walker this year? Had they drafted Queen it likely would have changed what our current ILB looks like.

Instead Love what if they drafted Tee Higgins. Higgins rookie year he put up 908 yards on 67 receptions and 6 TD's. Since then he has posted back to back 1000+ yards on 74 receptions in each year, and 13 TD's. Obviously those numbers would look different in GB, but can't help but think he would have been an almost instant upgrade in the offense. Our WR's in 2020 we had Adams, Lazard, MVS as our main starters. Higgins easily would have been our number 4 if not higher. If Adams left last year, Higgins likely would have been our number 1 receiver and I have a hard time believing we have the same record as last year (if everything else played out the same way).

The decision of taking Love will show soon enough if it was the right one or the wrong one.

The rest of the draft included Dillon, Deguara, Kamal Martin, Jon Runyan, Jake Hanson, Simon Stepaniak, Vernon Scott, Jonathan Garvin.
Martin, Stepaniak and Scott are no longer with the team. I liked Scott his rookie year, but with the change of DC's he didn't really fit into the defense.
Runyan was a great 6th round draft pick. He has started in 33 of his last 34 games.

I believe Dillon and Degaura are primed for bigger years. Dillon struggled a bit last year and I believe the OL issues were part of it. That part has worked itself out now. With Love taking over I believe they will be even more focused on the run game. Deguara found a nice role as an H-back and I think he will have a bigger role in that position this year. With no Lewis and Tonyan, i think Deguara is primed for a much bigger role. Runyan was a very good find.
But this whole draft class hinges on what Love becomes as a QB. If Love becomes a top tier QB, it doesn't matter what the rest of this class is. If he is a flop and struggles, this class instantly looks bad. No pressure Jordan.

5 points
7
2
bottlefliper's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:33 am

Without drafting Love, Rodgers would have played as bad as in 2018 and 2019. Alone from there it was the right move.

If he comes up halfway decent, it would be even a greater win for the Packers. win more important games than AR is a small task to accomplish. He will already have that, if he wins one single playoff game.

Outside of that, you have to have vision and draft for the future anyway and so it was just the right choice with an aging QB who does not take care of his body.

-1 points
4
5
RCPackerFan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:53 am

Not sure how we know that for fact. I do believe Rodgers was rejuvenated from the Love pick though.

I don't know what level of play Love has to play at to be considered a great pick, to good pick to poor pick.

The best way to find a future QB is to take one when you don't need one, rather then trying to find one when you need one.

5 points
6
1
Untylu1968's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:36 am

But, if you don't draft Love that year, does Rodgers come in without that fire that was lit under his ass? You can speculate on every aspect, cherry-pick draft picks from hindsight.

5 points
5
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:55 am

You definitely can. I do believe it motivated Rodgers for sure.

But then do we have the crap we put up with the last couple of offseasons too? Perhaps he was just as motivated if they drafted him a WR in the first round?

Its all hypotheticals and whatnot at this point. But it does make me wonder how things would be different.

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:03 am

If we hadn’t drafted Love then, I think it’s pretty likely we would have taken a QB pretty high since. Then we’d have that drama. No team is going to ignore the position completely. Would that be better or worse? I don’t think the simple either or contrast is realistic.

2 points
2
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 24, 2023 at 02:56 pm

The book of Wolf (Ron) - "When you see the quarterback that you want, you go get him"

Gutekunst did. This is why he's the GM. If he was wrong, he will lose his job. I trust the project.

1 points
1
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:39 am

RCP,
Nicely done! Enjoyed the read!

2 points
2
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:03 am

Thanks.

Until Love gets playing full time and for a few years we won't truly know if Love was the right pick or not. We really don't know how good or bad he will be until he starts playing. So I'm not going to make any bold predictions of what his future will hold.

But I think what they need to do is to build a lot of talent around him. They did that for Rodgers. In 2005 when they drafted Rodgers, they drafted Murphy. 2006 Jennings. 2007 James Jones. 2008 Jordy Nelson, Jermichael Finley. I can see them doing something similar for Love. They started last year by drafting Watson and Doubs. 21 they drafted Rodgers, though it didn't work out, they did use a 3rd round pick on him.

I wouldn't be surprised if they drafted at least 3 more weapons in this draft. I wouldn't be surprised if they came out of this draft with a couple of more WR's. At least 1 TE (maybe more), and maybe a RB. I feel like they are going to try and surround Love with as much talent as possible.

4 points
4
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:22 am

RC,
Another good post!

