Cory's Corner: This Is Clearly A Reload

There are so many top pieces still in place that a division title is within reach. 

The debates have become endless. 

Now that Aaron Rodgers has been shipped to New York, many are thinking that the Packers are just going to hit the restart button. 

But it isn’t a complete rebuild when you’ve got one of the best running back tandems in the NFL, one of the best defensive linemen in the league and a cover corner that wants to prove that he can get back to being one of the best cover corners like he was back in 2020. 

The Packers are clearly reloading  and what is even more frustrating for the Bears, Vikings and Lions is that Green Bay has a really good shot to win the NFC North again. 

Think about that for a second. The Packers got rid of their first ballot Hall of Fame quarterback and finally, (finally!) the Bears, Vikings and Lions have a real shot to actually make some noise in the division. There was an exhale throughout the Midwest. Many were smiling on April 26 when the Rodgers trade became official, because that finally gave them hope. 

But then the Packers knocked it out of the park during the NFL Draft. They’ve got two capable tight ends that can stretch the field and block, they’ve got another dynamic pass rusher and they even added a shifty slot receiver that can catch punts. Did the Packers just prioritize a special teams player? When was the last time that happened?

The NFL schedule release is still a couple days away but Green Bay only has five games against teams that were in the 2022 postseason. If the Packers only have one of those games in their first eight, that really bodes well for a Packers team that will be trying to define who they are with an unproven quarterback. 

Not to mention, let’s not forget that Matt LaFleur will have plenty to prove as well. He has been operating in Aaron Rodgers’ shadow for the last four years. He wants to let everyone know that he can call a heck of an offensive game — without No. 12. Expect the offense to be wide open, with plenty of pre-snap movement and misdirection. 

This is not going to be a rebuild. This has reload written all over it. 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
10 points
 

Comments (110)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
TKWorldWide's picture

May 09, 2023 at 06:28 am

I think the single biggest factor is how well Love plays. If he’s average or better, the team has a very good chance. Do we think he can do a TD/INT of about 26/16? That’s the range I’m expecting. However, I reserve the right to change my mind as the season goes on.

I also think it’s a bit premature to say GB has 2 tight ends that can stretch the field and block. They definitely have the talent to do those things, and the defense better honor that, but as far as great production THIS year, we’ve got to pump the brakes (or the horses, Butch) a bit.

The “8 first rounders on defense” has gotten a lot of traction lately. To expect them to be AT LEAST middle of the pack is not asking too much. I’d love to know how many other defenses around the league can boast such numbers!

Oh, and as always, GPG!

10 points
10
0
NickPerry's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:02 am

"The “8 first rounders on defense” has gotten a lot of traction lately. To expect them to be AT LEAST middle of the pack is not asking too much."

It has TK, I just made reference to it today in my comment and IMO it SHOULD get traction. Most of these guys are all Gutes picks and I think he's done a good job. KC wasn't his pick but I like Wyatt for some reason and think there's a excellent chance he's really a good player. Walker IMO takes the "Year 2 Jump" and hopefully Gary is back sooner than later and doesn't take forever to get it going again.

Alexander can be as great as he wants to be, but it HAS to just piss him off to no end to play deep on 3rd and short. Stokes was bad last year before his injury but had a good rookie year. Hopefully we see 2021 Stokes and not 2022 when he comes back.

6 points
6
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:11 am

Not unusual at all for a d-lineman to take a year or so to get acclimated. He has talent. He CAN do it. But will he? 🤞!

4 points
4
0
murf7777's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:21 am

TK…I think your prediction of Love is about accurate considering our lack of vets in our pass catching dept. We are looking very good at OL and RB positions. Unfortunately, there will be some frustrations with drop passes and wrong routes with the excitement of some big plays and what the future may hold.

I don’t think anyone would put our pass catchers into above average going into this season. They would fall somewhere in the bottom 10. This is the youngest group I’ve ever experienced which dates back to the early 70’s. That said the future potential to be top 10 is there. It takes WR and especially TE’s a year or two to reach their potential. That alone will make it more difficult for Love to achieve big numbers in year one.

6 points
7
1
TKWorldWide's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:46 am

Yes! And as long as everyone is realistic, it’ll be okay. Just looking for some encouraging signs this year, and a big jump the following year.

3 points
4
1
mnbadger's picture

May 09, 2023 at 12:10 pm

Much neeeded reality check murf regarding receivers.
But Hell, it's May.
Nobody's dropped a ball yet or run into each other. Until reality sets in, I'm seeing them as future all pro's!
GPG!

4 points
4
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 02:36 am

Musgrave is basically a big bodied receiver. Ironically Kraft may get more YAC but not stretch the field as much. What we really need is receptions 3 yards on either side of the line of scrimmage consistently turning into at least 4 yards of forward progress. I'd love to see less thrown behind the LOS but still dink and dunk metriculating down the field has become GB style. We need fewer drops on deep strikes.

I figure all 3 phases will gel much better by 2024, but this squad will practice together more than we've gotten in how long? That can only help.

2 points
2
0
Johnblood27's picture

May 09, 2023 at 06:34 am

To extend your thoughts Corey, the WR room is reloaded with more young talent to add to the young talent infused last season. No rebuild there.

The OL has some very good parts and some "need to rebound" parts (looking at you Greg Meyers) and some nice potential in the jars on the shelf as well. No rebuild there

RB gets a nice infusion with Lew Nichols added to a pretty good tandem. No rebuild there

OK, the TE room is getting rebuilt, but it may look like a reload if the rooks can play to their potential.

QB Jordan Love has been on the team for 3 full seasons and has taken a lot of practice snaps to build his foundation, just like AR did for his first 3 years. Developing a QB can proceed in practice (the Packer way) or by fire in league games (other teams ways) I do not see Love as a rookie, but as a 3rd year young vet. He came out early and needed the seasoning before he was sent out to perform. He now has the seasoning needed, no rebuild there, strictly reload.

The defense received the additional support it needed with the draft infusion of talent at DL, OLB and S (maybe). The pieces were already there at OLB, ILB, CB and a nice framework at DL, that leaves Safety as the one area in need of some reinforcements, and a ultra reliable CB turned S has been added to the mix there. No rebuilds therre

Special Teams received a new punt returner, a new long snapper and a new kicker. Some definite rebuilding there, but the coaching and leadership is in place to make the rebuild parts look more like a reload, lets see how Mr Nixon follows up his outstanding season.

Looks like another GBP North Division Championship to me. No rebuilds there.

9 points
9
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:13 am

I would love to see 88 or 85 split the seam of a cover-2 with a nice Keith Jackson style 50 yard TD!

12 points
12
0
T7Steve's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:28 am

You made me think what I thought we missed in the draft, Johnblood27. "The OL has some very good parts and some "need to rebound" (looking at you Greg Meyers)"

I really wanted competition a center. When they kept Bakh I thought they'd get someone for inside depth (I never want to see Hansen on the field again). Maybe there wasn't one good enough on their board? Maybe they can put Tom in there, but I think his future is outside.

They have to do something to get more push on the inside, especially on the goal line.

Touchdowns not field goals. Extra points and kickoffs only, take allot of pressure off the new kicker (not to mention the D).

7 points
7
0
dobber's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:48 am

It think you hit a lot of my thoughts, esp. coming into the draft: I was all about finding at least one if not two OL to raise the talent floor in the OL room with guys playing for new contracts (Runyan and Nijman) or having a problematic 2024 cap number (Bakhtiari). Instead, they didn't draft a single OL...which is really unusual. I expected they might flirt with a power OG just to play with their short yardage groupings (see: Eagles, Philadelphia).

