Kris Jenkins NFL Draft Prospect Profile and Scouting Report

Michigan Defensive Tackle Kris Jenkins - 2024 NFL Draft Scouting Report

Name: Kris Jenkins

School: Michigan

Year: Senior

Position: Defensive Tackle

Measurables: 6’2 ⅔”, 299 lbs. (Combine Measurements)

Combine: ARM: 34”. HAND: 9 ⅜”. VERTICAL: 30”. BROAD: 9’7”. BENCH: 29 Reps. 40-YD DASH: 4.91. 10-YD SPLIT: 1.70. 20-YD SHUTTLE: 4.78

Stats:

Courtesy of Sports-Reference.com

 

General Info:

A native of Olney, Maryland, Jenkins attended Our Lady of Good Counsel High School, where as a senior, he recorded an impressive 15 sacks, 40 tackles, including 19 for a loss, and 3 forced fumbles, one of which he recovered for a touchdown.

After committing to play his college ball at Michigan as a three-star recruit, Jenkins saw his first significant playing time as a sophomore, playing in all 14 games of the 2021 season, including four starts.

He then started 29 games across his final two years in Ann Arbor, and won a national championship in 2023 as a team captain. Jenkins was awarded second-team All-American and second-team All-Big Ten honors for his senior season.

Jenkins ended his college career with 113 tackles, 8.5 for a loss, 4.5 sacks and an interception.

There is NFL lineage in Jenkins’ family, with his father, Kris, and uncle, Cullen, both enjoying long careers in the league. Cullen Jenkins spent seven seasons in Green Bay between 2003 and 2010.

 

Positional Skills:

Strengths

Jenkins is a very good all-around run defender, and this is really the strength of his game. He is not the heaviest, but plays with excellent leverage which makes him hard to move off the spot, and continues to hold his ground when moving laterally to defend outside runs.

The 22-year-old shows the ability to shed blocks and reach for tackles, and is just trustworthy on run downs.

There is real power in his body, too. Jenkins packs a strong initial punch to impact offensive lineman when he strikes, and his core strength means he is not knocked off balance when a second offensive lineman gets involved while he is already engaged with an opponent.

Jenkins has some untapped pass rush potential, and flashes the ability to cause problems with bull rush, spin move or quick hand swipe. He also tested extremely well athletically, earning an 8.96 Relative Athletic Score (RAS) out of 10 compared to other defensive tackles.

Weaknesses

‘Untapped’ is indeed the operative word for Jenkins’ ability as a pass rusher. He was not very productive in college in that regard with just 4.5 sacks and 36 hurries in total.

There are plenty of reps where he is easily stonewalled, and double teams often erased him easily. If he cannot impact passing downs, Jenkins’ value at the next level will ultimately be limited.

Despite his terrific performance at the NFL scouting combine, the explosiveness he displayed in the drills did not really show up on tape, where he lacked the true burst needed to be a difference maker.

 

Fit with the Packers:

Green Bay is in need of a defensive lineman whose priority is stopping the run, and Jenkins fits the bill. He is the best interior run defender in this class and would complement the current group of pass-rush-first linemen the Packers employ.

Jenkins hits all the athletic thresholds the team has traditionally valued, and would satisfy Brian Gutekunst’s penchant for drafting top tier athletes. He would be able to compete immediately for playing time as a rookie, especially on first and second down.

His link to the Packers via his uncle will not hurt, and Jenkins is absolutely a player Green Bay is likely to be interested in, most likely in the second round.

 

VIDEO:

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
2 points
 

Comments (17)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
golfpacker1's picture

April 05, 2024 at 09:22 am

Wow, Jenkins looks skinny for weighing 299 lbs. His weakness in production is concerning, but his tackle numbers are very good. To me drafting a DT should be a 2025 thing, so that we have an opportunity to draft a TOP 2-3 guy instead of settling for a lesser talent this year. 2025 has a much stronger DT class to pick from.

If we ended up with an extra 2nd round pick after trading back @ #25, we could take a DT and not screw up the next 3 picks. Otherwise, by shoehorning DT into our Top 3 picks, we lose the chance to pick the LB we want @ #41 and the Safety we want @ #58. LB and S are a way bigger need than DT this year.