There are a few on here that consistently say the Packers never gave Rodgers the skill players he needed. You do a good job pointing out he did have some good players around him, particularly early. Yes, I have been saying for awhile now the Packers will & need to surround Jordan with one of the very best WR's & TE's in this draft. I suspect they will draft two of each. As you know so much of what the Packers can do will be based on the trade. The damn trade! Wish it was finalized yesterday and was favorable with the Packers.

I cannot get Quentin Johnston, Dalton Kincaid, and Darnell Washington out of my mind. Throw in Bijan Robinson & Broderick Jones as well. Any of these guys would be great and then pick up a couple more of the 2nd tiered offensive players like a Musgrave, Laporta, Tucker, Tillman, Hutchinson, Boutte, etc.

2 points
2
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:40 am

Thanks,

I have said a few times that they did a great job of building the talent around Rodgers early in his career. The problem was that they stopped doing that late in his career. They used a 2nd round pick on a WR for Rodgers in 2005, 2006, 2008, 2011, 2014, 2022. They also drafted Jones in the 3rd round in 2007.
The biggest problem was after drafting Cobb, they only drafted Adams in the 2nd round until they traded up last year to take Watson. They really need to add a WR somewhere between 14 and 22. It would have helped to keep drafting and developing those guys.

I hope they take the same approach with Love at the helm. Surround him with talent and a lot of it. Don't put all the pressure on Love. I agree with you that I think they will draft a pair of WR's and TE's. I also think a RB in the middle rounds is a very strong possibility.
I would not be surprised at all if they used their first round pick on a WR or TE. If they were to trade Rodgers to the Jets for the pair of 2nd round picks, I could see them using one of those on a WR or TE. And then double dip in the 4th/5th round area for more WR/TE's.

Darnell Washington just seems like a natural fit in our offense. We basically get a young version of Lewis. Which is a good thing.

I would absolutely love it if they could find another speed WR. Someone that puts more fear in defenses. We saw what Watson did to defenses as soon as he got going. if we could add a guy with big time speed, that could really help open up the offense.

1 points
1
0
DoubleJ's picture

March 24, 2023 at 10:25 am

"I cannot get Quentin Johnston, Dalton Kincaid, and Darnell Washington out of my mind. Throw in Bijan Robinson & Broderick Jones as well. Any of these guys would be great and then pick up a couple more of the 2nd tiered offensive players like a Musgrave, Laporta, Tucker, Tillman, Hutchinson, Boutte, etc."

In order to get Johnston on Kincaid they would for sure need to use their R1. Using an R1 on a WR is a waste of a pick usually. Since 2010, there have been more WR make the Pro Bowl who were picked in R2 than R1. In fact R3 has only 1 less Pro Bowl receiver than R1 since 2010. Basically the best value for WR is in R2 & R3. Kincaid scares me with his injuries and his age. He turns 24 yeah and I personally don't like drafting players who are older than 22. Especially if their production was best when they were 23/24 and you have to wonder if it was only because they were more physically mature at that point. Darnell Washington though looks like the sky is the limit for his ability. He is already the best blocking TE in the draft and has a CRAZY high ceiling for receiving. While move TEs are nice, an in-line is still the best as that creates better mismatches and makes it harder on the D to know what is going on.

0 points
2
2
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 24, 2023 at 12:54 pm

Double,
Gave you a thumbs up because I very much enjoy interaction and discussion. regardless if either are in agreement.

I am 100% with you about Darnell Washington and I think he is high on the Packers list & should the Packers draft him I would be very excited & happy. One can use statistics all day long but there are times if an exceptional player (a difference maker) is sitting there like possibly Johnston, or maybe even JSN than you absolutely have to take them. Additionally, every year is different in terms of your teams needs. This year, we lost Watkins, Cobb, Big Dog, Lazard, Tonyan, etc. Throw in a young & inexperienced QB with basically two 2nd year WR's and the cupboards are bare. Receivers such as Toure & Melton are unknowns. If there was ever going to be a year to pick WR's & TE's in round 1 this is the year. Top talent at those positions probably are going to be staring you in the face at #13 & #15 forcing you to make a decision. Last year, Lazard did not stop defenses from bracketing Watson and shutting him and the offense down later in the year. With the talent depleted do you think players such as Tillman, Rice, Hutchingson and so on are going to be an upgrade from Lazard? If so, when and how much? This is what I am basing my reasoning for a top WR & TE who can open up the offense and keep the defense honest. Second tiered talent is not going to move the needle very far if at all over last year. My opinion!