That leaves us with two reasonable conclusions (could be both)...
1. they really do like their OL depth and how players like Rhyan, Walker and Jones could be contributors and eventual starters.
2. they disliked the OL pool in this year's draft so much that when their picks came up they didn't think they could do much better than what they already have...and decided they'd rather take their chances in the 2024 draft pool.

In the end, I agree with your assessment on Myers: he needs to be much more consistent and more of a tone-setter inside. I don't think Hanson makes this team in 2023 (maybe the PS?), but they'll have three guys who can play C (Myers, Tom, Jenkins), and a guy who has played there in preseason (Runyan). I also agree that Tom has a long way to go to hold up against power inside as a C or G.

"Touchdowns not field goals. "

From your keyboard to God's ears, man.

5 points
5
0
Guam's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:30 am

I prefer option #1 Dobber. This draft was certainly thin at the top for OL, but nothing I read indicated the day three talent was significantly worse than usual. And the Packers had lots of day three picks. I think the Packers like the young O-linemen they have been developing.

I do believe the Packers will draft for O-linemen in 2024. I just don't see the Packers giving Bahk a fourth contract given his price, age and injury history.

I hate this new era where team stars don't get to retire with their team, but it is business as usual in the salary cap age of the NFL.

2 points
2
0
dobber's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:43 am

"I prefer option #1 Dobber."

I hope that's the case...very possible they looked at those day 3 OL and said they already have just as good on the roster. It makes looking ahead much more pleasant. Nobody wants to be drafting OL from a deficit of talent and a position of glaring need.

"I hate this new era where team stars don't get to retire with their team, but it is business as usual in the salary cap age of the NFL."

The players negotiated the CBA they're playing under and that generated this climate. Good players get their guarantees and bonus payouts. I think it's bad for the lesser players.

3 points
3
0
Guam's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:44 am

"I think it is bad for lesser players"

Lesser players and older players. Bahk may well be able to play at a very high level for the next couple of years, but no one will sign him to a three year deal after his current contract expires. And three year deals seem to be the minimum nowadays in the NFL unless you are a marginal (lesser) player.

The CBA accomplished some good things like leveling the playing field between wealthy teams and less well to do teams; transferring money from unproven college draftees to proven players; and pushing player safety, but it has some problems that could be improved. I would love to see some sort of capped exemption for players that have been with one team for their entire career. I'm just old and old fashioned, but loyalty has value to me and I would love to see "one team" players retire with that team.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

May 09, 2023 at 10:38 am

I do think that the team believes that we have more talent on the OL than many believe. However, my biggest OL question last year wasn’t players but coaching. I think that has to be dramatically smarter. To me it goes back to the baffling changes made to the OL in the last championship game and ran through player usage all summer and season.

I think last year we had a lot of coaching questions, player evaluation, usage and learning seemed all too dubious to me. That includes the crush on Hanson, the failure to get Nijman time at RT and then using him to back up Bakh and not play or practice at right while not using Tom. Trotting out a one armed Nijman in the last 2 games too, rather than just starting Tom or Walker and instead flirting with the short armed and virtually as raw Tenuta (Jones’ illness recovery likely made him unlikely). It ran through the whole Newman at RT experiment too. Just a mess and one not fully excused by a lack of options.

I wonder if Rodgers was a factor in some of that? I find myself hoping so, if only because that would, with his absence now, give us hope that better sense will prevail now. Whether that’s true it must. If Bakh is starting, Tom should be given a full bore opportunity to seize the C spot this year. It’s time for some serious competition.

I’d not move Jenkins, because I see that as an area where a G has to show true contention first. Maybe Delance as well as Rhyan changes that. Tenuta would be a good prospect based on his profile, if he weren’t so tall. No, Hanson to me isn’t competition absent a revelatory showing this summer I don’t see coming. Nijman should just stay at RT and work in his footwork, Jones/Walker, whomever can lead the 2s.

To me the big question is not who should be at T, but who should be C and backing up at G in the middle if injuries do strike (including if one means moving Tom to T). My starting lineup of choice at this point does not include Myers. Bakh, Jenkins, Tom, Runyon, Nijman. Myers, Newman and Rhyan are welcome to change that. I wish one would. Regardless, the coaching needs to show a big jump in caliber.

3 points
3
0
Johnblood27's picture

May 09, 2023 at 11:11 am

My starting lineup of choice at this point does not include Myers. Bakh, Jenkins, Tom, Runyon, Nijman. Myers, Newman and Rhyan are welcome to change that. I wish one would.

Whhaaaaaaaa????

1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

May 09, 2023 at 11:39 am

I'd like to see Tom try to push at center too. I think Myers will take a step or a jump if he gets real competition. Hanson was only ever going to be a backup for Myers and didn't/couldn't push him.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 09, 2023 at 11:50 am

Tom had played center in college (14 starts) and is certainly cerebral enough. Play your best 5. If he ultimately replaces Bakh at LT it won’t hurt him more than backing up. I think he projects as our best C long term otherwise and it could be that Nijman goes back to LT and Walker/Jones take the right next year. Nijman was one of the top rated LTs before Bakh began returning.

1 points
2
1
Johnblood27's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:31 pm

I am sorry.

My mistake.

I did not see the period after Meyers name.

1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:52 am

I did really think Jones was coming along last season till he got sick. My dream goal line O put him beside Nijman (inside or outside of him). How could you NOT get a push with over 700LBs in your face?

You and Guam have it.

Maybe they think they can add someone cheap let go from another team closer to the season if they have to.

0 points
1
1
BirdDogUni's picture

May 09, 2023 at 10:55 am

The one thing I love about Gutey is his desire to grind and churn the bottom of the roster all season long. Seems much more involved and tenacious in that area of his duties than TT seemed to be. IDK if it is truly the case or just seems like it, but grabbing Lazard and Melton off practice squads seems like next level GM'ing and I think Melton will be as valuable to the Packers as Lazard proved to be.

If Bo Melton makes a decent 2nd year jump, he's going to be hard to keep off the field, IMO.

2 points
3
1
Coldworld's picture

May 09, 2023 at 11:42 am

If Melton can catch effectively and consistently and has worked in his routes, I think he will surprise a lot of people. Firstly he’s timed faster than any other WR on the roster, secondly he’s not a pure slot and he’s as tall and a tad heavier than Reed. The Seahawks used him on the perimeter quite a lot in camp. His burst is dramatic. He profiles very much like Reed and can help with returns as well.

As I see it, the best WRs in camp split this way:

Y/Slot: Doubs/Toure/Watts
Slot/Y/Option: Reed/Melton
X: Watson/Wicks/Cotton
Big Slot/X: Musgrave/Dubose/Heath.

Watson, Doubs, Reed are locks if healthy (Musgrave too). I think Toure will be the 4th and Melton may well be the 5th and it’s between Wicks and DuBose for the 6th unless someone like Cotton shocks us all and lights up camp. People forget just how deep the WR class talent last year was.

5 points
5
0
T7Steve's picture

May 09, 2023 at 12:16 pm

I don't even remember seeing Cotton.....

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

May 09, 2023 at 02:19 pm

He was hurt, hamstring, last preseason I think. 6.2, 4.37 40. Small school X type.

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 02:43 am

You missed that #69 is gone?

0 points
0
0
DragonSilk's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:51 am

Greg Meyer is a Boston Marathon winner from Grand Rapids, but I agree with your point.

2 points
2
0
T7Steve's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:56 am

That stamina will play good late in games. LOL.

I thought it sounded funny, but I got what he meant.

