I am really sick of the vanilla crap.

this team needs real reps with real plays with the real players competing against real nfl players BEFORE the regular season starts.

hiding what? every team runs the same plays, just in a different order.

hiding what? after week one every team will have MLFs offense on tape. It comes down to play sequence, formation disguise and player execution.

Dont be MM and try to out-cute yourself.

the nfl idiots made the schedule extremely stupidly with the 2 biggest division games at game 1 and 2 when teams aren't playing worth a crap because of all the pre-season vanilla crap. Way to degrade the season you nfl idiots!

The GBP will start out 0-2 if MLB doesn't get the 1's some work together. That includes the prima dona AR too.

Two weeks to go to the opener and injuries will happen around the NFL.

Keeping your powder dry for the WR rich Packers all the way down to final cut downs in the pass happy NFL could pay lucrative dividends...including acquiring ILB talent.

Pack is going to have to cut some good WRs...or trade them to a hungry team not wanting to play the waiver wire.

Not saying they should but does Taylor and a WR or two get traded for a draft choice or player?

Besides Adams and maybe** GMO none of our WR are worth anything. They are all late round picks or UDFA...no one is giving up draft picks for them.

If. I think Boyle had his best practice yesterday, but that’s a pretty thin sample on which to decide, especially given the number we have just held. On that basis, did we anoint Flynn as better than Rodgers because he threw more TDs in a game?

Somehow they got a 6th for a dud like Hundley...

I don't understand where the narrative that we would some how cut GMO came from, but it's dumb. He is our 2nd most experienced WR. The drop off from 1 to 2 is huge, and after 2 it's alot of speculation & "what ifs".

Gute seemed to rule that out yesterday. Presumably that tells us something about what the FO and coaches think, especially as they were talking about the need to get Shepherd and Lazard reps against starters because they had earned it.

Good list.

I think Kizer still is the #2 unless Boyle lights it up in the last two games. And so far, neither has. And remember, Kizer is in his 4th new offense in 4 years and is still very young. I think this plays into ML and Hackett's views of potential. But Boyle has talent. He too is very inconsistent to date.

I also think keeping only 3 Tackles at the most important position on the OL in the pass happy NFL and 6 Guards will not happen. Sure, Turner can slide, but I am certain the Pack keeps 4 T's...the 4th being Pankey, DeBeer or Nijman who is very intriguing.

And I am certain D. Williams makes the 53 over Ford. But Ford may too, given the emphasis on the running game, at the expense of Lewis/TE. Vitale can block in line if needed and Tonyan has upped his run block game.

Very Good list. Logical! What about Josh Jones S. ?

I know I am in the minority, but the offense will need more juice at RB/FB and TE than at WR. Therefore, I think 5 WRs will make the roster because you can use 2 of the projected TEs as slot receivers and you can put RBs and FBs out wide also. WRs cannot provide the same versatility.

If GB goes with a 26/24 split on O/D, I would advocate for the 26 being defense instead of offense as you have Turophile. Since defense is a reaction job, the players need more rest than offensive players do and injuries seem to strike defensive players more often than offensive players.

It will be curious to see if Burks goes on IR to start the season.

Uhhh...no. Lazard makes the team for sure. Moore & or Davis may not. All anyone needs to do is listen to Rodger’s interviews. There is so much code in them that it’s almost comical. ;)

Your 53 looks good. Only 2 QBs. Don't care if Kizer or Boyle. Your WR 7 okay but Lazard may bounce either ESB or Davis. Rookie RB Williams needs to lay off weed, catch the damn ball.
I see only 3 TE. Wish Sternberger would stub toe and get RS.
Madison could be odd man out, but Gute may see differently.
Add either Fadol Brown or Looney for 6 DL. Other goes on PS.
I like Ramsey too but expect him on PS and OLB Gilbert on 53.
Summers likely a PS guy until he can learn to wrap and tackle.
The CB number and selection are most likely choices.
Top 3 safeties are locks. Campbell on PuP until Jones is dealt.
ST three are as expected

I too think green Bay has something in tonyan. I don't think he will be a game changer, but serviceable pass catcher. I'm thinking a Donald Lee type career.

Alison is not going anywhere. Experience and polish are as important as anything especially for WRs.

Given STs, I think they keep 7 WRs again. Shepherd, Davis, ESB, Lazard and Kumerow are very good on STs and those are important snaps on both returns and coverage....especially coverage with Scott looking good booming punts.

Here's my armchair prediction, as things stand now:

Adams WR 1
MVS WR 2 with Kumerow his backup and also in 4 WR packages
Allison slot with Shepherd as backup and starter/backup ST PR/KR
ESB as 5th WR with slot talent and outstanding downfield blocking/STs

That's 6 and could be it...but given STs, I think the Pack could keep 7 with 3 or 4 getting many snaps on coverage and return units.

So....
Davis backup 7th or Lazard?

Davis has more speed and is now showing fine receiving talent (AKA Driver in year 3)...but man, he's brittle. Lazard is 4.55-4.6 but fairly quick for a very big guy and good route runner. Was very dependable and healthy in college.

I say keep Davis and see if he can stay healthy...and Lazard to PS. If Davis gets dinged again early, IR and waive with injury settlement and bring up Lazard.

Moore...PS and I think he makes it easy.

Allison isn't going anywhere. And he certainly isn't losing out to Kumero.

You see, the difference is that Gmo has come up CLUTCH in REAL games that actually MATTER. Kumero hasn't done shit in comparison. And Gmo is certainly better than Lazard, Shepherd, and Davis.

Davis isn’t that high

Allison and Kumerow do not have more upside than EQ, they at their prime, Kumerow is 27.

I don't really think the 2nd ILB job is that important. Mostly because about half the time it's on the field it will essentially be a big dime with either Greene or Campbell playing the position for better coverage.

If it were a 3-4 to protect against the run, I would like something a little more sturdy. Personally, I would want our 7 best athletic run defenders out there. So the Smith's, Gary, Martinez, Clark, Adams, Lowry. A good combination of beef and explosiveness. Essentially, I think it can be a part time role that is morphed based off need. Multiple guys can fill the void.

Will be interesting to see TDavis deployed as a receiver in a game. Seems like every year we hear about him doing well in camp...

We might be able to get somebody else after cutdown.

We're going to lose some good WRs. Period. Can't keep them all. I agree, try to trade them but I wouldn't get my hopes up.

As long as Martinez doesn't break, we'll be fine there.

heeheeheeheeehahahahahaheehee,stop,hahahaheeheeheeheeha.

Prima dona much?

I gave a thumbs up, that made me laugh

Since the WRs will all be traded to the same team for the backup QB, GB should be able to resign some of them after they are cut from that team because they wouldn't be able to retain them all. Not a bad strategy :)

Lazard cut some weight and regained a bit of quickness. He knows how to get open and move the chains. I would keep him on my 53.

Me too..................Brady to Lazard to for their eleventeeth Lombardi......

He's sick of not getting it.

As cold and hard as an ex-wife's heart.

No.