0 points
1
1
Packerpasty's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:01 pm

"and for a few years we won't know"...WTF...now we are giving him "a few years"....me, I'm giving him half a season....a few years....thats funny...if he's mediocre he will still be mediocre in a few years, if he lights up the league then thats what he'll do from this year on....im giving him 7 total years no way...if he aint good this coming year Gutes will be gone...

-1 points
1
2
DoubleJ's picture

March 24, 2023 at 10:29 am

"Instead of Love what if they drafted Patrick Queen?"

Queen has been a average - above average starter. However, I think Quay Walker has far more potential as a player. I know Madden ratings aren't everything, however, Madden 23 had Queen at 79 overall and Walker at 77. It will be interesting to see if Walker makes a big jump this year.

1 points
3
2
RCPackerFan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 12:18 pm

Correct. And not saying he would have been the correct choice or anything. I just know that in that draft most fans wanted Queen. Which is why I brought him up. And with them going out and signing Campbell the next year and a couple of years later drafting Walker. Had they taken Queen instead, I do wonder how it would have affected those other moves they made.

1 points
1
0
Johnblood27's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:26 pm

I never was a Queen fan.

Just too light in the loafers for an ILB for me.

If you think the GBP run defense was soft over the past few years (decades?) just put a little guy in the middle and take a look.

I would have been extremely disappointed if the GBP took Queen.

Maybe I would have been on board if they moved him to safety...

3 points
3
0
Johnblood27's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:29 pm

Measurable Measurement %tile
Height 6' 0" 9
Weight 229 lbs 14
Arm Length 31⅝" 29
Hand Size 10" 76
40 Yard Dash 4.5s 94
Vertical Jump 35" 63
Broad Jump 125" 88
Bench Press 18 reps 20

from the combine

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:01 pm

Totally agree. I did then and still do now.

1 points
1
0
jurp's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:23 am

What if we'd drafted LB Jordyn Brooks instead of Love (he was taken BEFORE Queen)? Jeff Gladney? Xavier McKinney? You can't just cherry-pick who you'd've picked - every decision has a positive and negative possibility amd there's no guarantee that a non-pick of Love would've lead to a pick of Queen or Higgins.

0 points
2
2
RCPackerFan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 12:26 pm

Honestly, I will say this as politely as possible. I can do whatever the hell I want.

The reason why I brought up those 2 players names was because when the Packers were getting closer to picking they were names that most people were thinking they were going to be looking at getting.

Yeah, I could have chosen anyone. I could have chosen Johnathon Taylor. Which is who i was hoping they were going to take.

0 points
1
1
stockholder's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:32 am

I would have taken Queen and Chinn.
Both were all Team rookies.
And Petine needed to finish rebuilding the defense.
The draft Gurus said Higgins.
Who I also liked, but got Down voted.
I would have signed a FA for the DL.

0 points
2
2
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:03 pm

So was Stokes, whom you “ never would have taken.”

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:03 pm

Duplicate

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 24, 2023 at 12:13 pm

""". I can't help but wonder what would our last 3 years have been like had they decided to not draft Love.""""

Well, we would have had a team that won games and didn't advance in the playoffs, we'd have no alternative to a 39 year old who doesn't deliver in big games. We'd be looking at drafting a QB, even though some people seem to think Rodgers is going to play at a high level until he's 45.

Meanwhile, somebody else would have drafted Love, and unless he was clearly a lot worse than the other 4 QBs taken in that draft (Burrow, Tua, Herbert, Hurts) we'd be sitting here saying ...."We shoulda". Kind of like the Vikings, who passed on Rodgers TWICE, because they had just made the playoffs with Daunte Culpicklepepper.

They had TWO first round picks, spent one on Superduper WR, Troy Williamson, and that great pass rusher, Erasmus James. And for 15 years, they watched Aaron Rodgers win division titles while they drafted Ponder and Bilgewater and over the hill vets like Favre and Johnson. Tavarous Jackson. Sam Bradford.(didn't they trade two picks for him after Bilgewater broke?)

Look.....I don't give a damn who it is, if your QB is over 35, if he hasn't been to the Super Bowl in a decade, and you have a chance to get a legitimate franchise QB (not always possible, drafting at the end of the round), then it's a very solid move to get that guy.

It was the right move, regardless of what Love does this year. I think you should have a little more faith in the organization that drafted and developed Rodgers.

4 points
4
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 12:35 pm

I'm not saying it was the wrong move or that Love won't be the next great QB or anything. Just simply saying, I do wonder how different things would be.