1 points
1
0
cdoemel's picture

May 09, 2023 at 06:25 pm

Josh Meyers, but yeah

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

May 09, 2023 at 06:43 am

"Matt LaFleur will have plenty to prove as well. He has been operating in Aaron Rodgers’ shadow for the last four years. He wants to let everyone know that he can call a heck of an offensive game — without No. 12. Expect the offense to be wide open, with plenty of pre-snap movement and misdirection."

^^^THIS^^^

We FINALLY get to see what this offense could possibly look like. Motion, misdirection, a QB actually lining up UNDER center. Hey, perhaps we'll actually see (get ready for it) passes down the MIDDLE of the field! Or AJ Dillon taking a handoff 7 yards deep and hitting the hole without taking it out of the shotgun. There's going to be some CB's and Safeties in this league who have to make a "business decision" once AJ breaks through the LOS. I think the running game is better this year...Much better.

Rebuild, restart, or reload, whatever you want to call it this team has a LOT of talent. 8 first round picks on defense and if Joe Barry can just pull his head out of his ass long enough, they just might be able to start playing like we all think they can. The offense will take a minute, that many young players at the skill position almost demands bumps along the way. But they get to do it together while they grow and that IMO is KEY.

14 points
16
2
T7Steve's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:38 am

Too bad the Barry D works best only (sometimes) with a lead. It would be a great help to the young O if our ST/AHC had his head in that room a bunch this year. I hope he can help both sides with in-game adjustments (what are those?) too. He can look at the field and be outside of both units and make it easier to make changes.

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

May 09, 2023 at 10:52 am

The Barry D can’t be the same as last year. If Barry just repeats last year it will fail. You simply can’t waste players strengths so profligately and hope to excel.

Demovsky has suggested that Savage will be playing more robber, the role he played in college and in which he looked best under Pettine. If that’s the case, we should see more tight coverages as we won’t be playing shell at the back. The Edge is significantly reloaded. And the DL personnel has changed. We have a few younger, lighter disrupters. Brooks and Ford are presumably the plan for run downs, but that still seems flimsy if that’s the extent of improving our run porosity. Some different approaches seem called for there too.

Both Barry and LaFleur’s schemes and usage are going to have to look radically different from last year if we are to succeed (and they are to survive beyond Murphy). Both have to have learned and to make use of the free hands this season affords them. That, as much as Love or the development of other young players is going to speak to the potential of this team in the next few seasons. It’s a critical year for so many.

I am a little baffled by the seeming widespread assumption that Tarvarius Moore was signed as a primarily STer. That was what he did coming off an Achilles, an injury with a longer post fitness hangover than ACLs!

Moore is a natural deep coverage prospect who had 4.32 speed. Even if that’s a little diminished, he’s still fast. His coverage skills had him pushed into playing corner, but he’s a natural S with the speed, burst and awareness to play deep. He started playing there again in the playoffs. I would not be at all surprised if he’s starting with Savage and we’ve abandoned the deep shell with Moore as a Free S and Savage nearer the line and able to anticipate plays, not wait on them. I think Moore cam here in a prove it deal with the carrot of being a long term answer at FS.

3 points
3
0
T7Steve's picture

May 09, 2023 at 12:22 pm

I think that Stokes playing press will help allot too. Have you heard how his rehab is progressing? When he first got hurt it didn't sound like it was as bad as it turned out.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

May 09, 2023 at 05:01 pm

No, and I don’t think we will meaningfully till he starts rehabbing on the sidelines. I’m treating him like Gary, as a potential PUP/IR candidate into the season, till proved otherwise.

I do agree with you, Stokes is built to and has played as a press corner. That’s why we signed him and how he played so well in year one. He doesn’t profile nearly as well in off coverage, in addition to not having much experience in it. It’s no accident that his good game last season had a different game plan.

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 02:49 am

Nick, I really want to see 3rd and short to be a run play, not going for a 30 yard pass when nothing's been working. I don't pretend to know what was AR12 input and what wasn't, but I heard somewhere that keeping the drive alive is a good idea. Getting 6 wins this season to match AR12's first year as a starter should be doable.

JL10's 3rd year a SB? GPG

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

May 09, 2023 at 06:54 am

Rebuild? Reload? Whatever.

It’s a very promising assembly of recently drafted/UDFA signed talent to help the Packers get where we want to go… which is walking off a plane carrying the Lombardi Trophy.

A continued emphasis on D with top talents was necessary after changing Defensive Coordinators. New shemes. New talent requirements.

Our GM has done a nice job of paroviding talent to both sides of the ball. He certainly didn’t reach for a WR like MIN did R1.

Gutekunst has filled this team on both sides of the ball with highly regarded talents (5 of PFF’s Top 100 Players, 9 of their Top 200 Players). He’s done a great job giving us players with solid, dynamic physical traits along with resumes filled with production. It looks like a good group of players added to this Packers team. Far better than anything assembled by our division foes, by quite a lot.

I think football for Packer fans & players alike, is going to be fun again.

6 points
9
3
LambeauPlain's picture

May 09, 2023 at 06:56 am

The change on STs began last year. Rich was brought in with a complete makeover in focus, urgency, talent, scheme and skill players. Players were brought in specifically to play STs, starters added to the units...no longer staffed with bottom of depth chart players. WeTeams was deemed as important as O and D and it showed on the field.

That was a rebuild.

The change of Offense will be this year starting with an expectation MLF will finally take control and run his IOC offense as envisioned. MLF will call it, Jordan will run it, and audibles & running the play clock down to zero to determine what "play" to call should be over. TE and WR will have may have up to 5 rookies seeing action. Offense is going to look very different pre and post snap.

Feels like a rebuild.

Defense now has 8 first rounders and some highly paid FAs that greatly under-performed last year. The DL will have two new starters (Wyatt, Slayton or Brooks) to team with Kenny. Wooden, Van Ness may figure prominently in the rotation. DBs have adept press corners (Alexander, Stokes, Douglas) whose talents were routinely ignored playing off ball, soft zone. Expect that approach will dumped. After several years, S will have a new starter. If, as hoped, Asst. HC Rich will be routinely sitting in Defense meetings directing Barry...the Defense better be very different...or in 2024 both the DC and HC will be.

Better be a rebuild.

Roster is being rebuilt due to the cap with far more churn than usual...from top to bottom...lots of new faces.

A reload is adding a few key players and run the same plays. This season won't be that. Can't be, if winning is the objective.

5 points
7
2
Coldworld's picture

May 09, 2023 at 11:10 am

It’s a generational transition. The fact that a few holdovers remain doesn’t change that. Only Bakh and Smith currently are older than 28. More than 9/10 of this roster could be playing in 2028 if they prove good enough. Whatever name you wish to give it, this is a new roster.

3 points
3
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 07:30 am

Bakh is gone.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 07:39 am

Agreed. Under performance of D I pin on DC, not talent on the field. Here's hoping that Bisaccia really does have more of a say than JB, especially if the D is ineffective. I've read a lot of opinions as to the internal power structures, but I don't think anyone here really knows how it works.

Regardless of talent on the roster, the ability to make in game adjustments is on coaches and necessary. The 2 changes to the OL that were made around game 8 should have been made by halftime of week 1 at the latest. Even if it couldn't have won the opener, it would have changed the record for the first half of the season, and likely by more than 1 W.

2 points
2
0
Packer_Fan's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:04 am

Well here are some thoughts.

RB: Like you said Cory, very good tandem. But since the team will rely on Jones and Dillon a lot, keep 4 RB to keep them fresh. How about 3000 total yards from the running backs total.

WR & TE: Rebuild. Perhaps lots of talent, but unproven. And so much to learn in complexity. Expect learning pains from this group and from Love. That's why the RB have to be used a lot more.

