Austin Booker NFL Draft Prospect Profile and Scouting Report

Kansas Defensive End / EDGE Austin Booker - 2024 NFL Draft Scouting Report

Name: Austin Booker

School: Kansas

Year: Junior

Position: EDGE

Measurables: 6’4 1/2”, 240 lbs. (Combine Measurements)

Combine: ARM: 33 7/8” HAND: 9 1/4” VERTICAL: 32.5” BROAD: 10’0” BENCH: 40-YD DASH: 4.79 10-YD SPLIT: 1.67 20-YD SHUTTLE:

Stats:

Courtesy of Sports-Reference.com

 

General Info:

Austin Booker was a three-star composite prospect coming out of Center Grove High School in Indiana—but definitely at the upper end of three-stars. He was heavily recruited by P5 schools, including (not limited to) offers from Oregon, Washington, Michigan State, Iowa, Cincinnati, and Arizona. Booker wound up staying in the Midwest, choosing to begin his college career as a Minnesota Golden Gopher.

Booker was redshirted his true Freshman year and did not appear in any games.

As a redshirt freshman in 2022, Booker did see playing time for Minnesota—but extremely limited. Though he appeared in six games, he played few snaps and recorded just 2 total tackles. After the season, presumably frustrated with his playing time, Booker entered the transfer portal. 247-Sports gave him a three-star transfer rating and eventually Booker wound up at another school that was interested in him out of high school: Kansas.

Booker’s single season as a Jayhawk was phenomenal, and enough for him to declare for the draft despite being a redshirt sophomore—and despite starting just one game. After being kept off the stat-sheet in his debut, Booker took over when Kansas hosted Illinois and did not look back. He recorded two sacks in that game, and would finish the season with eight total. Booker also managed 56 tackles (40 solo, 12 for a loss) and two forced fumbles. His performance was a big part of Kansas finishing ranked in the AP 25 at the end of the year for the first time since 2007.

Booker participated in both the 2024 Reese’s Senior Bowl and the 2024 NFL Scouting Combine in the lead up to the NFL Draft. He reportedly had a very solid week of practice at the Senior Bowl, leading to him flying up draft boards. However, his Combine performance, though solid, was a little disappointing and slowed his meteoric rise a little bit. At once point talked about as someone who could potentially fly into the 1st Round, Booker seems most likely to be a day 2 pick.

 

Positional Skills:

Strengths

Booker is a weird prospect. Even though he didn’t play much in college, “raw” is not the right word to describe him. He has a shockingly refined repertoire of pass-rush moves and uses them effectively. It’s a phrase that gets thrown around a lot, but Booker is well positioned to be an INSTANT contributor as a pass-rush specialist while other elements of his game develop.

Booker was a basketball player in high school, and it shows up in his game. He uses his unusual length (really big wingspan!) very effectively. He can outreach most tackles and uses that to work around blocks really well.

Though the testing was not incredible, film shows a player with agility, speed, and explosiveness. Booker launches off of the line quickly and disrupts plays.

Quite simply, even though it reads as a cop-out instead of actual analysis, Booker is as instinctive, natural of a pass-rusher as I’ve encountered since I started writing these profiles. That’s how he thrived despite the low snap count—he has remarkable feel for how to counter and deal with opposing tackles.

Weaknesses:

 Just one season of significant playtime in college. Booker has the smallest sample size I can remember of a college player who declared early for the draft. Teams do not have a whole lot to go on when trying to project Booker’s NFL success.

For every Hassaan Reddick who thrives as a 240 pound pass-rushers, there are a dozen Shane Rays who just cannot make it in the pros. Booker looks like he has room to fill out his frame and he probably needs to. Finding success at his size is rare.

As you might have figured out based on his size, strength is not a core part of Booker’s game right now. Though functional, he needs to get stronger in the pros. Theoretically, that is very doable—he’s going to have access to NFL quality training and equipment, after all, but there’s always some guys that cannot manage to do it for one reason or another. Booker’s approach in the pros is going to be really important; if he doesn’t put in work, he’s going to flame out. I haven’t seen any concerns about his attitude, but you never know.

 

Fit with the Packers:

As a draft-eligible prospect, there are some similarities between Booker and former Packers’ great Clay Matthews. Like Booker, there were hefty concerns about Matthews’ experience—he only started the final ten games of his career at USC. They have similar builds (Booker is 6’4”, 240 lbs, Matthews was 6’3”, 240 lbs). Matthews did have slightly better measurables. but that’s why he was a 1st round pick, and while the sky is the limit for Booker, he is unlikely to go in the 1st (though he could sneak into the tail end). Realistically, Booker’s minute career snap total is hugely concerning, and makes him an extremely risky prospect and he is most likely to go late on Day 2, assuming a team isn’t in love with him.