Rodgers likely doesn't have the offseasons that they have. Meaning our offseasons are way different. Perhaps his attitude towards retirement is different. Who knows what happens. I just think the last few years is way different that way.

I think it was smart drafting a guy and developing him like they did with Rodgers. It was a good plan and worked out well.. Forcing a young QB to play right away doesn't work that often.

I have no clue how good or not good Love will be. We will find out very soon though.

0 points
0
0
jurp's picture

March 24, 2023 at 03:57 pm

Whether we drafted Love or not, our seasons would've ended the same way - with choking and heartbreak. Love was a non-factor in how they played out and Tee Higgins would never have caused Rodgers to look his way instead of Davantae's. Queen's presence would not have caused the offense to not shit the bed each time after the defense gave them a turnover in 2020. We know why we lost those playoff games, and Queen, Higgins or anyone else you think we should've drafted would've made no difference.

1 points
1
0
BirdDogUni's picture

March 24, 2023 at 04:25 pm

That's a pretty cynical view of it jurp... You don't think if Tee Higgins was on the field, DA might not have been double covered? You don't think we might have been far enough ahead it wouldn't have mattered that late in the game?

Hard to know what would've happened. I doubt we'd be talking about Jordan Love today if we'd have drafted Higgins. 12 would still be our QB.

At the time, I thought the timing was all off to draft Love. Maybe Gutey is smarter than all of us and it was the perfect time and Love is the perfect replacement for 12. It will be a few years before we know for sure, but I'm glad Love at least looks like a team 1st guy, so far.

0 points
1
1
greengold's picture

March 24, 2023 at 04:38 pm

To me, seemed the Love pick was the perfect scheme pick for LaFleur's Offense. I think Gutekunst had different ideas about how much longer the Packers were going to keep Rodgers, and he made what I thought was a smart choice for the future, as badly as I wanted a WR, like half of Packer Nation did.

0 points
0
0
Untylu1968's picture

March 24, 2023 at 07:54 am

What kind of rating would've been given to the 2005 draft after year 3? Sometimes patience is needed, in our instant gratification world..

5 points
5
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:05 am

That had the makings for being an all time great draft. First 3 picks were Rodgers, Nick Collins, Terrence Murphy.

Collins was on his path to HOF until he had a career ending neck injury. And Murphy was a guy that looked like he potentially could have been great, but he had a career ending neck injury before his career even got started basically.
Had those 2 guys not suffered career ending neck injuries, who knows where those guys would have been career wise.

2 points
4
2
Untylu1968's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:18 am

Agree 100%, but Collins wasn't the instant success we all demand these days. I love the excitement of the draft and develop, just hoping we strike gold!

6 points
6
0
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:41 am

Yes, after his 3rd year many had Collins as a certain bust. Then it clicked. Rodgers was made of glass. The Dallas game hadn’t won over the majority at that point.

2005

1.24 Aaron Rodgers, QB

2.19 Nick Collins, S

2.26 Terrence Murphy, WR

4.14 Marviel Underwood, S

4.24 Brady Poppinga, LB

5.07 Junius Coston, G

5.31 Michael Hawkins, CB

6.06 Mike Montgomery, DE

6.21 Craig Bragg, WR

7.31 Kurt Campbell, LB

7.32 William Whitticker, G

Murphy looked to have promise but undiagnosed severe spinal stenosis (narrow, weak) emerged immediately and ended his career. Before the 2008 season this did not look good. Poppinga was likely the only ok pick for most then.

1 points
3
2
jurp's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:24 am

Underwood had decent upside, too, but got hurt early and shortened his career considerably.

1 points
1
0
bottlefliper's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:45 am

Just right.......even Collins had his critics in the begining. What was the problem back than? That he could not hold on to the INT or was it his football IQ? Not sure anymore but I still remember that there have been a lot of doubts after season 1.
Felt sorry for Murphy, he had a lot of potential.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:53 am

He was hesitant, hiding his speed in effect and not getting to plays, he took a lot of bad angles and missed tackles as a result and struggled to anticipate generally. It was really not till his 4th season that he was truly good. He’s a near classic example of potential for whom the light bulb turns on suddenly, everything falls into place and transforms him dramatically.

4 points
4
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 24, 2023 at 10:50 am

Nick was a good tackler even as a rookie. Over 80 takes in each of his first two seasons. And remained so. But his pass pro instincts were hit and miss...mostly miss.

But the pass pro really blossomed after his rough 3rd year (when he missed 3 games with a knee injury and affected his play when he returned). And he exploded in year 4 with 7 INTs. And the INTs continued until his career ended with the neck injury.