OL: I think this group is capable and so do the Packers. I would like to see Walker or Jones make progress this year to ease the transition from Bak.

DL: Rebuild with Clark as a base. But no proven players beyond him. Looks like the Pack is going to smaller and quicker DL with the draft picks. Who knows how this will play out this year.

OLB: A declining Smith, recovering Gary and a raw Van Ness. Look for this group to start slow and get better as the season goes on.

ILB: All set.

DB: Hard to say about this. This is all up to Barry. Will he use Alexander aggressively like the second Viking game or will the whole group be passive and play off the line 10 yards, Was the poor play last year a result of the players or just a screwed up system from Barry. Probably both. And how do they play Douglas and Stokes together? I just can't figure out what Barry will do??? Not good.

Special Teams. Rebuild here with new Kicker and Snapper. Nixon is good for kickoffs and hopefully Reed for punts.

6 points
7
1
TKWorldWide's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:18 am

DB’s: look at the 2 MN games. Night and day. Hopefully JB will look at that and play accordingly! IF 18 would have lit 23 up in that second game, I’d be expecting Zone City this year. But since it was wildly successful, hope to see 23 isolated on the opposing team’s #1 much more often. Other teams do it. So can GB!

5 points
5
0
dobber's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:27 am

This team "could" win the division in 2023, but is clearly looking out longer term with its personnel.

QB--rebuilt. Plenty of drama around it, but 12 wasn't going to be around forever, he's indicated he's about done, and his trade value added players to the mix (and isn't done paying yet). Must find ways to put 10 in positive situations, stay even or ahead of the sticks.

RB--One really good one, one who is solid enough but both might be gone in 2024. Added a Jamaal Williams type in Lew Nichols through the draft. Good for 2023.

WR--top of the depth chart seems to be set, but they need to avoid injury. Added lots of bodies to see what sticks (a few will end up on the PS). Still in rebuild mode.

TE--completely rebuilt. Expect that Musgrave will be the Tonyan in 2023, and that Kraft will draw most of the Y-work. Keep it simple, play to their strengths, put them in position to be successful.

OL--Not a rebuild, yet. I'm uneasy, but the Packers clearly like what they have. This is a unit that's going to have to stay healthy, but moreover must bully defenses and create opportunities to run the ball. That's a real change in mentality. Dark horse starter at RT: Rasheed Walker.

DL--Rebuild. Lost two starters (Lowry and Reed), and are filling in with depth. Drafted two guys (Brooks and Wooden) who don't fit the usual Packers "type", but are athletic and get upfield in a hurry.

OLB--Churn? Packers are always adding bodies on the edge. People were very hard on P. Smith last year, but he's more the Robin to a Rashan Gary-type Batman: he's not the alpha, but I thought played admirably trying to fill that role. A four of Smith, Gary, Van Ness, and Enagbare looks pretty good, and most can put their hand on the ground and rush from the inside, too. Flexible group.

ILB--Set for now. I think Campbell needs to show better to be back in 2024 on his current deal. Walker needs to mature, but I expect he'll be a cornerstone piece for awhile.

CB--Set for now. Plenty of talent. Nixon helps shore up the depth, but Savage plays over the slot a lot which limits NIxon's usage. Looking for a 5th guy to develop.

S--Right now, yuck. If the middle of your defense is bad, your whole defense will be bad...this is the biggest concern on that side of the ball. Maybe Moore will be a player, maybe Savage will respond in a contract year, but this position group looks like it needs help.

Coaching--this feels like as much of a problem right now as anything else, and there could be a significant rebuild coming here. Usually when a HC is on the hot-seat, he starts churning assistants. That hasn't happened, yet. Barry has had some stretches where his defense played well (early 2021, later in 2022), but mostly has been "disappointing". Butkus and Stenavich need to make the right calls on OL (Hanson and Newman on the right side? UGH!) and Montgomery has to get the DL playing well. LaF didn't have a distinctive play-calling resume prior to coming to GB, and the offense really only had one year where it really hummed since he arrived (2020)...now we're relying on it to be really good and complex to support a stable of young skill position guys.

Sevens not threes.

4 points
4
0
4thand10's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:12 am

Dobber….I’m not sleeping on Goodson or Patrick Taylor….whether it was preseason or in game, I didn’t see mistakes with those 2 and I saw tough running and tough yards. I was shocked Goodson didn’t get more opportunities. Unlike most, I don’t view the secondary as a weakness on this team. 20,21 we all had seen LaFluers system. Last year, it looked like a Rodgers McCarthy system. I’m excited to see what happens this year…more excited than i’ve been in a while….stable of TEs, a new Tyler Irvin type slot in Reed, a stable of RBs…this definitely feels like a misdirection Lafluer offense that we were accustomed to seeing and has pounding the rock written all over it. Legit deep threat in Watson. On paper…this is a much better team. I don’t expect it, but man I hope they make the playoffs

5 points
6
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 07:49 am

I'm not trusting DC to get anything right at all. I'm hoping that promoting Bisaccia makes that irrelevant. I'm also wondering how much of the 3 seasons with 13 wins was due to MLF. If GB being "soft"' is really his personality rubbing off on everybody, we'll probably need Bisaccia to take the reins in 2024 and replace MLF and JB both. I wouldn't cry about that.

Hopefully we see MLF shine, along with JL10. GPG!

2 points
2
0
stockholder's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:24 am

If it's only being competitive. We've already Lost.
I'm spoiled. Brett Favre and Rodgers did it.
And now you're saying; re-load with an UNPROVEN QB?
Well - Congratulations for blowing smoke up are ass.
We don't have any threats beyond Jones.
Dillion is far from a threat. He hasn't been a upgrade.
And Nobody has come close to Adams,MVS,Lazard, or Tonyan.
I can't live on Hype. It's whats got us to the rebuild.
Expecting Rookies to be better than Experience.
Just isn't going to happen. Lower your expectations.
Until more players stand out. We've Lost are mojo.
Listen to any Viking, Bear, Lions fan.
They're beaming with Trash Talk and can't wait to play us.
While the Jet fans carry the expectations of success.

-12 points
6
18
dobber's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:37 am

"Listen to any Viking, Bear, Lions fan.
They're beaming with Trash Talk and can't wait to play us."

They're also secretly wetting their pants that the Packers might be right and that 10 will be a very good QB.

7 points
9
2
marpag1's picture

May 09, 2023 at 10:36 am

Even if the Packers had nothing more than Etling at QB, the NFC North has Cousins, Goff and Fields. That kinda nullifies your right to chest-thumping.

3 points
4
1
LambeauPlain's picture

May 09, 2023 at 10:58 am

One fun fact: The Packers have the 9th weakest "strength of schedule" based on 2022 W/L. Also the weakest in the North. Ironically the Bares have the toughest SoS in the North.

Also, if you can believe this...Bleacher Report ranked the Packers D 18th in the NFL going into 2023 with the lions 24, the Bares 29 and Minnie 30.

The 18th ranking in spite of this 2022 performance:
17th in points allowed
17th in total yards allowed
28th in yards allowed per play
21st in turnover created
6th in passing yards allowed
12th in passing touchdowns allowed
24th in passing yards allowed per attempt
26th in rushing yards allowed
23rd in rushing touchdowns allowed
28th in rushing yards allowed per attempt
24th in penalties committed
25th in turnover percentage

Hope the Defense gets "Rich" this season.

5 points
5
0
CentralPA_PackFan's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:04 am

"I'm spoiled. Brett Favre and Rodgers did it.
And now you're saying; re-load with an UNPROVEN QB?"

You mean exactly like in 2008 when a guy named Aaron Rodgers took over for Favre and went 6-10?