Passing on an early DT and targeting Boyd-DT-UNI in the 4th would be a better move, especially if Gute acquires some extra 4ths and 5ths like he did last year. It would be huge if he does it again because our picks in the 4th & 5th rounds are way at the back of each.

2 points
3
1
DoubleJ's picture

April 05, 2024 at 09:54 am

Depends on how the board falls. If Murphy II is there at 25 I would take him right away as he is good against the run and pass. Jenkins is an interesting guy at #58.

1 points
1
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

April 05, 2024 at 11:30 am

At 25 - I believe that the Packers have an A-list of players that if not there - they will trade down. I wonder if Murphy and/ Newton are on that list. I would not be too surprised if they are.

1 points
1
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

April 05, 2024 at 12:39 pm

As I think that Clark will sign an extension this off-season - this would reduce the need for his replacement. So Jenkins in the 2nd would be nice but not necessary. However T.J. Slaton will become a FA after this season - so it may be prudent to look for his replacement and potential upgrade. So Boyd in the 4th makes good sense - especially giving him a year to work behind the starters.

1 points
1
0
Cheezehead72's picture

April 05, 2024 at 01:25 pm

Muscle weighs more than fat

1 points
1
0
stockholder's picture

April 05, 2024 at 10:07 am

He isn't clark and never will be.
He's no grave digger either.
He's not a fit for the packers.

1 points
2
1
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

April 05, 2024 at 10:28 am

You high?

1 points
2
1
jannes bjornson's picture

April 05, 2024 at 12:19 pm

Should not be on the Board.

0 points
1
1
Cheezehead72's picture

April 05, 2024 at 01:26 pm

So what makes you say he is not a fit for the Packers

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

April 05, 2024 at 10:32 am

Speaking of the Packers letting accomplished veterans go - - I was so surprised when GB let Cullen Jenkins go after the Super Bowl win against the Steelers. He was part of that great defense and I thought he was really missed. Didn't follow Kris' career as much, but this guy certainly has the bloodlines, and they do need some help there. Do we really think the run D will be better with the same guys and a new coordinator? Or do they need help? I think they need somebody accomplished at stopping the run.

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 05, 2024 at 12:21 pm

He drafted Wyatt with a One Pick. He's the three-tech. If you want to stop the run and catch up with the 2010 defense, draft T'vondre Sweat.

2 points
2
0
packerbackerjim's picture

April 05, 2024 at 05:53 pm

I’m with you. I don’t give a damn he doesn’t conform to size boundaries. GB does not have a run stuffer. Sweat is that guy.

1 points
1
0
splitpea1's picture

April 05, 2024 at 11:01 am

This article fits very nicely with the previous one about giving K. Clark a new contract--where I would lean toward caution given the huge number of snaps he has already played in his career.

Yes, I am very much interested in Jenkins should he be available in the right place. It's time for the Packers to prioritize run defense on the line for once with someone higher than a late pick. The contracts of both Clark and Slaton are going to expire after this season, and depending on how the Packers feel about them going forward, I would think Jenkins merits more than a passing glance.

By the way, I loved Cullen. You always root for a player that is undrafted, works hard to make the team, and ends up becoming a difference-maker as his career progresses.

2 points
2
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

April 05, 2024 at 11:58 am

That was quite the D-line with Ryan Pickett, BJ Raji and Cullen Jenkins. I miss that whole defense; it had some real studs.

2 points
2
0
Starrbrite's picture

April 08, 2024 at 02:31 pm

They were outstanding and not resigning Jenkins was a huge mistake.

0 points
0
0
Turophile's picture

April 05, 2024 at 12:47 pm

As it so often is, its all about where he could be drafted. At #41 he is in the picture, maybe a trifle high, but at #58 he is a bargain. One of the best run stoppers in the game, which is very useful. His pass rush needs developing more, but the Packers can do that.

A realistic option for the Packers to draft him, I think.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 05, 2024 at 01:47 pm

I do not believe Team Gutey selects a DL prospect in the first two days with those 5 picks unless a true first round talent with year one starter potential drops into late second, third. Even then...

Of course, typing this probably guarantees a DL is selected. Gutey does throw a changeups...not as many as Ted, but he always pitches a few.

Last year I was SMH as he traded down twice in the 2nd...and still got Reed, and added Wicks and Brooks with the maneuvers. Then I was shaking my head and smiling.

0 points
0
0