St. Nick had truly become a complete S...and was on the path to greatness. Loved watching him ply.

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:59 am

He started year one and you could see his ability and the 40" vertical. He had the IT factor. One of Ted;'s best picks.

3 points
3
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:46 am

Very true. it took him a couple of years to become the player we knew. But man was he good when he became the player we remember.

I think Collins's injury in 2011 was a major reason why we didn't make it back to the super bowl. He was so good that he erased a lot of issues for our defense. Once he was gone they didn't have that eraser anymore.

5 points
5
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:43 am

Always remember the dissapointment with Terrence that we never got a chance to see him play. There was that #1 DB pick Lewis in the 80's with the neck injury too that was so dissapointing, and others.

3 points
3
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:47 am

He took a head shot from Davis that would get the LB tossed with today's rules and suspended. It was unfortunate as Murphy was developing like a Robert Brooks profiled WR.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 10:57 am

Going to recover a Davenport fumble. However, he may have been lucky, given the severity of his condition. He recovered, wanted to play, but knowing the extent of the stenosis now, TT wouldn’t sanction the risk and nor would any other team. The good news is he seems to have done very well for himself since, in the real estate business in Texas.

1 points
1
0
jurp's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:26 am

Spinal stenosis can easily lead to quadriplegia. He, indeed, got very lucky.

1 points
1
0
bottlefliper's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:47 am

So its on us to give them some time.....

0 points
1
1
Packers2020's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:02 am

I honestly am not sure we will see more runs with Jordan Love. Everyone says that AR was part of the problem and did not run ML's offense at times and didn't run the ball as much as ML wanted to. The Packers ran the ball 44.7% of the time last year and passed the ball 55.3% of the time. That is a pretty balanced percentage. That tells me AR ran the plays that ML called or when he audibled, he was still calling runs when he was supposed to.

In 2021, we ran the ball 42% of the time and passed 58% of the time so we actually ran more this year than last.

The other thing to realize is if the defense is stacking the box and has 1 high safety, you need to pass. If a defense has two safeties back and have not stacked the box then you run the ball. Zone and man to man coverage can also come into play on when to run and pass.

The thing that may improve is if Love can go through his progressions quicker and throw on time then this offense could improve later in the year. AR was struggling this year on throwing on time it seemed.

My point is this is not as cut and dry as everyone thinks it is.

I guess time will tell.....

4 points
5
1
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:28 am

Packers,
2023 will be the start of a new era with a major reset! Agree with what you share and we will see JL running ML's offense. I noticed a significant difference in how JL ran the offense last year in his limited play compared to AR. JL played faster and got the ball out on time. The offense just seemed to hum and look fantastic in the Philly game. Excited about what the offense does in 2023. Just pick up several more offensive players with several at the skilled position and we are going to enjoy watching them.

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 24, 2023 at 12:08 pm

He was driving the ball to the first read. If he gets too locked-in the safeties and CBs will cheat on the routes looking for the INT. Playing behind Rodgers helped him learn the progressions and Clements will be a good guide.

1 points
2
1
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 24, 2023 at 12:46 pm

J,
Possibly but it was encouraging as hell & refreshing as hell. JL is going to throw some interceptions for sure those first couple of years, but he has the talent and he is going to learn. At the moment, based on his college playing I see him as falling somewhere between Favre (gunslinger) & Rodgers (ubber cautious) in terms of his play style. Without question sitting behind Rodgers for 3 years and watching him play carefully absolutely is going to benefit him. Going to be very interesting in seeing how much his game style might have changed from college if at all.

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 24, 2023 at 02:18 pm

Sorry, I must say you did not look that game and now comes with false claims. Even announcers noticed how Jordan was going through progression and see field well.

You have presumption that he was going to first read because he threw ball quickly, not hold on ball long as your precious (ACR), easily avoiding pressures and keep his eyes downfield. When he noticed that Philly D trying to trick him on his first pass of second series, he quickly threw ball to check down (AJ Dillon) avoiding mistake. Next pass was TD.

He is much quicker in his field scanning and make decisions post snap, not pre snap like your precious. In 2 possesions he led Packers to 10 points and kept game open till the end. And he did that vs SB team.

Now, please, find him more mistakes. I will be glad to explain were you makes mistakes.

1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

March 24, 2023 at 09:42 am

What is cut and dry, is that we need an O-line that the QB and coach can count on for run blocking and a reasonable amount of time for passing.

That can turn an average QB into an MVP candidate and vice versa if you don't have one.