And, who gives a rat's patoot about what Vikings, Bears, Lions, and Jets fans think about anything? They have a grand total of TWO Super Bowl wins between them with the last one coming almost 40 years ago. "Trash talk" and "expectations" is all they EVER have.

8 points
10
2
dobber's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:19 am

Bottom line is that few teams start over at QB with a proven NFL talent. 12 made it clear he's about done and the Packers got good compensation, all things considered. They parlayed that asset into capital.

They could've ridden together with 12 and his crappy contract off into the sunset, but where would this team have been? Some people get too attached to the livestock and the past without seeing context, the present, or the future.

7 points
9
2
croatpackfan's picture

May 09, 2023 at 03:58 pm

"Some people get too attached to the livestock and the past without seeing context, the present, or the future."

No, some people are racists. Take that in consideration!

0 points
1
1
T7Steve's picture

May 09, 2023 at 12:33 pm

Our you a Viking fan?

-1 points
3
4
Untylu1968's picture

May 09, 2023 at 02:24 pm

So Favre and Rodgers were both proven commodities when they took over? Man, you talk outa your ass so much, I can't even take you seriously as a football fan..

5 points
7
2
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 10, 2023 at 12:16 am

You have such a loser attitude. Just looking for any angle you can to hate this team just cuz ayahuasca boy isnt their qb anymore. Id call you a fanboy but youre something worse. Your sad posts make me want to puke.

3 points
3
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 08:09 am

SH- put Dillon behind a capable O line and he's a threat. 3rd and short with both our O linemen at 6'9" at guard and hand the rock to Quadzilla we did not see. Instead it was go for a deep pass, which usually took our offense off the field.

I want to see run first, and the dink and dunk to TE. Christian Watson is a MVS replacement, hopefully he gets used like it and develops into an upgrade. Musgrave won't get YAC but Kraft might. If Luke Ness Monster can put a solid 20# on he won't be any slower and he could be a monster!

None of this is proven and that includes MLF.

3 points
3
0
egbertsouse's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:29 am

I agree this is not a rebuild. I wanted them to go for an all-out rebuild and trade all the older players who still had some tread on the tires to accumulate draft picks and cap space for the future. However, I understand that is not the Packer way. I am still happy they moved on from the Diva because it ensures an interesting season and not just another Grounding Day rerun.

I’m not buying into this “win the division” hype. If Justin Fields improves this year, the Packers could easily have the fourth best QB in the division in a QB driven league. I tend to keep my expectations reasonable and I’m expecting around 6-11 this year. I would be happy with a repeat of 8-9. I would be very happy with 9-8. I would be ecstatic with a 10-7 and a wild card. You “win the division “ people are setting yourselves up for massive disappointment.

-2 points
5
7
Coldworld's picture

May 09, 2023 at 12:17 pm

I don’t care if we win the division or not this year. If Love and enough of this roster show significant progression AND LaFleur and Bary demonstrably justify their right to their titles, then that’s a big win and one that will have much more significance for much longer.

3 points
3
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 08:19 am

CW I couldn't agree more. Just seeing JL10 start for a stretch will be a revelation. Everybody's loving Gutey right now but was drafting JL 100% his idea, and is that what ultimately soured AR12 and kept us out of the SB? A WR first round draft pick in that historic class could have put us over the top, or not? Obviously we'll never know. If JL10 is a bust that'll set Gutey's legacy. If JL10 is even Garopalo levels of competent this will be a fun season! And Gutey might be vindicated. JL10's third season as a starter with a SB? GPG!

1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

May 09, 2023 at 12:41 pm

No negativity before the season starts. No high expectations either. Just get better every practice and game.

A team made it to the NFC championship game in this QB driven league with a third string 7th round rookie QB.

Build a complete team that executes, and it makes a bunch of mistakes and inexperience disappear.

3 points
3
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 08:23 am

Practice? Our starting QB at every practice? When's the last time we had that? How much of a difference would that have made the last 4 years?

Yutes are hungry! Excited to see what they can do, nervous about shedding Bakh.

1 points
1
0
EnemyTerritory's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:16 pm

Agreed. I’m looking for a competitive developing team but I’m not expecting better than a third place finish in the NFCN. I’m hoping the FO knows what they are doing in the Love transition but in the end it will be his performance on the field under duress that will write the storyline. Given the cap hell they’ve been operating under the last few years the FO has IMHO done a good job in pushing the reset button in stabilizing the financials and acquiring assets. 2023/2024 is all about 2024/2025 and beyond, not another division title in the immediate future. Likely having two first round picks and some cap space will help fill remaining holes.

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 08:28 am

ET I'm not even worried about a third place finish in the division this season; "it's not whether you win or lose but how you play the game." We have that luxury for one year. Fortunately AR12 made it easy to duplicate the success of his first year as a starter, 6 wins should be doable. By 2024 all three phases should gel much better, JL10's third season as a starter a SB? GPG!

1 points
1
0
PeteK's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:33 am

It will be an improved division and many black and blue shots will be dished out. I keep referencing the last game vs Lions as a barometer. If we block better especially Hutchinson we can beat the Lions because in every other category we were even.

8 points
8
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 08:31 am

3 losses in a row to the Lions, is that unprecedented? Get the yutes to play as a team and I'm happy, a team we did not have much of last season. And they played for 60 minutes in maybe one game, that second one against the Vikings.

1 points
1
0
TxFred's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:40 am

I expect a run the ball down their throats, with no self-serving church 'n duck on short yardage & red zone especially. Ball control, enough to keep defenses honest. Move the chains. A QB that runs MLF plays & learns running the offense.

5 points
8
3
mrtundra's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:46 am

Yes! No more Hero Ball! No more running down the play clock to 1 before the ball is snapped, Run the ball, move the chains and do it MLF's way, for a change! I like our chances, in the North. GO PACK, GO!!!

4 points
7
3
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 08:33 am

Welcome to WI, Fred. GPG!

1 points
1
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

May 09, 2023 at 07:45 am

Rebuild if GB has to draft a QB high in 2024 or 2025.
Reload/reset if Love is legitimate - above average or better.

If they have to use first and second round picks to draft a QB, and maybe multiple firsts and seconds, that will take a toll over the course of a couple of years.

5 points
7
2
Guam's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:08 am

It does all come down to Love doesn't it? This is a QB driven league.......

2 points
2
0
dobber's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:39 am

The churn has been going on for years, but this is the key piece, yes.

We can all come up with QBs who were good, but not great, who won divisions or got to the SB, but it's hard to win an SB without a QB who is a difference-maker.

3 points
4
1
greengold's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:20 am

Very true, dobber. I believe we have that difference maker in JL.

I see 5 key components who have been dying to do this… have their chance to play/contribute with meaningful opportunities:
1. Love
2. Jones
3. Dillon
4. LaFleur
5. Toure

Love had his best season at Utah St. in 2018 largely because he had continuity, a great OL and WR targets he was familiar with.

I think chances are very high Love comes out white hot, and that he’ll surprise many throwing to Watson, Doubs, Toure, Melton, while building strong relationships with all the newly drafted & signed TEs/WRs.

Hey, Toure might actually get targets!

Imagine how many games Aaron Jones & AJ Dillon walked off the field disappointed… Neither received the number of attempts they should have had.

LaFleur gets to run his scheme!!! The whole thing. Everything. Unencumbered.

Add in a new Defense? Some top flight STs?

This Packers team can go some places.

0 points
6
6
BirdDogUni's picture

May 09, 2023 at 02:00 pm

Toure - A 7th round pick going into his second year. He flashed last year and given the opportunity, he might be a factor.