The best landing spot for Booker is a team with established, veteran EDGE rushers that he can learn behind while serving as a pass-rush specialist and a special teams player. Those established, veteran EDGE rushers could, hypothetically, have names like “Preston Smith” and “Rashan Gary!” Maybe you even throw a recent first round pick in there named “Lukas Van Ness!” While Green Bay does not need to spend high picks on a pass-rusher, you can never have enough, especially with Kingsley Enagbare expected to miss most of the year with a torn ACL. I would be thrilled if the Packers added Booker in the third round, as he could be phenomenal depth as a specialist while being able to develop his skills without immediate pressure (except for the pressure he generates). He will need to bulk-up, though, especially if he is in a 4-3 Scheme in the NFL.

 

VIDEO: 

 

 

__________________________

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
2 points
 

Comments (16)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
LLCHESTY's picture

April 07, 2024 at 10:25 am

A guy that size not running a 3-cone is a serious red flag. It's sounds like it's mainly the NFL's fault guys aren't running the agilities at the combine as they aren't on TV and are thus run after all the other tests and on field drills. They need to move them to the next day when they do the bench test. But a 240 lb Edge isn't going to be successful unless he's as bendy as a Gumby doll. That basically means a 3-cone at 7 or under for guys 250 lbs and under.

The 3-cone has the closest correlation with success when it comes to Edge rushers. If I was a GM I'd be very leery of drafting an undersized guy that didn't run one. Gutey may or may not take an undersized pas rusher this year but I seriously doubt he would take one without that testing. Marshawn Kneeland had a 7.02 3-cone at 267 lbs and ran it at the combine. That's a guy Gutey should have some interest in.

2 points
3
1
Coldworld's picture

April 07, 2024 at 01:39 pm

I agree with you on the 3 cone for speed/agility rushers. Why on earth, absent injury, would an agent not allow a healthy player not take a test at at least the co-key metric?

Maybe film/in person scouting could, in a few instances be enough. They can’t tone or physically test on pre-draft visits. Interviews and written tests are all that is permitted.

-1 points
0
1
Leatherhead's picture

April 07, 2024 at 05:47 pm

Let me pose a hypothetical.

The GM of a team has a chance to draft Mongo Jackson. Every snap of football he has played in college has been analyzed and scrutinized. You've had scouts at practice and at games and you've done your vetting and this is a guy that you want. Would it really bother you that he skipped this?

From the agent's prospective, he WOULD want Jackson to participate in anything that might improve his draft position, so the only possible rationale is that this wouldn't help. IOW, he's not too quick and you'd prefer to let the film speak to his quickness.

Over and over I hear scout and GMs and ex players say that what shows up on the field is more important than the testing in shorts, and I have to agree with that.

-1 points
0
1
TKWorldWide's picture

April 08, 2024 at 06:42 am

Isn’t that the guy Alex Karras played in Blazing Saddles?
Sure, 3-cone, but how about One Punch Horse KO?

1 points
1
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 08, 2024 at 08:36 am

The way Gutey reacted to Kam Kinchens slow 40 at the combine I'd have to say he wouldn't agree with you. The Packers have thresholds and if a player falls outside of them they won't draft them, at least not early.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

April 07, 2024 at 10:50 am

So here is yet another guy, and at a position we are already strong at, that we should pick in the 3rd round. The last time I checked we only have 4 picks on Day 2, not 10 picks. I love the player profiles but everyone suggests GB somehow shoehorn this player or 5 others into the early mix somehow. This dude has one year of decent production and doesn't merit a pick before the 6th round.

That is the area where we might take a shot at a developmental Edge. An earlier profile about a U Conn Edge named Watts shows a player more likely to be an option. 2 others are Myles Cole-Texas Tech, and Braidon McGregor-Michigan.

Ideally this is what our draft should look like to start with. Fill the actual biggest hole/needs first, then fill in the other wants.

#25 or trade back-choose an O-lineman in an area we can get a TOP TEN OL that actually competes to start, not just strictly a backup
#41- Don't play with fire-GB needs a starting ILB and we here choose from the TOP 3
#58-GB also needs a starting Safety to pair with McKinney-All of the TOP 10 are probably here
#88-The sneakiest need we have is CB and here we still have 4 of the TOP 10
#91 or a trade back still gets us a Top 10 RB, plus gains another early Day 3 pick that is huge

2 points
2
0
Matt's picture

April 07, 2024 at 01:36 pm

I agree with you but as the time goes I think more and more about getting CB in 1st round. I don't think that we will have a big choice at #88. What about OL if we continue our success in assessing the talent, this deep and good class could give us a comfort of taking 2 guys in #88 and #91 and one of them shoud be a starter.