3 points
3
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 24, 2023 at 12:32 pm

"""I honestly am not sure we will see more runs with Jordan Love""

I don't foresee a dramatic increase in the number of runs, either. However, I think we'll get more than 94 yards rushing from the QB position, so our overall rush numbers are probably going to be better. If we got 250 more yards rushing last year, we'd have been 7th in rushing.

We were 15th last year, 2113 yards, 3 yards behind Jacksonville. Trevor Lawrence had 200 more yards rushing. In fact, quite a few of the better rushing teams in the league feature a QB who get you 20 yards a game on the ground....Bears, Ravens, Eagles, Cowboys, Bills.....hell, Mahomes ran for over 350 yards.

I don't want Love running around like Fields, but this guy is going to break the pocket on some scrambles and gain more than 100 yards on the season. In that respect, we've improved the team's rushing ability.

1 points
1
0
Heyward's picture

March 24, 2023 at 10:03 am

The offense is in trouble if Deguara's role in the passing game expands.

0 points
2
2
Leatherhead's picture

March 24, 2023 at 12:22 pm

That's an interesting take. He caught 13 passes in 15 targets last year. Over the last two years, he's been targeted 48 times and caught 38 of them (that's a 79% catch rate).

If we got 38 catches on 48 targets, my thinking would be "how many catches will he get if he gets more targets?"

Tonyan and Lewis are gone. They had about 75 targets between them. Even if we add a primo pass catcher at TE, we're still going to need contributions from others, and Deguara should be one of those guys, IMO

2 points
2
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 24, 2023 at 10:30 am

Rodgers was not great in 2017,2018, and 2019. In 2018 and 2019 Rodgers was starting to miss passes he always threw perfectly before. He was the most accurate QB I ever saw. Drafting Love pissed off Rodgers and he played way better again. Close to the Rodgers of old but still not as accurate as he used to be. Having an All Pro WR who catches everything also makes you look better.

Since Rodgers is pissed now off again, I would be surprised if he doesn't play great for the Jets for 2-3 years. I hope he does. Then the Jets will be a good trade partner in the future. Hopefully they are a good trade partner now and we get this debacle done without screwing this trade up too.

I am not a fan of trading up in the draft in the 1st round. It usually cost too much as teams trading up are desparate and teams know it. I will always wonder if Love would have still been there 4 picks later. And who else had the hots for him that would have jumped ahead of us.

The big misses were Patrick Queen and Tee Higgans in the 1st. A trade up would have been needed for Queen but we could have stayed right there for Higgins. Both would have been game changers which is what you need from a 1st round pick. Another big miss was Jeremy Chinn-S in the 2nd. He has been a stud and also would have been a game changer for us. A great safety would have helped more than a good RB.

I get the Deguara pick would fit the coaches "system" but the jury is out on that one. A much better pick would have been Denver TE Albert Okwuegbunam out of Missouri. He has been rumored to be available by trade the last 2 years. We could still fix this mistake by trading a 7th round pick for him or better yet trade Savage to a safety needing team (Denver) and get back a 6'5 260lb TE who ran 4.49 @ the combine. He had 27 TD catches @ Missouri. We could really use him and we also trade $5 million for $900,000. I would be disappointed if we didn't try to make this happen when we need a TE and salary cap relief so badly. No brainer!

The 2020 draft wasn't that strong and later picks would be nitpicking. Antonio Gibson-RB from Memphis was a draft crush but he went early 3rd. I don't know that Love playing good for Green Bay this year would be a huge surprise for everyone, but he is in the mold of modern QB's now. If he ended up somewhere between Mahommes and Hurts performance wise, I guess I would be OK with that. HA HA

1 points
1
0
Ron61's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:02 am

Stop regurgitating these 5 second sound bites you hear from the espn talking heads. ‘Rodgers undermines MLF”.
BS! How do you know?

You obviously bought into Rodgers is the problem. Just wait until they roll that supposed Rolls Royce out on the field and find out it’s another Pinto!

You and all the Rodgers haters might experience the hell other teams feel YOY of trying to find a great QB. Packer fans have been spoiled like no other team in history for 30 years of excellence at QB.

RODGERS AND FAVRE WILL NEVER BE SURPASSED

-6 points
2
8
Coldworld's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:10 am

Bring back Favre. Solve the problem. Actually, they have been surpassed, or rather never did surpass, Starr.

“Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while… you don't do things right once in a while… you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately so is losing.”

Vince Lombardi.

0 points
4
4
Ron61's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:32 am

Get serious. Starr was a game manager on a legendary team.