Bo Melton - A 7th round pick going into his second year, also has wicked speed...

Jayden Reed - 2nd round pick Rookie.

I seriously don't know what the starting lineup or depth chart will look like come opening day, but if all three are healthy, I expect all three on the 53.

1 Christian Watson
2 Romeo Doubs
3 Samori Toure
4 Jayden Reed
5 Bo Melton
6 Dontayvion Wicks
7 Grant DuBose
8 Jeff Cotton
9 Malik Heath
10 Duece Watts

TC should be mighty interesting. Wonder how many WRs we'll have on the 53 this year? Wonder how many TEs we carry on the 53 this year? Should be some fierce competition, anyway.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

May 09, 2023 at 12:24 pm

I think it comes down to QB in part, but as much to whether LaFleur, Barry and co. are for real. A forced change at both could change the equation dramatically. We will find out a lot this season. Conceivably the verdict on coaching will be more definitive.

2 points
2
0
BirdDogUni's picture

May 09, 2023 at 02:58 pm

My biggest fear isn't if Love will be any good, because I've seen enough of him to know with the right scheme and play calls he can produce if his WRs get at least a bit of separation. My biggest fear is MaLF and Barry.

Hoping Richie B can do enough coaching to compensate for both of them. Lol.

2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 08:40 am

It's bigger than that. If JL10 is a bust, that's Gutey's legacy. Pretty easy to see that drafting him in 2020 hurt our chances for a SB compared to taking a WR first round in that historic draft class. AR12 wasn't the diva media made him out to be and it's understandable this soured him on GB.

OTOH if JL10 proves to be Garapolo competent Gutey's ok. If JL10's third season as a starter goes to the SB, Gutey's a hero. GPG!

1 points
2
1
croatpackfan's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:07 am

It will be for sure interesting season. My expectations - none. My hope - play off, and than, who knows how universe will settle itself.

There is a lot of unknown. Will any of drafted players excell, and how many, at what position? Will all of last season drafted players have jump in their playing? I doubt. But it is important if some of them will do, like Enagbare, Wyatt, Doubs, Toure, Ford, OLs like Walker, Jones, some might have second year slump, some will play at the same level (Walker? Watson?). Will some second year disapointer, like Myers put their stuff together and play on NFL level?

Will young team chemistry help all young players to overachieve expectations many have for them? Will that chemistry help veterans on team to find in themselves youth attitude again?

There is a lot of questions, at the moment, no answers. But that is the reason why is this season so exciting and, if we allow to ourselves, be positive in our view of Packers near and long term future.

GO PACK GO!!!!

4 points
4
0
PatrickGB's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:10 am

Every year has a draft and every year there are new players on the team. So, one can say that every year is different. Matt has said that since he has been here. Call it what you will but this year the team had/has tough cap decisions. My first thought is that they did well considering the situation it was put in.

8 points
8
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 08:46 am

Pat, we'll have to say that til '24 unless they go 5-12. Anything better than that and JL10 at least matches AR12's first year as a starter.

The real "rebuild* is in fan expectations. Are we up to the challenge? '24 should see all 3 phases gel much better. Will JL10's third season as a starter get to the SB? GPG!

2 points
2
0
packer132's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:12 am

Hope springs eternal. I thought the Packers were poised to make a run the last couple of years. They re-signed 18 of 22 starters in 2021 and had a good mix of vets and young players. What happened last year? It was a combination of good offense and poor defense and sometimes good d and subpar offense. It's a league of parity, and about 16 of the 32 teams have a good shot to make the playoffs. Green Bay has the potential on paper to have a decent season. Improvement from some younger players, better play calling, and key coaching COULD turn a couple of losses to wins. I am stoked for an exciting season.

7 points
7
0
4thand10's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:27 am

Key differences though Pack 132:
1) Special teams is not going to lose us 3 games due to crucial fumbles. We’ll have much better field position.
2) They signed 2 additional interior DL …which was an eye popping need
3) They drafted/ signed quality Edge players
4) Walker will mature, I don’t think he’ll cost us yards / games this year
5) Biscacia has more say in how things work
6) we no longer have a diva with his preferred plays that the whole league knows about.
7) TEs help an oline a whole lot…and I’m sorry but Tonyan couldn’t block to save his ass. My only hope is they keep the highly aged Marcedes Lewis….if only to teach the new TEs…he’s worth keeping even if it’s just to tutor.
I am hopeful, my expectations are tempered . But man , I’m excited to watch this team grow.

4 points
6
2
packer132's picture

May 09, 2023 at 01:18 pm

4th: I agree on all of your points, and all that you noted SHOULD make for a better record and season than 2022. I expect the first few games to be a learning experience for the rookies and young starters though, and especially Love. Also, the black and blue division is better, and GB won't dominate like they did a few years back. September can't get here fast enough for me. No record prediction but I do predict a better all-around team.

3 points
3
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 08:51 am

Lewis and Bakh are gone.

Last year, I don't believe D lacked talent on the field. Hopefully Bisaccia fixes DC.

Other than that it's "draft and develop" in the spotlight, front and center!

1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

May 10, 2023 at 10:54 am

You keep saying Bakh is gone? Where/when did you hear this?

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:29 am

Believe you will actually see a LaFleur playbook this year w/o some Diva going up to a line wait to last second then do HIS OWN thing not play called. Really glad Rodgers has been shown the door whether winning or losing season!

4 points
8
4
RCPackerFan's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:37 am

"But it isn’t a complete rebuild"

This is not a complete rebuild. Lets be honest. Every team builds a new team every year. Its just the level that they have to rebuild from the previous year. It will appear like a complete rebuild because we have significantly changed 3 positions. But the truth is this is not a complete rebuild.
Basically our defense returns minus 3 players. Reed, Lowry and Amos. Amos still could return. But our defense comes back mostly intact. We have 3 proven Pro Bowl vets. Clark, Campbell and Alexander. If we were in a complete rebuild we wouldn't have those 3 guys on our roster.

If we were in a complete rebuild we wouldn't have players like Bakhtiari and Jenkins returning. Our OL will look very similar to last year, the only real change will be whoever plays at RT, and unless they shuffle things around. RB will also look almost the exact same. The only difference would be RB3.

Will definitely have a new look with switching from Rodgers to Love. WR and TE are also getting revamped. While Love is a brand new QB he has been in the system now going into his 4th year. LaFleur will definitely work the offense around Love's talents, compared to before how he ran the offense based on Rodgers abilities. While Love isn't Rodgers, he is younger and more mobile. We will likely see more boot action plays, more read option stuff and more motion.

Besides the switch at QB, WR and TE also are getting huge changes.
TE they are losing Lewis and Tonyan. But are gaining Musgrave and Kraft. From last year to this year our TE class has gotten a lot faster and more athletic. The speed will significantly change the position. It will take time for them learn how to play in the NFL, but they should be able to contribute early. Musgrave should be an immediate seam stretching TE. His size and speed will make a difference.
Interesting note that no one has mentioned about Musgrave. He was a TE that was coming off an injury prior to the draft. He was drafted with the 42nd pick in the draft. You know who else was coming off an injury and was picked with the 42nd pick? Rob Gronkowski. Both measured at 6'6. Gronk was 264 lbs, Musgrave 253. Gronk ran 4.68, Musgrave 4.61. I'm not saying that Musgrave will be the next Gronk, but he has some similarities to Gronk. And the fact that both were taken with the 42nd pick is really interesting.

WR they lost Lazard and Cobb. They are returning 3 WR's that had playing time last year. They then have 3 rookies who all have a realistic chance of not only making the roster but could contribute.