0 points
1
1
Leatherhead's picture

April 07, 2024 at 05:37 pm

""#25 or trade back....Olineman"....There's a big part of me that says YES, and I've argued for Graham Barton at #25 as a real good pick. And it's looking more and more like we're going to get a shot at a real good tackle. The only things that keep me from being 100% on board with that is our history of taking defenders on Day 1 and the availability of OL on Day 2. We can get some really good OL then, but we can get a premium defender at #25 AND two very good OL on Day 2.

"" GB needs starting (caliber) ILB""" I have to agree. Every way you run this, we need another guy in the linebacker mix, even assuming good health for Walker and McDuffie. You know, the Packers "could" trade both second round picks to move up, like they did to get Christian Watson. I don't think that'll be necessary, because we're going to get a real good ILB at that spot. You can debate minutiae about who is better, but any of them would be good players for us.

Time to get linemen at #58 and #88. On my last simulation, that got us Cooper Beebe and Van Pran

After looking around, mostly at Spotrac, there is a ...wait for it......plethora of available vet safeties available in FA, including Ford, Amos, Hyde and other notables. I'm not 100% convinced we're going to line up a rookie next to McKinney.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

April 07, 2024 at 12:02 pm

4.79 is not CM3- No Thanks.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

April 07, 2024 at 02:00 pm

Who is? Should we just go with Wilson regardless of medical opinion? No player helps if they can’t get on the field and mostly stay there. Wilson is also very willowy in build at this point, which may be a problem at the NFL level. It’s probably unsurprising that he didn’t bench press. He’s 233, but he’s 6’4”.

Probably the best all around athlete (40, 3 cone and vertical) at ILB is Trevin Wallace (Kentucky): 4.51 40, 10’7” broad and 35.5” vertical. The next best bring Jordan Magee, 4.55, 10’4” and 35.5”. Wallace is not a great tackler and lacks power and struggles to shed blocks despite being 240 ish pounds. Magee is a 220 pound ILB/SS hybrid. May help cover but he’s no 3 down prospect.

If Wilson is off the board medically or just picked, should we just give up or take one of those because all the others are valueless? The reality is that you have to look at multiple facets and also ones from players who actually exist. I’m betting Wilson is no CM3 in the bench press either (23). Drafting is the art of the possible, not a smorgasbord of perfection.

1 points
1
0
stockholder's picture

April 07, 2024 at 03:54 pm

Ok go around ILB - Take the SS next.
WE had bad safeties who couldn't tackle.
I'll take Gray later. Even Trotter.
Truth is- Wilson could be gone before #41.

2 points
2
0
golfpacker1's picture

April 08, 2024 at 08:45 am

The problem is GB has painted itself into a corner by at least not signing a FA Linebacker who could start from day one. Now we have 2 choices, draft a starting caliber LB early or else this very weak draft class will be depleted. Or pin our hope on a veteran LB gets cut. I guess trading for one is a 5% chance too.

#41 is the best option to fill the need with a sure starter and all of the Top 3 could be there. It also ensures that we won't have to trade up and waste premium picks to fill a huge hole that we have created ourselves. I love Christian Watson, but GB screwed the pooch by not drafting him @ #28 in the 2022 draft. That led to wasting 2 second round picks to draft the player we should have taken earlier.

Waiting until #58 could mean Cedric Gray is the best option, and not that he is a bad one at that. Waiting until #88 almost surely means the Top 5 is gone. Fix the problem with one pick @ #41 because it's not going away by itself.

1 points
2
1
LLCHESTY's picture

April 07, 2024 at 03:27 pm

Who cares about an Edge's 40 time? 🙄

-1 points
1
2
Alberta_Packer's picture

April 07, 2024 at 03:21 pm

Booker is a challenging evaluation. While he does possess some desirable traits - he lacks the performance history you would like to see of a Day 1 / 2 prospect. Plus his technique requires much more work. Maybe a later round pick for GB - after they've addressed some of their more pressing needs.

1 points
1
0
BAMABADGER's picture

April 07, 2024 at 05:23 pm

Sorry, but one year of production does not make an early round draft choice. Maybe 6th or 7th.

0 points
1
1
gsd3's picture

April 08, 2024 at 04:02 am

Pass.

0 points
0
0