BART STARR
Career
Games-196
RECORD
94-57-6
Cmp%
57.4
Yds
24718
Y/A
7.8
TD
152
Int
138

-2 points
1
3
Leatherhead's picture

March 24, 2023 at 12:47 pm

On that legendary team, you had multiple HOFers. And each and every last one of them would look you in the eye and tell you "Bart was our leader".

He wasn't a game manager on a legendary team. He was the leader of a legendary team.

4 points
5
1
dobber's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:08 pm

...in an era where passing wasn't favored and QBs were hunted and beaten.

5 points
6
1
Johnblood27's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:40 pm

cookie here...

Comparing passing statistics from Starr's era to today is simply asinine.

Anyone who puts stats out there and makes value statements without qualifying statements is not to be respected.

3 points
4
1
Untylu1968's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:21 pm

They don't have to be surpassed, but at some point, they need to be replaced and nows the time.

2 points
3
1
greengold's picture

March 24, 2023 at 03:35 pm

Talk to Randy Wright's hand.

1 points
1
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 24, 2023 at 11:46 am

Ron you need therapy. You and about 5% of the Packers fans who think we should keep Rodgers until he is 49 years old and using a walker to get on the field need to accept the fact that Green Bay wants control of their team back, now. Not in 2 years. Do you really think even if he plays for us this year that he won't pull the same sh$t next year? The front office is done with Rodgers holding the TEAM hostage year after year. The mistake they made was letting Rodgers con them last year into that anti team building contract and missing the kings ransom of a trade.
What a colossal mistake that will haunt us for years with massive dead cap hit for Rodgers and all the contracts we have had to extend to stay afloat. Not to mention we can't bring in free agents that would help the team because we have no money.

Now back to the thread. I was going to talk about a player that we missed in the 2020 draft that would have helped us, Denzel Mims. And that we have a golden opportunity to get him now by just telling the Jets we want him included in the trade. He is way down their depth chart and they want to move on from him anyway and his very low cap hit of $1.4 million. He still has untapped talent, 6.3 210lbs. and 4.3 40 at the combine. A potential star there for the asking. At a position of need and he fit the Packers thresholds then and still does now.

3 points
6
3
Ron61's picture

March 24, 2023 at 12:08 pm

First, if I wasn’t in therapy I might be offended.
Anyone who is as thick as golf pack does not have the capacity of original thought. They/he, depending on its pronoun, rather summon up rehashed talking points that melt in light of objective facts.

Gute is the Problem not Rodgers. Rather than going all in with draft picks and free agents to win NOW, he chose to prepare for the future and waste picks.

Then he gives Rodgers the contract he earned and turns around and loses Davante and MVS leaving Rodgers with a bunch of rookies.

Some people’s kids.

THAT IS NOT WIN NOW!

-3 points
1
4
Leatherhead's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:27 pm

"""Anyone who is as thick as ......... does not have the capacity of original thought"""

Original is not the same as correct. But I do get your point about people parroting what they hear. I can talk politics with a guy for about a minute and I can pretty much tell where he's getting most of his news because they're repeating what they've heard or read there.

I taught schools for 20 years and I wondered how throwing worksheets at students was encouraging critical thinking. Now I know.

3 points
3
0
BirdDogUni's picture

March 24, 2023 at 04:38 pm

Oh good... Another one... SMH

You tell him Lh...

0 points
0
0
jurp's picture

March 24, 2023 at 04:19 pm

"Then he gives Rodgers the contract he earned and turns around and loses Davante and MVS leaving Rodgers with a bunch of rookies. "

This is on Murphy - the guy Gutekunst reports to - not Gutekunst himself. The evidence? Read on:

"Rather than going all in with draft picks and free agents to win NOW, he chose to prepare for the future..." I got rid of the rest of that sentence because it is truly nonsense. You sure you're not stockholder's son?

2 points
2
0
Packerpasty's picture

March 24, 2023 at 12:23 pm

pretty sure people are going to be very disappointed after the upcoming season is over....then it will be amusing to read all the posts..."he needs more time" "MLF has to go" "its Gutes fault"....

-7 points
0
7
LambeauPlain's picture

March 24, 2023 at 01:41 pm

It is always best, when working and communicating with customers, to under-promise...then over-deliver.