On offense they have lost a lot of receiving options. They lost Lazard, Cobb, Tonyan, Lewis. In terms of production though, it won't be hard for them to replace.
Combined Lazard and Cobb had 94 receptions for 1205 yards and 7 TD's.
Combined Tonyan and Lewis had 59 receptions for 536 yards and 4 TD's.
Those are not monstrous numbers they have to replace. Comparing it to the year before Lazard and Cobb didn't come close to equaling what Adams had for numbers. Adams the year before had 123 catches for 1553 yards and 11 TD's.
Watson and Doubs will most likely increase their production. Musgrave and Kraft to match the TE production only need to average 2 catches for 16 yards each per game. That isn't that much to ask for.

The amount of production that they have to replace is not that tall of a task. This is not as big of a rebuild as some are making it out to be.

3 points
3
0
dobber's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:14 am

"If we were in a complete rebuild we wouldn't have those 3 guys on our roster. If we were in a complete rebuild we wouldn't have players like Bakhtiari and Jenkins returning."

I think people confuse "rebuild" with "fire-sale". I would argue that in a rebuild, you're looking frankly at your roster and figuring out which players have a reasonable chance of being key contributors in the window of success you're aiming for. You invest in those guys and keep them around--with that in mind, they'd be fools to deal Jenkins or Alexander or maybe Clark. Anyone who may not fit that window becomes a flexible piece, but you don't just shoot yourself in the foot to move guys just because you might get a pick or a little cap relief (fire-sale).

" In terms of production though, it won't be hard for them to replace.
Combined Lazard and Cobb had 94 receptions for 1205 yards and 7 TD's.
Combined Tonyan and Lewis had 59 receptions for 536 yards and 4 TD's.'

Very true: you're basically saying they need to replace a single high-end WR and a productive outlet TE...that might be very do-able, especially with an established QB. But it's much harder doing it when you're breaking in a green QB...not to mention that the WR are also instrumental in the run game. There are a huge number of moving pieces here. The key piece is Aaron Jones: he's going to figure prominently in the passing game.

3 points
3
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:42 am

"I would argue that in a rebuild, you're looking frankly at your roster and figuring out which players have a reasonable chance of being key contributors in the window of success you're aiming for. "

Every team rebuilds. No matter how they want to frame it, they rebuild every year. My post was basically saying that these are the reasons they are not in a complete rebuild. They are in a remodel, but not completely rebuilding from ground up.

In terms of renovating a house, there are different levels. Some houses are perfect as they are. No needs, can move right in. Some houses people will choose to change some paint colors, maybe a change some lighting fixtures and plumbing fixtures. There are some remodels that you have to replace windows, and open up some walls or tear down some walls. Some remodels you have to entirely gut the house down to the studs. You may have to replace floor joists and start from scratch. The extreme ones you have to lift the house and put a brand new foundation underneath.

Every team at the very minimum replaces paint colors. The Packers are in remodeling the kitchen and bathroom stage of the remodel. They gutted the kitchen and bathroom and are putting all new flooring in, new cabinets, new plumbing fixtures, new lighting. And in other parts of the house they are just doing some painting.

The only question we need to know is how long will it take for the kitchen to get done, and if it will turn out how we are envisioning it.

"But it's much harder doing it when you're breaking in a green QB...not to mention that the WR are also instrumental in the run game. There are a huge number of moving pieces here. The key piece is Aaron Jones: he's going to figure prominently in the passing game."
While I agree that Love being a brand new QB will be different. And the production may not be there. Love has been in the QB friendly system for 3 years already. Going into his 4th. Rodgers did not put up big numbers last year. There were contributing factors to why. But I don't see why Love can't come close to matching what Rodgers did last year numbers wise. Rodgers final numbers were 542 attempts and 350 completions 64.6% completion percentage. He threw for 3695 yards (217 yards per game). 26 TD's and 12 Interceptions.
I don't see any reason why Love can't come close to those numbers.

I agree that the key is Jones. And I expect him to be used a ton this year!

2 points
2
0
T7Steve's picture

May 09, 2023 at 01:00 pm

I agree every team rebuilds every year. If you don't get better, you get worse. Even if you just won the Super Bowl, you don't/can't stay the same.

I think Love will be able to improve drastically on last season's results. That will make him an average QB. He's not going to look like an MVP Rodgers (at least not at first), but I don't think they'll be asking or wanting him to. Last season I think Rodgers was barely average and didn't take any game winning chances. Those chances might cost a game, but by not taking them, you've lost already.

I bet we can score more touchdowns this year and won't have to push 4th downs as much.

Ball control and keep the D on the sideline.

1 points
1
0
4thand10's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:32 am

Right on the money RC.

2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 09:02 am

Bakh is gone.

I want to see run first, but that depends on an O line that can make that happen. I want to see the dink and dunk offense be TE first, or Jones as a target. This means much more production from TE. If Christian Watson is used as MVS replacement and develops into an upgrade that'd help.

Complex offense and other receivers completing chunk plays may take time to gel. Yutes are hungry and practicing! GPG

1 points
1
0
LeotisHarris's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:38 am

Nuh-uh, Cory. It's a rebuild! Neeneer, neener, neener. *sticks-out-tongue* *throws-a-rock* *hides-behind-tree*

-3 points
3
6
ricky's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:40 am

As far as players, if the OL can stay healthy, they should be able to protect Love, and try to open running lanes. But I would think other teams would focus on stopping the run, disrupting passing routes to affect timing, and trying to put extra pressure on Love during obvious passing downs. How Love handles this is unknown. Also, the loss of the team's long time OL coach seemed to cause some problems for the OL. Will the OL be up to the task? Also, the WR group is very young; the TE's are rookies, and will take a while to get used to being in the pros, and Love and his receivers will only have a limited amount of time to get to know each other. It seems likely that Love will be getting a lot of snaps in the exhibition season, as every rep is precious in learning tendencies and timing.
Defensively, does anyone really believe that Barry will suddenly design defensive schemes to maximize the strengths of the players on defense? Or will there once again be confusion in the secondary, and a lack of performance by the DL. It seems the players aren't impressed with Barry as a coach, and were frustrated at having to play such soft coverage the first half of the season. During the second half, Barry's defense definitely got better. Which inexplicably made the team bring Barry back for another year. I believe in the players; the coaching staff? Meh.
Finally, we will now get to see just how good of a coach LaFleur is, as you noted. But what bothers me is whether the Packers are fully committed to Love. It seems they are hedging their bets, and are still "on the fence" whether he can be a reliable starter in the league. Personally, I think he's ready. But that is an armchair perspective, based on very limited snaps during real games. But Love seems to be much more calm on the field, and when he flings the ball, he does so with accuracy and speed, with a nice release. But that is pure hope and optimism. Winning the division? Talk to the Lions about that. Or possibly Minnesota. Don't bother with Chicago, since they're now officially the Lions of the division.

1 points
2
1
dobber's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:02 am

"But I would think other teams would focus on stopping the run, disrupting passing routes to affect timing, and trying to put extra pressure on Love during obvious passing downs."

Absolutely. If I'm an opposing DC, this is my general plan of attack against the Love-led Packers until the Packers show with consistency that it just doesn't work.

"Love and his receivers will only have a limited amount of time to get to know each other. It seems likely that Love will be getting a lot of snaps in the exhibition season, "

Love garnered most of the practice snaps for about 8 weeks last season, and most of the OTA/preseason snaps a year ago. He should be finding his way with the returnees. It's a balancing act: the Packers need 10 to be sharp and in-phase with his receivers, but they don't want to expose him unnecessarily to injury from buckaroo pass-rushers trying to make a name for themselves in the preseason.

"Talk to the Lions about that. Or possibly Minnesota. Don't bother with Chicago, since they're now officially the Lions of the division."

They're making smart moves by building from the lines outward, but until the Lions show that they can get out of their own way over the course of a full season, they're still the Lions. The Bears added a bunch of pieces, but they had more gaping wounds than any one off-season could fix. The Vikings won an unsustainable number of close games in 2022 (just like the Packers did in 2021), and have lost players--they look like a team that will get eaten on the ground, and will still struggle to cover. In general, the teams in the NFCN are running to the mean.

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 09:07 am

DC Joe Barry will hopefully be kept from screwing up our D like he did last year by Bisaccia's promotion.

Shedding Bakh has me nervous, but talent is there. "Draft and develop" is front and center. GPG!

1 points
1
0
fireball's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:42 am

Mainly, I'm just glad that Aaron Rodgers is gone, and has taken his constant whining and complaining and gigantic ridiculous contract with him. Now, last season, without Hackett as defensive coordinator, LaFleur was not that good with the offense. Let's see how he does this coming season with Rodgers also gone. And you again have to worry about the defense under Joe Barry. Remember, LaFleur insisted on sticking with Barry. So, Lafleur still has to prove that he is capable of making solid decisions in the hiring and firing of coaches under his supervision. Will Jordan Love work out? Will the defense improve? Will the offense be better? Will LaFleur be able to handle the dramatic changes overall? It's a brand new day all around. Huge opportunities for both success and failure abound.

I'm looking forward to the coming season.

-2 points
4
6
TKWorldWide's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:16 am

Hackett did what??

3 points
3
0
fireball's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:20 am

I made a mistake. Hackett was the offensive coordinator under LaFleur the first three years.

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:25 am

Barry has been pretty offensive at times.

3 points
3
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 09, 2023 at 11:14 am

Just busting your chops.

2 points
2
0
Swisch's picture

May 09, 2023 at 09:25 am

As excited as I am about all of the young players on the Packers, I'm just as glad for veterans such as Jones, Dillon, Bakh, and Clark as key pieces to provide experience and leadership.
It's the veterans who give us a legitimate shot at 9 or 10 wins and a possibility of the playoffs.
We need the veterans to come through on and off the field to make this less of a rebuild and more of a reload.

2 points
4
2
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 10, 2023 at 09:09 am

Bakh is gone.

1 points
1
0
Ron61's picture

May 09, 2023 at 10:04 am

Firstly, Being a fan of Rodgers and Gute was a tough spot to be in and however much i will miss Rodgers i am relieved it’s ended and both seem truly happy. Had to get that off my chest.

Every GM has their hits and misses on draft day but Gute performs exceptional. The memorable and debatable pick of Jordan Love will be his. Rebuild or reload will be defined by Love’s performance and I hope he is as good as he looked against Philly last season.

I believe that this team is loaded with talent and better than the Jets roster. Aaron Jones and Dillon are the best 1-2 punch in the league. I love Christian Watson and he was the rookie of the year and steal of the draft. Watson with Doubs and Jayden Reed will be dynamic to watch develop with Jordan. Throw in highly touted Luke Musgrave and Tucker Kraft sure hope Gute hits on one of them. Also, really like the Sean Clifford pick if Jordan falters.

Defensively, we have young Georgia talent and first rounders melding into a cohesive group. I do wish we would have sought out a different defensive coach. That second Viking game was a head scratcher last season when the packers changed something and we saw them destroy the Vikes while Jaire Alexander shut down the best young receiver in the league. That’s the kind of defense they are capable of. Rasul Douglas needs to be allowed to be the ball hawk he was in 2021.

Totally believe we are in a reload only a year removed from back to back to back 13-3 seasons with the nucleus still intact minus Rodgers. As everyone knows it’s all up to Love’s performance as to how good this team can be.

LET’S GO!

3 points
4
1
Leatherhead's picture

May 09, 2023 at 11:53 am

''''Totally believe we are in a reload only a year removed from back to back to back 13-3 seasons with the nucleus still intact minus Rodgers''''''

Not exactly. The offense that screwed the pooch against the 49ers sixteen months ago has undergone some substantial change.

Gone: Rodgers, Adams, MVS, Lazard, St. Brown, Lewis, Cobb and Tonyan . That's the passing attack. They've all been replaced in 16 months. The only skill position players who remain are Jones, Dillon, and Deguara, and they're all probably in their last year here. I think that's a pretty good chunk of the "nucleus"

Conversely, the offensive line has added talent since that game: Bakhtiari and Jenkins, both back from injury. Myers, too, played hurt in that game . And we got Tom in the draft. So that's 4 pretty good additions to the line we put on the field that day.

I think Love is going to play better than the 2022 version of Rodgers. I think the line will be in better shape than they were at the start of last season, and I think we'll score more points than we did last year.

2 points
3
1
T7Steve's picture

May 09, 2023 at 02:45 pm

If you're going to plagiarize my thoughts don't do such a good job of it. LOL.

Touchdowns NOT field goal attempts.

1 points
1
0
HarryHodag's picture

May 09, 2023 at 11:05 am

It's nice to be optimistic but some reality also is helpful.

I agree with his assessment of the returning players. He even downplayed the offensive line which isn't that bad. He also downplayed the linebackers, both are capable of being good.

But he made one fundamental flaw in his assessment: he assumes the rookies can come in and play like veterans. They will, in time, develop. Christian Watson didn't show his skills until past mid-season last year. An occasional rookie does play at a veteran level out of the blocks. But to assume that will happen right away is a major leap.

He forgets that even with Rodgers last year the Lions beat Green Bay in the cold at Lambeau. The Lions have also improved. The Bears will be better and the Vikings will, of course, self-destruct but they did win the division going away last year.

It's going to be a four-team dogfight to the finish. Can the Packers win the division? It's possible, but the new kids need to become veterans real fast.

2 points
3
1
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 09, 2023 at 11:18 am

Absolutely loved Keesian Nixon's comments. Exactly the type of fire these young guys need to have. Screw what the haters say. Its all just farts in the wind. This team is coming for scalps and I'm here for it.

"We're nobody's underdog."
-Mike McCarthy

4 points
4
0
Handsback's picture

May 09, 2023 at 11:39 am

“It’s nice to be optimistic but some reality is also helpful”
Great quote Harry, we all can be optimistic because we’re fans….but until the Packers show these teams that their softness is done and begin playing smash mouth football that makes teams dread playing them is the norm, then the Pack will still be in the rebuilding mode.
I didn’t make up the expression, but it fits at this point in time. “Reality s——s” As a fan, I’m prepared for a season of recalibration. This team has holes and hopefully the youthful players make those holes close quicker than normal.
Just MHO

2 points
2
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 09, 2023 at 11:43 am

If by "reloading", you mean we're trying to put a team on the field that can contend for the division, then yeah,we're reloading.

3 points
5
2
Turophile's picture

May 09, 2023 at 03:49 pm

I wouldn't call what has happened a reset, re-boot, reload, or re-anything.

My description for this, is that it is a youth movement. The old guard are gone (Reed, Amos, Rodgers, Crosby, Cobb, Lewis). Holdovers David Bakhtiari and Pat O'Donnell are feeling their age now, as we go into the season with the youngest team in the league.

2 points
2
0
BA4Packers's picture

May 09, 2023 at 08:05 pm

Top 5 OLine, top 5 LT, top 5 LG, top 5 RB, top RB duo, top 5 edge rusher, top 5 D lineman, top 5 ILB duo, top 5 CB, top 5 CB group, and I’m going to add top 5 TE duo.
This ain’t no rebuild!

2 points
2
0