3 points
3
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 24, 2023 at 03:19 pm

The 2020 draft is a point of view draft. I wanted to win a Super Bowl. I was looking for quick impact and shoring up weaknesses. I might have a different analysis if I just wanted to have a good team. So, with production as the criterion:

1. Love: F+. No impact. GB has never won a game he played in.
2. Dillon: B. Pretty solid player. Never the clear starter, though.
3. Degaura: D+. Belongs in the NFL. 656 snaps. 371 rec. yds.
5. Martin: D-. Played just 16 games and was promising in them.
6. Runyan: B. Average or a little better starter.
6. Hanson: F+. 75 bad snaps so far.
6. Stepaniak: F. Liked the pick, but we're doing results.
7. Scott: F. 89 bad snaps.
7. Garvin: D. Occasionally semi- useful reserve. Not good enough.

If the criteria are more normal, Love looked promising. He was not ready in 2020 or 2021. He can turn the grade around.

Dillon is interesting. Does break some tackles, yet I prefer Jones or Jamaal Williams to pick up a yard. OTOH, catches the ball really well. Doesn't seem to run much of a route tree, just vanilla RB routes. His Yds/rec and Yards per target are good. While his stats are good for yards after catching passes, he isn't explosive. He is pretty fast, but he doesn't make the cut that leads to big gains on running plays or on his catches.

Deguara also could go either way, but is more likely to be a role player. He is a better athlete than he is given credit for, but I don't think he is a plus player. He isn't good as a lead blocker. He can't play in-line. He has good hands, but runs routes only as well as a normal TE. He has to be schemed open. He can run drag routes but doesn't seem to be able to threaten the seam. He is compared to Kyle Juszczyck, but despite playing 16, 17 and 16 games, Juszczyk only played 43%, 56% and 50% of snaps in the last three seasons. It remains to be seen whether given more snaps - say 500 snaps - whether Deguara can maintain his efficiency. I doubt he ever plays more than 600 snaps in a season. That would be fine for a 3rd round pick, and for a GB 3rd rounder, one of our better ones.

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

March 24, 2023 at 03:42 pm

Favre vibes!!! (Say that 3 times fast). Like when Ted drafted Rodgers... if only Gutekunst could have selected the next Nick Collins in that 2020 draft! The next Brady Poppinga!!!

I think your assessment is spot on, but, I'd give Love a much higher grade. I understand production as the criterion, but, he's not had many opportunities with AR in front. Thought he's handled TC and Preseason like a boss. Very professional, and has gotten progressively better.

You can only play the opportunities in front of you.

To me, Gutekust drafted in 2020 like his shit didn't stink. As if he thought they had the Super Bowl roster in place. Why? Because teams add a FB/HB as the cherry on top in those situations, and I'll be damned if Gutekunst didn't do just that.

I found the Deguara pick two rounds prior to projected to be overtly cavalier. It pissed me off, quite frankly, and, I personally had Deguara going to the Packers in R5 or R6.

You're right, TGR. We were loading for the Super Bowl, and Gutekunst drafted like he felt he was done. Mission already accomplished, in April. Well, it doesn't work like that, and never has. Wow, was I torqued. And, I understood the Love pick... I know a lot of people who didn't.

1 points
1
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 25, 2023 at 01:46 pm

I would have given Love a higher grade but my sole criterion was production. GB lost every game in which he appeared. QB winz is a crap stat. But the KC loss, let's just say Love contributed to that loss. The Detroit loss, OTOH, one can argue that GB lost despite solid positive play from Love.

If my job were to make sure there is a franchise in GB in 2025 or 2030, then the Love pick makes sense. I am not worried about that, so maybe a C because GMs should always snag a potential franchise QB who almost drops to within easy range.

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:04 pm

Packers need another Anthony Dilwig, or a Hundley...hey;, they may have one on the roster!!! No one knows...

-1 points
0
1
golfpacker1's picture

March 24, 2023 at 08:20 pm

Green, I threw my draft notes, magazines and Packers hat across the room when they traded up and drafted Love. Especially with Higgins sitting right there and us needing another WR weapon. Drafting him would have made it tough to double team Devonte. He might have been the difference maker in 2020 and 2021 in us getting to the Super Bowl. After I calmed down I still didn't see drafting for the future but with the way Rodgers has become so difficult to deal with, it looks like a shrewd move now. Do you remember who we were trying to keep from picking Love? It didn't seem as if they were talking much about Love in the 1st round. Seemed like they predicted 2nd round if I remember. But according to Ron61 I am kind of thick. I am sort of like Big Lou the life insurance salesman who is on meds too. I'm not taking offense to the thick comment, but I am confused by the cultish Rodgers loyalty. And I also have 2 of his jerseys that I will not dispose of. I also will cheer for the Jets playing anyone but Green Bay.

0 points
0
0